Sociological studies suggest that the number of overweight
and obese people is increasing worldwide, while obesity increases
the risk of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, thyroid
dysfunction, cognitive and psychoemotional disorders, including
depression [1-3]. The most common causes
of obesity are an excessive diet and unhealthy lifestyle, which
includes insufficient physical and social activities [1-3].
The state of thyroid status has its own features in obesity and
attracts the attention of researchers, because thyroid hormones
are involved in the regulation of basal metabolism, thermogenesis
and lipid metabolism [2]. Most clinical
and epidemiological studies converge in associating thyroid dysfunction
with overweight and obesity. In euthyroid patients, there is a positive
correlation between body weight and thyroid-stimulating hormone
(TSH) indices, although data on peripheral hormone levels in obesity
are ambiguous. It should be admitted that thyroid status plays an
important role not only in the pathogenesis of obesity, but also
in the system of regulatory processes that provide organism’s adaptation
to physical loads and stress [2, 4, 5].
Nevertheless, the issue of the possible modulating effect of obesity and
restricted physical and social activities, as well as their combination,
on the reactivity of regulatory systems, including the thyroid status, remains
poorly understood and requires appropriate experimental studies.Experimental rat models of obesity and metabolic syndrome
are thoroughly described in the literature, their choice and conduct
do not cause difficulties [6]. However,
the concept of unhealthy lifestyle is more complex and ambiguous.
At present, such factors as a decrease in social activity due to
the development of distance learning and remote work practices,
as well as the expansion of the virtual entertainment sphere and forced
lifestyle changes, are attracting particular attention against the
background of the COVID-19 pandemic. This model can be implemented
in an experiment by keeping animals in individual cages. According
to Mumtaz et al. [7], the social isolation
factor can act as a chronic stressor leading to changes in social
behavior, the functioning of the neurochemical and neuroendocrine
systems, and reactivity to acute stress. Based on this, we adopted
an individual maintenance as a variant of social activity restriction
in rats (social isolation).The study was aimed to explore first the effect of a high-calorie
diet and social isolation on the development of obesity, its metabolic
and behavioral consequences, as well as the thyroid status features,
and then to assess the reaction of thyroid status hormonal indices
on short-term stress in rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All experiments with laboratory animals was carried out in
compliance with the legislation, in accordance with the provisions
of the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals
used for experiments or other scientific purposes (ETS N 123), as
well as the principles and regulations approved by the Bioethics
Committee of the Institute of Physiology of the National Academy
of Sciences of Belarus (IP NASB). The experiments were performed
on sexually mature male Wistar rats. Animals were introduced into the
experiment at the age of 2 months and a body mass of 180–200 g.
The following types of experimental exposures were examined: a high-calorie diet
(HCD) and a social isolation (SI), as well as their combinations.
The rats were divided into 4 groups: (1) Control (n = 20)—standard vivarium diet and
optimal housing conditions (by 6–7 individuals per common cage);
(2) Control-SI (n = 20)—standard
diet and individual cage housing; (3) HCD (n =
36)—a diet was added with animal fat as a lard (45% of food caloric
value) and carbohydrates (drinking water was replaced with 10% fructose
solution at an ad libitum access to drinkers), rats were housed
under standard conditions (by 6–7 individuals per common cage);
(4) HCD-SI (n = 36)—a high-calorie
diet and individual cage housing. HCD included a lard added in accordance
with animal’s body weight, while observing 45% of an additional
contribution to a standard vivarium diet as the body weight increased,
and according to a caloric value of the basal diet. Lard consumption
per animal was recorded under both group and individual housing.
Techniplast cages with a floor area of 1500 cm2 (48
× 38 × 21 cm) were used for a group housing, while for individual
housing we used Zoonlab Gmbh cages with a floor area of 360 cm2 (26
× 20 × 14 cm) for used for an individual housing. Both variants
complied with the ETS No. 123 requirements, with the floor area
per rat being always no less than 200–250 cm2.The duration of the experiment was 4 months. In the last week,
the Porsolt forced-swim test for rodent depressive behavior was
performed [8]. Each rat was placed for
6 min in a vessel filled with water up to the mark at a height of
30 cm; water temperature was 24–25°C. The duration of the first
act of active swimming, the number and duration of freezes (no swimming
movements, full immobility) were recorded. The refusal from active
swimming characterized the state of “despair”, being a sign of depression
[8].Rat body mass was estimated on Scout Pro scales (China), and
systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured on a PanLab system (Spain).
At the final stage of the experiment, half of the animals in each
of the four groups were exposed to acute short-term stress, forced
swimming in cold water (t =
13°C) for 5 min. The animals were withdrawn from the experiment
1 h after stress, under thiopental anesthesia. All other animals
were also decapitated using sodium thiopental. The visceral adipose
tissue, liver, thyroid, and blood were sampled for serum separation
and further analysis of biochemical and hormonal indices.Blood serum biochemical indices, such as total cholesterol,
triglycerides, glucose, and total protein, were determined by enzymatic
methods using Diasens commercial kits (Belarus) on a BS-200 Automated
Biochemistry Analyzer (China) with BS-330 software. Blood serum
hormones were determined by enzyme immunoassay: triiodothyronine
(T3), thyroxine (T4), and free T4 (fT4) with Chema kits (Russia),
free T3 (fT3) and cortisol with Diagnostic Systems kits (Russia),
thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with FineTest kits (China).Thyroperoxidase (TPO) activity in thyroid tissue was assayed
as described elsewhere [9]. Thyroid tissue
was homogenized using an IKA T10 basic Ultra-Turrax homogenizer
(Germany) and 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The homogenate
(diluted 1 : 80) was centrifuged at 4°C and 5000 rpm (10700 g) on
an Allegra 64R Centrifuge Beckman Coulter (USA). Supernatants were
separated, and a protein content was determined by the biuret method
on a BS-200 Automated Biochemistry Analyzer (China) using Diasens
kits (Belarus). The supernatants for TPO activity assay were kept
on an ice bath (melting ice temperature) and used during 3–4 h.
Spectrophotometric studies were carried out on a SOLAR CM 2203 spectrofluorimeter.
The buffer and other components were placed into a thermostatted
cuvette (1 cm). Incubation mixture composition: 0.05 M sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4)—2.7 mL, KI solution (0.6 M)—75 µL, supernatant—200
µL. The contents of the cuvette were held for 3 min at 25°C. The
reaction was initiated by adding H2O2 (10
µL of 40 mM solution), the sample was stirred, and the optical density
was recorded at a wavelength of 353 nm for 3 min. The enzyme activity
was expressed in international units per mg of protein per minute
of incubation (IU/mg/min).The activity of iodothyronine deiodinase type 1 (D1) in the
liver was assayed as described previously [10]
with some modifications, that of malonic dialdehyde (MDA)—by the
reaction with thiobarbituric acid [11].
The procedure of D1 assay [10] is based
on the determining hepatic D1 activity by a conversion of T4 into
T3 in the presence of a dithiothreitol (DTT) cofactor. The following
reagents were used: 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.8), 0.01 M sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.6) containing 0.25% bovine serum albumin (BSA),
320 mM DTT in distilled water, T4 (I) standard in methanol—1000
µM added with 0.5 N NaOH (100 µL per 5 mL of solution); T4 (II) standard
was obtained by diluting T4 (I) 20-fold on BSA-phosphate buffer
added with 0.5 N NaOH to pH 8.0 (final concentration 50 µM). Liver
homogenate was prepared on Tris-buffer (1 : 5) at a melting ice
temperature, then centrifuged for 15 min on a BioSan LMC-3000 centrifuge
at 3000 rpm (1700 g).Incubation mixture composition: supernatant—700 µL, DTT—40
µL, T4 (II) standard—40 µL. Incubation at 37°C for 1 h was performed in
duplicates: 2 experimental and 2 control samples (control samples
without DTT and T4). The reaction was stopped by adding 700 µL 96%
ethanol, while DTT and T4 were added to the control samples. After
stirring, the samples were left in a refrigerator for 2 h or overnight
for protein precipitation. The supernatant was separated by centrifugation
and used for the determination of T3 by ELISA (storage was possible
at –20°C until analysis). The resulting supernatant contained about 48%
ethanol. It was found that, when determining T3 by ELISA in an alcohol-containing
supernatant, it is necessary to mix it with a “zero serum” (pooled
human serum treated with activated charcoal), not allowing the ethanol
concentration in the sample to exceed 5%. The effect of ethanol concentration
on T3 determination by ELISA was tested on pooled human serum. When
adding ethanol to this serum with a final concentration of no more
than 5%, the T3 level was determined as a baseline, obtained in
the native serum. While performing this technique, the supernatant
was added to the “zero serum” at a ratio of 10 : 100 L in such
a way that the ethanol content in the sample was about 4.8%, which
was maximum allowable.Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica 6.0.
The normality of data distribution was checked using the Shapiro–Wilk
test. If the distribution was normal, the ANOVA was applied using
the Fisher exact test (data were presented as M ± SEM). For non-normal distributions,
the nonparametric methods, Kruskal–Wallace test, were used (data
were presented as Me (25th–75th percentile)). Differences were considered
significant at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
At the first
stage, the experiment focused on the effect of a high-calorie diet
and social isolation. The body mass indices in Control and Control-SI rat
groups were almost identical at the end of the experiment (Table
1). The high-calorie diet led to a statistically significant
increase in the body mass by an average of 10% versus Control group,
while the combined effect in HCD-SI led to a 12% increase on average
versus Control-SI group. These rat groups (HCD and HCD-SI) were
practically indistinguishable from each other in average body mass
values. The visceral fat mass did not reveal significant differences
in the rats of Control and Control-SI groups. The rats of HCD group
showed a 4-fold gain in the visceral fat mass versus Control group,
while this elevation was less pronounced in HCD-SI group: approximately
2-fold versus Control-SI group. At the same time, the visceral fat
mass in HCD group was 2-fold higher versus HCD-SI group. Obviously,
in social isolation, the gain in rat visceral fat mass was less pronounced
versus group housing, although fat intake in these rat groups was
almost the same (6.7 and 6.8 g per day, respectively). The mean
SBP values in both groups fed a standard diet (groups 1, 2) were
practically identical, while in the rats fed an excessive diet (groups
3, 4), they significantly increased by 11 and 15%, respectively, reaching
comparable values (Table 1).
Table 1.
The effect of high-calorie diet and
social isolation on body mass, visceral fat mass, and systolic blood pressure
(SBP) in male Wistar rats
Indices
1)
Control
2)
Control-SI
3)
HCD
4)
HCD-SI
Body
mass, g
373.9
± 7.7
370.6
± 8.6
411.1
± 9.0*#
416.2
± 9.3*#
Visceral
fat mass, g
5.5
± 0.5
5.2
± 0.5
21.8
± 1.2*#
10.7
± 0.8*#^
SBP,
mm Hg
131.1
± 2.2
134.0
± 1.4
145.3
± 2.1*#
153.6
± 2.5*#^
The differences are significant at p <
0.05: *—vs Control group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.
As seen
from Table 2, the values of biochemical blood
indices were almost identical in Control and Control-SI groups.
Feeding a high-calorie diet led to an increase in the total serum
cholesterol level in the rats of HCD-SI group. The triglyceride
level increased significantly only in HCD, but not HCD-SI, group.
The glucose level increased significantly in both groups versus
Control group.
Table 2.
Biochemical indices of blood serum and
thyroid tissue in rats of experimental groups (M ± SEM)
Indices
1)
Control
2)
Control-SI
3)
HCD
4)
HCD-SI
Blood serum
Total
cholesterol, mmol/L
1.43
± 0.09
1.50
± 0.08
1.58
± 0.07
1.65
± 0.08*
Triglycerides,
mmol/L
0.55
± 0.05
0.57
± 0.09
0.97
± 0.09*#
0.65
± 0.07^
Glucose,
mmol/L
5.41
± 0.30
5.86
± 0.38
6.89
± 0.27*#
6.39
± 0.28*
Thyroid tissue
Triglycerides,
mmol/g tissue
4.52
± 0.57
3.30
± 0.63
9.63
± 0.88*#
6.23
± 0.51#^
MDA,
mmol/g tissue
59.71
± 5.13
60.85
± 8.44
86.49
± 5.22*#
74.07
± 5.15
The differences are significant at p <
0.05: *—vs Control group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.
The determination of triglyceride levels in thyroid tissue
showed comparable values in the first two groups of rats fed a standard
diet and revealed a significant increase in the index with a high-calorie
diet regardless of the housing conditions versus Control group.
However, the accumulation of triglycerides in thyroid tissue was
most pronounced in HCD group, significantly exceeding (1.5-fold)
this index in the rats exposed to a combined effect (HCD-SI group).
The MDA level in thyroid tissue significantly increased (1.4-fold) with
a high-calorie diet in group 3 versus Control, while in group 4,
there was only an upward tendency for the its level (Table 2).Considering the increase in visceral fat mass, SBP elevation
and metabolic shifts, we can state that the animals fed a high-calorie
diet developed an experimental metabolic syndrome. The consumption
of almost equal amounts of lard under conditions of social isolation
and in group housing led to a more pronounced accumulation of visceral
fat and greater metabolic abnormalities under conditions of group
housing (Tables 1, 2).The assessment
of the rat psycho-emotional status was carried out using the Porsolt
forced-swim test, which is designed to detect depressive behavior
in rodents [8]. As seen from Fig.
1, the rats of Control-SI group differed by a reliable, almost
2-fold, increase in the duration of the first active swimming act
versus Control group. The rats fed a high-calorie diet showed shifts
in the opposite direction, namely a significant decrease in the
duration of the first active swimming act and an increase in the
freezing (immobility) time, indicative an increasing depression.
Fig. 1.
The results of the Porsolt forced-swim
test in experimental animals (Me (25; 75). The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.
At the first
stage of the experiment, along with hormonal indices, the characteristics
of the activity of some enzymes of thyroid status were also studied
(Table 3). TPO activity in thyroid tissue was
almost indistinguishable in the first two groups. Against the background
of a high-calorie diet, there was a significant decrease in TPO activity,
almost half of the control level, regardless of the housing conditions
(Table 3). In contrast, hepatic D1 activity
significantly increased with excessive nutrition.
Table 3.
Indices of TPO activity in thyroid tissue
and D1 activity in liver tissue in rats of experimental groups
Indices
1)
Control
2)
Control-SI
3)
HCD
4)
HCD-SI
Thyroid
TPO,
IU/mg protein/min
0.69
± 0.12
0.70
± 0.13
0.37
± 0.04*#
0.40
± 0.08*#
Liver
D1,
nmol/g tissue/h
90.00
± 8.27
71.33
± 7.97
152.56
± 20.29*#
136.88
± 14.33
The differences are significant at p <
0.05: *—vs Control group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.
Serum hormonal indices of the thyroid status are presented
in the Figures as light bars (rats without stress) and hatched bars
(rats after stress). First of all, it is necessary to consider the
effect of a high-calorie diet and social isolation on the studied
indices.As seen
from Fig. 2, TSH values are not significantly
different among the animals of the first two groups (Control and
Control-SI) without stress, although in group 2, there was an upward
tendency for the TSH level (p >
0.05). A high-calorie diet led to a significant (1.8-fold) increase
in the TSH level versus Control, while HCD-SI group showed a 2-fold
increase in the index versus Control group and a 1.5-fold increase
versus Control-SI group. A significant (1.8-fold) increase in the TSH
level was observed under the influence of short-term stress in Control
group; a significant hormone increase (1.5-fold) was also detected
in HCD group. However, in the rats kept in isolation (Control-SI
and HCD-SI), the shifts in TSH levels did not reach statistical
significance (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
The experimental exposure on the TSH
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.
Against the background of excessive feeding, there were a
significant 1.6-fold increase in the total T3 level and a 1.4-fold
increase in the total T4 level, which was paralleled by a 1.7-fold
elevation of hepatic D1 activity versus Control group (Figs.
3, 4; Table 3). When a
high-calorie diet was combined with social isolation, T3 and T4
levels remained within control values, despite a significant increase
in TSH levels versus Control. Serum T3 and T4 levels in HCD significantly
exceeded those in HCD combined with social isolation.
Fig. 3.
The experimental exposure on the T3
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.
Fig. 4.
The experimental exposure on the T4
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.
The poststress
T3 level (Fig. 3) remained relatively
stable in almost all experimental groups, whereas the serum T4 significantly
increased in Control-SI group against the background of stress (Fig.
4).As seen from Fig. 5 and 6, the
feeding type and housing conditions had no effect on levels of free thyroid
hormone fractions. A poststress elevation of fT3 was only observed
in Control group (Fig. 5), and of fT4
only in HCD-SI group (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5.
The experimental exposure on the fT3
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.
Fig. 6.
The experimental exposure on the fT4
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.
A high-calorie diet and social isolation caused no significant
shifts in serum cortisol levels (Fig. 7),
but there was a downward tendency for its index in Control-SI group.
Fig. 7.
The experimental exposure on the cortisol
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.
A short-term stress exposure caused a sharp (1.8-fold) increase
in the serum cortisol level in Control group rats versus those not
exposed to cold water swimming, hence unstressed (Fig.
7).It is worthwhile to characterize stress-induced changes in
the indices in Control group, i.e. an increase in levels of ТSH
(1.8-fold) and cortisol (1.8-fold), as well as a slight increase
in the serum fT3 level, which appears to be an adequate physiological
reaction to a short-term acute stress.In Control-SI
group, there was also a significant increase in serum cortisol levels
(1.8-fold), but there were no changes in such indices as TSH and
fT3, which is typical for Control group. The mean serum TSH value
in Control-SI group after swimming-induced stress matched that in
Control group after swimming. However, at the same time, the magnitude
of the response to acute stressor exposure was decreased.In HCD group, there was only observed a 1.5-fold increase
in serum TSH levels in the stressed versus unstressed animals. No
cortisol release into the bloodstream was detected 1 h after stress.In HCD-SI group, there was a poststress increase in cortisol
levels similar to that in Control group (1.8-fold), but there was
no reaction from TSH. The latter may be due to the initially elevated
level of the index, which exceeded the control value by more than
2-fold.The results of the Porsolt forced-swim
test in experimental animals (Me (25; 75). The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.The experimental exposure on the TSH
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.The experimental exposure on the T3
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.The experimental exposure on the T4
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.The experimental exposure on the fT3
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.The experimental exposure on the fT4
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.The experimental exposure on the cortisol
level in the rats of experimental group. The differences are significant
at p < 0.05: *—vs Control
group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group; &—vs unstressed
animals; **—vs Control group after stress; ##—vs Control-SI group
after stress; ^^—vs HCD group after stress.The effect of high-calorie diet and
social isolation on body mass, visceral fat mass, and systolic blood pressure
(SBP) in male Wistar ratsThe differences are significant at p <
0.05: *—vs Control group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.Biochemical indices of blood serum and
thyroid tissue in rats of experimental groups (M ± SEM)The differences are significant at p <
0.05: *—vs Control group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.Indices of TPO activity in thyroid tissue
and D1 activity in liver tissue in rats of experimental groupsThe differences are significant at p <
0.05: *—vs Control group; #—vs Control-SI group; ^—vs HCD group.
DISCUSSION
It is known from the literature that the isolation of rodents
in early childhood causes later on a pronounced anxiety and depression
accompanied by a decrease in corticosterone blood levels (chronic
isolation stress) and changes in neuroplasticity indices [12, 13]. When isolating adult animals, no such characteristic
shifts may occur, but more often, a hyperactive phenotype ensues [12, 13]. In our experiments, when tested in the Porsolt
test, animals in Control-SI group showed a significant increase
in the duration of the first swimming act versus Control group.
The animals of HCD group showed opposite shifts, namely a decrease
in the time of the first swimming act and an increase in the freezing
time. These characteristics seem to indicate the development of
an active phenotype against the background of isolation stress and
the signs of depression in a high-calorie diet under conditions
of group housing.There is ambiguous information in the literature concerning
the effect of social isolation on the body mass of animals. Some
authors point out that social isolation in overfed adult rodents
promotes an increase in obesity and concomitant alterations of metabolic
functions [14], while others report the
opposite results [15, 16]. The social isolation
model that we used in our experiments restricted an increase in
visceral obesity and characteristic metabolic and hormonal shifts
and also increased animal activity in the Porsolt test. The HCD
group rats had a most pronounced visceral obesity and exhibited
a tendency toward depression in the Porsolt test.As for the peculiarities of the thyroid status in HCD, our
results confirmed the clinical observations stating an increase
in the TSH level in obesity [2]. This
fact can be interpreted as evidence of hypothyroidism in obese patients,
however, in our experiments, an increase in the TSH level was recorded
against the background of elevated T3 and T4 levels. Current studies
indicate that leptin produced by adipocytes has a regulatory effect
on TSH secretion as it activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
(HPA) axis by affecting the neurons residing in the paraventricular
nucleus and responsible for TSH production [17].
It has been suggested that an increased TSH level in obesity is not
a consequence of hypothyroidism, but serves as a mechanism aimed
at the activation of basal metabolism [17].
Our work also revealed other adaptive components of the response
aimed at the activation of metabolism in excessive high-calorie diet
and visceral obesity, such as an activation of hepatic D1 and an
increase in T3 and T4 blood levels. T3 is known to increase the
intensity of lipolysis in adipose tissue through cAMP-dependent mechanisms,
and thus affects lipolysis synergistically with the adrenergic system
[17]. However, under conditions of social
isolation, serum T3 and T4 shifts characteristic of HCD were absent
in spite of elevated TSH levels.The fact of a decrease in TPO activity in thyroid tissue in
HCD and HCD-SI groups deserves attention. It may be explained by
an accumulation of triglycerides in the thyroid gland in obesity
and their toxic effect on the thyroid function, which was also noted
in other studies [18]. Alternatively, this
may be associated with an increase in free-radical processes, as
evidenced by an increase in the MDA level (Table 2).
Inhibition of TPO activity with prolonged overfeeding and visceral obesity
may indicate a downward tendency for the thyroid function, which
in the long run may entail the development of hypothyroidism.There are few publications in the literature addressing the
problem of obesity in the light of its influence on the reactivity
of the organism’s regulatory systems under stress, although it is
well known that a number of neuroendocrine processes are definitely
altered in obesity. In our experiments, a study of the reaction
to short-term stress showed that in the rats with a severest visceral
obesity (HCD group), there is no stress-induced increase in blood
cortisol levels after 1-h exposure. It can be assumed that this
is due to the neurobiological mechanisms of depression in obese
animals. According to the literature, depressed patients are characterized
by substantial changes in the HPA axis, with attenuated HPA and
sympathetic responses to acute stress [19-21] being
typical for depressed patients. There is evidence of a biological
link between type 2 diabetes, which is characteristic of obesity,
depression and HPA axis dysregulation, including stress response [22].As for the social isolation model, Control-SI rat group showed
an increased activity in the Porsolt test and an upward tendency
for the TSH level, presumably due to chronic isolation stress. Against
the background of prolonged social isolation (Control-SI and HCD-SI
groups), TSH release in response to short-term stress, which was characteristic
of Control group, did not show up.Thus, the feeding type, as well as the deficit of social activity,
are factors that modulate the state of regulatory systems and alter
their reactivity in response to acute stressor exposure.
CONCLUSIONS
1. A high-calorie 4-month diet causes a significant gain in
the body and visceral fat mass, as well as an elevation of systolic
blood pressure, glucose and triglyceride serum levels, in male Wistar
rats. Visceral obesity and triglyceride levels were increased most
pronouncedly when the animals were housed collectively as opposed
to their individual housing under social isolation conditions.2. The results of the Porsolt test indicate an increase in
depression in rats fed a high-calorie diet and a manifestation of
an active phenotype in animals housed in conditions of social isolation.3. A high-calorie diet leads to a significant increase in
TSH levels, total serum fractions of thyroxine and triiodothyronine,
and hepatic D1 activity, which seems to be an adaptation aimed at the
activation of metabolism. Under conditions of combined exposure
to a high-calorie diet and social isolation, no increase in thyroxine
and triiodothyronine blood levels was observed.4. Against the background of a high-calorie diet, there is
a decrease in TPO activity and an increase in triglyceride and malondialdehyde
levels in thyroid tissue, which in the long run may lead to a decrease
in the thyroid function.5. The reaction to short-term acute stress in animals of Control
group includes a sharp elevation of cortisol and TSH, as well as
a slight increase in the serum level of free triiodothyronine.6. The rats fed a high-calorie diet also showed an increased
TSH release into the bloodstream 1 h after stress, but the cortisol
level remained virtually unchanged in the meantime.7. When animals were housed individually (social isolation),
regardless of the type of their diet, a typical stress response
was observed in the form of a cortisol release into the bloodstream after
1-h exposure. However, in these animals, TSH response to acute stress
was not manifested, since the level of this index was already somewhat elevated
against the background of chronic stress of social isolation.Thus, social isolation and a high-calorie diet evoke oppositely
directed changes in behavioral reactions of male Wistar rats. These
exposures, as well as their combinations, lead to specific shifts in
the functional activity of the pituitary-thyroid-adrenal axis, which,
in turn, corrects the physiological response to short-term stress
exposure.
Authors: Georgia Balsevich; Andres Uribe; Klaus V Wagner; Jakob Hartmann; Sara Santarelli; Christiana Labermaier; Mathias V Schmidt Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 4.286