| Literature DB >> 35599766 |
Huiyuan Huang1, Quanwu Song2, Jiawen Chen1, Ying Zeng1, Wenqi Wang1, Bingqing Jiao1, Jiabao Lin1, Yan Li3, Rong Zhang4, Lijun Ma1, Huafeng Pan5, Yafei Shi2.
Abstract
Background: Childhood maltreatment is known as a significant risk factor for later depression. However, there remains a lack of understanding about the mechanisms through which childhood maltreatment confers risk for depression. This study explores how Qi-stagnation constitution (QSC) and emotion regulation affect the link between childhood maltreatment and depressive symptoms in Chinese college students.Entities:
Keywords: Qi-stagnation constitution; childhood maltreatment; depression; emotion dysregulation; moderated mediation model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35599766 PMCID: PMC9114459 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.825198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
FIGURE 1The conceptual framework of the moderated mediation model. CTQ, total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); QSC, conversion score of the Qi-Stagnation Constitution Scale; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II.
Descriptive statistics of the studied variables.
| Variables | Mean | SD | Range | n/N (%) |
| Age (years old) | 18.51 | 0.77 | 18–25 | |
| CTQ | ||||
| Total score | 34.15 | 9.96 | 25–92 | |
| Emotional abuse | 6.79 | 2.66 | 5–23 | 17.8% |
| Physical abuse | 5.91 | 2.03 | 5–22 | 11.7% |
| Sexual abuse | 5.44 | 1.53 | 5–21 | 14.3% |
| Emotional neglect | 9.06 | 4.34 | 5–25 | 39.1% |
| Physical neglect | 6.95 | 2.54 | 5–21 | 29.3% |
| Single exposure | N/A | N/A | N/A | 21.9% |
| Multiple exposures | N/A | N/A | N/A | 32.6% |
| QSC | 27.28 | 19.48 | 0–100 | |
| DERS | 84.78 | 21.19 | 36–153 | |
| BDI | 7.26 | 6.82 | 0–47 | |
N = 2108. SD, standard deviation; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); QSC, conversion score of the Qi-Stagnation Constitution Scale; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II; n/N (%), percentage of different type of childhood maltreatment exposures.
Intercorrelations between the studied variables.
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. Gender | |||||
| 2. Age (years old) | 0.034 | ||||
| 3. CTQ | 0.019 | 0.016 | |||
| 4. QSC | 0.100 | 0.006 | 0.323 | ||
| 5. DERS | 0.019 | 0.015 | 0.397 | 0.619 | |
| 6. BDI | 0.031 | 0.072 | 0.325 | 0.556 | 0.532 |
N = 2,108. Pearson’s correlation analyses were performed to investigate the association between age, CTQ, QSC, DERS, and BDI.
SD, standard deviation; CTQ, total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); QSC, conversion score of the Qi-Stagnation Constitution Scale; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
The correlations between Qi-stagnation constitution (QSC) and different types of childhood maltreatment.
| CTQ | EA | PA | SA | EN | PN | |
| Mean ± SD | 34.15 ± 9.96 | 6.79 ± 2.66 | 5.91 ± 2.03 | 5.44 ± 1.53 | 9.06 ± 4.34 | 6.95 ± 2.54 |
| QSC | 0.323 | 0.352 | 0.215 | 0.181 | 0.251 | 0.189 |
The values in the second row of the table represent the Pearson’s correlation coefficients between Qi-stagnation constitution (QSC) and different types of childhood maltreatment. SD, standard deviations; CTQ, total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); EA, emotional abuse; PA, physical abuse; SA, sexual abuse; EN, emotional neglect; PN, physical neglect; QCS, conversion score of Qi-stagnation constitution Scale. ***p < 0.001.
Results of moderated mediation analyses.
| Predictor variable | QSC | BDI | ||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Intercept | 0.065 | −1.323 | −1.356 | −1.655 |
|
| ||||
| Gender | −0.203 | 0.050 | −0.053 | −0.009 |
| Age (years old) | −0.022 | 0.067 | 0.078 | 0.085 |
|
| ||||
| CTQ | 0.323 | 0.321 | 0.158 | 0.100 |
|
| ||||
| QSC | 0.508 | 0.309 | ||
|
| ||||
| DERS | 0.297 | |||
|
| ||||
| QSC × DERS | 0.166 | |||
|
| 0.114 | 0.109 | 0.337 | 0.410 |
|
| 89.94 | 85.58 | 267.23 | 243.22 |
N = 2,108. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. CTQ, total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); QCS, conversion score of the Qi-Stagnation Constitution Scale; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II. ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2The moderated mediation model of childhood maltreatment, Qi-stagnation constitution, emotion regulation and depression. Path coefficients were shown in unstandardized regression coefficient. CTQ, total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); QSC, conversion score of the Qi-Stagnation Constitution Scale; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II. ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3Difficulties in emotion regulation moderates the effect of Qi-Stagnation Constitution on depressive scores. QSC, conversion score of the Qi-Stagnation Constitution Scale; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II.
Conditional indirect effects of CTQ on BDI under different levels of DERS and pairwise contrasts between conditional indirect effects.
| DERS | Effect | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | |
| Conditional indirect effects | Effect 1 (M-1 SD) | 0.046 | 0.010 | 0.028 | 0.067 |
| Effect 2 (M) | 0.100 | 0.010 | 0.081 | 0.120 | |
| Effect 3 (M + 1 SD) | 0.153 | 0.014 | 0.127 | 0.183 | |
| Pairwise contrasts between conditional indirect effects | Effect 2 – effect 1 | 0.054 | 0.007 | 0.040 | 0.068 |
| Effect 3 – effect 1 | 0.107 | 0.014 | 0.080 | 0.137 | |
| Effect 3 – effect 2 | 0.054 | 0.007 | 0.040 | 0.068 |
CTQ, total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF); BDI, depressive sore using Beck Depression Inventory-II; DERS, total score of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; BootSE, standard error of bootstrap; BootLLCI, lower limit of 95% confidence interval; BootULCI, upper limit of 95% confidence interval.