Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized rounding tool for use on the general paediatric ward and to determine if its use can improve quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction. Methodology: The study used a pre- and post-intervention prospective observational methodology. The intervention consisted of the implementation of a Checklist Rounding Tool (CRT) entitled the 'Paediatric Inpatient Rounding Checklist (PIRC)' which outlined items deemed essential to discuss during rounds for all patients admitted to the paediatric ward. The PIRC was created by the research team after reviewing the literature and it was peer reviewed by a panel of expert paediatricians. Performance on rounds based on discussion of checklist items as well as patient and parent satisfaction were evaluated by an external observer both pre- and post-PIRC implementation. Results: Four of the five less frequently addressed checklist items were discussed significantly more post-intervention. The Rounds Quality Score was significantly improved after checklist implementation, the pre- and post-intervention scores being 8.24 and 9.61/10, respectively (P-value <0.001). Patient and parent satisfaction were rated higher with the use of the checklist. There was no difference in the duration of rounds between the pre- and post-implementation phases. Conclusion: In summary, utilization of a standardized rounding tool on an inpatient paediatric ward led to improvement in quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized rounding tool for use on the general paediatric ward and to determine if its use can improve quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction. Methodology: The study used a pre- and post-intervention prospective observational methodology. The intervention consisted of the implementation of a Checklist Rounding Tool (CRT) entitled the 'Paediatric Inpatient Rounding Checklist (PIRC)' which outlined items deemed essential to discuss during rounds for all patients admitted to the paediatric ward. The PIRC was created by the research team after reviewing the literature and it was peer reviewed by a panel of expert paediatricians. Performance on rounds based on discussion of checklist items as well as patient and parent satisfaction were evaluated by an external observer both pre- and post-PIRC implementation. Results: Four of the five less frequently addressed checklist items were discussed significantly more post-intervention. The Rounds Quality Score was significantly improved after checklist implementation, the pre- and post-intervention scores being 8.24 and 9.61/10, respectively (P-value <0.001). Patient and parent satisfaction were rated higher with the use of the checklist. There was no difference in the duration of rounds between the pre- and post-implementation phases. Conclusion: In summary, utilization of a standardized rounding tool on an inpatient paediatric ward led to improvement in quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction.
Authors: Ryan Holton; Roma Patel; Matthew Eggebrecht; Bethany Von Hoff; Oliver Garrison; Steven McHale; Jenna Bednar; Andrew Olson Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Jonathan Seigel; Lesta Whalen; Erin Burgess; Benny L Joyner; Ashley Purdy; Roger Saunders; Lindsay Thompson; Theodore Yip; Tina Schade Willis Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2014-02
Authors: Kevin J O'Leary; Audrey Killarney; Luke O Hansen; Sasha Jones; Megan Malladi; Kelly Marks; Hiren M Shah Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Elizabeth D Cox; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Victoria P Rajamanickam; Pascale Carayon; Michelle M Kelly; Tosha B Wetterneck; Paul J Rathouz; Roger L Brown Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: María Arriaga Redondo; Ester Sanz López; Ana Rodríguez Sánchez de la Blanca; Itziar Marsinyach Ros; Laura Collados Gómez; Alicia Díaz Redondo; Manuel Sánchez Luna Journal: An Pediatr (Barc) Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 1.500
Authors: Sarah Collins; Ann C Hurley; Frank Y Chang; Anisha R Illa; Angela Benoit; Sarah Laperle; Patricia C Dykes Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Merrick Lopez; Yana Vaks; Michele Wilson; Kenneth Mitchell; Christina Lee; Janeth Ejike; Grace Oei; Danny Kaufman; Jamie Hambly; Cynthia Tinsley; Thomas Bahk; Carlos Samayoa; James Pappas; Shamel Abd-Allah Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2019-05-16