Neurometabolite Levels and Relevance to Central Sensitization in Chronic Orofacial Pain Patients: A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study.

Background: Refractory chronic pain in the orofacial region involves central sensitization (CS). However, not all chronic pain patients exhibit CS. An objective assessment of CS may be useful for pain management. Changes in the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neural activity or excessive activity of nerves and glial cells may cause CS and contribute to pain chronification. Patients and
Methods: 1H-magnetic resonance spectra were acquired from the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and thalamus in 20 patients with chronic orofacial pain and suspected CS, and 21 healthy volunteers, using a single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy sequence. The patients were assessed using the Central Sensitization Inventory.
Results: Aspartate/total creatine (tCr) and glutathione in the ACC were significantly higher in the patient group. However, no significant difference was observed between groups in the neurometabolites measured in the thalamus. Patients also exhibited a tendency for increased gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)/tCr in the ACC. There were positive relationships between Central Sensitization Inventory scores and glutamate + glutamine (Glx) in the thalamus, a positive trend for Glx in the ACC and a negative relationship for GABA/tCr in the ACC.
Conclusion: The high levels of aspartate/tCr and glutathione in the patient group suggest excitatory neuronal activity and hyperactivity of neurons and glial cells. The correlation analysis results suggest that excitatory and inhibitory neurometabolites are involved in the chronification of orofacial pain, including CS.

Introduction

Chronic pain in the orofacial region becomes refractory and degrades patients’ quality of life in many cases. Central sensitization (CS) is a possible cause of the transition from acute to chronic pain.1 CS is clinically characterized by disproportionate pain, in which the severity of pain and functional disability are disproportionate to detectable tissue damage and pathophysiology, or which occurs regardless of peripheral lesions.2 CS has been defined as “an amplification of neural signaling within the central nervous system that elicits pain hypersensitivity.”3 Altered brain and brainstem function in the pain processing system corresponds to CS, including functional connectivity changes among brain regions,4 neural plasticity, such as new synapse formation5 and long-term potentiation,6 imbalance of the activity between excitatory and inhibitory neurons,7 and excess glial cell activation.8 To evaluate CS, neurophysiological examinations (quantitative sensory testing, and various stimuli),9 questionnaires,10 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and cerebral metabolite measurement (proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: 1H-MRS) have been used in medical practice and research.

Hyperactivity or hypoactivity of excitatory and inhibitory neurons are important factors in CS. Glutamate (Glu) is a prominent excitatory neurometabolite in the central nervous system and activates several receptors, such as the N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor, in which excessive activation causes high permeability to calcium and sodium ions, and acts as both a trigger and effector of CS.11 Phosphorylation of these receptors increases their hypersensitivity and decreases inhibitory transmission by reducing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine tonic inhibition.12 Positive allosteric modulation of the GABA-A receptor reduces CS.13 1H-MRS can be used for noninvasive quantitative measurement of neurometabolites related to excitatory and inhibitory neural activity in the human brain. Previous studies have detected changes in the levels of several neurometabolites corresponding to specific cerebral regions, and these changes have been extensively examined in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and thalamus in chronic pain patients. The ACC and thalamus are involved in the affective components of pain and the essential relay of nociceptive inputs to transmit signals from the brainstem to the cortex, respectively. Moreover, the mediodorsal and intralaminar thalamic nuclei send nociceptive signals to the ACC, suggesting abnormal processing of the affective component.14,15 Various increases or decreases in the patterns of excitatory and inhibitory neurometabolites have been observed in these brain regions in previous 1H-MRS studies of chronic pain.16

1H-MRS studies have been conducted to measure Glu, glutamine (Gln), and GABA in a range of pain conditions and various brain regions.16 However, neurometabolite findings of studies examining chronic pain remain controversial. Trends toward increases in both Glu/total creatine (tCr) and Glu + Gln (Glx)/tCr have been reported in the ACC in patients with various chronic pain conditions in comparison with healthy controls,17 whereas significantly lower Glx or Glu in ACC were reported in patients with severe neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord injury18 and low back pain.19 Other studies reported no significant changes in excitatory or inhibitory neurometabolites in chronic pain patients with low back pain,20,21 knee osteoarthritis,22 musculoskeletal pain23 and migraine.24 The level of GABA in ACC has been reported to be reduced in fibromyalgia25 and pelvic pain patients.26 Migraine patients were found to exhibit significantly increased levels of Glx in the thalamus,27 whereas lower GABA levels were observed in patients with neuropathic pain in the trigeminal regions28 and spinal cord.29 Excitatory neurometabolites in the thalamus were reported to exhibit no significant differences in patients with fibromyalgia30,31 and migraine.24

The nociceptive pathway via the trigeminal nerve differs from that in the extremities of the limbs and body. Few 1H-MRS studies have examined the orofacial region. In addition, although numerous studies have investigated chronic pain, not all chronic pain patients exhibit CS. Therefore, in the current study we aimed to elucidate changes in neurometabolites associated with excitatory and inhibitory neural and glial activity in the ACC and thalamus in CS patients with chronic orofacial pain, and to examine the correlation between CS questionnaire responses and neurometabolite levels.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Twenty patients (18 females and two males) with chronic pain in the orofacial region were recruited from the pain clinic of Tokyo Dental College at Suidobashi Hospital. The patients had spontaneous and persistently continuing pain with widespread dysesthesia and/or static allodynia. One of the criteria for CS included disproportionate pain regardless of peripheral lesions2 as determined by imaging examinations, such as computed tomography, conventional MRI, MR neurography (three-dimensional volume rendering magnetic resonance neurography: 3DVR-MRN),32 and 3D anisotropy contrast (3DAC) on the basis of diffusion-weighted imaging.33 In addition, pain control was difficult, and patients were unresponsive or only temporarily responsive to conventional pain therapies such as various medications, local or nerve block anesthesia and local anesthetic injection into myofascial trigger points. Patients’ mean age was 52.4 ± 12.8 years (mean ± standard deviation: SD). Pain duration ranged from 0.5 to 25 years, and the mean duration was 7.6 ± 7.3 years (mean ± SD). Table 1 shows patients’ site and type of pain, occasion of pain, International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP)34 and medications. Already prescribed medication was continued during the study. ICOP classified the patients into three groups: 1) probable persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain (n = 9), 2) other trigeminal neuropathic pain (n = 5) and 3) chronic primary myofascial orofacial pain (n = 6) (as shown in Table 1). The type of pain was used to categorize patients into three groups: 1) chronic postsurgical pain (n = 12), 2) myofascial pain (n = 6) and 3) others (n = 2) (as shown in Table 1).

Table 1

Orofacial Chronic Pain Patients’ Characteristics

	Age	Sex (F/M)	Site and Type of Pain	ICOP	Side	Duration (Years)	Occasion	Temporary Analgesic Effect	CSI Score
1	56	F	CPSP of mandible (37)	6-3-3	L	15	37 pulpect	SGB, ATP and Mg (IV)	46
2	59	F	Chronic pain of maxilla	6-3-3	R	4	18 ext	Acetaminophen	42
3	65	F	Neuropathy of chin, CPSP	4-1-2	R	2	Frenoplasty	Pregabalin	12
4	79	F	CPSP of mandible (36)	6-3-3	L	8	Occlusal trauma, 36 ext	SGB, ATP and Mg (IV)	33
5	57	F	Myofascial pain of masseter	2-1-2	R	8	TMD, occlusal adjustment, disc excision	SGB, duloxetine, tramadol	56
6	44	F	Neuropathy of tongue, CPSP	4-1-2	R	1.3	Angioma removal	Mirogabalin, dextromethorphan	40
7	39	F	CPSP of mandible (46), myofascial pain of masseter	6-3-3	R > L	2	46 endodontics	SGB, Mg (IV)	24
8	46	F	Myofascial pain of lateral pterygoid	2-1-2	L < R	20	TMD, occlusal adjustment	Amitriptyline, tramadol, aripiprazole	16
9	64	F	Neuropathy of lip, CPSP	4-1-2	R	6	36, 37 dental implant	None	NA
10	49	F	Myofascial pain of masseter and temporalis	2-1-2	L < R	10	TMD, occlusal adjustment	Trigger point injection, Mg (IV)	13
11	69	F	Myofascial pain of masseter	2-1-2	L	9	Practicing violin	SGB	11
12	60	F	CPSP of maxilla (16)	6-3-3	R	0.5	16 ext	Amitriptyline, pregabalin	27
13	33	F	CPSP of maxilla (15, 25)	6-3-3	L > R	2.3	15 ext, 25 pulpect	Tramadol	27
14	46	F	Myofascial pain of masseter	2-1-2	R	10	48 ext, occlusal adjustment	Mg (IV)	59
15	44	F	CPSP of mandible(45), myofascial pain of masseter	6-3-3	R	3	45 ext, occlusal adjustment	BZD, non-BZD hypnotic, muscle relaxant and many others	28
16	40	M	Neuropathy of tongue, CPSP	4-1-2	L	0.5	IAN block injection	Mirogabalin	11
17	64	F	Neuropathy of chin and lip, CPSP	4-1-2	R	20	Mental nerve alcohol block	Mirogabalin, Mg (IV)	26
18	49	F	Myofascial pain of masseter	2-1-2	R	0.6	36 dental treatments	Amitriptyline, pregabalin, midazolam (IV)	43
19	56	F	CPSP of mandible (48)	6-3-3	R	25	48 ext	Amitriptyline	31
20	28	M	CPSP of mandible (15)	6-3-3	R	5	15 ext	None	10

Notes: The dental formula was in accord with the FDI World Dental Federation tooth numbering system. L > R and L < R represent the side with more severe ongoing chronic pain.

Abbreviations: CSI, Central Sensitization Inventory; ICOP, International Classification of Orofacial Pain; 6-3-3, probable persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain; 4-1-2, other trigeminal neuropathic pain; 2-1-2, chronic primary myofascial orofacial pain; CPSP, chronic postsurgical pain; ext, extraction of tooth; Pulpect, pulpectomy; TMD, temporomandibular joint disorder; IAN, inferior alveolar nerve; IV, intra venous drip infusion; SGB, stellate ganglion block; BZD, benzodiazepine; NA, not applicable.

Twenty-one sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers (19 females and two males) without any pain, medication for central nervous system conditions, or cerebral nerve disease participated. The mean age of the control group was 53.2 ± 12.9 years (mean ± SD), and there was no significant difference in age between the control group and the patient group (p = 0.61, Student’s t-test).

All participants provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Dental College (#923).

Questionnaire Evaluation

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was used as a self-report questionnaire tool.10 The patients completed the Japanese version of the CSI.35 Patients were given the questionnaire to fill out at home and return to us on a day close to the MRI scanning. Scores were calculated using a five-point evaluation for 25 question items in part A of the CSI, and total scores ranged from 0 to 100.

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

All experiments were performed using a 3.0 T Ingenia Philips MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) with a 32-channel receive head coil and a multitransmit body coil. The MRS protocol included a single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with chemical-shift selective water suppression. The MRS acquisition parameters were as follows: repetition time/echo time (TE) = 2000/35 ms, complex points for the spectral data = 1024, and total number of acquisitions = 128. The linewidth of the water spectrum in magnitude mode became smaller than 18 Hz after shimming.

Whole brain images were acquired using sagittal 3D T1-weighted gradient echo imaging with the following parameters: field of view (FOV) = 25.6×25.6 cm, voxel size = 0.5×0.5×0.5 mm, repetition time/TE = 6.3/3.5 ms and flip angle = 8°.

Voxel Location

1H-MRS voxels of interest (VOIs) were set in the ACC (20×30×20 mm) and thalamus (20×20×20 mm), as shown in Figure 1. VOIs in the ACC were positioned parallel to and above the corpus callosum, starting from the genu of the corpus callosum and extending 3 cm posteriorly and covered left and right ACC17 in patients. VOIs in the thalamus were set in the side that was contralateral to that of the ongoing chronic pain. Similar VOIs were located in a healthy volunteer who matched the patients in terms of sex and approximate age.

Figure 1

Positions of voxels of interests.

MRS Data Processing and Measurement

The MRS data were processed using a linear combination model (LCModel Version 6.3).36 Tissue composition inside the VOI was calculated on the basis of the segmentation of 3D T1-weighted images using Gannet3.0.37 Water concentrations used in the LCModel analysis were calculated on the basis of the volume fractions of white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Metabolite concentrations were then divided by the fraction of WM and GM to correct for CSF inside the VOI, because metabolites are mainly present in the WM and GM.38 Water scaling and eddy-current correction were performed and metabolites were fitted in the chemical shift range (0.2–4.2 ppm).

We measured Glu, Glx, aspartate (Asp)/tCr, GABA/tCr, and glutathione (GSH). The tCr (Cr + PCr) was used for normalization, because tCr is widely used as an internal reference in human studies.39 Glu was analyzed independently because it was reliably determined in high quality control of spectra at 3T with a short TE.40 Glx and GABA/tCr were evaluated for correlation analysis between the neurometabolites and CSI scores in the patient group.

Metabolites processed by the LCModel with Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds < 25% for GSH and 15% for the others were analyzed. A representative 1H MR spectrum obtained from the ACC and thalamus, LCModel spectral fit, and neurometabolite fits in a patient are shown in Figure 2. Mean signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ± SD values for patients and controls were 27.35 ± 6.67, 31.29 ± 2.97 in the ACC and 19.55 ± 2.63, 20.38 ± 2.58 in the thalamus, respectively. Mean full-width of half maximum (FWHM) ± SD values for the patients and controls were 0.033 ± 0.010 ppm and 0.037 ± 0.006 ppm in the ACC and 0.051 ± 0.005 ppm and 0.049 ± 0.006 ppm in the thalamus, respectively. No significant differences were observed in FWHM in both regions between the patients and the controls (F[1, 78] = 2.9929, p = 0.0876, two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Patients’ data showed lower SNR compared with that of the controls in the ACC, but there were no significant differences in the thalamus (F[1, 78] = 3.9945, p = 0.04913, Tukey’s honestly significant difference test for post hoc test: p = 0.0141 [ACC], p = 0.914 [thalamus]).

Figure 2

Spectra and LCModel fitting.

Statistical Analysis

Group differences were tested using Student’s t-test with Bonferroni-adjusted p-value < 0.005 on each 1H-MRS measure (Glu, Glx, Asp/tCr, GABA/tCr, and GSH) separately for each of the two voxel regions in ACC and thalamus between the patients and the controls. Correlation coefficients were calculated between the neurometabolites (Glx and GABA/tCr) of the two regions and CSI scores in the patient group. Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, and Spearman correlation coefficient, ρ, were calculated for normal and non-normal distribution data, respectively. Normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Correlation coefficients were interpreted as follows: >0.75, good to excellent relationship; 0.50 to 0.75, moderate to good relationship; 0.25 to 0.50, fair relationship; and 0.00 to 0.25, little or no relationship.41 The p-values for each correlation coefficient were calculated.

The CSI score and five metabolites in the two regions were tested at the 5% significance level among three patient groups classified by ICOP and the type of pain, using one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica version 13 (TIBCO Software Inc. CA, USA).

Results

The levels of neurometabolites and p-values between the patient group and healthy controls are shown in Table 2. Asp/tCr and GSH were significantly higher in the patient group in the ACC (Student’s t-test, Bonferroni-adjusted p-value < 0.005). Patients showed a tendency toward increased GABA/tCr in the ACC, although this effect did not reach significance (p = 0.0388). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any neurometabolite in the thalamus.

Table 2

Neurometabolite Levels

Neurometabolite	Region	Group Means (SD)		p-value
		Patients	Controls
Asp/tCr	ACC	0.500 (0.181)	0.364 (0.062)	0.004*
	Thal	0.359 (0.103)	0.341 (0.104)	0.846
GABA/tCr	ACC	0.179 (0.063)	0.140 (0.054)	0.039
	Thal	0.125 (0.054)	0.112 (0.048)	0.251
GSH	ACC	1.78 (0.272)	1.531 (0.238)	0.003*
	Thal	1.83 (0.485)	1.89 (0.405)	0.535
Glu	ACC	9.50 (1.418)	9.089 (0.488)	0.235
	Thal	6.507 (1.204)	6.117 (0.855)	0.154
Glx	ACC	12.402 (2.557)	12.096 (0.889)	0.617
	Thal	9.824 (2.370)	9.241 (1.790)	0.382

Note: *Student’s t-test with Bonferroni-adjusted p-value < 0.005.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Asp, aspartate; tCr, creatine (Cr) + PCr; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; GSH, glutathione; Glx, glutamate (Glu) + glutamine (Gln); ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Thal, thalamus.

A moderate to good relationship between Glx and CSI scores was observed in the thalamus (r = 0.556, p = 0.013) (Figure 3A). Fair relationships were found between GABA/tCr (r = −0.467, p = 0.044) and Glx (ρ = 0.420, p = 0.074) in the ACC (Figure 3B and C). GABA/tCr showed little or no relationship in the thalamus (r = −0.248, p = 0.307) (Figure 3D).

Figure 3

Correlation between CSI scores and neurometabolites.

There were no significant differences among the three patient groups classified by ICOP for CSI score (F[2, 16] = 1.508, p = 0.861) and each neurometabolite in the two regions (F[10, 60] = 1.332, p = 0.235), and by the type of pain for CSI score (F[2, 16] = 0.398, p = 0.678) and each neurometabolite in the two regions (F[10, 60] = 0.788, p = 0.641).

Discussion

1H-MRS revealed higher levels of Asp/tCr and GSH in the ACC in chronic orofacial pain patients compared with the levels in healthy controls, but no differences in metabolite levels in the thalamus. Glx levels in the ACC and thalamus indicated a positively moderate to good or fair relationship with CSI scores, whereas GABA/tCr levels in the ACC showed a negatively fair relationship with CSI scores.

Asp is an excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter and a highly selective agonist for NMDA receptor-type glutamate receptors,42 and is also part of a metabolic pathway involved in the production of NAA.43 Although Asp has not been frequently evaluated in 1H-MRS studies of pain, a complex combination of alterations of Asp/Cr, N-acetyl aspartate/Cr, and Gln/Cre in ACC has been reported to differentiate migraine patients from controls.44 These three metabolites act as eventual precursors of Glu.45 Glu is transported into mitochondria via the Asp/Glu carrier, then decarboxylated and converted to Asp.46 This process is an essential component of the malate/Asp NDH shuttle, which links glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle in brain cells, as well as neurotransmitter labeling from glucose and the formation of the neurotransmitter Glu from Gln Asp aminotransferase in astrocytes and neurons. This shuttle is also essential for transferring the reducing equivalents from glycolysis to the mitochondrial electron transport chain and subsequent oxidative phosphorylation.47 Consequently, increased levels of Asp suggest both neural and glial hyperactivity in ACC. Regarding increases in the levels of excitatory neurotransmitters in ACC, our results are consistent with those of a previous MRS study of chronic pain in miscellaneous pain patients.17

Long-term potentiation of neuronal synapses in ACC is thought to play an important role in the development of CS.48 Short-term plasticity in ACC is also related to CS, and nociceptive signals are transmitted through the thalamic-anterior cingulate pathway.49 The absence of group differences in neurometabolites in the thalamus in the current study suggests the CS may involve reduced activity of this pathway, or that CS was already established in the ACC.

GSH is a major intracellular antioxidant, and its prevalence in glial cells is approximately twice that in neurons.50 The fundamental role of GSH is detoxification of reactive oxygen species, which is critical for maintaining normal functioning of the human brain.51 Excessive stimulation of the NMDA receptor and an influx of calcium ions causes the production of excess free radicals and oxidative stress, which leads to CS and cellular apoptosis.52 GSH provides neuroprotection and modulates the activity of several membrane receptors, including NMDA receptors.53 Previous studies reported that GSH decreased the expression of NMDA receptor subunit GluN1, and inhibited mechanical allodynia and CS in chronic post-ischemia pain model rats.54 A GABA agonist and endomorphin-1 increased the pain threshold and GSH in spinal cord injury model rats.55 Glu-induced GABA release was prolonged by GSH and oxidized GSH in rat hippocampal slices.56 In addition, Asp induced GABA release via the selective activation of NMDA receptors in retina cells.57 In the current study, significantly higher Asp/tCr and a trend toward higher GABA/tCr compared with the levels in controls suggests that excessive activation of NMDA receptors induced by pain causes the production of GSH in astrocytes, maintains oxidative stress, and modulates the activation of NMDA receptors and release of GABA.

The CSI can be used to assess both somatic and emotional complaints that are commonly associated with CS. Few studies have investigated the associations between neurometabolite levels and CSI scores. Aguila et al reported a positive relationship between GABA levels and CSI scores in posterior cingulate cortex in migraine patients,58 whereas a negative correlation between GABA/tCr in the ACC and CSI scores was observed in the current study. In addition, Aguila et al’s research group recently reported that migraine and other chronic pain patients exhibited significantly higher CSI scores than controls, whereas GABA levels in ACC were not significantly different in any of the examined pain groups compared with levels in healthy controls.59 In contrast, the level of GABA in ACC was negatively correlated with other indices associated with chronic pain, such as the intensity of ongoing osteoarthritis pain22 and fibromyalgia,60 and the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index for patients with abdominal pain.40 The current results revealed a positive correlation between Glx and Gln levels in ACC and CSI scores. These findings suggest that an imbalance between GABA and glutamate neural activity may promote the development of CS. Our findings are consistent with those of several previous investigations. In fibromyalgia patients with low levels of GABA, the level of Glx was found to be negatively correlated with clinical pain scores after transcranial direct current stimulation treatment.60 Furthermore, the Glu/GABA ratio was positively associated with anxiety and depressive scores in veterans with chronic pain23 and in chronic back pain patients.21 Inhibitory-excitatory imbalances in the ACC may be related to both the somatosensory and emotional aspects of CS.

The thalamus is an essential relay for trigeminal-nociceptive inputs that are transmitted from the medulla oblongata to the cortices. In the current study, Glx in the thalamus was positively correlated with CSI scores. Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the correlation between Glu and Gln levels and pain intensity. Although the level of Glx in the thalamus of migraine patients was reported to be higher than that in healthy controls, correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between this neurometabolite and pain intensity during the last pain attack.27 However, a significant positive correlation was found between Glu/Cr of the left thalamus and visual analog scale pain scores in fibromyalgia patients.31 The Glx level was correlated with pain sensitivity in experimental pain stimulation in healthy individuals.61 A previous study reported a strong correlation between nociceptive-related neuronal activity in the thalamus and local field potentials in the ACC in mice.62 Nociceptive thalamocingulate connections are considered to be crucial to the transition from acute nociceptive stimulation to chronic pain conditions. Because the pain duration of our patient group ranged from 0.5 to 25 years, our findings were likely to have reflected the transition to CS.

The same metabolites were not detected in the correlation analysis within patient groups and the comparison between patients and the controls. Asp/tCr and GSH indicated little or no relationship (r < 0.2) with CSI score in the ACC and thalamus. Although Asp/tCr and GSH were elevated in the patient group, they did not fluctuate in conjunction with the severity of central sensitization. Conversely, Glx and GABA/tCr, which were correlated with CSI scores, varied in conjunction with severity, although the patient group did not necessarily show higher values than controls. The main reason the same metabolites were not detected might be related to differences in the method used to search for the relationship between CSI and metabolites, and the method used to test for high and low metabolite levels between the groups.

There were no significant differences among the three groups classified by ICOP and the type of pain for both CSI score and each metabolite. Although the absence of differences might have been caused by the small sample size in the current study, the findings suggested that CS and the levels of associated neurometabolites can fluctuate regardless of classification by diagnosis and the characteristics of pain.

The current study involved several limitations. We did not use spectral editing techniques such as J-difference editing MEGA-PRESS (MEscher-GArwood-Point RESolved Spectroscopy) or multiple quantum coherence editing. Thus, neurometabolites with similar spectral peaks were possibly segregated into imprecise concentrations, including Asp, GSH, GABA, Glu, and Gln. The Asp concentration in the ACC of healthy controls in the current study (2.01 ± 0.327 mM, mean ± SD) was lower than that reported in a previous study using MEGA-PRESS (2.80 ± 0.31 mM).63 Asp could be detected in PRESS, but exhibited weak to moderate correlations with other measures.64 Measurements that separate Asp from other neurometabolites could reveal the role of Asp and imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory neural activity to develop CS in ACC. Regarding GSH, one previous study reported that estimated GSH in ACC was not significantly different between PRESS and MEGA-PRESS using a 3T system.65 In addition, the voxel size in the thalamus was larger than the region of the trigeminal nucleus in size and lower SNR in patients compared with the levels in controls in the ACC, which is likely to have affected the results. Regarding GABA, the results of the current study should be considered as preliminary findings because the measurements made by PRESS have limited accuracy.64 Moreover, medication was not controlled in our patients, and anticonvulsants and antidepressants were frequently used (Table 1). A previous study reported that a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor caused changes in the levels of GABA in the ACC but not the levels of Glu or Gln.66 Therefore, the possibility that medication influenced the current results cannot be excluded. Moreover, the correlation coefficients were not high. Therefore, the correlation analysis in this study should be considered as exploratory. Finally, in the Japanese version of the CSI, scores represent subclinical (0–29), mild (30–39), moderate (40–49), severe (50–59), and extreme (> 60) states.35 Thus, the current study sample included subclinical patients (Table 1). However, it is possible that the accompanying symptoms associated with chronic pain listed in the questionnaire were not matched to patients with orofacial pain, because the CSI was originally developed for a population of patients with chronic pain in the whole musculoskeletal system. This issue should be examined in more depth in future studies.

Conclusion

Chronic orofacial pain patients exhibited higher Asp/tCr, and GSH in the ACC, suggesting that the activity of excitatory neurons and glial cells is related to the chronicity of emotional-affective aspects of pain. In addition, the results revealed positive relationships between CSI scores and Glx in the thalamus, as well as trends toward a positive relationship with Glx in ACC and a negative relationship with GABA/tCr in the ACC. These findings suggest that neuronal and glial activities and excitatory and inhibitory neurometabolites are related to the chronification of orofacial pain, including CS. The current findings indicate that the combined use of questionnaires and 1H-MRS may increase the accuracy of CS diagnosis.