Literature DB >> 35596099

Mapping the obesity problems scale to the SF-6D: results based on the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg).

Sun Sun1,2, Erik Stenberg3, Yang Cao4, Lars Lindholm5, Klas-Göran Salén5, Karl A Franklin6, Nan Luo7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity Problem Scale (OP) is a widely applied instrument for obesity, however currently calculation of health utility based on OP is not feasible as it is not a preference-based measure. Using data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg), we sought to develop a mapping algorithm to estimate SF-6D utility from OP. Furthermore, to test whether the mapping algorithm is robust to the effect of surgery.
METHOD: The source data SOReg (n = 36 706) contains both OP and SF-36, collected at pre-surgery and at 1, 2 and 5 years post-surgery. The Ordinary Least Square (OLS), beta-regression and Tobit regression were used to predict the SF-6D utility for different time points respectively. Besides the main effect model, different combinations of patient characteristics (age, sex, Body Mass Index, obesity-related comorbidities) were tested. Both internal validation (split-sample validation) and validation with testing the mapping algorithm on a dataset from other time points were carried out. A multi-stage model selection process was used, accessing model consistency, parsimony, goodness-of-fit and predictive accuracy. Models with the best performance were selected as the final mapping algorithms.
RESULTS: The final mapping algorithms were based on OP summary score using OLS models, for pre- and post-surgery respectively. Mapping algorithms with different combinations of patients' characteristics were presented, to satisfy the user with a different need.
CONCLUSION: This study makes available algorithms enabling crosswalk from the Obesity Problem Scale to the SF-6D utility. Different mapping algorithms are recommended for the mapping of pre- and post-operative data.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-walk; Health utility; Mapping; Obesity; Obesity-problem scale (OP); Quality of life (QOL); SF-6D

Year:  2022        PMID: 35596099     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01473-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  15 in total

1.  Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Ronette L Kolotkin; Ross D Crosby; G Rhys Williams
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  The impact of living with morbid obesity on psychological need frustration: A study with bariatric patients.

Authors:  Ángel Megías; David González-Cutre; Vicente J Beltrán-Carrillo; José M Gomis-Díaz; Eduardo Cervelló; Kimberley J Bartholomew
Journal:  Stress Health       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Yaling Yang; Aki Tsuchiya; Donna Louise Rowen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-07-08

4.  Formation of the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, SOReg.

Authors:  J L Hedenbro; E Näslund; L Boman; G Lundegårdh; A Bylund; M Ekelund; A Laurenius; P Möller; T Olbers; M Sundbom; J Ottosson; I Näslund
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values.

Authors:  Clara Mukuria; Donna Rowen; Sue Harnan; Andrew Rawdin; Ruth Wong; Roberta Ara; John Brazier
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  High acquisition rate and internal validity in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom; Ingmar Näslund; Erik Näslund; Johan Ottosson
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  The relationship between health-related quality of life and weight loss.

Authors:  R L Kolotkin; R D Crosby; G R Williams; G G Hartley; S Nicol
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-09

Review 8.  The impact of bariatric surgery on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Lindekilde; B P Gladstone; M Lübeck; J Nielsen; L Clausen; W Vach; A Jones
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 9.  Quality of Life Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleeya Hachem; Leah Brennan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Jane Garb; Garry Welch; Sofija Zagarins; Jay Kuhn; John Romanelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.