| Literature DB >> 35596160 |
Chunhai Gao1, Endale Tadesse2, Sabika Khalid3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In light of the recent policy reform in China, the present study aims to investigate the potential impact of family SES on the quality of the parent-child relationship (PCR) through the serial mediating role of participation in organized visual art activities in privately owned centers (VAA1) and parent-supervised visual art activities (VAA2) across genders.Entities:
Keywords: Extracurricular activities; Parent–child relationship; Socioeconomic status; Visual art activities
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35596160 PMCID: PMC9123813 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13215-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Demographic information of the sample
| Full | Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | M(SD) % | Male | Female |
| 12.6 (2.03) | 12.04 (1.94) | 13.16 (2.07) | |
| 86.9% | 79.6 | 94.2 | |
| 33.3% | 22.9 | 10.4 | |
| Married | 80.1% | 45.7 | 55.3 |
| Divorce | 10.5% | 35.6 | 64.4 |
| Remarried | 7.2% | 72.5 | 27.5 |
| Widowed | 2.2% | 71.9 | 28.1 |
| Did not finish primary school | 3.1% | 38.6 | 61.4 |
| Primary School | 6.4% | 59.3 | 40.7 |
| Junior high school | 16.9% | 45.7 | 54.3 |
| Vocational High school | 21.5% | 62.4 | 37.6 |
| Senior high school | 30.2% | 52.3 | 47.7 |
| Undergraduate and above | 21.8% | 35.3 | 64.7 |
| Did not finish primary school | 8.6% | 52.8 | 47.2 |
| Primary School | 9.4% | 67.6 | 36.4 |
| Junior high school | 10.0% | 51.3 | 48.7 |
| Vocational High school | 7.4% | 32.6 | 67.4 |
| Senior high school | 26.4% | 44.9 | 55.1 |
| Undergraduate and above | 38.2% | 62.0 | 38.0 |
| Under 1000RMB | 18.8% | 48.7 | 51.3 |
| 1000-3000RMB | 14.0% | 56.2 | 43.8 |
| 3000-6000RMB | 20.6% | 70.7 | 29.3 |
| 6000-9000RMB | 34.4% | 52.5 | 47.5 |
| Over 10000RMB | 12.2% | 67.4 | 32.6 |
| Under 1000RMB | 16.1% | 51.0 | 49.0 |
| 1000-3000RMB | 10.4% | 48.6 | 51.4 |
| 3000-6000RMB | 28.5% | 60.2 | 39.8 |
| 6000-9000RMB | 21.0% | 49.9 | 50.1 |
| Over 10000RMB | 24.0% | 50.7 | 49.3 |
Descriptive analysis and comparison of means across gender
| VAA1 | VAA2 | PCR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | F | M | SD | F | M | SD | F | |
| 21.83*** | 29.86*** | .096 | |||||||
| Male | 2.9442 | .79193 | 3.03 | .896 | 3.74 | .912 | |||
| Female | 3.1212 | .73448 | 3.26 | .839 | 3.73 | .874 | |||
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. VA1 Organized Visual art activities by private training centers, VAA2 in-and-out of home visual art activities supervised by parents, PCR Parent–child relationship
Pearson correlation among operating variables
| M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | M | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FE | 3.27 | 1.50 | .652 | .543 | .224 | .525 | .532 | .544 | 3.37 | 1.44 | |
| ME | 3.13 | 1.52 | .652 | .457 | .657 | .714 | .769 | .749 | 3.13 | 1.47 | |
| FI | 2.54 | 1.06 | .243 | .157 | .524 | .470 | .440 | .582 | 2.39 | .972 | |
| MI | 2.08 | .954 | .224 | .457 | .524 | .621 | .650 | .785 | 2.06 | .909 | |
| PCR | 3.74 | .912 | .452 | .321 | .597 | .752 | .627 | .883 | 3.7286 | .874 | |
| VAA1 | 2.94 | .792 | .432 | .649 | .440 | .650 | .606 | .692 | 3.1212 | .735 | |
| VAA2 | 3.03 | .896 | .344 | .701 | .482 | .789 | .783 | .792 | 3.2616 | .839 |
FE Father Education, ME mother education, FI Father Income, MI Mother Income, all correlation values are significant P < 0.001
Direct and indirect effect SES on the parent–child relationship
| Multi-group Model | ||||||||||||
| Full Model ( | Male ( | Female ( | ||||||||||
| Paths | β | SE | 95% CI | β | SE | 95% CI | β | SE | 95% CI | |||
| SES-PCR | 0.47*** | 0.001 | [0.06, 0.08] | 0.39*** | 0.067 | [0.15, 0.39] | 0.58*** | 0.012 | [0.21, 0.57] | |||
| SES-VAA1-PCR | 0.06** | 0.004 | [0.02, 0.05] | 0.04** | 0.052 | [0.37,0.65] | 0.08** | 0.036 | [0.17, 0.22] | |||
| SES-VAA2-PCR | 0.08*** | 0.002 | [0.01, 0.06] | 0.08** | 0.072 | [0.44, 0.53] | 0.08*** | 0.041 | [0.16, 0.30] | |||
| SES-VAA1-VAA2-PCR | 0.01*** | 0.052 | [0.024, 0.051] | 0.01*** | 0.104 | [0.35, 0.46] | 0.01*** | 0.081 | [0.41, 0.48] | |||
| 51.47*** | 0.947 | .997 | 0.048 | 49.72*** | 0.965 | .978 | 0.040 | 53.71*** | 0.970 | .989 | 0.045 | |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 1The multiple mediation model of socioeconomic status on the parent–child relationship among total samples (N = 1624). Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, SES: Socioeconomic Status, PCR: Parent–child relationship
Fig. 2The multiple mediation model of socioeconomic status on the parent–child relationship among the male sample (N = 772). Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3The multiple mediation model of socioeconomic status on the parent–child relationship among the female sample (N = 852). Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001