| Literature DB >> 35599773 |
Qianqian Lin1, Dongxu Li2, Cheng Hu3, Zhihua Shen1, Yongguang Wang1,2,4.
Abstract
Background: Cue-induced craving is widely considered to be the most important risk factor for relapse during abstinence from methamphetamine (Meth). There is limited research regarding electroencephalography (EEG) microstates of Meth-dependent patients under exposure to drug-related cues. Our objective was to investigate whether EEG microstate temporal characteristics could capture neural correlates of cue-induced Meth craving in virtual reality (VR) environments.Entities:
Keywords: EEG microstates analysis; cue-induced craving; methamphetamine dependence; resting state; virtual reality
Year: 2022 PMID: 35599773 PMCID: PMC9114476 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
Figure 1Schematic diagram of assessment procedure.
Demographic characteristics and VAS scores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Age (Years) | 33.69 ± 6.46 | 31.57 ± 9.15 | 1.06 | 0.29 |
| Years of Meth-use | 9.83 ± 3.83 | |||
| Age of first Meth taking | 24.14 ± 7.01 | |||
|
| ||||
| Meth-craving | 2.257 ± 1.559 | |||
| Meth-using | 4.629 ± 3.606 | |||
| Meth-liking | 3.886 ± 2.220 | |||
|
| ||||
| Meth-craving | 4.457 ± 2.254 | 0.267 ± 0.828 | 10.225 | <0.001 |
| Meth-using | 6.371 ± 3.388 | 0.400 ± 1.192 | 9.748 | <0.001 |
| Meth-liking | 4.686 ± 1.859 | 1.233 ± 1.888 | 7.401 | <0.001 |
Figure 2Spatial correlations are depicted between microstate topographies. (A) Topographies of microstate in healthy control (HCs) with cue-induced condition, HCs with resting condition, Meth-dependent patients with cue-induced condition, and Meth-dependent patients with resting condition. The topographies are labeled as microstate classes (A–D). Note that polarity (blue vs. red) is ignored in the microstate definition. (B) Spatial correlations between microstate topographies (A–D) identified from separate topographies of resting or cue-induced conditions in each group.
Figure 3Outcomes of electroencephalography microstates with multiple comparisons. (A) Coverage, (B) duration, (C) occurrence, and (D) transition probability. Dots indicate the microstates feature and outline of violin plot represents the kernel probability density estimation. Significant post-hoc results between groups or between conditions are marked by asterisks.
Figure 4Interaction between group and condition. (A) Coverage, (B) duration, and (C) occurrence. Positive value indicates an increasing microstates feature from resting to cue-induced condition, while negative value represents a decreasing microstates feature. Significant interaction between group and condition is indicated by asterisks. (D) Transition probability. The solid line indicates a significant interaction between group and condition for transition probability of A → C, C → A, B → D, and D → B, respectively.