Literature DB >> 35596034

Prdm9 deficiency of rat oocytes causes synapsis among non-homologous chromosomes and aneuploidy.

Srdjan Gasic1, Ondrej Mihola1, Zdenek Trachtulec2.   

Abstract

Aneuploidy (abnormal chromosome number) accompanies reduced ovarian function in humans and mice, but the reasons behind this concomitance remain underexplored. Some variants in the human gene encoding histone-3-lysine-4,36-trimethyltransferase PRDM9 are associated with aneuploidy, and other variants with ovarian function reduced by premature ovarian failure (POF), but no link between POF and aneuploidy has been revealed. SHR/OlaIpcv rat females lacking PRDM9 manifest POF-a reduced follicle number, litter size, and reproductive age. Here, we explored this model to test how POF relates to oocyte euploidy. The mutant rat females displayed increased oocyte aneuploidy and embryonic death of their offspring compared to controls. Because rat PRDM9 positions meiotic DNA breaks, we investigated the repair of these breaks. Fertile control rodents carry pachytene oocytes with synapsed homologous chromosomes and repaired breaks, while sterile Prdm9-deficient mice carry pachytene-like oocytes with many persisting breaks and asynapsed chromosomes. However, most PRDM9-lacking rat oocytes displayed a few persisting breaks and non-homologous synapsis (NHS). HORMAD2 protein serves as a barrier to sister-chromatid repair and a signal for the synapsis and DNA repair checkpoints. NHS but not asynapsis was associated with HORMAD2 levels similar to the levels on rat pachytene chromosomes with homologous synapsis. NHS was accompanied by crossing-over decreased below the minimum that is essential for euploidy. We argue that the increased mutant rat aneuploidy is due to NHS, which allows some oocytes to pass meiotic checkpoints without one crossing-over per chromosomal pair, leading to segregation errors, and thereby NHS links POF to aneuploidy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35596034     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-022-09954-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  63 in total

1.  Oogenesis in the mouse. A study of the meiotic prophase.

Authors:  K BORUM
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 2.  Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis.

Authors:  Douglas K Bishop; Denise Zickler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Genetics of meiosis and recombination in mice.

Authors:  Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.813

4.  Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11.

Authors:  F Baudat; K Manova; J P Yuen; M Jasin; S Keeney
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes.

Authors:  Teresa Chiang; Francesca E Duncan; Karen Schindler; Richard M Schultz; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice.

Authors:  F Baudat; J Buard; C Grey; A Fledel-Alon; C Ober; M Przeworski; G Coop; B de Massy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Meiotic sister chromatid exchanges are rare in C. elegans.

Authors:  David E Almanzar; Spencer G Gordon; Ofer Rog
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice.

Authors:  Kevin Brick; Fatima Smagulova; Pavel Khil; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; Galina V Petukhova
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Hybrid Sterility Locus on Chromosome X Controls Meiotic Recombination Rate in Mouse.

Authors:  Maria Balcova; Barbora Faltusova; Vaclav Gergelits; Tanmoy Bhattacharyya; Ondrej Mihola; Zdenek Trachtulec; Corinna Knopf; Vladana Fotopulosova; Irena Chvatalova; Sona Gregorova; Jiri Forejt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A candidate gene analysis and GWAS for genes associated with maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21.

Authors:  Jonathan M Chernus; Emily G Allen; Zhen Zeng; Eva R Hoffman; Terry J Hassold; Eleanor Feingold; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.