| Literature DB >> 35597906 |
Yuan Li1, Zhi-Gang Yang2, Shan Huang3, Ke Shi3, Yi Zhang3, Wei-Feng Yan3, Ying-Kun Guo4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To elucidate the value of texture analysis (TA) in detecting and differentiating myocardial tissue alterations on T2-weighted CMR (cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac amyloidosis; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Texture analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35597906 PMCID: PMC9124433 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02671-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.174
Fig. 1Framework of this study. The extent of LGE in CA and HCM were quantified using the full width half maximum technique. T2WI images were used for the texture analysis. Feature extraction was performed on the ROIs on the basal septum of the left ventricle. Stepwise methods were performed to selecting the optimal features. LGE: late gadolinium enhancement; CA: cardiac amyloidosis; HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ROI: region of interest
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the included subjects
| CA (n = 100) | HCM (n = 217) | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 58.5 ± 10.7 | 50.7 ± 14.8 | < 0.001 |
| Gender, females, n(%) | 41 (41%) | 101 (46.5%) | 0.318 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.0 ± 3.3 | 24.1 ± 3.5 | < 0.001 |
| NYHA III-IV, n(%) | 64 (64%) | 23 (10.6%) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension, n(%) | 16 (16%) | 65 (30%) | 0.001 |
| Diabetes, n(%) | 9 (9%) | 18 (8.3%) | 0.263 |
| Dyslipidemia, n(%) | 7 (7%) | 12 (5.5%) | 0.823 |
| Sub-types of HCM | |||
| Asymmetrical/LOVOT | 37 | 168/124 | |
| Concentric | 63 | 36 | |
| Mid-ventricular | – | 2 | |
| Apical | – | 11 | |
| AL, n(%) | 93 (93%) | / | |
| NT-proBNP, pg/ml | 8.5 ± 1.1 | 7.0 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
| Troponin T, pg/ml | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 |
| Medications | |||
| Diuretics | 68 (68%) | 26 (12%) | |
| β-blockers | 26 (26%) | 78 (35.9%) | |
| ACEI/ARB | 12 (12%) | 31 (14.2%) | |
| Ca2+ blockers | 5 (5%) | 33 (15.2%) | |
| Statin | 8 (8%) | 22 (10.1%) | |
| Cardiovascular magnetic resonance | |||
| LV-ESV index, ml | 26.6 ± 9.5 | 23.9 ± 9.2 | 0.029 |
| LV-EDV index, ml | 49.6 ± 11.4 | 59.8 ± 13.8 | < 0.001 |
| LVEF, % | 46.6 ± 13.0 | 61.0 ± 7.9 | < 0.001 |
| LV mass index, g/m2 | 43.3 ± 13.3 | 45.6 ± 17.5 | 0.25 |
| MWT | 15.4 (14.5, 17.6) | 18.5 (16.2, 21.1) | < 0.001 |
| Presence of main LGE pattern | |||
| Patchy | 17 (24.3%) | 163 (75%) | |
| Transmural | 25 (35.7%) | 54 (25%) | |
| Subendocardial | 23 (32.8%) | ||
| Diffuse | 5 (7.2%) | ||
| LGE extent (g) | 55.9 (37.3, 81.3) | 10.2 (3.2, 25.2) | < 0.001 |
| LGE extent (%) | 49.4 (37.4, 63.8) | 11.4 (4.5, 21.6) | < 0.001 |
CA: cardiac amyloidosis; HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; AL: light-chain amyloidosis; ESV: end-systolic volume; EDV: end-diastolic volume; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MWT: maximal wall thickness; LGE: late gadolinium enhancement
Differences of selected texture features between CA and HCM
| Image type | Feature class | Features names | CA | HCM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelet-LHL | GLRLM | Long run emphasis | 6.639 (5.796, 7.310) | 7.360 (6.721, 8.266) | < 0.0001 |
| Wavelet-LHL | GLRLM | Short run emphasis | 0.535 (0.510, 0.567) | 0.504 (0.478, 0.530) | < 0.0001 |
| Wavelet-LLH | GLRLM | Long run emphasis | 143.8 (104.5, 192.4) | 193.9 (148.7, 252.2) | < 0.0001 |
| Wavelet-HLH | GLDM | Small dependence high gray level emphasis | 0.143 ± 0.019 | 0.128 ± 0.016 | < 0.0001 |
| Original | First order | Skewness | 0.323 ± 0.436 | 0.107 ± 0.447 | < 0.0001 |
| Original | GLDM | Large dependence emphasis | 48.3 (38.8, 56.2) | 55.6 (50.2, 60.0) | < 0.0001 |
| Original | GLDM | Correlation | 0.911 (0.858, 0.951) | 0.819 (0.712, 0.908) | < 0.0001 |
GLRLM: gray level run length matrix, GLDM: gray level dependence matrix, GLCM: gray level co-occurrence matrix; H: high wavelet filter; L: low wavelet filter
Fig. 2ROC curves for the radiomics model in the training and testing cohorts. ROC: Receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC: area under the ROC curve
Diagnostic capacity of the selected tissue features for discriminating CA and HCM
| AUC (95%CI) | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | NPV | PPV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training group | 0.915 (0.879,0.951) | 0.860 | 75.7 | 90.7 | 89.0 | 79.1 |
| Testing group | 0.842 (0.759,0.924) | 0.792 | 60.0 | 87.9 | 82.9 | 69.2 |
| Similar hypertrophy | 0.864 (0.805,0.922) | 0.822 | 83.5 | 81.0 | 83.1 | 81.5 |
AUC: the area under the curve, PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value
Intraclass correlation coefficients for the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the selected texture features
| GLRLM-LRE LHL | GLRLM-SRE LHL | GLRLM-LRE LLH | GLDM-SDHGLE LHL | First order-Skewness | GLDM-LDE | GLDM-Correlation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-observer | 0.949 | 0.893 | 0.855 | 0.847 | 0.880 | 0.794 | 0.773 |
| Inter-observer | 0.918 | 0.883 | 0.834 | 0.761 | 0.858 | 0.758 | 0.757 |
Abbreviations as in Table 2