Genmeng Yang1,2, Juan Li3, Yanxia Peng1,2, Baoyu Shen1,2, Yuanyuan Li1,2, Liu Liu1,2, Chan Wang1,2, Yue Xu1,2, Shucheng Lin1,2, Shuwei Zhang1,2, Yi Tan1,2, Huijie Zhang1,2, Xiaofeng Zeng1,2, Qi Li4, Gang Lu5. 1. NHC Key Laboratory of Drug Addiction Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. 2. School of Forensic Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. 3. School of Basic Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. 4. SDIVF R&D Centre, Hong Kong, China. 5. CUHK-SDU Joint Laboratory on Reproductive Genetics, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
Aim: This study investigates the effects of ginsenoside Rb1 (GsRb1) on methamphetamine (METH)-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and METH-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. It also examines whether GsRb1 can regulate these effects through the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathways. Methods: SH-SY5Y cells were pretreated with GsRb1 (20 μM and 40 μM) for 1 h, followed by METH treatment (2 mM) for 24 h. Rats were treated with METH (2 mg/kg) or saline on alternating days for 10 days to allow CPP to be examined. GsRb1 (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 1 h before METH or saline. Western blot was used to examine the protein expression of NR2B, ERK, P-ERK, CREB, P-CREB, and BDNF in the SH-SY5Y cells and the rats' hippocampus, nucleus accumbens (NAc), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Results: METH dose-dependently reduced the viability of SH-SY5Y cells. Pretreatment of cells with 40 μM of GsRb1 increased cell viability and reduced the expression of METH-induced NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB and BDNF. GsRb1 also attenuated the expression of METH CPP in a dose-dependent manner in rats. Further, GsRb1 dose-dependently reduced the expression of METH-induced NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF in the PFC, hippocampus, and NAc of rats. Conclusion: GsRb1 regulated METH-induced neurotoxicity in vitro and METH-induced CPP through the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF regulatory pathway. GsRb1 could be a therapeutic target for treating METH-induced neurotoxicity or METH addiction.
Aim: This study investigates the effects of ginsenoside Rb1 (GsRb1) on methamphetamine (METH)-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and METH-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. It also examines whether GsRb1 can regulate these effects through the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathways. Methods: SH-SY5Y cells were pretreated with GsRb1 (20 μM and 40 μM) for 1 h, followed by METH treatment (2 mM) for 24 h. Rats were treated with METH (2 mg/kg) or saline on alternating days for 10 days to allow CPP to be examined. GsRb1 (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 1 h before METH or saline. Western blot was used to examine the protein expression of NR2B, ERK, P-ERK, CREB, P-CREB, and BDNF in the SH-SY5Y cells and the rats' hippocampus, nucleus accumbens (NAc), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Results: METH dose-dependently reduced the viability of SH-SY5Y cells. Pretreatment of cells with 40 μM of GsRb1 increased cell viability and reduced the expression of METH-induced NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB and BDNF. GsRb1 also attenuated the expression of METH CPP in a dose-dependent manner in rats. Further, GsRb1 dose-dependently reduced the expression of METH-induced NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF in the PFC, hippocampus, and NAc of rats. Conclusion: GsRb1 regulated METH-induced neurotoxicity in vitro and METH-induced CPP through the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF regulatory pathway. GsRb1 could be a therapeutic target for treating METH-induced neurotoxicity or METH addiction.
Methamphetamine (METH) is widely used as a recreational drug. Long-term consumption of METH elicits somatic, psychiatric, and cognitive impairment [1,2]. METH abuse has increased dramatically in recent years, becoming a serious public health problem worldwide [2]. Current treatments are of minimal efficacy, so there is an urgent need to develop novel pharmacotherapies to combat METH dependence [3].As a psychostimulant, METH can increase the extracellular level of dopamine (DA) in the nervous system by promoting DA release and attenuating DA reuptake [4]. We reported that the co-administration of ketamine and alcohol alters dopamine-related gene expression and BDNF in the cortical-striatal circuitry [5]. Mesocorticolimbic signaling inhibits the availability of ventral striatal D2-type receptors and promotes impulsivity in METH-dependent individuals [6]. This rewarding circuitry involves the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and its afferents from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC); the NAc also receives dopaminergic and glutamatergic afferents from the hippocampal formation [7].The present study focuses on corticolimbic circuits, which are comprised of the PFC, NAc, and hippocampus. Except for DA, the roles of other neurotransmitters and their respective receptors—including glutamate, γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA), and serotonin—in the motivational effects of METH have been identified [2,[8], [9], [10]]. Recent studies have shown that METH affects synaptic glutamatergic activity by elevating the level of NR2B-containing N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in the PFC [11]. METH can also modulate cytokine production, such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, through the cAMP/PKA/CREB/ERK signaling pathways [12]. However, the mechanisms of NR2B alteration in corticolimbic circuits induced by METH dependence are not yet fully understood.The conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm has been used to study the reinforcement properties of drugs, such as amphetamine, METH, cocaine, and morphine [13]. CPP has been developed to identify small molecules that carry therapeutic value to treat drug abuse [13]. METH-induced drug-seeking (i.e., CPP) and drug-taking (i.e., self-administration) behaviors are mediated, at least in part, through D1/D5 receptors in the dorsal hippocampus [14]. Acute administration of METH induces locomotor stimulation through the activation of the NR2B receptor [15]. A recent experiment demonstrated that YQA14, a selective D3 receptor antagonist, can attenuate METH-induced CPP in rodents [16].Ginsenoside Rb1 (GsRb1), a key constituent of ginseng, is widely used in the pharmacological examination of the effects of ginseng. GsRb1's chemical structures are shown in Fig. 2B. GsRb1 has a variety of neuroprotective effects on the brain, such as the attenuation of excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress; the maintenance of neurotransmitter balance; the inhibition of autophagy; and anti-tau phosphorylation [[17], [18], [19]]. Recent work in our laboratory has demonstrated that GsRb1 protects the blood–brain barrier (BBB) against the neurotoxicity exerted by the HIV-1 Tat (human immunodeficiency virus-1 trans-activator of transcription protein) and METH in rats [20]. Previous studies have suggested that GsRb1 may modulate METH-induced CPP in mice through the regulation of DA receptors [21]. No works to date have examined whether GsRb1 can mediate the effects of METH on NR2B-containing NMDARs and CPP. To address this knowledge gap, we tested the hypothesis that GsRb1 attenuates METH-induced drug-seeking behaviors by regulating the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathways in the corticolimbic circuit.
Fig. 2
Effect of Rb1 on METH-induced CPP in rats. (A) The experimental protocol for Rb1 and METH treatments, rats received METH (2 mg/kg IP) or saline (10 ml/kg IP) injections 1 h after Rb1 (5, 10, 20 mg/kg, IP) or saline (10 ml/kg IP) treatments. (B) The CPP score was calculated by subtracting the time spent in the saline-paired compartment from the time spent in the drug-paired compartment. CPP scores show that METH significantly increased the time spent on the drug-paired side ($p < 0.05,$$p < 0.01,indicating a significant difference compared with the pre-conditioning, n = 10). (C) Place preference data were expressed by subtracting the time spent in the saline-paired compartment from the time spent in the drug-paired compartment. Columns indicate mean ± SEM (∗p < 0.05,∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group;##p < 0.01,###p < 0.01, indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group,n = 10).
First, we investigated the pharmacological effects of METH and GsRb1 on dopaminergic neurons using SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Through this process, we assessed the mechanisms of the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathway underlying these effects. We also performed in vivo CPP tests to determine whether GsRb1 can mediate drug-seeking behaviors induced by chronic METH administration in SD rats. We then further explored whether NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling is involved in METH-induced neurotoxicity and drug-seeking behavior and GsRb1 rescue effects.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
METH (purity 100%) was dissolved in saline (pH 7) (National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, China). GsRb1 (purity 98%) was sourced from Chengdu Must Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (China). The antibodies against NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, CREB, p-CREB, BDNF, and β-actin were sourced from Cell Signaling Technology (USA), and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Sigma (Germany).
Cell lines and cell culture
Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells sourced from the National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource (NICR, China) were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM/F12) (1:1) medium containing 15% FBS at 37°C incubators with 5% CO2.
Cell viability assay
Cell Counting Kit-8 was used to determine cell viability (Beyotime, China). SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in a 96-well plate at a density of 2 × 104/100 μl and treated with varying concentrations of METH and Rb1 for 24 h. We then added 10 μl of a CCK-8 solution to each well and incubated the cells for 1 to 2 h. Mean optical density (OD, absorbance at 450 nm) was used to calculate the percentage of viability: cell viability percentage = (ODtreatment – ODblank)/(ODcontrol – ODblank) × 100% (see Fig. 1: Supplementary Information).
In vitro experimental design
For the drug treatment, the cells were pretreated with Rb1 (20 μM and 40 μM) for 1 h [[22], [23], [24]] and 2 mM METH treatment for 24 h [25], when the cells were at the confluence of 75 to 85%. The cells were then rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before the drug treatment. For the in vitro experiment, cells were randomly grouped as follows: (I) vehicle group; (II) METH (2 mM) treatment group; (III) Rb1 (40 μM mM) treatment group; (IV) Rb1 (20 μM) pretreatment + METH (2 mM) treatment group; and (V) Rb1 (40 μM) pretreatment + METH (2 mM) treatment group.
In vivo animal experiments
Animals
Male adult Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were sourced from Kunming Medical University (China). The rats were kept in an environmentally controlled room (23 ± 2°C) under a standard 12 h:12 h light/dark cycle. The experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kunming Medical University.
Experimental design
Male SD rats (n = 60) were equally and randomly divided into six groups. Drug dosages were based on those of previous studies [20,24]: (1) control rats received 0.9% saline through intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 10 ml/kg; (2) METH (2 mg/kg, IP) treatment; (3) Rb1 (20 mg/kg, IP) treatment; (4) Rb1 (5 mg/kg, IP) pretreatment 1 h + METH (2 mg/kg, IP) treatment; (5) Rb1 (10 mg/kg) pretreatment 1 h + METH (2 mg/kg) treatment; and (6) Rb1 (20 mg/kg) pretreatment 1 h + METH (2 mg/kg).
CPP experiment
Apparatus
The apparatus used for CPP had two equal-sized chambers made of plexiglass with different colors and textures (35 cm × 35 cm × 35 cm) (XR-XT401, Xinruan Information Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). The internal spaces between the two chambers were separated by a central tunnel 15 cm (L) × 35 cm (W/H). The central tunnel was gray, with a featureless floor. Per previous studies, the CPP experiment was conducted in three distinct phases: habituation, conditioning, and post-conditioning [26].
CPP model
Habituation phase (days 1–3): On days 1–3, each rat was housed in the CPP chambers and could freely explore the chambers for 30 min to minimize stress and initial bias. Pre-conditioning test was videotaped for 15 min on day 3 (see Fig. 2A). Rats were excluded when they exhibited a preference to any chamber for >67% of the total time [27].Conditioning phase (days 4–13): Each rat received an IP administration of either 2 mg/kg METH or 10 ml/kg saline on alternating days. On days 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, the rats were administered METH and confined to one compartment of the apparatus. They were given saline injections and confined in the other chamber on days 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13. Each rat's locomotor activity was videotaped for 30 min daily for 10 days (5 drug sessions and 5 saline sessions) (see Fig. 2A). Naive animals received a vehicle (saline 10 ml/kg) or Rb1 (5, 10, 20 mg/kg, IP) 1 h before each METH or saline administration during the conditioning phase. All drugs were freshly prepared every day before injection.Post-conditioning phase (day 14): CPP was evaluated again 24 h after the final administration. Drug treatment was not performed on the test day. The rats were again placed in the central tunnel and allowed free access to both chambers for 15 min. Any changes in place preference (CPP scores) were determined by determining the difference between the time spent in the saline-paired compartment and the METH-paired compartment of the apparatus [16]. Preference behavior was determined by determining the difference between the time spent in the METH- and saline-conditioned chambers in the pre-and post-conditioning phases.All rats were euthanized 24 h after the last test. Each rat's PFC, hippocampus, and NAc were harvested and frozen for subsequent analysis.
Western blot analysis
Western blotting was carried out as previously described [25]. Briefly, the cells and brain tissues were homogenized in a protein extraction buffer (Beyotime, China). BCA protein assay was used to determine protein concentration (Beyotime, China). They were incubated overnight with primary antibodies (anti-NR2B, anti-ERK, anti-p-ERK, anti-CREB, anti-p-CREB, anti-BDNF, and anti-β-actin) at 4°C, followed by secondary antibodies for 2 h at ambient temperature. The films were captured using the ECL chemiluminescence system. Protein bands were quantified using ImageJ software (Version 1.46).
Statistical analysis
The western blot and CPP results were assessed using a one-way ANOVA. Results are reported as mean ± SEM. Pearson correlation was applied to analyze the relationship between METH-induced CPP behavior and protein expression levels in the brain. Analyses were performed using SPSS 9.0 and GraphPad Prism (version 5.0). p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Results
Cell viability was reduced with an increase in METH concentrations from 0.5 mM to 3 mM. As low as 0.1 mM METH reduced cell viability, and the effect was most obvious with 2 mM METH. This indicates that METH reduces the viability of SH-SY5Y cells dose-dependently. Pretreatment with 40 μM Rb1 increased cell viability, indicating that Rb1 provides a neuroprotective effect against METH-induced cytotoxicity (see Fig. 1: Supplementary Information).
Rb1 reduces the elevated expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in METH-treated SH-SY5Y cells
The expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB and BDNF increased significantly in the METH group [NR2B: F(14) = 20.1, p < 0.0001; p-ERK:F(14) = 307, p < 0.0001; p-ERK/ERK: F(14) = 94.56; p < 0.0001; p-CREB: F(14) = 23.77, p < 0.0001; p-CREB/CREB: F(14) = 6.41, p = 0.008; BDNF: F(14) = 21.84, p < 0.0001] without altering the total ERK and CREB expression. When cells were pretreated with Rb1 (20, 40 μM) for 1 h, the expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, and BDNF gradually decreased in the Rb1 (20, 40 μM) groups, and p-CREB and p-CREB/CREB decreased in the Rb1 (40 μM) group (Fig. 1). The results indicate that METH can elevate the protein expression levels of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB and BDNF, and the pretreatment of Rb1 can reverse the process.
Fig. 1
The effects of METH and Rb1 on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, pERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in METH-induced SH-SY5Y cells. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were analyzed by western blot. (∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group; #p < 0.05,##p < 0.01,###p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group, n = 3-5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM in at least 3 experiments.
The effects of METH and Rb1 on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, pERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in METH-induced SH-SY5Y cells. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were analyzed by western blot. (∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group; #p < 0.05,##p < 0.01,###p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group, n = 3-5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM in at least 3 experiments.Effect of Rb1 on METH-induced CPP in rats. (A) The experimental protocol for Rb1 and METH treatments, rats received METH (2 mg/kg IP) or saline (10 ml/kg IP) injections 1 h after Rb1 (5, 10, 20 mg/kg, IP) or saline (10 ml/kg IP) treatments. (B) The CPP score was calculated by subtracting the time spent in the saline-paired compartment from the time spent in the drug-paired compartment. CPP scores show that METH significantly increased the time spent on the drug-paired side ($p < 0.05,$$p < 0.01,indicating a significant difference compared with the pre-conditioning, n = 10). (C) Place preference data were expressed by subtracting the time spent in the saline-paired compartment from the time spent in the drug-paired compartment. Columns indicate mean ± SEM (∗p < 0.05,∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group;##p < 0.01,###p < 0.01, indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group,n = 10).
Rb1 attenuates METH-induced CPP in rats
CPP is considered an effective method for measuring drug-induced reward effects. The experimental schedule applied in the present study is presented in Fig. 2A. Compared with the pre-conditioning phase, the rats stayed longer in the drug-paired chamber of the apparatus after they were treated with METH, as shown in Fig. 2B. However, after the rats were treated with Rb1 (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg), the differences between pre-and post-conditioning gradually decreased. These results indicate that Rb1 can attenuate METH-induced CPP, as shown in Fig. 2C.
Effect of Rb1 and METH on the expression of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in PFCs
Compared to the saline group, the protein expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF increased significantly in PFCs without altering their total CREB and ERK expression after being treated with METH. Prior treatment with Rb1 (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg) caused the expression levels of NR2B and p-CREB to decrease significantly in the Rb1 (20 mg/kg) + METH group, and BDNF, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, and p-CREB/CREB decreased by varying degrees in the Rb1 (10, 20 mg/kg) + METH group. The protein expression was not statistically significant in the Rb1 (5 mg/kg) + METH group. [NR2B: F(17) = 9.284, p = 0.0008; p-ERK: F(17) = 14.59, p < 0.0001; p-ERK/ERK: F(17) = 12.23, p = 0.0002; p-CREB: F(17) = 43.07, p < 0.0001; p-CREB/CREB: F(17) = 65.70, p < 0.0001; BDNF: F(17) = 83.02, p < 0.0001]. These results are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3
Effects of Rb1 and METH on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in the PFC of METH-induced CPP rats. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were detected by western blot. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001,indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group,n = 3). The data are represented as the means ± SEMs of three independent experiments.
Effects of Rb1 and METH on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in the PFC of METH-induced CPP rats. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were detected by western blot. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001,indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group,n = 3). The data are represented as the means ± SEMs of three independent experiments.
Effect of Rb1 and METH on NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB and BDNF in hippocampus
The expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF increased significantly in the METH group. Pretreatment with Rb1 resulted in a gradual decrease in the expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in the Rb1 (10, 20 mg/kg) + METH groups. Further, p-CREB was significantly reduced in the Rb1 (20 mg/kg) + METH group. Alterations in the expressions of these proteins were not statistically significant in the Rb1 (5 mg/kg) + METH group. [NR2B: F(17) = 7.986, p = 0.0016; p-ERK: F(17) = 1 0.16, p = 0.0005; p-ERK/ERK: F(17) = 2.057, p = 0.1421; p-CREB: F(17) = 15.81, p < 0.0001; p-CREB/CREB: F(17) = 6.090, p < 0.0049; BDNF: F(17) = 15.49, p < 0.0001]. These results are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Effects of Rb1 and METH on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in hippocampus of METH-induced CPP rats. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were detected by western blot. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group,n = 3). The data are represented as the means ± SEMs of three independent experiments.
Effects of Rb1 and METH on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in hippocampus of METH-induced CPP rats. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were detected by western blot. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group,n = 3). The data are represented as the means ± SEMs of three independent experiments.
Effect of Rb1 and METH on NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB and BDNF in NAc
Fig. 5 illustrates that the expression of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB,and BDNF increased significantly in the METH group compared to the saline group. Pretreatment of NAc with increasing dose of Rb1 (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg) gradually, decreased the expression levels of NR2B, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, p-CREB, and p-CREB/CREB in the Rb1 (10, 20 mg/kg) + METH groups. BDNF decreased in the Rb1 (20 mg/kg) + METH group. Here too, changes in the expression of these proteins were not statistically significant in the Rb1 (5 mg/kg) + METH group. [NR2B: F(17) = 73.52, p < 0.0001; p-ERK: F(17) = 45.31, p < 0.0001; p-ERK/ERK: F(17) = 11.41, p = 0.0003; p-CREB: F(17) = 31.59, p < 0.0001; p-CREB/CREB: F(17) = 6.964, p = 0.0029; BDNF: F(17) = 10.06, p = 0.0006]. These results are shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5
Effects of Rb1 and METH on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in NAc of METH-induced CPP rats. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were detected by western blot. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001,indicating a significant difference compared with the control group;#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01,###p < 0.001,indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group, n = 3).The data are represented as the means ± SEMs of three independent experiments.
Effects of Rb1 and METH on the expressions of NR2B, ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK, CREB, p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB, and BDNF in NAc of METH-induced CPP rats. The expression levels of NR2B (A), BDNF (B), ERK, p-ERK, p-ERK/ERK (C), and p-CREB, p-CREB/CREB (D) were detected by western blot. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001,indicating a significant difference compared with the control group;#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01,###p < 0.001,indicating a significant difference compared with the METH group, n = 3).The data are represented as the means ± SEMs of three independent experiments.
Correlation analysis between ex vivo protein expression and in vivo CPP measures
A Pearson analysis was performed to determine whether a correlation existed between drug-seeking behaviors and protein expression in the brain. Protein expressions were found to highly correlate with post-pre values in the METH group (A–D) (NR2B, r = 0.924, p < 0.001, n = 9; p-ERK, r = 0.975, p < 0.001, n = 9; p-CREB, r = 0.972, p = 0.001, n = 9; BDNF, r = 0.927, p < 0.001, n = 9). In the Rb1 + METH group, however, no correlation was established between drug-seeking behaviors and NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, or BDNF levels (A, B, C, D) (NR2B, r = 0.515, p = 0.156, n = 9; p-ERK, r = 0.690, p = 0.40, n = 9; p-CREB, r = 0.051, p = 0.897, n = 9; BDNF, r = 0.047, p = 0.904, n = 9). These results are shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6
NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF expressions in the PFC, hippocampus and NAc correlate with preference ratios. NR2B (A), p-ERK (B), p-CREB (C), and BDNF (D) expressions significantly correlated with preference ratios in the PFC. (A) r = 0.877, p < 0.01; (B) r = 0.914, p < 0.01; (C) r = 0.924, p < 0.001; (D) r = 0.866, p < 0.01; n = 9. (A–D) NR2B (A), p-ERK (B), p-CREB(C), and BDNF (D) expression significantly correlated with preference ratios in the hippocampus. (A) r = 0.961, p < 0.001; (B) r = 0.917, p < 0.01; (C) r = 0.918, p < 0.001; (D) r = 0.894, p < 0.01; n = 9). NR2B (A), p-ERK (B), p-CREB (C), and BDNF (D)expression significantly correlated with preference ratios in the NAc. (A) r = 0.936, p < 0.001; (B) r = 0.882, p < 0.01; (C) r = 0.931, p < 0.001; (D) r = 0.850, p < 0.01; n = 9).
NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF expressions in the PFC, hippocampus and NAc correlate with preference ratios. NR2B (A), p-ERK (B), p-CREB (C), and BDNF (D) expressions significantly correlated with preference ratios in the PFC. (A) r = 0.877, p < 0.01; (B) r = 0.914, p < 0.01; (C) r = 0.924, p < 0.001; (D) r = 0.866, p < 0.01; n = 9. (A–D) NR2B (A), p-ERK (B), p-CREB(C), and BDNF (D) expression significantly correlated with preference ratios in the hippocampus. (A) r = 0.961, p < 0.001; (B) r = 0.917, p < 0.01; (C) r = 0.918, p < 0.001; (D) r = 0.894, p < 0.01; n = 9). NR2B (A), p-ERK (B), p-CREB (C), and BDNF (D)expression significantly correlated with preference ratios in the NAc. (A) r = 0.936, p < 0.001; (B) r = 0.882, p < 0.01; (C) r = 0.931, p < 0.001; (D) r = 0.850, p < 0.01; n = 9).
Discussion
In this study, we spent 6 months observing the therapeutic effects of GsRb1 on METH-induced cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells and METH-induced CPP changes in rats. CPP is commonly used to investigate drug-seeking behaviors. This study extended the field by successfully establishing a METH-induced place preference rat model. Previously, our research group demonstrated that METH-induced CPP elevated the protein kinase A (PKA)/CREB signaling pathway [28]. We found that repeated dosing of GsRb1 can attenuate METH-induced CPP. This supports prior findings by Kim et al (1996; 1998), who reported that ginseng extracts inhibit hyperactivity and CPP induced by METH. Unlike our study, Kim et al used high dosages of ginseng (e.g., 100 mg/kg). The GsRb1 used in our study showed dose-dependent effects on CPP. The highest dose of GsRb1, 20 mg/kg, had the greatest inhibition effects on the expression of METH-induced CPP.According to our results, METH strongly upregulated the protein expression of NR2B in SH-SY5Y and the corticolimbic network in vivo. Pretreatment with GsRb1 (40 μM) was found to significantly downregulate the expression of NR2B induced by METH in SH-SY5Y in vitro. Consistent with these in vitro findings, heightened expression levels of NR2B were observed in the PFC, NAc, and hippocampus; pretreatment with GsRb1 reduced NR2B expression in these brain areas ex vivo. In the PFC, pretreating with 20 mg/kg of GsRb1 downregulated NR2B levels compared to the METH-treated group. In the hippocampus, NR2B expression levels were reduced by pretreatments of 10 and 20 mg/kg of GsRb1. In the NAc, reduced NR2B was induced by pretreatments with 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg of GsRb1.Our data and the work of previous studies demonstrate that GsRb1 affects areas of the brain differently. Li et al [15] reported that amphetamine and METH can increase NR2B levels in the midbrain in rats. Their study linked DA and glutamate neurotransmission to amphetamine and METH in the midbrain. NR2B is critical for many forms of synaptic plasticity [29], locomotor sensitization to drugs of abuse [30], and CPP in mice [31]. Further, increased NR2B can lead to an influx of calcium and excitotoxic damage of neurons [32]. Interestingly, GsRb1 selectively inhibits the activity of calcium channels in hippocampal neurons [33]. Another recent study showed that GsRb1 can directly inhibit basal NMDAR-mediated synaptic transmission [34]. Kim et al [35] reported that the calcium influx evoked by NMDAR activation could be mediated by ginseng Rg3. Thus, our study's observed inhibition of NR2B might contribute to the protective effect of GsRb1 by dampening the influx of calcium. Additional investigation is required to study whether the calcium channel in the glutaminergic synapse is involved in the neuroprotection of GsRb1 against chronic METH consumption.ERK signaling involves both NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity and the control of transcription factor activity, such as Ras/ERK/CREB signaling [36]. As with the ERK-mediated phosphorylation of CREB at serine-133 via p90rsk [37,38], the phosphorylation of CREB occurs in response to Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and stress-activated signaling pathways [39]. The transcription factor BDNF is modulated by Ca2+-induced CREB and the activation of CaM-dependent protein kinase II/IV [40]. Thus, CREB is a nuclear effector of the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathway. The p-CREB/BDNF is strongly associated with neuronal regeneration, development, survival, addiction, depression, and cognition [41,42]. Because CREB influences signaling information from multiple sources, it is not surprising that the enhancement of CREB functions affects many complex behaviors—some beneficial and others detrimental. Elevated neuronal functions of CREB could lead to drug tolerance and dependence [42,43]. Our data show that the phospho-ERK/CREB signaling cascade was upregulated in the corticolimbic brain circuits of rats after chronic exposure to METH and in the SH-SY5Y cell line. Previous studies have demonstrated that p-CREB levels increase in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) after long-term consumption of certain drugs [44,45]. Recent evidence has further shown that the activity of the NR2B/ERK/CREB signaling is vital for modulating reward-seeking behavior [46,47]. We found that pretreatment with GsRb1 significantly downregulated the expression of p-ERK and p-CREB induced by METH in SH-SY5Y cells and CPP rats. We observed significant relationships between drug-seeking behaviors and NR2B/p-ERK/p-CREB/BDNF expression in the METH group. However, there were no correlations between protein expression and behaviors in the Rb1 treatment group. These data indicate that GsRb1 treatment might block the correlation between brain protein expression and behavior in rats.Accumulating evidence suggests that BDNF plays a role in METH-induced neurotoxicity [48,49], drug reward responses, locomotor sensitization [50], and METH addiction and withdrawal [51]. Chronic METH exposure increases BDNF levels in the brain [49,52] and induces neuronal death, apoptosis [49,53], and hippocampal atrophy [54]. We observed that BDNF expression was elevated in SH-SY5Y cells and in the hippocampus, PFC, and NAc brain circuits after chronic exposure to METH. Recently, epigenetic mechanisms, particularly in exon IV of the BDNF gene, have been shown to be strongly associated with drug addiction and enhanced relapse vulnerability [55,56]. In our experiments, pretreatment with GsRb1 significantly downregulated the expression of BDNF induced by METH in SH-SY5Y and CPP rats. These data indicate that NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF are involved in the protective effect of GsRb1 on METH-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells and CPP rats.
Conclusion
Our findings show that METH induces elevated levels of NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF in SH-SY5Y cells and corticolimbic brain circuits in CPP rats. High dosages of GsRb1 can significantly reduce NR2B, p-ERK, p-CREB, and BDNF expression. This suggests that GsRb1 can dampen METH-induced toxicity in SY5Y cells and METH-induced drug-seeking behaviors in rats by downregulating the NR2B/ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathways. Thus, GsRb1 has potential as a therapeutic target for METH addiction or neurotoxicity.
Funding sources
This work was supported by the (81960340 and 82060382), the NHC Key Laboratory of Drug Addiction Medicine (2020DAMARA-008), the Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province (202001AT070098), and the Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects Joint Special Project (202001AY070001-015).
Authors: Paul M Thompson; Kiralee M Hayashi; Sara L Simon; Jennifer A Geaga; Michael S Hong; Yihong Sui; Jessica Y Lee; Arthur W Toga; Walter Ling; Edythe D London Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2004-06-30 Impact factor: 6.167