| Literature DB >> 35600955 |
Jie Ding1, Mei Shanshan2, Cai Mengcheng1, Zhang Danying1, Yu Jin1,3.
Abstract
Objective: Bushen Huoxue Huatan Decoction (BHHD) is a classic prescription for treating polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). This study aims to explore the effects and possible mechanisms of BHHD on PCOS by integrating network pharmacology and clinical study.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35600955 PMCID: PMC9122682 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2635375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1The idea and process of this research.
Figure 2Venn diagram (blue is the drug targets; red is the disease targets; in the middle are common targets).
Figure 3Component-target network (the red diamonds represent potential active ingredients, whereas the green circles represent target genes).
Compound information sheet.
| Molecule ID | Molecule name | Structure | OB (%) | DL | Degree | Herb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOL000098 | Quercetin |
| 46.43 | 0.28 | 113 | MG, ZJC |
| MOL000006 | Luteolin |
| 36.16 | 0.25 | 44 | DS |
| MOL000422 | Kaempferol |
| 41.88 | 0.24 | 44 | BS, ZJC, SCP |
| MOL013179 | Fisetin |
| 52.6 | 0.24 | 35 | ZJC |
| MOL000173 | Wogonin |
| 30.68 | 0.23 | 33 | HQ |
| MOL007154 | Tanshinone IIa |
| 49.89 | 0.4 | 27 | DS |
| MOL004328 | Naringenin |
| 59.29 | 0.21 | 26 | YJ |
| MOL007100 | Dihydrotanshinlactone |
| 38.68 | 0.32 | 24 | DS |
| MOL000358 |
|
| 36.91 | 0.75 | 24 | ZJC, BS, DG, HQ, MGH, YJ |
| MOL002714 | Baicalein |
| 33.52 | 0.21 | 21 | HQ |
Figure 4Results of core target screening. (a) PPI network diagram. (b) Core target diagram (the darker the node and the larger the area, the more important the target.).
Information on 20 core targets.
| Target | Description | UniProt ID | Degree | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAT3 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 | P40763 | 45 | Reviewed |
| JUN | Jun proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit | P05412 | 43 | Reviewed |
| AKT1 | AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 | P31749 | 42 | Reviewed |
| MAPK3 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | P27361 | 42 | Reviewed |
| MAPK1 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 | P28482 | 40 | Reviewed |
| TP53 | Tumour protein P53 | P04637 | 39 | Reviewed |
| TNF | Tumour necrosis factor | P01375 | 33 | Reviewed |
| MAPK8 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 | P45983 | 31 | Reviewed |
| MAPK14 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 | Q16539 | 30 | Reviewed |
| IL-6 | Interleukin-6 | P05231 | 29 | Reviewed |
| EGFR | Epidermal growth factor receptor | P00533 | 28 | Reviewed |
| FOS | Fos proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit | P01100 | 28 | Reviewed |
| APP | Amyloid beta precursor protein | P05067 | 27 | Reviewed |
| VEGFA | Vascular endothelial growth factor A | P15692 | 27 | Reviewed |
| ESR1 | Oestrogen receptor 1 | P03372 | 26 | Reviewed |
| CTNNB1 | Catenin beta 1 | P35222 | 24 | Reviewed |
| EGF | Epidermal growth factor | P01133 | 24 | Reviewed |
| CXCL8 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 | P10145 | 22 | Reviewed |
| EDN1 | Endothelin 1 | P05305 | 22 | Reviewed |
| MYC | MYC proto-oncogene, BHLH transcription factor | P01106 | 21 | Reviewed |
Figure 5Bubble chart of enrichment analysis results. GO enrichment (top 30 of enrichment).
Figure 6Bubble chart of enrichment analysis results. KEGG enrichment (top 30 of enrichment).
Comparison of ovulation in patients with PCOS before and after treatment (%).
| Cases | Total cycles (number) | Ovulated cycles (number) | Nonovulated cycles (number) | Ovulation rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 372 | 107 | 265 | 28.8 |
| After treatment | 62 | 372 | 227 | 144 | 61.2 |
Note. P < 0.05.
Comparison of anthropometric indexes ( ± S).
| Cases | BMI | WHR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 22.034 ± 3.64 | 0.84 ± 0.07 |
| After treatment | 62 | 21.44 ± 3.06 | 0.83 ± 0.07 |
Comparison of clinical symptoms (%).
| Cases | Hirsutism | Acne | Acanthosis nigricans | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 28 (45.2) | 48 (77.4) | 24 (38.7) |
| After treatment | 62 | 26 (41.9) | 36 (58.1) | 11 (17.7) |
Note. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Satterthwaite was applied when the P-value for F-test (equality of variance test) was <0.05. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in two-tailed test.
Serum sex hormone changes before and after treatment ( ± S).
| Cases | LH (IU/L) | FSH (IU/L) | LH/FSH | T ( | E2 (pg/mL) | DHEAS ( | PRL ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 9.65 ± 5.77 | 6.31 ± 1.70 | 1.58 ± 0.92 | 0.58 ± 0.28 | 46.73 ± 29.10 | 294.21 ± 94.75 | 12.13 ± 6.48 |
| After treatment | 62 | 7.63 ± 5.63 | 6.79 ± 1.20 | 1.11 ± 0.70 | 0.50 ± 0.13 | 42.00 ± 19.81 | 250.20 ± 71.86 | 11.16 ± 5.04 |
Note. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Satterthwaite was applied when the P-value for F-test (equality of variance test) was <0.05. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in two-tailed test.
Serum sex hormone changes before and after treatment ( ± S).
| Cases | INS0 min | INS30 min | INS60 min | INS90 min | INS120 min | INS180 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 10.81 ± 7.07 | 76.23 ± 44.19 | 78.57 ± 48.59 | 77.04 ± 51.12 | 64.18 ± 40.30 | 27.68 ± 22.78 |
| After treatment | 62 | 10.40 ± 5.07 | 50.69 ± 35.30 | 65.54 ± 38.09 | 60.55 ± 24.71 | 45.23 ± 26.32 | 20.89 ± 12.50 |
Note. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Satterthwaite was applied when the P value for F test (equality of variance test) was <0.05. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in two-tailed test.
Comparison of INS before and after treatment ( ± S).
| Cases | FBG (mmol/L) | HOMA-IR | IAUC | ISI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 5.04 ± 0.46 | 2.61 ± 2.17 | 217.56 ± 106.96 | 0.0276 ± 0.196 |
| After treatment | 62 | 5.00 ± 0.45 | 2.35 ± 1.27 | 160.73 ± 81.13 | 0.0281 ± 0.194 |
Note. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Satterthwaite was applied when the P-value for F-test (equality of variance test) was <0.05. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in two-tailed test.
Inflammatory cytokines with significantly different INT values between PCOS and healthy women detected by proteome profiler human cytokine array kit ( ± S).
| Index | Density INT (mm2) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCOS | Health women | ||
| Reference spots | 20778.8 ± 1593.6 | 21674.2 ± 2436.9 | 0.1961 |
| CCL5/RANTES | 22124.6 ± 1277.8 | 25117.3 ± 2715.2 | 0.0005 |
| CD40 ligand/TNFSF5 | 17456.6 ± 3125.6 | 14630.6 ± 4630.7 | 0.0159 |
| Complement component C5/C5a | 14752.9 ± 6610 | 8783.3 ± 9464.3 | 0.0143 |
| CXCL1/GRO | 7409.8 ± 5930.9 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0000 |
| CXCL12/SDF-1 | 13251.6 ± 4410.3 | 10547.8 ± 3355.7 | 0.0036 |
| IL-1ra/IL-1F3 | 10950.8 ± 2491.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0000 |
| IL-8 | 12428.8 ± 23671.1 | 19921.4 ± 33480 | 0.0374 |
| IL-13 | 1763.2 ± 2766.3 | 6372.6 ± 4389.7 | 0.0044 |
| IL-16 | 2579.3 ± 3031.3 | 6000.3 ± 5001.8 | 0.0203 |
| IL-18/IL-1F4 | 6950.9 ± 4118.1 | 16923.0 ± 1831.2 | 0.0000 |
| MIF | 18353.9 ± 2793.1 | 16376.1 ± 3268.7 | 0.0340 |
| Serpin E1/PAI-1 | 18189.9 ± 7078.6 | 22070.2 ± 1389.7 | 0.0051 |
Note. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Satterthwaite was applied when the P-value for F-test (equality of variance test) was <0.05. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in two-tailed test.
Comparison of inflammatory factors before and after treatment ( ± S).
| PCOS cases | IL-18 (pg/mL) | IL-16 (pg/mL) | IL-8 (pg/mL) | IL-1ra/IL-1F3 (pg/mL) | MIF (pg/mL) | CD40 L (pg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 62 | 97.22 ± 13.25 | 102.41 ± 8.97 | 103.61 ± 13.54 | 133.42 ± 13.93 | 66.73 ± 9.18 | 65.48 ± 5.84 | |
| After treatment | 62 | 53.95 ± 10.96 | 54.34 ± 9.03 | 50.78 ± 11.30 | 61.94 ± 16.38 | 27.73 ± 6.12 | 31.80 ± 6.28 | |
Note. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Satterthwaite was applied when the P-value for F-test (equality of variance test) was <0.05. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in two-tailed test.