Literature DB >> 35599780

Childhood Trauma, the HPA Axis and Psychiatric Illnesses: A Targeted Literature Synthesis.

Felim Murphy1, Anurag Nasa2, Dearbhla Cullinane3, Kesidha Raajakesary2, Areej Gazzaz1, Vitallia Sooknarine1, Madeline Haines2, Elena Roman2, Linda Kelly1, Aisling O'Neill1, Mary Cannon1, Darren William Roddy2.   

Abstract

Studies of early life stress (ELS) demonstrate the long-lasting effects of acute and chronic stress on developmental trajectories. Such experiences can become biologically consolidated, creating individual vulnerability to psychological and psychiatric issues later in life. The hippocampus, amygdala, and the medial prefrontal cortex are all important limbic structures involved in the processes that undermine mental health. Hyperarousal of the sympathetic nervous system with sustained allostatic load along the Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal (HPA) axis and its connections has been theorized as the basis for adult psychopathology following early childhood trauma. In this review we synthesize current understandings and hypotheses concerning the neurobiological link between childhood trauma, the HPA axis, and adult psychiatric illness. We examine the mechanisms at play in the brain of the developing child and discuss how adverse environmental stimuli may become biologically incorporated into the structure and function of the adult brain via a discussion of the neurosequential model of development, sensitive periods and plasticity. The HPA connections and brain areas implicated in ELS and psychopathology are also explored. In a targeted review of HPA activation in mood and psychotic disorders, cortisol is generally elevated across mood and psychotic disorders. However, in bipolar disorder and psychosis patients with previous early life stress, blunted cortisol responses are found to awakening, psychological stressors and physiological manipulation compared to patients without previous early life stress. These attenuated responses occur in bipolar and psychosis patients on a background of increased cortisol turnover. Although cortisol measures are generally raised in depression, the evidence for a different HPA activation profile in those with early life stress is inconclusive. Further research is needed to explore the stress responses commonalities between bipolar disorder and psychosis in those patients with early life stress.
Copyright © 2022 Murphy, Nasa, Cullinane, Raajakesary, Gazzaz, Sooknarine, Haines, Roman, Kelly, O'Neill, Cannon and Roddy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPA axis (hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal); childhood adversities; depression; development; psychosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35599780      PMCID: PMC9120425          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.748372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   5.435


Introduction

Alterations of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is one of the most notable neurobiological findings in psychiatry (1, 2). However, HPA changes are inconsistent both across and between psychiatric conditions. It is thought that early life stress (ELS) may influence subsequent HPA development and subsequent responses to stress, resulting in a vulnerability to psychiatric illness. Development of the human brain is complex, and is characterized by dynamic stages of plasticity and periods of complex biological and environmental integration. However, while early experiences have the capacity to shape the brain and give rise to vital developmental competencies such as language there is an equal potential for adverse exposures such as trauma-related stress to cause maladaptive developmental changes. Experiences of adverse events can become biologically consolidated, creating individual vulnerability to an array of psychological issues later in life (3, 4). In this review, we explore the developmental trajectory of the child and the psychopathological consequences of early childhood trauma. We also discuss the normal HPA-axis stress response and a targeted review of HPA-related findings in mood disorders and psychosis.

Early Life Stress and Trauma

Defining and Measuring Early Life Stress and Trauma

Stress may be classified into three distinct categories (5). “Positive stress,” referring to normative and short-lived adverse experiences with minor physiological change: e.g., meeting new people or changing daycare. “Tolerable stress,” as characterized by intense but short-lived adverse experiences such as the death of a family member or a natural disaster. The effects of this stress are thought to be reversible when accompanied by substantial support from a parent/adult, however tolerable stress may progress into the final subtype; “toxic stress.” Toxic stress is defined as intense adverse experiences enduring over a longer period, spanning weeks, months or years such as war, natural disasters, and physical, emotional and sexual violence. This form of stress may result in permanent physiological and psychological changes to the developing child. Although the terms “stress” and “trauma” have been used interchangeably in the literature, trauma can be more specifically associated with “toxic stress.” Various tools designed to assess adverse childhood experiences of stress and trauma exist (6). Using the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study, Felliti et al. designed a questionnaire examining the effects of psychological, physical and sexual abuse, alcohol and drug exposure, health related problems, and depression. They found that instances of toxic stress can be divided into three subtypes: abuse (physical, sexual, emotional), neglect (physical, emotional), and household dysfunction (domestic violence toward a parent, household substance abuse or other mental illness, problematic separation/divorce). These toxic stress/traumatic events in turn demonstrate strong associations with multidimensional negative health outcomes in adulthood, including adverse mental health issues, ischemic heart disease, cancer, chronic lung disease, skeletal fractures, and liver disease. Since the development of the ACE questionnaire, tools with greater specificity and validity have been developed, such as the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (7) and The 27-item Early Trauma Inventory Self-Report-Short Form (ETISR-SF) (8). Studies consistently demonstrate associations between poor health outcomes and childhood stress and trauma in the absence of protective factors (9).

Prevalence of Childhood Trauma

Epidemiological studies have shown a moderate to high prevalence of childhood trauma across populations. In the United Kingdom, 16% of children report having experienced trauma (10), but figures climb as high as 32% in Canada (11). However, a recent systematic review, recommends caution in interpreting national prevalence rates, detailing that emotional abuse in childhood is as common as 83% in Greece (12). These prevalence rates are a major cause of concern given the strong evidence supporting the persistent harmful effects of early traumatic experiences on adult psychological wellbeing (13), and the significant association between childhood trauma and the later occurrence of psychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar affective disorder (BD) and psychosis (2, 14, 15). Although there is a large body of research demonstrating that early childhood trauma is an important risk factors for psychopathology (16), a concrete understanding of the psychobiological processes behind this link remains limited. One potential mechanism is the disruption in the development of the stress response system during childhood, and its dysregulation into adulthood.

The Neurosequential Model of Neurodevelopment

According to the neurosequential model (17), the development of complex interrelated brain structures occurs sequentially and hierarchically. That is, the more complex and dispensable a system is to immediate survival, the later it develops. Regions involved in cardiorespiratory actions are fully functional at birth (e.g., the brainstem), while regions involved in higher executive functions such as emotional and behavioral regulation (e.g., the prefrontal cortex) require longer periods to organize and develop fully. The micro neurodevelopmental processes (i.e., synaptogenesis, myelination, migration, differentiation, arborization, and apoptosis) are scheduled within the developmental trajectory with a prearranged plan, with different brain areas developing at time-specific periods. However, these developmental processes are not independent of each other, and as such, factors influencing early neural development are likely to result in dysfunctions that also affect later development of higher cortical and limbic areas (18). Implications of the neurosequential model indicate that throughout human development, there are periods when certain biological systems are more malleable in response to environmental stimuli. These sensitive periods can be defined as time frames (or windows) during which developmental systems are vulnerable to certain stimuli (17, 19).

The Trajectory of a Sensitive Period

To demonstrate the importance of sensitive periods it is important to first understand how they operate. A sensitive period is triggered by intense neural activity initiated by an experience (20). This phenomenon can be characterized as the “opening” of a sensitive period, a point from which the developing system is receptive to environmental stimuli. The termination or “closing” of a sensitive period is less well understood. A review by Johnson (21) describes the termination phase of a sensitive period as a period of significant decline in plasticity (21), suggesting potential explanations: (1) termination arises from endogenous factors controlled by biological maturation or external environmental triggers; (2) learning is self-terminating; and (3) underlying plasticity does not reduce, but rather the constraints on plasticity become stable. According to the first view, maturational and/or environmental factors cause neurochemical changes in certain brain areas which increase the rate of pruning leaving strong existing patterns in full functional capacity. Areas with strong synaptic connectivity become permanently linked, and therefore indicate the end of a sensitive period. Several sensitive periods appear to end as an animal (or human) approaches sexual maturity (20). For instance, heightened plasticity in the sound localization pathway in barn owls declines as these juveniles approach adulthood (22). The second view proposes that the process of learning may produce changes in the brain that reduce the system's overall plasticity (23). Studies using computer-simulated neural networks (24) support the view that unspecialized brain systems have higher levels of plasticity, meaning that the connections within these systems are sensitive and adaptable. As the system specializes and changes, it becomes rigid and less sensitive as a result. For instance, it is more difficult to learn a second language as an adult when a primary language has already been learnt. This means that learning in one particular way impedes learning in another and, therefore, reduces plasticity. Unless earlier-learned abilities are neglected or lost, new learning may always be limited. The third view suggests that plasticity does not reduce but rather the constraints of plasticity become stable. For example, Thomas and Johnson (23) describe the change in information received by visual cortex regions as the distance between an infant's eyes increases (23). To keep up with the increasing distance between the eyes, the cortical areas of the brain must remain malleable. However, plasticity does not decline once growth stops. Instead, it becomes constrained by fixation of the eyes once the child stops growing. Thus, the plasticity becomes “hidden” by the features that constrain it. A further conceptual model known as the “stress acceleration model” argues that experiences of toxic stress or trauma may lead to faster (or accelerated) maturation of the neural circuits responsible for emotional processing and is therefore evidence of early system adaptation (25). The model suggests that support from a caregiver enables the child to develop emotional circuits following a normal developmental pattern. In the absence of this support, development of emotional circuitry is forced to accelerate. While this is potentially adaptive in the short term, premature closure of the sensitive period for emotional development may lead to poor emotional functioning in the long term (26).

Reopening Sensitive Periods

Recent work has also explored the possibility of “reopening” sensitive periods. For example, MDMA has been found to reopen a striatal-sensitive period involved in social reward learning in rodents (27). Fluoxetine (a treatment for MDD) can increase plasticity of the visual cortex in patients with amblyopia (28). Antidepressants are also associated with increased neurogenesis in the hippocampus (29) and may a potential mechanism for antidepressant effect. However, suppression of plasticity by fluoxetine elsewhere has also been reported (30). Valproate (a treatment for epilepsy and BD) can reopen auditory sensitive periods for determining absolute pitch (31). The reopening of sensitive periods for emotional circuitry such as those compromised in the HPA-axis are yet to be investigated.

The Stress Response

The human response to a threat results in hyperarousal; facilitated by the sympathetic nervous system. This hyperarousal can be viewed on a continuum, including states of calmness to arousal to alarm, fear, and terror – this final stage commonly referred to as the “fight, flight or freeze” response (32). Hyperarousal causes physiological changes such as increases in blood pressure, heart rate and respiration, cognitive changes such as hypervigilance and detachment from unessential environmental cues, and an initiation of outward behaviors such as crying or shouting (33). While these responses are an adaptive mechanism in adults, it is not as useful for children or infants who lack the physical capabilities to flee or defend themselves. Instead, the primary purpose for this response in children is to attract a primary caregiver who can protect or remove them from the situation. Importantly, the traumatic stress response (i.e. the “toxic stress response” response) differs from the regular stress response in that the neurochemical changes, which are initially beneficial, often outlive the threat of the stressor. This means that the hyperarousal state continues even when the stressor has dissipated. This becomes problematic, causing disruptions to homeostasis, and the emergence of a maladaptive feedback cycle (34). A complex set of neurobiological interactions underlie this process. While researchers differ between which brain areas are included in the model of the traumatic stress response in children (4, 35–38), most agree that it is embedded within three major circuits: the HPA axis, the limbic system, and the prefrontal cortex.

The HPA Axis

The HPA axis represents the major neuroendocrine stress response system that serves to adapt an organism to demanding change. The release of Corticotropin Releasing Hormone (CRH) by the hypothalamus induces alertness and increased attentional capacity. CRH prompts the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary, which subsequently induces the secretion of adrenal cortisol and cortisone. Under normal conditions, cortisol is released with a distinct diurnal rhythm, characterized by levels increasing during the night just prior to waking, a transient acute spike in release following awakening (the cortisol awakening response), followed by a steady decline throughout the day until sleep. Physical or psychological stressor also induces a temporary spike of cortisol (39). In contrast, reduced morning cortisol levels have repeatedly been observed in chronically stressed individuals (40–42). This may be due to a protective downregulation of the HPA axis to avoid overexposure to stress hormones (43). A potential mechanism underlying the mediating effects of adverse experiences during childhood on adult psychopathology has been seminally modeled in McEwen's (44) theory of Allostatic Load (44). This theory posits that chronic stressors cause a long-lasting deviation of the normal stress state, resulting in a new established set point. This predisposes an individual to increased vulnerability for developing pathologies, both physical and psychological (45). Pituitary volume changes have been reported in MDD with both increased (46, 47), reduced or not change in volume reported (48–50). In contrast, BD is mostly associated with reduced pituitary volumes (51, 52). Similarly, larger pituitary volumes were found in first episode psychosis (53, 54), clinical high risk individuals and those with a family history of psychosis (55). Larger volumes in the at risk groups were found in those who later transition to psychosis (53, 56). In contrast, smaller volumes are found with chronic schizophrenia (57, 58), possibly reflecting pituitary hypoplasia following repeated HPA overactivity. ELS has been found to be a predictor of increased anterior, but not posterior pituitary volume in adolescents. Although the HPA axis is regulated internally through negative feedback loops withing the axis itself, it is also recieves dense connections from brain regions involved in the processing of stress. This regions in include the limbic system and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Brain related areas and the HPA axis. On the left is a midline saggital representation of the brain showing a stylised hippocampus (red), amygdala (green) and medial prefrontal cortex (yellow). On the right, the classic HPA axis is shown. Inputs to the HPA from the hippocampus are mostly inhibitory, inputs from the amygdala are mostly excitatory while the prefrontal inputs can be both inhibitory and excitatory depending on whether they originate from the dorsal (inhibitory) or vental (excitatory) prefrontal areas.

Brain related areas and the HPA axis. On the left is a midline saggital representation of the brain showing a stylised hippocampus (red), amygdala (green) and medial prefrontal cortex (yellow). On the right, the classic HPA axis is shown. Inputs to the HPA from the hippocampus are mostly inhibitory, inputs from the amygdala are mostly excitatory while the prefrontal inputs can be both inhibitory and excitatory depending on whether they originate from the dorsal (inhibitory) or vental (excitatory) prefrontal areas.

Limbic Control of the HPA Axis

The Limbic System is a group of interconnected brain regions involved in emotion, memory.and behavior (59). The amygdala and hippocampus are key hubs within the limbic system (60). The amygdala assigns emotional valence to sensory inputs (61), whereas the hippocampus has roles in memory formation (62). Both structures have connections with the HPA axis, allowing modulation of the stress response. While the amygdala is principally excitatory to HPA axis functioning, the hippocampus is mostly inhibitory (63–65).

Amygdala

The amygdala lies anterior to the hippocampus in the medial temporal lobe and consists of three functional nuclear divisions: the central, basolateral, and corticomedial groups. The HPA axis is largely influenced by the central and corticomedial groups which project in abundance to the hypothalamus. Lesions to these groups have been shown to reduce ACTH and corticosterone secretion following stress (66, 67). Stimulation to central nuclei causes overexpression of CRH resulting in an increase in HPA axis activity (68–70). Amygdalar effects of the HPA axis have also been shown to be region and stressor specific (71, 72). Induced early life stress has been associated with amygdalar hypertrophy in primates (73), with increased volumes also found in children exposed to both neglect (74) and mild maternal disengagement (75). Interestingly, no change in amygdala volume has been found in individuals exposed to physical or sexual abuse as children (76, 77). Reviews have found that amygdalar volumes are reduced bilaterally in MDD (60) and in pediatric BD (78) with varying amygdalar connectivity with prefrontal regions in both conditions (79). Reduced amygdalar volume has been suggested as a mechanism for stress sensitization to MDD following exposure to violence in children (26). The evidence for amygdalar volume differences in psychosis is more nuanced (80) with some studies of first episode psychosis revealing complex volume reduction (81–83) while others did not show significant differences (84). Similar results were found in patients with schizophrenia (79, 85, 86). The experience of childhood trauma has been found to be predictor of right and total amygdalar volumes in first episode psychosis (87) (Hoy). Perturbations in amygdalar inputs to the HPA axis in the developing brain due to ELS may presdispose to MDD, BD and psychosis.

Hippocampus

The hippocampus inhibits the HPA axis through its fornix outputs to the hypothalamus (59, 63, 64). Hippocampal stimulation decreases glucocorticoid secretion in rodents (88) and multiple studies suggest that rodents genetically modified to have reduced hippocampal function results in dramatic increases in corticosterone release (89, 90). However, regulation of the HPA axis by the hippocampus appears to be both region- and stressor-specific. Trauma also results in significant hippocampal changes (91) with ELS decreasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis in rodents (92). Smaller hippocampal volumes have been found in individuals with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (93), and pre-clinical models showing significant reductions in rodent hippocampal volume following induced stress compared to pre-stress size (94). Both depression and stress in people with chronic pain have also been shown to modulate hippocampal metabolite function (95–97). Despite pre-clinical studies suggesting acute changes resulting from stress, it has been suggested that reduced hippocampal volume is not the result of, but rather a risk factor for conditions such as PTSD (98). Reduced hippocampal volumes is the most reported finding in MDD (99–103) including in depressed children (101), indicating that hippocampal volume changes may be an early marker for MDD. Childhood trauma has been associated with smaller hippocampal regions in MDD comparted to those without childhood trauma (36). Most brain imaging studies have found no changes in hippocampal volume in BD (104–106), but some studies have reported reduced volumes, (107–110). Interestingly, Childhood trauma is associated with increased amygdala gray matter volume patients with BD compared to those without trauma (111). In contrast, reduced hippocampal volume is an established finding in schizophrenia (82, 108, 112–117), Individuals at ultra-high risk for the development of psychosis may also demonstrate reduced hippocampal volumes (80, 83). Childhood trauma has been found to be predictor of left hippocampal volume in first episode psychosis.

Prefrontal Cortex Control of the HPA Axis

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) regulates the response of the amygdala by processing additional sensory information experienced during a traumatic event (38). Structural changes have also been observed in the mPFC in patients with PTSD (118, 119). The prefrontal cortex has an extended sensitive period and continues to develop into early adulthood, making it more susceptible to insults through childhood to adolsecence. Dysregulation in developing executive functional capacities during childhood may impact the processing of both traumatic and non-traumatic situations in the future. Reduced mPFC volume has repeatedly been demonstrated in adults reporting childhood emotional maltreatment and/or early life adversity (120, 121). This has significance for a range of psychological and psychiatric conditions given the vital role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the “top down” regulation of emotional behavior. Lesions of the cingulate gyrus are linked to enhanced ACTH and corticosterone secretion in rats (122). Other studies imply that the role of the mPFC is substantially more complex. Lesions of the right infralimbic cortex decrease corticosterone responses to restraint stress, while lesions restricted to the left do not affect glucocorticoid secretion at all (123). Additionally, induced ELS via the maternal separation model reduces pre- and post-synaptic protein expression of inhibitory neurons in the mPFC (124). Importantly, however, is that the cingulate gyrus and infralimbic cortex efferently project to different brain areas. The cingulate cortex projects to stress inhibitory (dorsomedial hypothalamus and the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus), whilst the infralimbic cortex projects to stress excitatory areas (stria medullaris and amygdala) (125–128). Overall, these observations suggest that different mPFC areas are associated with different roles in HPA axis regulation (129). Children diagnosed with preschool onset MDD have reduced right ventromedial PFC volume compared to controls (130). Many studies have have identified abnormal amygdala-PFC functional connectivity in MDD compared to controls (131–134). Similarly in BD, amygdala-PFC functional connectivity abnormalities have been reported (135). Like MDD, there are also reports of amygdala-PFC connectivity abnormalities in BD (136) and psychosis (137).

Childhood Trauma Causes Adult Sensitization of the HPA Axis

The process of HPA axis sensitization to stress as a result of childhood trauma may occur long before adulthood. Dysregulated cortisol responses are detectable in adolescents with a history of child abuse (138) and exposure to childhood violence (139). Importantly however, dysregulated responses are not consistently associated with psychopathology such as MDD or PTSD. This suggests that the onset of psychopathological symptoms, due to neurobiological changes, may be occurring later in the developmental trajectory. A wide disparity exists across studies investigating HPA axis reactivity in adolescents who have experienced childhood trauma. While some studies report hyperactivation of the HPA axis in response to stress (3) others report hypoactivation (138, 140). Likewise, inconsistencies are observed for diurnal regulation (141, 142). A potential explanation for these contradictory findings has been provided by Kuhlman et al. (143). In their study, adolescents completed the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Task (144) while their parents completed the Early Trauma Inventory (8). Salivary cortisol samples were taken from the participants as part of the stress test procedure in addition to 1 week later during 2 consecutive weekdays as a measure of diurnal rhythm. Results indicated that exposure to “non-intentional trauma” (e.g., witnessing an accident or experiencing a natural disaster) was associated with normal diurnal regulation but elevated cortisol at bedtime. “Physical abuse” (e.g., being injured to the point of bruising) was associated with faster reactivity to acute stress. “Emotional abuse” (e.g., persistently being ridiculed or insulted by a caregiver) was associated with delayed recovery following acute stress. The authors suggest that HPA axis functioning can be perceived as specific to trauma subtypes rather than inconsistent across studies; however, more research to establish a concrete connection between reactivity and subtype in adolescents. An important question remains, will these findings generalize to adult sensitization and will such sensitization result in psychopathology? A retrospective review of current rodent models shows promising results in favor of this relationship. Recreations of early life neglect (maternal separation and/or early weaning) in rodent offspring have allowed for insight into the potential long-term biological and behavioral effects of trauma. Neglected rodent offspring have shown increased susceptibility to anxiety and depressive-like behaviors when exposed to stress in both adolescence and adulthood (145, 146). Similarly depressive-like behavior in neglected female rodents was found when faced with the forced swim test (147). The same rodents also exhibited significantly elevated corticosterone levels, indicating a dysregulated HPA axis response and, thus, heightened sensitivity to stress. Moreover, the preliminary evidence observed throughout these various rodent models suggests that early life stress does indeed cause adult sensitization to stress and likely causes a predisposition to psychopathologies such as mood disorders and psychosis.

The HPA Axis, Early Life Stress and Psychiatric Conditions

Early life stress (ELS) due to childhood abuse and/or neglect has been linked to increased risk of psychiatric illness onset and recurrence, increased disease severity and poor treatment response (pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy) (148, 149). The remainder of this review will target key articles regarding HPA activity and early life stress in mood, anxiety and psychotic disorders. Studies investigating daily cortisol secretion (eg, morning, total daily cortisol etc.) and the cortisol response to both awakening and stressors will be examined in these disorders, with an emphasis on recent metaanalyses where appropriate. The HPA activation directly after awakening is known as the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and involves a transient “bump” in cortisol between 30 mins to an hour after awakening, usually measured as area under the curve (AUC) from sequential testing during the first hour after awakening. The CAR is thought to provide a measure of the reactivity and reserve of the HPA axis. The cortisol response to stressors involve before and after measurements and are often also described as AUC. Common stressors used in these studies include the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and other psychological stressors. HPA responses following physiological manipulation, e.g., dexamethasone suppression (DST) will also be examined.

Mood Disorders

MDD and BD are the most common mood disorders and are both associated with poor life quality, increased disability, and mortality (150). In the United States, MDD and BD have a lifetime prevalence of 16 and 5% respectively (150). An MDD episode presents with depressed mood and/or anhedonia (diminished interest or pleasure) with a collage of other symptoms including psychomotor and sleep changes. BD has two distinct pathological phases, a depressed phase similar to an MDD episode and an mania or hypomanic phase presenting with periods of elated mood and increased energy. A systematic review of 44 articles looking at different subtypes of ELS (sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect) concluded that mood disorders are associated with all forms except emotional neglect (151).

High Daily Cortisol Is Not Specifically Associated With MDD and ELS

A case-control study found that childhood trauma severity was not associated with high diurnal salivary cortisol (based on AUC, measured at awakening, noon and 8 p.m.) in currently depressed MDD patients with although this association was present in patients with glucocorticoid resistance (152). Another study of early adolescent females, aged 9 to 14, with a genetic predisposition to depressive illness, had higher daily cortisol if they had experienced maltreatment during their childhood (153). Although no differences were demonstrated in long term hair cortisol assays between those with childhood trauma vs. those without, patients who were unresponsive to treatment revealed lower cortisol levels prior to psychological treatment (154). A further study investigating differences in baseline cortisol in patients with comorbid psychiatric illnesses found no baseline cortisol differences in either children or adults with comorbid MDD and PTSD (155). A meta-analysis of 651 depressed children and adolescents found greater basal cortisol levels in MDD children and adolescents compared to controls (156). Higher morning cortisol was reported in a meta-analysis of 1,354 depressed adult patients. An attenuated effect was observed for the evening salivary cortisol, however this was based on a smaller number of studies, all of which were underpowered (157). A further metaanalysis of 18,374 adult individuals found higher cortisol in MDD when measured continuously throughout the day, with morning times revealing the least difference between the groups. Morning MDD CRH was also found to be higher compared to controls. Interestingly, removing the one study (of 16 CRH studies) with the largest effect size collapsed this CRH increase. ACTH was also higher overall in MDD patients; however, there was no difference between control and depressed patients at any one time of day (158). Similarly, another meta-analysis of 727 patients over 60 years old observed higher basal morning cortisol in patients. Morning ACTH also showed no difference between groups (159). A meta-analysis of long-term cortisol secretion 751 patients) through hair assays found no differences between MDD and controls (160). Interestingly, depressed patients with higher levels of cortisol prior to treatment are less likely to benefit from psychological therapy in a metaanalysis of 212 MDD patients investigating cortisol as a predictor of psychological therapy response in depressive disorders (161) (see Table 1).
Table 1

Daily HPA measurements in depression.

References Year Study type Total N N of cases N of control Mode of cortisol collection Findings
Nikkheslat et al. (152)2019Case-Control21816355Salivary cortisol: DiurnalThe severity of childhood trauma was associated with increased diurnal cortisol levels only in individuals with glucocorticoid resistance
Fischer (154)2018Cohort Study89370Hair cortisolNo differences were demonstrated in long term cortisol measurements through hair cortisol between those with childhood trauma vs. those without
Mayer et al. (155)2020Case-Control925636Salivary cortisol and plasma: baselineThere were no baseline cortisol differences in those with MDD-PTSD- child, MDD-PTSD adult and MDD-no trauma
Lopez-Duran et al. (156)2009Meta-Analysis1,332651736Salivary, plasma or urine cortisol: Basal levelsDepressed children and adolescents were found to have greater basal cortisol levels than non-depressed controls
Knorr et al. (157)2010Meta-Analysis2,4061,3541,052Salivary CortisolStatistically significant mean difference was found between MDD and healthy individuals in the morning and evening
Aas et al. (162)2011Meta-Analysis18,374N/AN/ASalivary, blood, CSF, urine cortisol73% of MDD individuals have cortisol values greater than non-depressed individuals. Across all studies, cortisol seems to be elevated by over half an SD unit across depressed individuals. Across all studies, ACTH levels were elevated to a similar degree during MDD
Murri et al. (159)2013Meta-Analysis3,4247272,697Salivary and plasma cortisolBasal morning cortisol was found to be greater in the morning in MDD patients over 60 years old, morning ACTH levels do not differ between the depressed and healthy group
Psarraki et al. (160)2020Meta-Analysis1,8197511,068Hair cortisolLong term cortisol secretion measured through hair found no differences between control and MDD
Quidé et al. (163)2017Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis212212N/APre-Treatment levels of cortisol inhair, urine, saliva or bloodThe higher the basal and post-challenge cortisol levels were before starting psychological therapy, the more symptoms patients experienced at the end of treatment and/or the smaller their symptom change

A targeted review of key articles and metanalysis showing daily HPA measurements in depression. ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MDD, major depressive disorder; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

Daily HPA measurements in depression. A targeted review of key articles and metanalysis showing daily HPA measurements in depression. ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MDD, major depressive disorder; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

No Clear Association Between Cortisol Responses in MDD With ELS

An increase in CAR in those with childhood neglect has been found irrespective of a diagnosis of MDD (164, 165). No correlation between the severity of depression and CAR was shown in those with early life stress (165). Lower cortisol and ACTH responses were shown following the TSST in children with comorbid MDD and PTSD; however, adults with PTSD commencing in adulthood and those with social anxiety disorder (SAD) showed no differences. When HPA axis feedback was measured through metyrapone challenge, no differences in cortisol levels were found (155). In contrast, a cohort study found positive association between greater depressive symptoms, childhood maltreatment and higher cortisol levels following a TSST (166). Depressed patients with childhood trauma in a different study showed no differences in stress cortisol reactivity following images of child abuse compared to healthy controls (with or without childhood trauma); however, higher reactivity was found in depressed patients with no childhood trauma (167). Conflicting responses to stress tests have been displayed in other meta-analyses. Cortisol reactivity in the morning and afternoon to psychological stress was blunted in a metanalysis of 98 MDD patients compared to controls (168). However, a later meta-analysis of 296 MDD patients showed no significant difference in peak response cortisol levels following social stress (169) (see Table 2).
Table 2

HPA responses in depression.

References Year Study type Total N Number of cases Number of controls Mode of cortisol collection Findings
Peng et al. (165)2014Case- Control1095851Salivary cortisol: CARAn increase in CAR in those with childhood neglect irrespective of diagnosis of MDD
Lu et al. (164)2016Case- Control803545Salivary cortisol: CAR and DSTAn increase in CAR in those with childhood neglect irrespective of diagnosis of MDD; The DST responses indicated an increased response in those with MDD and childhood trauma experiences
Mayer et al. (155)2020Case- Control925636Salivary cortisol: TSST, DSTTSST cortisol responses demonstrated a lowered cortisol and ACTH response in those with MDD and PTSD from childhood vs. controls, however, those with PTSD from adulthood and those with SAD had no differences, when HPA axis feedback was measured through metyrapone challenge, no differences in cortisol levels were found
Cantave et al. (166)2018Cohort Study156156Salivary cortisol: CARA positive association between higher acute cortisol levels, greater depressive symptoms and childhood maltreatment was demonstrated in the TSST
Suzuki et al. (167)2014Case- Control803941Salivary cortisol: Images of child abuseMDD patients with childhood trauma showed no differences in stress cortisol reactivity following images of child abuse compared to healthy controls (with or without childhood trauma); however, higher reactivity was found in patients with no childhood trauma
Watson et al. (170)2007Case- Control681028Serum cortisol: Dex/CRH testThose with low levels of emotional neglect showed an enhanced response from the CRH response
Lopez-Duran et al. (156)2009Meta-Analysis926388538Salivary, plasma or urine cortisol: DSTDepressed children and adolescents had higher cortisol production post Dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in contrast to controls. On the other hand, cortisol and ACTH levels post-CRH infusion were non-significant between groups
Aas et al. (162)2011Meta-Analysis1,639N/AN/ASalivary, blood, CSF, urine cortisolElevations of cortisol during MDD are greater when the HPA axis is artificially challenged compared to when it is not.
Murri et al. (159)2013Meta-Analysis606245361Salivary and plasma cortisolNo difference was found in the cortisol level post -DST in MDD over 60-year-old adults compared to controls
Burke et al. (168)2005Meta-Analysis1969898MDD patients' stress reactivity cortisol level in the morning and afternoon to psychological stress was blunted in comparison to the healthy counterparts
Ciufolini et al. (169)2014Meta-Analysis800296504No significant difference in peak response cortisol levels post social stress tasks between MDD and control groups
Mokhtari et al. (171)2012Meta-Analysis1,121670451MDD subjects had greater cortisol levels in response to the DEX/CRH test in contrast to healthy controls

A targeted review of key articles and metanalysis showing HPA responses to awakening, psychological stressors and physiological manipulation. ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone CAR, cortisol awakening response; CRH, corticotrophin releasing hormone; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DEX, dexamethasone; DST, dexamethasone suppression test; MDD, major depressive disorder; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; SAD, social anxiety disorder; TSST, Trier social stress test.

HPA responses in depression. A targeted review of key articles and metanalysis showing HPA responses to awakening, psychological stressors and physiological manipulation. ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone CAR, cortisol awakening response; CRH, corticotrophin releasing hormone; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DEX, dexamethasone; DST, dexamethasone suppression test; MDD, major depressive disorder; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; SAD, social anxiety disorder; TSST, Trier social stress test. Following dexamethasone suppression an increased cortisol response was found in MDD patients with childhood trauma experiences (164). Interestingly, those with low levels of emotional neglect have shown an enhanced CRH response (170). Depressed children and adolescents (N = 388) revealed higher cortisol post DST in a metaanalysis. Conversely, cortisol and ACTH levels post-CRH infusion were non-significant between groups (156). Post DST, higher cortisol and reduced ACTH were found with MDD compared to non-depressed in a metanalysis of 1,639 adults (158). In a metaanalysis of 15 studies examing the role of the dexamethasone /CRH test as potential biomarker for MDD, patients had greater cortisol levels following the test compared to controls (171). No difference was found in the cortisol level post-DST in 245 depressed over 60-year-old adults (159).

Elevated Cortisol Turnover and Long-Term Cortisol in BD With ELS

A meta-analysis of 367 BD patients found higher morning cortisol levels were higher in bipolar outpatients and non-manic patients, relative to controls (172). Similarly, another meta-analysis observed higher awakening, morning, afternoon, and evening cortisol for 242 BD patients compared to control (173). While ACTH was raised in the BD group, CRH levels showed no differences between groups. A cohort study measuring cortisol metabolites revealed elevated beta reductase, a measure of cortisol turnover, in BD patients that experienced adverse childhood events such as physical abuse (162). The same group also found elevated long term hair cortisol in those patients with a history of childhood maltreatment (174).

Reduced Response Awakening, Stressors and Axis Manipulation in BD With ELS

A blunted CAR was found in a cohort study in BD patients with childhood maltreatment compared to those without (175). BD patients have a higher cortisol level post-DST relative to controls, with further elevation during the manic phase (173). However, the cortisol response to a dexamethasone/CRH test showed enhanced response in BD in those with low levels of emotional neglect (170), similar to those with MDD. Similarly, BD patients with high levels of trauma experienced blunted cortisol responses with associated increased brain activation (the right lingual gyrus and increased functional connectivity between the left amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). In contrast, healthy controls with high trauma levels were associated with high cortisol response to stress and decreased brain region activation (163).

Psychotic Disorders

Psychosis can occur as a primary symptom in disorders such as schizophrenia or manifest as a secondary symptom in other disorders such as MDD and BD (172). Regardless of diagnostic etiology, the core symptom of psychosis involves issues with intact reality testing, resulting in symptoms including hallucinations and/or delusions. The development of psychosis appears to have a strong association with early life events (176). Schizophrenia is the archetypal psychotic illness characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, disorganized behavior, and negative symptoms. Schizophrenia has a lifetime prevalence of 1% and commonly presents in adolescence and early adulthood (177). It is associated with poor recovery outcomes and reduced life quality expectancy with co-morbidities such as coronary heart disease, stroke, type II diabetes, respiratory diseases, and some cancers (177). A systematic review of 44 studies examining different subtypes of ELS (sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect) concluded that schizophrenia is associated with all forms (178).

Increased Baseline Cortisol With Blunted Responses in Psychosis

A meta-analysis examining morning cortisol levels in patients with schizophrenia [44 studies, n = 2,613) found a small to medium increase in morning cortisol concentration in patients compared to controls (172). Interestingly, morning samples taken before 8am revealed larger differences than those taken after 8 a.m. Similarly, a higher blood cortisol concentration was shown in a meta-analysis of 911 patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP), most consistent in drug-naive patients of an older presentation (i.e., not adolescents) (179). However, studies examining saliva cortisol concentrations failed to replicate these findings. Interestingly, subgroup analysis of longitudinal studies suggested that cortisol upregulation may be a phenomenon of FEP only with subsequent decrease after antipsychotic treatment. A meta-analysis of CAR across the psychosis spectrum [11 studies, n = 879) found that the response was lessened in patients with psychosis compared to healthy controls (180). Subgroup analysis found a flattened CAR in patients with schizophrenia and FEP, but not in individuals with at-risk-mental states, leading the authors to suggest that the response may be a marker for transition risk. In a recent meta-analysis of cortisol reactivity to psychological stress in patients with schizophrenia (4 studies, n = 180), patients demonstrated a blunted response compared to controls, with males in particular revealing lower cortisol AUCi and AUCg following stressors (181). The authors acknowledge the possibility of publication bias in favor for the male blunted reactivity in schizophrenia.

Increased Turnover With Less Blunted Responses in Psychosis With ELS

Using a stable marker of cortisol concentration over several months (hair), cortisol was elevated in a study of patients with schizophrenia (n = 28) who had a history of childhood maltreatment (174). Similarly, elevated cortisol metabolism (through urinary analysis of cortisol metabolites: e.g., urinary free cortisol/cortisone, allo-tetrahydrocortisol, tetrahydrocortisol, and tetrahydrocortisone) was found in schizophrenia patients (n = 63) with childhood trauma compared to those without trauma (162). In a study of 9 to 12 year old children with either clinical high risk of psychosis (n = 33), a family history of psychosis (n = 22), or typically developing children (n = 40), no association was found between the CAR and the numbers of negative life events in any group (182). However, in the family history group, CAR was positively correlated with distress experienced in relation to negative life events at the time of the event and with the level of distress experienced currently. In contrast, among typically developing children, CAR values were negatively correlated with distress experienced at the time of the negative life event. Schizophrenia spectrum patients (n = 25) demonstrated a blunted response to a psychosocial stressor (a modified Triers Social Stress tasking involving public speaking) compared to controls (n = 25) (183) with patients with a history of more emotional abuse showing a response closer to controls. Similarly, in a study of emotional brain function (functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing an emotional face-matching task) and cortisol reactivity in patients with schizophrenia (n = 40) and controls (n = 34) found that cortisol concentrations reduced in patients and increased in controls following the task (163). In those exposed to high levels of trauma, higher post scan cortisol was associated with region activation in the schizophrenia cohort. As such, ELS and psychosis are associated with high ambient cortisol and less flattened responses.

Conclusion

The relationship between early life stress (ELS), Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal (HPA) axis activity and psychiatric illnesses is complex. The development of the brain during childhood involves sequential and heirarchical development of brain regions and is susceptible to biological and psychological insults, particularly during developmentally sensitive periods. Toxic stress from childhood adversity may result in sympathetic hyperarousal through sustained allostatic load along the hodological associations of the HPA axis. Such connections include limbic structures involved in memory, behavior and emotion such as the hippocampus, amygdala and the medial prefrontal cortex. Inconsistencies exist in the literature regarding the hyperactivation of the HPA axis in adolescents who experienced childhood trauma. As such, it is thought that HPA axis changes may specific to the trauma subtype being studied, with further research needed in the domain. Our targeted review of the literature surrounding mood disorders and psychosis suggests that cortisol concentration is raised across psychiatric disorders. However, both bipolar disorder (BD) and psychosis is associated with more attenuated HPA responses to awakening (the cortisol awakening response), psychologicial stressors (e.g., the Trier Social Stress Test) and physiological manipulation (e.g., dexamethasone supression) in those patients who have experienced early life stress compared to those who have not. These reduced cortisol responses in BD and psychotic patients exist on a common background of increased long term cortisol and cortisol turnover. This suggests a hyperfunctioning HPA axis with little reserve remaining for a robust cortisol response to extra stress. The evidence from our targeted review for a similar effect in depression (MDD) is equivocal, despite the signficantly larger number of studies examining early life stress and HPA changes in MDD. Psychosis and BD share a number of commonalities in their biological basis. Psychosis is often a feature of mania in Type 1 BD (a diagnosis of mania requires either psychosis or hospitalization) (184). Common susceptibility genes for both disorders have also been identified. The first of such commonalities identified included zinc finger–binding protein 804A gene (ZNF804A) on chromosome 2q32 (185). Since then, additional areas of interest such as 1p36, 1q43, 4p14 and, of particular note, 15q26 have been identified (186). Schizoaffective disorder is another notable disorder under the heading of psychosis, often described as the intermediate of BD and schizophrenia, involving both affective and psychotic tendencies. Further genetic linkages have been implicated as common to all three disorders, of particular note COMT located in the 22q11 region (187) as well as genome wide significance at 1q42 (188). COMT is involved in the metabolism of catecholamines including noradrenaline and adrenaline (neurotransmitters known to be involved in acute stress). In contrast, loss of function polymorphisms in tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH-2) have been identified in MDD but have been shown not to be implicated in the pathogenesis of BD (189) or SZ (190). TPH2 is a key enzyme in formation of serotonin, with dysfunction of the TPH-2 associated with shunting of tryptophan toward kynurenine, a key pathway at the interface of inflammation and the stress response (191). This may be a mechanism for different cortisol profiles between MDD and BD/psychosis. Structural abnormalities common to both BD and schizophrenia have also been observed on neuroimaging. Diffusion studies of the uncinate fasciculus (79) (connecting the amygdala with the medial- and orbitofrontal cortices) and anterior and posterior thalamic radiations (192) have shown decreased fractional anistrophy (a marker of white matter microstructural abnormality) in both BD and schizophrenia. These connections are known to be involved in the stress response. In conclusion, the effect of the early life stress on the developing brain is highly complex and dependent on unique characteristics such as individual vulnerability, developmental sensitivity window, stressor type and duration. The suggestion of a common HPA profile in both BD and psychosis but not depression from our targeted review needs verification with large carefully conducted robust metaanalyses of daily cortisol concentrations and cortisol responses across these disorders.

Author Contributions

AN, FM, DC, KR, AG, and ER: writing, editing, and formatting manuscript. VS, LK, AO, and MH: proofreading and editing. DR and MC: leading the group, writing, editing, and formatting manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The work was funded by iHEAR study - MC.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  182 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of whole-genome linkage scans of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Authors:  J A Badner; E S Gershon
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Pituitary volume and third ventricle width in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  David A Cousins; P Brian Moore; Stuart Watson; Lucy Harrison; I Nicol Ferrier; Allan H Young; Adrian J Lloyd
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.905

3.  Maltreatment and diurnal cortisol regulation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristin Bernard; Allison Frost; Charles B Bennett; Oliver Lindhiem
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Altered tryptophan catabolite concentrations in major depressive disorder and associated changes in hippocampal subfield volumes.

Authors:  Kelly Doolin; Kelly A Allers; Sina Pleiner; Andre Liesener; Chloe Farrell; Leonardo Tozzi; Erik O'Hanlon; Darren Roddy; Thomas Frodl; Andrew Harkin; Veronica O'Keane
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 5.  Correlation between amygdala volume and age in bipolar disorder - a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural MRI studies.

Authors:  Juliana Usher; Stefan Leucht; Peter Falkai; Harald Scherk
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Chronic stress selectively reduces hippocampal volume in rats: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Taekwan Lee; Tim Jarome; Shi-Jiang Li; Jeansok J Kim; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 7.  Cortisol awakening response in patients with psychosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maximus Berger; Ann Katrin Kraeuter; Daria Romanik; Peter Malouf; G Paul Amminger; Zoltán Sarnyai
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Glucocorticoid negative feedback and glucocorticoid receptors after hippocampectomy in rats.

Authors:  A M Magariños; G Somoza; A F De Nicola
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.936

9.  Schizophrenia-An Overview.

Authors:  Robert A McCutcheon; Tiago Reis Marques; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 21.596

10.  MRI volumetric changes in hippocampal subfields in psychosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anurag Nasa; Olivia Mosley; Elena Roman; Allison Kelliher; Caoimhe Gaughan; Kirk J Levins; David Coppinger; Erik O'Hanlon; Mary Cannon; Darren William Roddy
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.