Yanqiong Shen1, Ruru Duan1, Jinjie Qian2, Qipeng Li1. 1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong 657000, P. R. China. 2. College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, P. R. China.
Abstract
Highly stable DUT-52 materials were synthesized by the hydrothermal method and well-characterized by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In order to systematically study the adsorption of dichromate ions in aqueous solution by the DUT-52 materials, a single factor experiment, kinetic experiment, thermodynamic experiment, competition ion experiment, and material regeneration experiment were designed. Based on the H-bond interaction between the dichromate ions and the H atoms of a NDC2- ligand, the DUT-52 materials showed a maximum removal rate of 96.4% and a maximum adsorption capacity of 120.68 mg·g-1 with excellent selective adsorption and material regeneration. In addition, the process of adsorption of dichromate ions by the DUT-52 materials is in accordance with the pseudo second-order kinetics and Langmuir models, and the adsorption mechanism and the important role of the H-bond interaction were reasonably explained using the XPS pattern and theoretical calculation. Accordingly, DUT-52 can be regarded as a multifunctional material for efficiently removing dichromate ions from the wastewater.
Highly stable DUT-52 materials were synthesized by the hydrothermal method and well-characterized by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In order to systematically study the adsorption of dichromate ions in aqueous solution by the DUT-52 materials, a single factor experiment, kinetic experiment, thermodynamic experiment, competition ion experiment, and material regeneration experiment were designed. Based on the H-bond interaction between the dichromate ions and the H atoms of a NDC2- ligand, the DUT-52 materials showed a maximum removal rate of 96.4% and a maximum adsorption capacity of 120.68 mg·g-1 with excellent selective adsorption and material regeneration. In addition, the process of adsorption of dichromate ions by the DUT-52 materials is in accordance with the pseudo second-order kinetics and Langmuir models, and the adsorption mechanism and the important role of the H-bond interaction were reasonably explained using the XPS pattern and theoretical calculation. Accordingly, DUT-52 can be regarded as a multifunctional material for efficiently removing dichromate ions from the wastewater.
Chromium mainly exists
with two valence states (+3 and +6) in nature,
and hexavalent chromium ions have strong toxicity and mutational and
carcinogenic properties. Hexavalent chromium ions can enter an organism
via a variety of ways, lead to damaging of the body, and cause sound
hoarse, nasal mucous atrophy, nasal perforation, emphysema and sclerosis
diseases, etc.[1−5] At present, the removal methods of dichromate ions mainly include
precipitation, membrane separation, adsorption, ion exchange, biotreatment,
and chemical oxidation, as well as a combination of these methods.[6−10] Some of the above methods endow with severe problems such as high
engineering technical difficulty, high potential risk, high cost investment,
low adsorption capacity, and weak selection ability. An adsorption
method is widely used, due to its easy operation, high efficiency,
large adsorption capacity, and recyclable regeneration. However, microporous
adsorbent materials (such as activated carbon, large pore resin, natural
zeolite, molecular sieve, and silica gel) in the nature have an irregular
and relatively complex structure, lacking the functional groups or
characteristic structures for capturing dichromate ions in wastewater,
and there are no large enough pores and nanocages for capturing and
storing dichromate ions.[11−15]In recent years, a class of metal–organic frameworks
(MOFs)
were built by inorganic metal ions and organic ligands, compared with
the traditional frame structure, molecular sieve, and activated carbon,
which show high porosity, large specific surface area, good stability,
and simple synthesis process.[16−20] Structurally speaking, the heavy metal ions enter the nanopore or
nanocages of MOF materials and interact with the active sites to realize
the function of efficient capture and separation. However, they would
have to face various harsh environments requiring high thermal stability
of MOF materials and chemical stability in their practical application.
To date, only a small number of microporous MOFs have both high thermal
and chemical stability, such as zeolitic imidazolate frameworks, material
sofistitute Lavoisier frameworks, porphyrin-class MOF and Zr-based
MOF materials, and so forth.[16−20] Recently, highly stable MOF materials have obtained some progress
in the capture and isolation of dichromate ions.[21−27] For example, a cationic porous MOF was prepared by using a neutral
triazidazole ligand and AgClO4, which is available through
anion exchange for high capacity and rapid capture and separation
of dichromate ions (Cr2O72–) in water.[26] An anionic zirconium-based
MOF material (ZJU-101) with a specific surface of 561
m2·g–1, which is much lower than
1862 m2·g–1 of MOF-867, was obtained, but the material can selectively adsorb and separate
Cr2O72– anions from the aqueous
solution by the ion exchange, whose highest adsorption amount is 245
mg·g-1.[27] Although
some progress has been achieved in the highly stable MOF materials
with regard to the capture and separation of dichromate ions, the
design and preparation of highly stable MOFs and their application
in the efficient capture and separation of dichromate ions from wastewater
remain a challenging work.In this work, well-known and highly
stable DUT-52 materials
were first used for the adsorption of dichromate ions, and the single
factor experiment, kinetic experiment, thermodynamic experiment, competition
ion experiment, and material regeneration experiment were designed.
In addition, the adsorption process of DUT-52 materials
was analyzed, and the dynamic model and thermodynamic model were established,
the adsorption process of dichromate ions by DUT-52 materials
was explored, and the adsorption mechanism was reasonably explained
by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) pattern and theoretical
calculation. These results provide an idea for the removal and separation
of dichromate ions in wastewater.
Results and Discussion
Structural
and Morphological Characterization
The prepared DUT-52 materials were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction
(XRD), and the characteristic peaks of the experimental and simulated
peaks of DUT-52 materials are basically consistent, which
proves the successful formation of porous DUT-52 materials.
The characteristic peak position of the activated sample of DUT-52 materials was basically unchanged,[28,29] indicating that the high-temperature activated sample still maintains
the crystal state (Figure a). DUT-52 materials were observed as a type
of white powder with a regular morphology but uneven size by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) in Figure d. The thermal stabilities of the prepared DUT-52 material samples were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA). The results showed that the DUT-52 materials mainly
lost the guest solvent molecules in the temperature range of 200–400
°C, while the frameworks began to decompose after 550 °C,
indicating that DUT-52 materials exhibit a high thermal
stability (Figure b). In addition, DUT-52 materials can exist stably in
0.1 mol·L–1 sodium hydroxide aqueous solution,
0.1 mol·L–1 hydrochloric acid solution, H2S, H2O, and various organic solvents, indicating
that DUT-52 materials also have the exceptional chemical
stability.[30−32] Therefore, DUT-52 materials have both
exceptional chemical stability and high thermal stability.
Figure 1
(a) XRD, (b)
TGA, (c) N2 adsorption and pore size distribution,
(d) SEM, and the (e) structure of DUT-52 materials.
(a) XRD, (b)
TGA, (c) N2 adsorption and pore size distribution,
(d) SEM, and the (e) structure of DUT-52 materials.The structure of DUT-52 materials
is similar to that
of UiO series, which is formed by connecting [Zr6O4(OH)4] with 12 NDC2– ligands.
This shows that a three-dimensional periodic structure with each octahedral
hole shares its triangular window with eight tetrahedral cages.[30−32]DUT-52 materials have two kinds of channels with the
sizes of 14 and 11 Å, respectively (Figure c). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) value and pore volume of the DUT-52 materials were
characterized with an ASAP2020, and the results show that the N2 adsorption and desorption curves of DUT-52 materials
at 77 K conform to Type-I type with a maximum adsorption amount of
480.64 cm3·g–1, and the calculated
BET value is 1685 m2·g–1, and the
pore volume is 0.65 m3·g–1 (Figure d). Compared with
the same series of materials, DUT-52 materials have large
specific surface area and pore volume and can be used to adsorb various
gas molecules, heavy metal ions, and organic pollutant molecules with
the potential application value and application prospects in the environmental
field.[30−32]
Adsorption Experiment
In order to
explore the optimal
conditions for the adsorption of dichromate aqueous solution by DUT-52 materials, four single factor optimization experiments
were designed, including the dosage of DUT-52 materials,
the initial concentration of dichromate aqueous solution, temperature,
and pH values of the dichromate aqueous solutions.When the
dosage of DUT-52 materials is less than 35 mg, the removal
rate of dichromate increases with the dosage of DUT-52 materials, and when the dosage of DUT-52 materials
is more than 35 mg, the removal rate exhibits a negative correlation
(Figure a). It is
possible that increasing the dosage of DUT-52 materials
can increase the adsorption active sites of the material, while the
limited concentration of dichromate will reduce the utilization of
the adsorption sites of the material, resulting in a decrease in the
removal rate of unit mass adsorbent.[33−40] Therefore, the optimal dosage of DUT-52 materials is
selected as 35 mg with a removal rate of 48.4%. When the initial concentration
of dichromate aqueous solution increases from 10 to 25 μg·mL–1, the removal rate increased gradually. When the initial
concentration of dichromate aqueous solution exceeds 25 μg·mL–1, the removal rate decreased gradually with the increase
of dichromate aqueous solution concentration (Figure b). When the initial concentration of dichromate
aqueous solution increases, the removal rate of DUT-52 materials for dichromate reaches equilibrium, the adsorption amount
no longer increases, and the removal rate gradually decreases.[33−41] Thus, when the concentration of dichromate aqueous solution was
25 μg·mL–1, the highest rate of dichromate
removal was 74.4%. The optimum adsorption temperature of DUT-52 materials for dichromate is 35 °C, and the removal rate is
76.6% (Figure c).
The most suitable adsorption temperature for dichromate adsorption
by DUT-52 materials is 35 °C with a removal rate
of 76.6%. When the temperature is in the range of 25–35 °C,
the removal rate changes little, while when the temperature is higher
than 35 °C, the removal rate decreases gradually with the temperature.
Dichromate aqueous solution with a pH value of 3.02 had the highest
removal rate of 96.4%. When the pH value is greater than 3.02, the
removal rate of dichromate gradually decreased with the increasing
solution pH (Figure d). When the pH value is between 2 and 5, the dichromate aqueous
solution is dominated by HCrO4– and Cr2O72–; when the pH value exceeds
7, the dichromate aqueous solution is dominated by CrO42–.[33−41] Therefore, the removal of the dichromate ions in the aqueous solution
is favored for the DUT-52 materials under acidic conditions.
Figure 2
Influence
of (a) different dosages, (b) initial concentration of
dichromate ions, (c) temperature, and (d) pH on the adsorption by
the DUT-52 materials.
Influence
of (a) different dosages, (b) initial concentration of
dichromate ions, (c) temperature, and (d) pH on the adsorption by
the DUT-52 materials.Therefore, the results show that the optimal adsorption conditions
are as follows: the dosage of DUT-52 materials is 35
mg, the initial concentration is 25 μg·mL–1, the adsorption temperature is 35 °C, and the pH value of solution
is 3.02, whose removal rate reaches the maximum value of 96.4%.Since the industrial wastewater usually contains some co-existing
anions such as NO3–, CO32–, SO42–, PO43–, Cl–, AC–, and so forth, it is necessary to explore the influence of these
co-existing ions on the removal of dichromate ions. The concentrations
of the different ions were set to be consistent with the dichromate
ions, and the results show that most of the co-existing ions have
only mild effects on the adsorption of dichromate ions (Figure a), which indicates that DUT-52 materials can maintain their commendable capture capacity
for dichromate ions in the presence of interfering ions. The reusability
of DUT-52 materials after the adsorption of dichromate
ions was further investigated, and the methanol–acetic acid
was selected as the effluent in the regeneration experiments.[41] After five recycles, the removal rate of dichromate
ions can still reach up to 80.3% and the framework stability of DUT-52 materials after five recycles still remains intact,
which were confirmed by the XRD patterns and SEM (Figure b). The experimental results
show that the aqueous solution of dichromate with different concentrations
gradually reaches equilibrium with the passage of oscillated time,
and its adsorption capacity does not increase. When the equilibrium
concentration is 300 μg·mL–1, its maximum
adsorption capacity is 120.68 mg·g–1, which
has reached the adsorption equilibrium (Figure d). Compared with other materials, its maximum
adsorption capacity belongs to the moderate level (Table S1).[1,30−41]
Figure 3
(a)
Effect of competing ions on the removal of dichromate by the DUT-52 materials; (b) cycle experiment of dichromate by the DUT-52 materials; (c) pseudo second-order dynamic model fitting
on the dichromate by the DUT-52 materials; and (d) adsorption
isotherm and Langmuir adsorption mode fitting for the removal of dichromate
by the DUT-52 materials.
(a)
Effect of competing ions on the removal of dichromate by the DUT-52 materials; (b) cycle experiment of dichromate by the DUT-52 materials; (c) pseudo second-order dynamic model fitting
on the dichromate by the DUT-52 materials; and (d) adsorption
isotherm and Langmuir adsorption mode fitting for the removal of dichromate
by the DUT-52 materials.The adsorption kinetics can reflect the adsorption rate of dichromate
by DUT-52 materials. According to the data of adsorption
time and adsorption capacity, the quasi first-order kinetics and quasi
second-order kinetics are fitted by formulas and 4 in which the
pseudo first-order kinetic fitting curve is obtained using ln(qe – qt) and t, and the pseudo second-order kinetic fitting curve is
obtained using t/qt and t, to obtain the kinetic process of adsorption of dichromate
by the DUT-52 materials.[33−41] The experimental results show that the R2 value of the pseudo second-order kinetic model is 0.9999 (Figure c), indicating that
the linear relationship is very good within the performed concentrations.[33−41] It can be inferred that the adsorption process of dichromate ions
by the porous DUT-52 materials, which conforms to the
pseudo second-order kinetic model. The Langmuir and Freundlich models
were fitted by eqs and 6 in which ce is plotted
with the ce/qe to obtain the Langmuir isotherm, while the Freundlich isotherm is
obtained by plotting lnce with lnqe. The experimental results show that the R2 value of Langmuir isotherm is 0.9987 with
a better linearity (Figure d). Therefore, the thermodynamic process of dichromate in
the DUT-52 materials is more consistent with the Langmuir
model.Thermodynamic energy can determine whether the reaction
can occur,
according to eqs , 8, and 9, 1/T acts as the transverse coordinate and lnK acts
as the ordinate, to obtain the thermodynamic linear fitting curve.
At 308, 318, 328, 338, and 348 K, the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) values are all negative (Table S2), which reveals that the adsorption process of DUT-52 materials on dichromate in aqueous solution is performed spontaneously,
and the ΔG value gradually increases, indicating
that the increased temperature is not conducive to the adsorption
process.[33−41] The enthalpy change (ΔH) values in the adsorption
process are negative, indicating that the adsorption process is an
exothermic process, the entropy change (ΔS)
values in the adsorption process are positive, indicating that the
adsorption process is an entropy increasing process, and its adsorption
rate is greater than the desorption rate.[33−41] Therefore, the process of dichromate adsorption in aqueous solution
by DUT-52 materials is a spontaneous and exothermic process.
Adsorption Mechanism
The sign for the Cr element can
be found in the spectrum of elemental mapping and XPS spectra of DUT-52 materials after the adsorption of dichromate ions (Figure a–c), and
the peaks at 588.07 and 579.22 eV can be assigned to Cr2p1/2 and Cr2p3/2, respectively (Figure c). From XPS spectra of DUT-52 materials before and after adsorption of dichromate ions, it can
be observed that the peaks of Zr3d and O2s basically had no change,
while the peak for C1s has subtle changes, indicating that these H
atoms of the NDC2– ligand were involved in the adsorption
process. The adsorption locator module of Materials Studios was performed
to investigate the adsorption sites of dichromate in the pores of DUT-52 materials. During the simulation process, the structure
of DUT-52 materials was kept as rigid with atoms frozen
at their crystallographic positions. The force field parameters for
the framework atoms and adsorbents were both taken from Universal
force field, while the partial charges for the framework atoms of DUT-52 materials were estimated by the QEq method. The possible
adsorption mechanism for dichromate ions adsorbed into the pores of DUT-52 materials mainly involves the H-bond interaction between
the O atom of dichromate and the H atom of the NDC2– ligand (Figure d), which plays an important role in the
capture of dichromate ions.[1,41]
Figure 4
(a) and (b) SEM and elemental
mapping of DUT-52 materials
before and after adsorption of dichromate ions; (c) XPS spectra of DUT-52 materials before and after adsorption of dichromate
ions; and (d) adsorption mechanism of dichromate and DUT-52 with hydrogen bonding interaction.
(a) and (b) SEM and elemental
mapping of DUT-52 materials
before and after adsorption of dichromate ions; (c) XPS spectra of DUT-52 materials before and after adsorption of dichromate
ions; and (d) adsorption mechanism of dichromate and DUT-52 with hydrogen bonding interaction.
Conclusions
The highly stable and porous DUT-52 materials have
been prepared by the hydrothermal method and were characterized by
XRD, TGA, SEM, and XPS. The effect of DUT-52 on the adsorption
process of dichromate ions in aqueous solution was explored through
the experiments under different conditions. The research results show
that DUT-52 materials show the maximum removal rate of
96.4% and the maximum adsorption capacity of 120.68 mg·g–1 with excellent selective adsorption and material
regeneration. In addition, the analysis of the kinetic and thermodynamic
data shows that the adsorption process of dichromate by DUT-52 conforms to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Langmuir
model, and the adsorption mechanism as well as the important role
of H-bond interaction was reasonably explained by the XPS pattern
and theoretical calculation. Therefore, DUT-52 can be
regarded as a multifunctional material to efficiently remove dichromate
ions from the wastewater, which can provide an idea for the wastewater
treatment.
Materials
Materials and Methods
All the chemical
reagents were
commercially purchased and used without further purification. An XRD-6000
X-ray powder diffractor (Shimadzu, Japan); FEI Quanta 200F scanning
electron microscope (FEI), thermogravimetric analyzer (Mettel-Toledo,
Switzerland); ASAP 2020 (Mike Instruments); PHS-2F pH meter (Shanghai);
and UV-2802PCS spectrophotometer (Shanghai Unico Instruments Co.,
Ltd.) were used; XPS data were collected on an ESCALAB 250 XPS, using
Al Kα X-rays as the excitation source.
Preparation of DUT-52
ZrCl4 (1.03 mmol,
230 mg) was dissolved in 20 mL of N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) in a 50 mL polytetrafluoroethylene
reactor, which was sonicated for 5 min. Then, 2,6-naphthaleneic acid
(216 mg, 1 mmol) was added into the mixture solution and sonicated
for 5 min, and then, 3 mL of acetic acid was added, and the mixture
was sonicated for 15 min, which was heated in an oven (120 °C)
for 24 h and cooled to room temperature.[30−32] The prepared
samples were centrifuged and washed three times with fresh DMF, the
solvent was exchanged with ethanol 3 times, the samples were dried
and activated under vacuum for 4 h, and the white powder of the activated DUT-52 materials was obtained.A certain dosage of DUT-52 materials was added into
10 mL of dichromate aqueous solution with
a certain concentration and pH, which were oscillated at different
temperatures for 30 min and filtered using a 0.45 μm hydrophobic
PTFE membrane, and the residual concentrations of dichromate ions
were determined by UV spectrophotometry.where c0 is the initial concentration of the dichromate ions
(μg/mL), ce is the equilibrium concentration
of dichromate
ions (μg/mL), V is the volume of dichromate
ions (mL), m is the dosage of adsorbent DUT-52 materials (mg), and qe is the adsorption
capacity (μg/mg).The removal rate (R) and the adsorption capacity (qe) of
the DUT-52 materials were calculated using eqs and 2.
Regeneration Experiment
The DUT-52 materials
after adsorption of dichromate ions (20 mg) were dispersed into the
mixture (40 mL) of methanol and acetic acid (1:1, v/v).[41] The resulting suspension was stirred for 12
h, and the solid was collected through the concentration. Finally,
the collected solid was washed with ethanol and dried and activated
under vacuum for 4 h.
Competition Ion Experiment
First,
35 mg of DUT-52 materials was added into 10 mL of dichromate
aqueous solution (25
μg/mL) with different competition ions (NO3–, CO32–, SO42–, PO43–, Cl–, and
AC–) and pH (3.02) under 35 °C, which were
oscillated for 30 min and filtered using a 0.45 μm hydrophobic
PTFE membrane, and then, the residual concentration of dichromate
ions was determined.
Adsorption Kinetics
DUT-52 materials (35
mg) were added into 10 mL of dichromate aqueous solution with different
initial concentrations (10–1000 μg/mL) and pH (3.02)
under 35 °C, which were oscillated different times and filtered
using a 0.45 μm hydrophobic PTFE membrane, and then, the residual
concentration of dichromate ions was determined.where qt is the adsorption capacity corresponding to t (μg/mg), qe is the adsorption
capacity (μg/mg), k1 and k2 are the kinetic rate constants, and t is the adsorption time (m).The kinetic relationship
in the adsorption of dichromate aqueous solution by the DUT-52 materials was calculated based on the quasi-primary kinetic equation
(eq ) and the quasi-secondary
kinetic equation (eq ).
Adsorption Thermodynamics
First, 35 mg of DUT-52 materials was added into 10 mL of dichromate aqueous solution with
different initial concentrations (10–1000 μg/mL) and
pH (3.02) under different temperatures (35–75 °C), which
were oscillated for 360 min and filtered using a 0.45 μm hydrophobic
PTFE membrane, and then, the residual concentration of dichromate
ions was determined.where qmax is the maximum saturated adsorption
capacity (μg/mg), qe is the adsorption
capacity (μg/mg), KL is the Langmuir
adsorption constant related
to the adsorption energy, KF is the Freundlich
adsorption constant related to the adsorption capacity, n is a temperature-dependent constant, and ce is the equilibrium concentration of dichromate ions (μg/mL).The thermodynamic relationship in the adsorption of the dichromate
aqueous solution by the DUT-52 materials was calculated
based on the Langmuir equation (eq ) and the Freundlich equation (eq ).where K is
the thermodynamic equilibrium constant, R is the
gas adsorption constant (8.314 J/mol K), T is the
absolute temperature (K), and ΔG, ΔS, and ΔH are the Gibbs free energy,
entropy, and enthalpy, respectively.The ΔG, ΔS, and ΔH of the DUT-52 materials can be calculated
according to eqs , 8, and 9.
Authors: Siwen Wang; Jun Huang; Yang Yang; Yamei Hui; Yuxi Ge; Thorjørn Larssen; Gang Yu; Shubo Deng; Bin Wang; Christopher Harman Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 9.028