Literature DB >> 35598593

Development and Validation of a Mortality Prediction Model in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates.

Alvaro Moreira1, Domenico Benvenuto2, Christopher Fox-Good1, Yasmeen Alayli1, Mary Evans1, Baldvin Jonsson3, Stellan Hakansson4, Nathan Harper5, Jennifer Kim1, Mikael Norman6, Matteo Bruschettini7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Understanding factors that associate with neonatal death may lead to strategies or interventions that can aid clinicians and inform families.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop an early prediction model of neonatal death in extremely low gestational age (ELGA, <28 weeks) neonates.
METHODS: A predictive cohort study of ELGA neonates was derived from the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register between the years 2011 to May 2021. The goal was to use readily available clinical variables, collected within the first hour of birth, to predict in-hospital death. Data were split into a train cohort (80%) to build the model and tested in 20% of randomly selected neonates. Model performance was assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared to validated mortality prediction models and an external cohort of neonates.
RESULTS: Among 3,752 live-born extremely preterm infants (46% girls), in-hospital mortality was 18% (n = 685). The median gestational age and birth weight were 25.0 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 24.0, 27.0) and 780 g (IQR 620, 940), respectively. The proposed model consisted of three variables: birth weight (grams), Apgar score at 5 min of age, and gestational age (weeks). The BAG model had an AUC of 76.9% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (72.6%, 81.3%), while birth weight and gestational age had an AUC of 73.1% (95% CI: 68.4%,77.9%) and 71.3% (66.3%, 76.2%). In the validation cohort, the BAG model had an AUC of 68.9%.
CONCLUSION: The BAG model is a new mortality prediction model in ELGA neonates that was developed using readily available information.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mortality; Neonate; Prediction; Preterm

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35598593      PMCID: PMC9296601          DOI: 10.1159/000524729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neonatology        ISSN: 1661-7800            Impact factor:   5.106


  32 in total

1.  CRIB II: an update of the clinical risk index for babies score.

Authors:  Gareth Parry; Janet Tucker; William Tarnow-Mordi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Early prediction of poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants by classification tree analysis.

Authors:  N Ambalavanan; A Baibergenova; W A Carlo; S Saigal; B Schmidt; K E Thorpe
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant. Originally published in July 1953, volume 32, pages 250-259.

Authors:  Virginia Apgar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology: a physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  D K Richardson; J E Gray; M C McCormick; K Workman; D A Goldmann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A comparison of neonatal mortality risk prediction models in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  M M Pollack; M A Koch; D A Bartel; I Rapoport; R Dhanireddy; A A El-Mohandes; K Harkavy; K N Subramanian
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The Golden Hour: care of the LBW infant during the first hour of life one unit's experience.

Authors:  Regina D Reynolds; Jobeth Pilcher; Ashley Ring; Rose Johnson; Pamela McKinley
Journal:  Neonatal Netw       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

Review 7.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-07

8.  Comparing very low birth weight versus very low gestation cohort methods for outcome analysis of high risk preterm infants.

Authors:  Louise Im Koller-Smith; Prakesh S Shah; Xiang Y Ye; Gunnar Sjörs; Yueping A Wang; Sharon S W Chow; Brian A Darlow; Shoo K Lee; Stellan Håkanson; Kei Lui
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  An exploratory analysis of missing data from the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Learn to Play - Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) project.

Authors:  Christine Delisle Nyström; Joel D Barnes; Mark S Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Neonatal Mortality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cheyenne Mangold; Sarah Zoretic; Keerthi Thallapureddy; Axel Moreira; Kevin Chorath; Alvaro Moreira
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.