| Literature DB >> 35596874 |
Ricardo Vieira Botelho1, Eduardo de Freitas Bertolini2, Alécio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos3, Jefferson Walter Daniel4, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim5, Fernando Luiz Rolemberg Dantas6, François Dantas6, Franz Onishi7, Eloy Rusafa Neto8, Marcelo Luiz Mudo9, Jerônimo Buzetti Milano10.
Abstract
Adult cervical spine traumatic facet joint dislocations occur when excessive traumatic forces displace the vertebrae's facets, leading to loss of joint congruence. Reduction requires either cranial traction or open surgical procedures. This study aims to appraise the effects of different surgical techniques in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine acute traumatic facet blocks in adults. This study was based on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, registered in Prospero (CRD42021279249). The PICO question was composed of adults with acute cervical spine traumatic facet dislocations submitted to anterior or posterior surgical approaches, associated or not with cranial traction for reduction. Each surgical technique was compared to the other. The primary clinical outcomes included neurological improvement or worsening and surgical success/failure rates. The anterior approach without cranial traction was efficient in reducing facet displacements. Skull traction was an efficient and immediate method to achieve spine dislocation reductions. Differences were not present among techniques regarding neurological improvement. There were no surgical failures in patients operated on via the posterior approach. The need to decompress and stabilize the cervical spine can be achieved by anterior or posterior surgical approaches, and there is no clear answer as to which initial approach is superior to the other.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical spine; Facet joints dislocations; Subaxial; Surgical treatment; Traumatic
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35596874 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01808-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosurg Rev ISSN: 0344-5607 Impact factor: 2.800