Literature DB >> 35594308

A polynomial invariant for a new class of phylogenetic networks.

Joan Carles Pons1, Tomás M Coronado1, Michael Hendriksen2, Andrew Francis3.   

Abstract

Invariants for complicated objects such as those arising in phylogenetics, whether they are invariants as matrices, polynomials, or other mathematical structures, are important tools for distinguishing and working with such objects. In this paper, we generalize a complete polynomial invariant on trees to a class of phylogenetic networks called separable networks, which will include orchard networks. Networks are becoming increasingly important for their ability to represent reticulation events, such as hybridization, in evolutionary history. We provide a function from the space of internally multi-labelled phylogenetic networks, a more generic graph structure than phylogenetic networks where the reticulations are also labelled, to a polynomial ring. We prove that the separability condition allows us to characterize, via the polynomial, the phylogenetic networks with the same number of leaves and same number of reticulations by considering their internally labelled versions. While the invariant for trees is a polynomial in [Formula: see text] where n is the number of leaves, the invariant for internally multi-labelled phylogenetic networks is an element of [Formula: see text], where r is the number of reticulations in the network. When the networks are considered without leaf labels the number of variables reduces to r + 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35594308      PMCID: PMC9122212          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A class of phylogenetic networks reconstructable from ancestral profiles.

Authors:  Péter L Erdős; Charles Semple; Mike Steel
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Defining phylogenetic networks using ancestral profiles.

Authors:  Allan Bai; Péter L Erdős; Charles Semple; Mike Steel
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Leo van Iersel; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Identifiability of tree-child phylogenetic networks under a probabilistic recombination-mutation model of evolution.

Authors:  Andrew Francis; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Regular networks can be uniquely constructed from their trees.

Authors:  Stephen J Willson
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Analyzing Phylogenetic Trees with a Tree Lattice Coordinate System and a Graph Polynomial.

Authors:  Pengyu Liu; Priscila Biller; Matthew Gould; Caroline Colijn
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.160

8.  Folding and unfolding phylogenetic trees and networks.

Authors:  Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton; Mike Steel; Taoyang Wu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Extended Newick: it is time for a standard representation of phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.