| Literature DB >> 35600338 |
Han Xu1,2, Ximing Wang2, Chaoqun Guan2, Ru Tan2, Qing Yang3, Qi Zhang2, Aie Liu4, Qingwei Liu1,2.
Abstract
The objective of this research is to explore the value of whole-thyroid CT-based radiomics in predicting benign (noncancerous) and malignant thyroid nodules. The imaging and clinical data of 161 patients with thyroid nodules that were confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. The entire thyroid regions of interest (ROIs) were manually sketched for all 161 cases. After extracting CT radiomic features, the patients were divided into a training group (128 cases) and a test group (33 cases) according to the 4:1 ratio with stratified random sampling (fivefold cross validation). All the data were normalized by the maximum absolute value and screened using selection operator regression analysis and K best. The data generation model was trained by logistic regression. The effectiveness of the model in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules was validated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. After data grouping, eigenvalue screening, and data training, the logistic regression model with the maximum absolute value normalized was constructed. For the training group, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 94.4% (95% confidence interval: 0.941-0.977); the sensitivity and specificity were 89.7% and 86.7%, respectively; and the diagnostic accuracy was 87.6%. For the test group, the AUC was 94.2% (95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.999); the sensitivity and specificity were 89.4% and 86.8%, respectively; and the diagnostic accuracy was 87.6%. The CT radiomic model of the entire thyroid gland is highly efficient in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis; differentiation; radiomics; thyroid disease; tomography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35600338 PMCID: PMC9117640 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.828259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Flowchart of Radiomics Analysis.
Figure 2F1-Score of 16 Optimal Features (the higher the F1-score, the greater the feature weight).
Figure 3ROC Curve of Training Group (different subsets are shown by different-colored curves; the yellow curve is the mean value curve).
Figure 4ROC Curve of Testing Group (different subsets are shown by different-colored curves; the yellow curve is the mean value curve).