Literature DB >> 35597836

Feasibility of endoscopic endonasal resection of intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngioma in adults.

Lei Cao1, Wentao Wu1, Jie Kang1, Kefan Cai1, Chuzhong Li2, Chunhui Liu1, Haibo Zhu1, Suming Gen1, Yazhuo Zhang2, Songbai Gui3.   

Abstract

Intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngiomas (IVCs) are usually considered as a contraindication of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of EEA for the resection of IVCs based on MRI topographical diagnosis and surgical findings. We reviewed the data of 22 patients who were diagnosed to be IVCs according to five MRI criteria and underwent surgery through EEA. Sixteen IVCs were resected using endoscopic endonasal infrachiasmatic corridor, five IVCs by using endoscopic endonasal suprachiasmatic trans-lamina terminalis corridor, and one IVC by using both the infrachiasmatic and suprachiasmatic corridors. During the operation, all the 22 cases were verified to be IVCs. Gross total resection was achieved in 21 (95.5%) patients. After surgery, visual improvement was observed in 14 (63.6%) patients, no change in 6 (27.3%) patients, and some deterioration in 2 (9.1%) patients. An improvement in intellectual ability was observed in nine (40.9%) patients, no change in twelve (54.5%) patients, and some deterioration in one (4.5%) patient. Fifteen of the 22 patients (68.2%) developed new endocrinological deficit. One postoperative cerebral spinal fluid leakage occurred. EEA can be used as a safe and efficacious approach for the radical resection of IVCs. The combination of the five MRI criteria may serve as an accurate preoperative diagnostic tool to define the topographical relationships between craniopharyngiomas and the third ventricle. The endoscopic transnasal view from below has the advantage of clarifying the relationship between tumors and the third ventricle floor.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniopharyngioma; Endoscopic endonasal approach; Intraventricular; Surgery; Third ventricle

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35597836     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01807-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   2.800


  23 in total

1.  Suprachiasmatic translamina terminalis corridor used in endoscopic endonasal approach for resecting third ventricular craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Ye Gu; Xiaobiao Zhang; Fan Hu; Yong Yu; Tao Xie; Chongjing Sun; Wensheng Li
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  Endocrinological and ophthalmological consequences of an initial endonasal endoscopic approach for resection of craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Peter G Campbell; Brian McGettigan; Adam Luginbuhl; Sanjay Yadla; Marc Rosen; James J Evans
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Early outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for adult craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  John A Jane; Erin Kiehna; Spencer C Payne; Stephen V Early; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Operative outcomes and adjuvant treatment of purely third ventricle craniopharyngioma after a transcallosal approach.

Authors:  Tae-Young Jung; Shin Jung; Woo-Youl Jang; Kyung-Sub Moon; In-Young Kim; Sam-Suk Kang
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients.

Authors:  Luigi Maria Cavallo; Giorgio Frank; Paolo Cappabianca; Domenico Solari; Diego Mazzatenta; Alessandro Villa; Matteo Zoli; Alfonso Iodice D'Enza; Felice Esposito; Ernesto Pasquini
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Craniopharyngioma: a pathologic, clinical, and surgical review.

Authors:  Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman; Kenneth O Devaney; Primož Strojan; Carlos Suárez; Eric M Genden; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 7.  Limits of endoscopic endonasal surgery for III ventricle craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Douglas A Hardesty; Alaa S Montaser; André Beer-Furlan; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel M Prevedello
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series.

Authors:  Paul A Gardner; Amin B Kassam; Carl H Snyderman; Ricardo L Carrau; Arlan H Mintz; Steven Grahovac; Susan Stefko
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum.

Authors:  Amin B Kassam; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman; Ricardo L Carrau; Arlan H Mintz; Daniel M Prevedello
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor.

Authors:  Yun-Sik Dho; Yong Hwy Kim; Young-Bem Se; Doo Hee Han; Jung Hee Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Kyu-Chang Wang; Dong Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.