Literature DB >> 35598896

Predictive biomarkers of response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy and bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Ziting Wang1, Wei Zheng So1, Kep Yong Loh2, Yew Koon Lim1, Ratha Mahendran1, Qing Hui Wu1, Edmund Chiong1.   

Abstract

Within the heterogeneous population of patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure, there are clear differences in prognosis and therapy with regard to the timeline when bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure occurred. There are a variety of classifications which include bacillus Calmette-Guérin refractory disease, relapsing, unresponsive, and intolerant. Further profiling of these patients may help to shed light on other forms of therapy that are less radical. We hereby summarize the different biomarkers that predicts for response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy and bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; immunotherapy; recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35598896      PMCID: PMC9543886          DOI: 10.1111/iju.14921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   2.896


area under the curve bacillus Calmette‐Guérin carcinoma in situ copy number variant Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico European Association of Urology European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer fluorescence in situ hybridization hazard ratio interleukin interquartile range lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio neoantigen load neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer odds ratio programmed death‐ligand 1 platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio single‐nucleotide polymorphism tumor mutation burden tumor microenvironment tumor suppressor gene transurethral resection of bladder tumor

Introduction

The definition of BCG failure has evolved over the years. The most recent definition in the EAU guidelines broadly defined BCG failure as any high‐grade disease occurring during or after BCG therapy. Prior to labeling the patient as BCG failure, the exclusion of disease in the upper urinary tracts and prostate should be established, along with ensuring that the patient has had adequate BCG, which is defined as at least five of six doses of an initial induction course plus at least two of six doses of a second induction course or two of three doses of maintenance therapy. Within this heterogeneous population of patients with BCG failure, there are clear differences in prognosis and therapy with regard to the timeline when BCG failure occurred. There are a variety of classifications which include BCG refractory disease, relapsing, unresponsive, and intolerant. The next line of treatment is a cystectomy, which some may deem as overtreatment for a non‐muscle invasive disease. Further profiling of these patients may help to shed light on other forms of therapy that are less radical. We hereby summarize the different biomarkers that predicts for response to BCG immunotherapy and BCG failure for NMIBC.

Predictors of BCG response and failure

Clinical‐pathological scoring systems

When BCG therapy was initially officialized as a therapeutic option, clinical parameters were highly anticipated to aid in deciding BCG provision for bladder cancer patients. Various clinical trials and numerous observational studies were en route to report their preliminary findings and declare significant predictors of poor oncological outcomes. Of note was the EORTC, as well as the CUETO groups. First introduced in the 2008 EAU Guidelines on TaT1 bladder cancer, the EORTC scoring system is based on a randomized cohort analysis of 2596 patients diagnosed with non‐muscle invasive tumors, developed primarily to facilitate management options post‐TURBT. This validated risk score has been consistently recommended by the EAU Guidelines for use in routine clinical practice over the last decade, , , , reaffirming its reliability in determining recurrence and progression risk at 1 and 5 years posttreatment. However, an important underlying drawback exists particular to this model – patients were mainly managed with intravesical chemotherapy. This inadvertently undermines the accuracy of predicting BCG failure when applied to a cohort that is treated with BCG, the current gold standard for treatment. To circumvent this incongruity, the CUETO framework was tailored specifically as a scoring model for patients treated with 12 doses of intravesical BCG therapy over a 5‐ to 6‐month period post‐TURBT. Likewise, it aims to ascertain the risk of recurrence and progression of cancer by assessing seven significant factors: gender, age, prior recurrence status, number of tumors, T category, associated CIS, and the World Health Organization 1973 tumor grade. Patients are then categorized into four risk groups as governed by the aforementioned risk factors, with the risks of recurrence and progression clearly delineated for each group. Indeed, while the CUETO model has been aligned to focus on the BCG‐treated population, patients were not standardized to undergo the standard treatment protocol of 1–3 years of maintenance therapy, as defined by the Southwest Oncology Group. Rather, they received six cycles of two‐weekly maintenance treatment across a 5‐ to 6‐month period, with the maximum period attained to be of a year's duration. Notably, this will naturally deviate from predicting a trustable response in high‐risk patients on a 3‐year BCG maintenance regime, which is in fact the current recommended treatment. Moreover, the CUETO model was unexpectedly seen to overestimate the risk of recurrence and likelihood of disease progression in high‐risk patients in several cohort studies. , , In more recent times, the EAU 2021 Guidelines have reclassified patients into four risk groups, with the additional clinical risk factors of age, multiple papillary tumors, and tumor diameter. Admittedly, all these models do appear to be sufficiently consistent and reproducible. However, aside from the limitations as mentioned above, the selected factors are still unable to account for the wide confidence intervals for recurrence and progression. Based on the new EAU risk groups, a patient within the very high‐risk group was cited as having a 53% 10‐year progression risk, with confidence intervals that range from 36 to 73%. This suggests that there are significant factors in play that are not captured within the risk stratifications.

Clinical characteristics

Gender and age have been identified as potential markers of responsiveness or failure to BCG therapy. In particular, the female gender was previously validated as a significant poor prognostic indicator of NMIBC recurrence in patients who were enrolled within the CUETO model. , It is hypothesized that the pathophysiology involves the association of bladder carcinogenesis with female hormonal receptors. , Other hypothesized mechanisms include the gender‐varying immunomodulatory activity which was seen within pathologic samples of NMIBC patients. Within this Japanese cohort, females demonstrated increased regulatory T‐cell counts within the TME, of which elevated levels independently predicted disease recurrence. Advanced patient age has also been postulated as a poor prognostic factor of BCG responsiveness in NMIBC. A study of 805 patients with bladder CIS who were treated with BCG therapy showed that at 5 years, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the age group more than 70 years old (73% vs 63%; P = 0.005). In the EORTC trial 30 911, it was reported that patients above the age of 70 years not only demonstrated poorer long‐term prognosis with regard to BCG responsiveness, but also demonstrated worse progression‐free survival, overall survival, and NMIBC‐specific survival. It is hypothesized that this is due to the age‐related attenuation of the immune response, diminishing the therapeutic effects of BCG treatment.

Biochemical immune response markers

Methods to objectively quantify the extent of immune cell response after the induction of BCG therapy have been purported to herald optimal outcomes of treatment, as seen in Table 1. Hematological biomarkers include NLR, PLR, and LMR. , , , In a retrospective cohort study involving 100 high‐risk NMIBC patients, higher mean NLR values were seen in the BCG non‐responder group (3.65 ± 1.16 vs 2.61 ± 0.77; P = 0.01). Moreover, increase in NLR correlated significantly with disease recurrence and progression risk scores. In a similar vein, another study also concluded that an optimal cutoff of NLR >2.5 served as an independent predictor of disease recurrence and prognosticated worse recurrence‐free survival in NMIBC patients, particularly within the subgroup treated with BCG therapy. A meta‐analysis of 15 studies comprising 5354 patients reported that elevated PLR exhibited poorer progression‐free survival and disease‐free survival. Although not limited to BCG therapy, it is also interesting to note that high PLR correlated significantly with patient age >65 years old. This finding postulates that bladder cancer prognosis might be confounded by either that of an elevated PLR or advanced age. Likewise, albeit not within the population of patients receiving BCG therapy, LMR was reported to be a potential prognostic marker for survival in bladder cancer patients who underwent radical cystectomy.
Table 1

Biochemical markers associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC

PredictorsAuthorNumber of patients/samplesOutcome
Recurrence (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Recurrence‐free survival (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Progression (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Progression‐free survival (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Response (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])
NLRGetzler et al. 28 113HR 3.7 (95% CI 1.2–11.9, P = 0.023)Lower RFS (21.3 vs 34.1 months in NLR ≥2.5 and <2.5, respectively, P = 0.013)
Racioppi et al. 27 100NLR value correlated significantly with recurrence risk score (R = 0.55, P = 0.01)NLR value correlated significantly with progression risk score (R = 0.49, P = 0.01)
LMRAdamkiewicz et al. 23 125AUC 3.25, OR 0.54, P < 0.001
FISHKamat et al. 31 126

Positive FISH result vs negative FISH result: at baseline (38.3% vs 17.8%, P = 0.020), at 6 weeks after BCG initiation (34.0% vs 13.5% P = 0.008), at 3 months after BCG (58.3% vs 15.3%, P < 0.001), and at 6 months after BCG (69.2% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001)

Positive FISH result vs negative FISH result: at baseline (19.8% vs 4.4%, P < 0.032), at 6 weeks (P = 0.030), at 6 weeks after BCG (28.0% vs 12.2%, P = 0.030), at 3 months after BCG (25.0% vs 6.8%, P = 0.013), and at 6 months after BCG (69.2% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001)

IL‐2Watanabe et al. 43 20Elevated IL‐2 levels are an independent predictor of BCG response (risk ratio 0.368, 95% CI 0.29–0.895, P = 0.003)
de Reijke et al. 44 23Low levels of urinary IL‐2 levels correlated significantly with tumor recurrence within 6 months after BCG initiation (P = 0.003)
Biochemical markers associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC Positive FISH result vs negative FISH result: at baseline (38.3% vs 17.8%, P = 0.020), at 6 weeks after BCG initiation (34.0% vs 13.5% P = 0.008), at 3 months after BCG (58.3% vs 15.3%, P < 0.001), and at 6 months after BCG (69.2% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001) Positive FISH result vs negative FISH result: at baseline (19.8% vs 4.4%, P < 0.032), at 6 weeks (P = 0.030), at 6 weeks after BCG (28.0% vs 12.2%, P = 0.030), at 3 months after BCG (25.0% vs 6.8%, P = 0.013), and at 6 months after BCG (69.2% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001) Adamkiewicz et al. contextualized NLR, PLR, and LMR to identify the best marker of progression in bladder cancer patients receiving BCG – all markers independently prognosticated progression in multivariable analysis. However, when compared alongside one another, LMR was superior to NLR and PLR in terms of predicting disease progression, surpassing as the indicator with the strongest prognostic value. Most of the studied biomarkers were serum in nature. However, Kamat et al. did evaluate the role of FISH in urine samples collected during BCG immunotherapy. FISH was performed using the UroVysion Bladder Cancer Recurrence Kit on patients who received the induction and maintenance course according to the Southwest Oncology Group trial 8507 protocol. , The study found that the presence of positive FISH results correlated with recurrence and progression rates. The same center also derived a cytokine panel based on nine urinary cytokines measured from before to just after the sixth instillation of BCG which predicted for recurrence with an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI 0.779–0.931).

Genomic pathway alterations

In particular, the research in p53, pRB, and PD‐L1 expression in bladder cancer has gained considerable traction in the last few years. , , , , , Genomic pathway alterations can generally be categorized into SNPs, CNV alterations, and epigenetic‐related modulation of genes, as seen in Figure 1. One of the earlier established single‐nucleotide variances was related to the interleukin cytokine family, whereby Leibovici et al. demonstrated that a particular variant genotype (C/C) of IL‐6 correlated with an increased risk of disease recurrence (HR 4.60) in patients receiving maintenance BCG after TURBT. Other studies have also demonstrated that high urinary levels of IL‐2 after BCG instillation were associated with shorter recurrence‐free survival. , While variances of tumour necrosis factor α and IL‐8 were associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence and longer recurrence‐free survival in BCG‐treated TURBT patients, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐17, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 demonstrated significant correlation with disease recurrence after BCG therapy.
Fig. 1

Epigenetic–genetic interactions in bladder cancer TME, providing differing mechanisms of control that regulates oncogene expression and silencing. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Epigenetic–genetic interactions in bladder cancer TME, providing differing mechanisms of control that regulates oncogene expression and silencing. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] The Sonic Hedgehog Pathway (Shh) is another crucial cell signaling pathway that controls tumor proliferation and differentiation. Chen et al. comparatively evaluated 177 SNPs found within 11 Shh pathways, reporting that nine SNPs located on GLI3, GLI2, and HHIP were all significantly associated with time to recurrence after BCG instillation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, two variant genotypes rs6463089 and rs3801192 remained significantly associated with a 2.40 (95% CI 1.50–3.84) and 2.54‐fold (95% CI 1.47–4.39) risk in recurrence after BCG treatment, respectively. Copy number variations have been extensively studied in its relations to outcomes of bladder cancer, but there is a paucity of data on its role in predicting for BCG therapy success. Cai et al. explored the impact of loss of heterozygosity on the interferon‐α gene locus and its relation to BCG treatment outcomes. Survival curve analysis revealed a significant association between the risk of recurrence and loss of heterozygosity on interferon‐α (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analyses, loss of heterozygosity remained as an independent predictor of BCG response (HR 4.09; 95% CI 2.59–6.28; P = 0.002). Agundez et al. assessed the role of 25 methylated TSGs and their association with clinical outcomes of BCG‐treated T1G3 tumors. The study evaluated several TSGs, notably PAX6, MSH6, RB1, THBS1, PYCARD, TP73, ESR1, and GATA. Two TSGs – MSH6 and THBS1 – were noted to be the predictors of disease progression after BCG on multivariate analyses. In particular, the research in PD‐L1 expression in bladder cancer has gained considerable traction in the last few years. Of note, Pierconti et al. demonstrated a significant correlation of PD‐L1 with tumor recurrence (P = 0.035). BCG nonresponders also were observed to have elevated PD‐L1 levels compared to responders. The phase 2 study KEYNOTE‐057 suggested that pembrolizumab was a possible nonsurgical option for patients with BCG unresponsive NMIBC who were not keen for or candidates for radical cytectomies. A complete response rate of 41% at 3 months and 23% for 2 years was achieved in BCG unresponsive bladder cancer patients with CIS who declined or were ineligible for radical cystectomy. Notably, complete response rates seemed to be better in patients with PDL‐1 negative status (combined positive score < 10%) patients. A summary of the genomic pathway alterations associated with outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC is outlined in Table 2.
Table 2

Genomic pathway alterations associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC

PredictorsAuthorNumber of patients/samplesOutcome
Recurrence (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Recurrence‐free survival (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Progression (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Progression‐free survival (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Response (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])
IL‐6 variant genotype (C/C)Leibovici et al. 42 519HR 4.60 (95% CI 1.24–17.09)HR 1.88 (95% CI 0.80–4.11)
IL‐2 receptor alpha rs2104286Lima et al. 46 204aHR 2.007 (95% CI 1.207–3.335, P = 0.007)
IL‐17 (IL‐17A rs2275913)Lima et al. 46 204aHR 2.097 (95% CI 1.118–3.993, P = 0.021)
TNF‐alpha T‐1031C (CC genotype)Ahirwar et al. 45 426HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.14–0.98, P = 0.024)Improved RFS at 31 and 60 months (P = 0.024)
TNF‐alpha T‐1031C (CT genotype)Ahirwar et al. 45 426HR 1.27 (95% CI 0.56–2.84)
TNF‐alpha rs1799964Lima et al. 46 204aHR 2.427 (95% CI 1.144–5.149, P = 0.021)
Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM‐1) rs5498Lima et al. 46 204aHR 1.759 (95% CI 1.050–2.949, P = 0.032)
C‐C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2 rs391835)Lima et al. 46 204aHR 2.197 (95% CI 1.120–4.312, P = 0.022)

Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) pathway

SNP genetic variations

Chen et al. 47 419

GLI3 rs6463089 HR 2.40 (95% CI 1.50–3.84)

rs3801192 HR 2.54 (95% CI 1.47–4.39)

Interferon‐alpha (chromosome 9p21)Cai et al. 48 117HR 5.002 (95% CI 2.459–10.17, P < 0.0001)HR 4.09 (95% CI 2.59–6.28, P = 0.002)
p53Esuvaranathan et al. 35 80p53 positive vs p53 negative (36.8% vs 32.4%, P = 0.741)p53 positive vs p53 negative (15.8% vs 5.9%, P = 0.336)
Park et al. 36 615‐year RFS: <10% p53‐positive cells vs ≥10% p53‐positive cells (49.9% vs 59.3%, P = 0.792)5‐year PFS: <10% p53‐positive cells vs ≥10% p53‐positive cells (90.7% vs 78.7%, P = 0.0495)
Lee et al. 37 32RR 3.8 (95% CI 1.3–11.4, P = 0.0182)
Cormio et al. 38 27Altered p53 expression vs normal p53 expression (38% vs 36%, P = 0.92)Altered p53 expression vs normal p53 expression (31% vs 0%, P = 0.06)
Gaya et al. 39 134p53 positive vs p53 negative (44.4% vs 46.8%, P = 0.83)
Lopez‐Beltran et al. 40 51≤2% p53‐positive cells vs >2% p53‐positive cells (60% vs 30.56%, P = 0.0332)≤6% p53‐positive cells vs >6% p53‐positive cells RR 1.037 (95% CI 1.002–1.074, P = 0.039)
pRBCormio et al. 38 27Altered pRB expression vs normal pRB expression (57% vs 15%, P = 0.037)Altered pRB expression vs normal pRB expression (36% vs 0%, P = 0.018)
Park et al. 36 615‐year RFS: 1–50% pRB‐positive cells vs 0%/>50% pRB‐positive cells (60.9% vs 53.6%, P = 0.951)5‐year PFS: 1–50% pRB‐positive cells vs 0%/>50% pRB‐positive cells (87.1% vs 83.0%, P = 0.912)
PD‐L1 expressionPierconti et al. 50 65OR 0.1204 (95% CI 0.0147–1.023, P = 0.035)
Genomic pathway alterations associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) pathway SNP genetic variations GLI3 rs6463089 HR 2.40 (95% CI 1.50–3.84) rs3801192 HR 2.54 (95% CI 1.47–4.39)

Tumor mutation burden

Bladder cancer is one of the cancers with the highest mutational burden, compared to other tumor types. TMB was first studied by Meeks et al., who found a significantly lower TMB in progressors compared to nonprogressors. This was also correlated by the Brazilian group in 2020. Bastos et al. performed whole exome sequencing from tumor samples extracted from 35 patients with NMIBC who were treated with TURBT, re‐TUR, and six or more BCG instillations. They also found that TMB load was higher in patients who were BCG responsive compared to those who were BCG relapsing or BCG refractory. However, Meek's cohort group had a much higher TMB, ranging between 5 and 15 mutations/MB compared to the Bastos' group, which had a median TMB of 3 mutations/MB, with a range of 2.6–5.5 mutations/MB. In multivariate analyses, a high TMB was still an important biomarker of BCG response, with an OR of 5.20 (95% CI 1.11–24.34).

DNA methylation

DNA methylation has played an central role in epigenetic‐related gene modulation and was potentially recognized as an alternative molecular marker that could predict clinical outcomes of NMIBC patients treated with BCG, initially pioneered by Alvarez‐Múgica et al.’s single gene analysis. Subsequently, another genome‐wide methylation analysis was performed on a cohort of high‐risk NMIBC patients, concluding that the presence DNA methylation independently predicted 1‐year clinical outcomes. Ilijazi et al. found that gene promoter GPR158, when hypermethylated, was found to be the ideal predictor of BCG failure with an AUC value of 0.809 (P < 0.001). However, most of the methylation studies have modest sample sizes and varied definitions of threshold methylation differences, hence DNA methylation remains to be established as a reliable biomarker for BCG responsiveness.

Neoantigen load

Neoantigens are nonautologous, tumor‐specific antigens produced as a result of tumor gene mutation. NMIBC specimens from 35 patients who undergone BCG treatment were analyzed using whole exome sequencing and then classified as BCG responsive and unresponsive respectively. NAL was found to be greater in BCG responders (NAL: 100; IQR 75–145 vs NAL: 65; IQR 48.3–82.5; P = 0.032). Elevated NAL levels also significantly correlated with higher BCG response rates and lower recurrence rates, with a recurrence‐free survival of 76% vs 33% at 24 months. In multivariate analyses, NAL remained an independent predictor of BCG response with an OR of 6.57 (95% CI 1.32–32.67).

Inflamed TME

A constitutively inflamed environment has been acknowledged as an integral hallmark of bladder carcinogenesis. This prompted a study by Damrauer et al. to analyze untested gene expression signatures and establish possible associations with clinical and treatment endpoints. A RNA‐based profiling (NanoString nCounter) was conducted on samples of NMIBC and reported the presence of a novel molecular expression signature of an inflamed TME, which significantly correlated with longer recurrence‐free survival after BCG therapy. Conversely, the study also identified an immunologically “cold” variant of TME of which if present signified BCG unresponsiveness. Advanced transcriptomic and sequencing also uncovered associations between the “cold” TME and FGFR3 gene overexpression.

Molecular subtypes

The concept of molecular subtyping was extrapolated from studies based on breast cancer. Sjodahl derived a Lund classification system based on distinct gene expression signatures specific for cell cycle, cytokeratins, cell adhesion, receptor tyrosine kinases, and immune response. The original urothelial carcinoma subtypes were defined as urobasal A, genomically unstable, urobasal B, squamous cell carcinoma like, and an infiltrated class of tumors. However, this classification was mostly based on whole genome sequencing. The UROMOL multicenter collaboration utilized total RNA sequencing and paired‐end sequencing. The transcriptome sequencing enabled them to reclassify the tumors into three major classes, with basal‐ and luminal‐like features. The presence of stage Ta and T1 tumors with basal‐like characteristics (class 3) were hypothesized to represent a Ta pathway of disease progression, while the luminal‐like tumors (class 2) were hypothesized to follow the CIS pathway of progression. The authors were unable to detect any statistical differences to BCG response among the three groups, but it should be noted that a significant proportion of the patients with CIS did not receive any BCG. This work was subsequently elaborated on by Robertson et al. who specifically evaluated the cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas patients with high‐grade T1 NMIBC treated with BCG, with a primary outcome of interest deemed as recurrence after BCG instillation. The Bladder Cancer Molecular Taxonomy Group developed a five‐cluster solution with objectively delineated clinical endpoints and biological features for each subtype: T1‐LumGU, T1‐Inflam, T1‐Myc, T1‐TLum, and T1‐Early. T1‐Myc and T1‐Early molecular subtypes experienced the highest rate of recurrence after BCG (14/30 with 24 months) and collectively had significantly poorer recurrence‐free survival in comparison to the other three subtypes. They found that these prognostic subtypes corresponded with established subtype methods – T1‐LumGU demonstrated comparable findings to LumU subtype in MIBC, while T1‐Inflam demonstrated similarity to the class 2b subtype in the UROMOL classification system as well as the basal and mesenchymal‐like subtypes in the Lund classification. Kim et al. also suggested another subtyping system to predict response to BCG therapy. Within their cohort of 948 NMIBC patients, they reported a prognostic signature‐based subtype after transcriptional profiling and found that MSP888 was able to independently predict both NMIBC progression and recurrence after BCG and was largely on‐par with the Lund taxonomy and UROMOL system in terms of subtype homogeneity across all classifications. The other predictors associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC are delineated in Table 3.
Table 3

Other predictors associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC

PredictorsAuthorNumber of patients/samplesOutcome
Recurrence (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Recurrence‐free survival (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Progression (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Progression‐free survival (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])Response (P‐value/HR/OR/correlation coefficient [R])
Tumor mutation burdenBastos et al. 53 35HR 0.28 (95% CI 0.10–0.82, P = 0.021)HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.09–0.77, P = 0.009)OR 5.20 (95% CI 1.11–24.34, P = 0.036)
DNA methylationKitchen et al. 55 21Hypermethylation of CpG cg11850659 and hypomethylation of CpG cg01149192 predicted recurrence and progression within 1‐year diagnosis of NMIBC (83% sensitivity, 79% specificity, 83% positive predictive value, and 79% negative predictive value)
Illijazi et al. 56 53GPR158 promoter hypermethylation was a predictor of BCG failure (AUC 0.809, P < 0.001)
NALBastos et al. 53 35HR 0.28 (95% CI 0.10–0.81, P = 0.019)OR 6.57 (95% CI 1.32–32.67)
MSP888 molecular signature‐based subtypeKim et al. 64 948HR 2.569 (95% CI 1.065–6.915, P = 0.036)HR 3.447 (95% CI 1.483–8.012, P = 0.004)
Other predictors associated with the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC

Conclusion

The group of patients who are BCG unresponsive remains a heterogeneous cohort. The above studies have laid the initial foundation to permit stratification on many factors but are largely still hypothesis generating in nature. Future translational studies should be performed in more ethnically diverse populations to elucidate the functional significance of the biomarkers in the management of BCG unresponsive bladder cancer and access potential therapeutic options.

Author contributions

Ziting Wang: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; writing – original draft. Wei Zheng So: Conceptualization; data curation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Kep Yong Loh: Conceptualization; data curation; software; visualization. Yew Koon Lim: Conceptualization; data curation. Ratha Mahendran: Writing – review and editing. Qing Hui Wu: Writing – review and editing. Edmund Chiong: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; writing – review and editing.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  62 in total

1.  Validation of the CUETO scoring model for predicting recurrence and progression in T1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  W Krajewski; O Rodríguez-Faba; A Breda; F Pisano; S Poletajew; A Tukiendorf; R Zdrojowy; A Kołodziej; J Palou
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)       Date:  2019-05-30

2.  EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016.

Authors:  Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Virginia Hernández; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Morgan Rouprêt; Bas W G van Rhijn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Gender differences in stage distribution of bladder cancer.

Authors:  N A Mungan; L A Kiemeney; J A van Dijck; H G van der Poel; J A Witjes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Prognostic factors in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: multivariate analysis of data from four randomized CUETO trials.

Authors:  Jesus Fernandez-Gomez; Eduardo Solsona; Miguel Unda; Luis Martinez-Piñeiro; Marcelino Gonzalez; Rafael Hernandez; Rosario Madero; Antonio Ojea; Carlos Pertusa; Jesus Rodriguez-Molina; Jose Emilio Camacho; Santiago Isorna; Mariano Rabadan; Ander Astobieta; Manuel Montesinos; Pedro Muntañola; Anabel Gimeno; Miguel Blas; Jose Antonio Martinez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Altered p53 and pRb expression is predictive of response to BCG treatment in T1G3 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Cormio; Isabella Tolve; Pasquale Annese; Angelo Saracino; Rosanna Zamparese; Francesca Sanguedolce; Pantaleo Bufo; Michele Battaglia; Francesco P Selvaggi; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky; Badrinath R Konety; Donald L Lamm; David Langham; Cheryl T Lee; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael A O'Donnell; Peter H O'Donnell; Daniel P Petrylak; Padmanee Sharma; Eila C Skinner; Guru Sonpavde; John A Taylor; Prasanth Abraham; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 13.751

7.  A Molecular Signature Determines the Prognostic and Therapeutic Subtype of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Responsive to Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy.

Authors:  Seon-Kyu Kim; Seong-Hwan Park; Yeong Uk Kim; Young Joon Byun; Xuan-Mei Piao; Pildu Jeong; Kyeong Kim; Hee Youn Lee; Sung Pil Seo; Ho Won Kang; Won Tae Kim; Yong-June Kim; Sang-Cheol Lee; Sung-Kwon Moon; Yung Hyun Choi; Wun-Jae Kim; Seon-Young Kim; Seok Joong Yun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Predictive value of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio on survival outcomes in bladder cancer patients after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Hai Bi; Ye Yan; Dong Wang; Zijian Qin; Guoliang Wang; Lulin Ma; Yi Huang; Jian Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Identification of a Novel Inflamed Tumor Microenvironment Signature as a Predictive Biomarker of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Damrauer; Kyle R Roell; Markia A Smith; Melissa A Troester; Eugene J Pietzak; Xuezheng Sun; Erin L Kirk; Katherine A Hoadley; Halei C Benefield; Gopakumar Iyer; David B Solit; Matthew I Milowsky; William Y Kim; Matthew E Nielsen; Sara E Wobker; Guido Dalbagni; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Andrew F Olshan; Bernard H Bochner; Helena Furberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 13.801

10.  Discovery of Molecular DNA Methylation-Based Biomarkers through Genome-Wide Analysis of Response Patterns to BCG for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Dafina Ilijazi; Walter Pulverer; Iris E Ertl; Ursula Lemberger; Shoji Kimura; Mohammad Abufaraj; David D'Andrea; Benjamin Pradere; Andreas Bruchbacher; Anna Graf; Francesco Soria; Martin Susani; Andrea Haitel; Luca Molinaro; Armin Pycha; Evi Comploj; Stephan Pabinger; Andreas Weinhäusel; Gerda Egger; Shahrokh F Shariat; Melanie R Hassler
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.