| Literature DB >> 35600546 |
Yuanfa He1,2,3, Jinfang Liang1, Xiaohui Dong1,2,3, Hongyu Liu1,2,3, Qihui Yang1,2,3, Shuang Zhang1,2,3, Shuyan Chi1,2,3, Beiping Tan1,2,3.
Abstract
The utilization efficiency of soy protein is affected by its 2 anti-nutritional substances-the antigens β-conglycinin and glycinin. This study investigated their effects on the growth performance, intestinal immune defense, and microbiome in juvenile pearl gentian groupers (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus♂). Three isonitrogenous and isolipidic diets were formulated containing fishmeal supplemented with 70 g/kg β-conglycinin or 100 g/kg glycinin, or no supplementation (control). Each experimental diet was fed to quadruplicate groups with 30 fish in each tank for 8 weeks. Dietary inclusion of either β-conglycinin or glycinin significantly reduced weight gain and specific growth rates, and cell proliferation of the distal intestine. Histological evaluation of the intestine tract revealed the inflammation signs, characterized by reducing of plica height and width as well as the number of the goblet cells, and widening of the lamina propria. The group fed the β-conglycinin diet had reduced lysozyme activity, contents of immunoglobulin M and complements 3 and 4. Increased activities of caspase-3 and -9 were observed in the group fed the β-conglycinin diet compared to the other 2 groups. In the intestinal microbiota, the relative abundances of the potentially pathogenic genera Photobacterium and Vibrio were significantly higher in the glycinin group than those in others. Therefore, the existence of soybean antigens (β-conglycinin or glycinin) could damage the structural integrity of the intestine, reduce immune defense, reshape the intestinal microbiome and, ultimately, impair growth in fish.Entities:
Keywords: Glycinin; Immune response; Intestinal microbiota; Pearl gentian groupers; β-Conglycinin
Year: 2021 PMID: 35600546 PMCID: PMC9092876 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Fig. 1Sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns of the isolated β-conglycinin (7S) and glycinin (11S) fractions. Lane 1: 7S fraction; lane 2: 11S fraction; lane 3: protein marker.
Formulation and nutrient composition of the experimental diets (DM basis, %).
| Item | FM (control) | β-Conglycinin (7S) | Glycinin (11S) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | |||
| Brown fishmeal | 40.00 | 40.00 | 40.00 |
| Casein | 11.20 | 6.00 | 4.00 |
| Gelatin | 2.80 | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| β-Conglycinin | 0.00 | 7.00 | 0.00 |
| Glycinin | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.00 |
| Wheat flour | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
| Corn starch | 13.13 | 13.26 | 12.69 |
| Fish oil | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Mineral premix | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| L-Lysine | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
| L-Methionine | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
| L-Arginine | 1.69 | 1.24 | 1.22 |
| L-Leucine | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Others | 4.68 | 4.68 | 4.68 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels | |||
| Lysine | 3.30 | 3.21 | 3.21 |
| Methionine | 1.34 | 1.28 | 1.31 |
| Arginine | 3.68 | 3.46 | 3.79 |
| Leucine | 3.75 | 3.53 | 3.68 |
| Crude protein | 48.78 | 47.66 | 48.21 |
| Crude lipid | 11.36 | 11.00 | 11.03 |
| Ash | 8.00 | 8.13 | 8.38 |
| Moisture | 7.51 | 7.35 | 7.55 |
The vitamin and mineral premixes were purchased from Qingdao Master Biotech Co., Ltd (Qingdao, China).
Others: soybean lecithin, 1.50%; soybean oil, 1.50%; calcium monophosphate, 1.00%; ethoxyquin, 0.03%; vitamin C (35%), 0.05%; attractant, 0.10%; choline chloride, 0.50%.
All the nutrient levels were measured values.
Growth performance of fish fed the experimental diets (n = 4).
| Item | FM (control) | 7S | 11S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBW | 50.83 ± 0.55b | 46.47 ± 0.63a | 45.31 ± 1.66a | 0.019 |
| WGR | 497.63 ± 6.49b | 446.86 ± 7.21a | 432.69 ± 19.47a | 0.019 |
| SGR | 3.19 ± 0.02b | 3.03 ± 0.02a | 2.98 ± 0.06a | 0.023 |
| PER | 2.44 ± 0.11 | 2.05 ± 0.14 | 2.12 ± 0.08 | 0.100 |
| FCR | 0.84 ± 0.04a | 1.03 ± 0.07b | 0.98 ± 0.04ab | 0.049 |
| FI | 2.11 ± 0.08 | 2.35 ± 0.02 | 2.33 ± 0.07 | 0.070 |
| SR | 97.50 ± 1.60 | 97.50 ± 0.83 | 98.34 ± 0.96 | 0.849 |
FM = fishmeal; 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin; FBW = final body weight.
a, bDifferent superscript letters in each row indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Weight gain rate (WGR) = 100 × (Final body weight – Initial body weight)/Initial body weight.
Specific growth rate (SGR) = 100 × [ln (Final body weight) – ln (Initial body weight)]/Days.
Protein efficiency ratio (PER) = Wet weight gain/Total protein intake.
Survival rate (FCR) = Total diet intake/Total wet weight gain.
Feed intake (FI) = 100 × Total diet intake/[(Initial body weight/Final body weight)/2 × Days].
Survival rate (SR) = 100 × The final fish number/The initial fish number.
Morphologic indexes of fish fed the experimental diets (n = 4).
| Item | FM (control) | 7S | 11S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 3.23 ± 0.07 | 3.41 ± 0.10 | 3.55 ± 0.17 | 0.189 |
| VSI | 8.85 ± 0.26 | 9.52 ± 0.30 | 9.13 ± 0.35 | 0.309 |
| ISI | 2.96 ± 0.17 | 3.03 ± 0.13 | 2.77 ± 0.17 | 0.487 |
| HIS | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 0.433 |
| ILI | 116.63 ± 2.70a | 126.63 ± 3.29b | 117.01 ± 3.66a | 0.048 |
FM = fishmeal; 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
a, bDifferent superscript letters in each row indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Condition factor (CF) = 100 × Body wet weight (g)/Body length (cm)3.
Viscerosomatic index (VSI) = 100 × Viscerosomatic wet weight (g)/Body wet weight (g).
Intestinal somatic index (ISI) = 100 × Intestinal somatic wet weight (g)/Body wet weight (g).
Hepatosomatic index (HSI) = 100 × Liver wet weight (g)/Body wet weight (g).
Intestinal length index (ILI) = 100 × Intestine length (cm)/Total body length (cm).
Fig. 2Histological examinations of the proximal intestine (PI, A), mid intestine (MI, B), and distal intestine (DI, C) in fish fed differential experiment diets for 8 weeks (200 ×, scale bar = 100 μm). (D), (E) and (F) represent the thickness of the intestinal muscular layer (MLT), plica height (PH), plica width (PW), and goblet cell (GC) number, respectively. Results are represented as means ± SEM (n = 4) and analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05). FM = fishmeal (control); 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin. LP = lamina propria.
Fig. 3Detection of cell proliferation of distal intestine in fish after 12 h of intraperitoneal injection using EdU (200 ×, scale bar = 100 μm). FM = fishmeal (control); 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
The intestinal immune indexes of fish fed the experimental diets (n = 4).
| Item | FM (control) | 7S | 11S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYS, U/g tissue | 0.06 ± 0.00c | 0.04 ± 0.00a | 0.05 ± 0.00b | 0.001 |
| ACP, U/g tissue | 0.07 ± 0.00a | 0.06 ± 0.00a | 0.08 ± 0.00b | 0.001 |
| C3, μg/g tissue | 471.65 ± 32.01b | 322.53 ± 17.13a | 633.42 ± 37.63c | 0.001 |
| C4, μg/g tissue | 1,452.00 ± 39.43b | 947.77 ± 26.38a | 1,653.72 ± 73.23c | <0.001 |
| IgM, μg/g tissue | 213.23 ± 6.67b | 150.21 ± 14.86a | 208.73 ± 9.41b | 0.004 |
| Cathelicidin, μg/g tissue | 42.11 ± 2.04 | 44.96 ± 0.60 | 43.62 ± 0.83 | 0.354 |
| Caspase-3, U/g tissue | 392.71 ± 20.25a | 475.23 ± 21.04b | 394.34 ± 21.68a | <0.001 |
| Caspase-9, U/g tissue | 0.61 ± 0.02a | 0.82 ± 0.03b | 0.76 ± 0.02b | <0.001 |
FM = fishmeal; 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin; LYS = lysozyme; ACP = acid phosphatase; C3 = complement 3; C4 = complement 4; IgM = immunoglobulin M.
a, bDifferent superscript letters in each row indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Alpha diversity analysis of the distal intestine of fish fed the experimental diets (n = 3).
| Item | FM (control) | 7S | 11S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACE | 651.76 ± 77.81 | 778.34 ± 127.37 | 469.25 ± 15.19 | 0.112 |
| Chao1 | 685.60 ± 84.45 | 800.35 ± 131.65 | 501.56 ± 20.69 | 0.143 |
| Simpson | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.208 |
| Shannon | 4.79 ± 0.31 | 4.95 ± 0.24 | 4.20 ± 0.50 | 0.231 |
FM = fishmeal; 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
Fig. 4Principal co-ordinates analysis of intestinal flora. FM = fishmeal (control); 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
Fig. 5The distal intestine microbiota at phylum levels in the 3 groups of fish fed the differential experimental diets. (A) Relative abundances of the distal intestine microbiota. (B) Results for the top-four phylum level are represented as means ± SEM (n = 3) and analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Same or no letters indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05). FM = fishmeal (control); 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
Fig. 6The distal intestine microbiota at class levels in the 3 groups of fish fed the differential experimental diets. (A) Relative abundances of the distal intestine microbiota. (B) Results for the top-five class level are represented as means ± SEM (n = 3) and analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Same or no letters indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05). FM = fishmeal (control); 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
Fig. 7The distal intestine microbiota at genus levels in the 3 groups of fish fed the differential experimental diets. (A) Relative abundances of the distal intestine microbiota. (B) Results for the top-ten genus level are represented as means ± SEM (n = 3) and analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05). FM = fishmeal (control); 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.
Fig. 8Comparisons of the abundance of potentially beneficial or pathogenic microbe genera in group FM with that in groups 7S and 11S. Values are means ± SEM of the 3 replicates. Asterisk (∗) represents a significant difference of P < 0.05 between groups. Double asterisks (∗∗) denote a highly significant difference of P < 0.01 between groups. FM = fishmeal; 7S = β-conglycinin; 11S = glycinin.