Implementation of E-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative study in higher education.

The primary aim of this study was to identify the degree of acceptance of e-exams by undergraduate students at Ajman University during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study used the descriptive approach. A questionnaire consisting of 27 items was distributed to 1986 undergraduate students. The results of the study showed that undergraduate students demonstrated a moderate degree of acceptance of the implementation of e-exams during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, with females students finding them more acceptable than male students. Discipline and academic year also showed an impact on such acceptance, with Pharmacy & Health Science College students, and those in their third academic year demonstrating the highest levels of acceptance. Implications of the study raise awareness of the importance of addressing challenges associated with e-exams such as strict computer technology settings.

1. Introduction

The education system is witnessing great and successive developments to keep pace with the changes resulting from the advancement of science and technology and the implications of the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the past few months, most national governments have shut down in-person teaching in their educational institutions completely or partially to curb the rapid spread of COVID-19 [1, 2]. Educational institutions and systems have therefore sought to adapt to these developments through teaching and evaluation strategies suitable to this new environment of the COVID-19 pandemic [3]. The evaluation process is among the main components of any stage of the educational process; because through it students are sorted according to their abilities and their achievement progress [4]. Indicates that improving and developing evaluation methods is one of the five goals of the academic community, as international academic accreditation institutions such as the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA) and the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) consider evaluation as one of the basic and necessary criteria for accreditation. E-exams came to provide a great service to the education system during the spread of a COVID-19 pandemic. E-exams also represent other benefits. Faculty members save time and effort, and students are safer with these e-exams when compared with traditional printed paper tests: the latter require a lot of time and effort to correct them and extract the results and announce them to students [5]. In addition, e-exams are considered one of the most important e-learning tools that measure achievement in developed countries [6]. Technology has enabled modern, unconventional evaluation methods, such as computerized evaluation, online assessment, remote evaluation, and question banks. Nowadays, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the e-exams system becomes looked to be a rapidly developing assessment instrument due to its precision and reliability [7]. According to [8], most educational institutions started using the e-exams system during the COVID-19 pandemic due to its positive features, such as reductions in the time required for students’ exams and institutions easily monitoring students during their examination. However, students’ perspectives on its implementation in Emirati universities such as Ajman University remain unexplored. Thus, the study sought to investigate the implementation of e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education institutions in the UAE. E-exams were carried out at Ajman University in the UAE, in the fall of 2020 during the spread of COVID-19. The current study is therefore aimed at investigating students’ acceptance of the implementation of e-exams in their university.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the issue of e-exams had already been addressed in a variety of previous studies [9-11] that aimed to explore and identify attitudes and perceptions of students and faculty members regarding e-exams or e-assessments are very important because they allow us to predict and interpret behavior in the future. Consequently, a decisive decision may have to be made regarding the system and mechanism for the assessment and evaluation of students, whether e-examinations will be used in lieu of traditional methods of assessment, or if they will be reduced or eliminated entirely. The authors hope in their current study on the impact of the transformation of most educational institutions in the countries of the world from face-to-face or traditional learning to blended learning, which represents a sudden shift to distance learning, which may lead to extending towards a more open digital ecosystem for e-exams. Moreover, E- exams have undergone significant progress, are now ubiquitous among higher education institutions around the world, and are rapidly being preferred due to the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, this investigation will help officials in higher education institutions and universities to make appropriate decisions about the permanent adoption of e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic and the possibility of their application after the pandemic. An additional aim is to give university officials feedback on the level of students’ acceptance of e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic. This means that the current study may supply higher education institutions with sufficient information about students’ degree of acceptance of the e-exams implemented during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. In turn, this will assist in the adoption of e-exams as a reliable assessment instrument and a valid alternative to traditional printed examinations in higher education institutions in the future [3]. In order to explore Ajman University undergraduate students’ degree of acceptance of e-exams during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, the study seeks to answers to the following research questions:

RQ1: To what extent do Ajman University undergraduate students accept e-exams during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic?

RQ2: Does the degree of Ajman University undergraduate students’ acceptance of e-exams during the spread of COVID-19 vary according to gender, college, and academic year?

2. Literature review

2.1 Definition of E-exams (E-exams)

E-exams can be defined as all forms of assessment and evaluation that are carried out using digital technologies [6, 12, 13]. It is a process that includes the implementation of exams through the internet or intranet [14] (Elsalem et al., 2021) [1]., 2021defined e-exams as computer-based and internet-based, where questions are posed to students, corrected directly, with feedback provided on the student’s responses and scores reported, and appropriate security measures taken to maintain confidentiality. Moreover [15], defined e-exams as a timed, controlled, summative evaluation exam carried out using each candidate’s own device working a unified operating system. According to [16], e-exams have benefits compared to traditional paper exams, such as that they may include new multimedia and be interactive, and software test elements that have greater validity for it, in addition to ease of labeling, being time-saving, minimizing managerial expenses, and achieving reductions in the cost of raw materials.

2.2 E- exams requirements, criteria & training the faculty members

According to [17], there are five requirements overlapping for an e-exam, which are; Students preparing for the exam, topics of the exam, a software package, electronic display sets, and a fully equipped facility. Fig 1. illustrated these requirements.

Fig 1

E-exam requirements.

Moreover [18], referred to significant processes when implementing e-assessment in higher education: to determine intended recipients and the purpose of testing; select appropriate instruments and e- platform; specify forms of feedback; clarify the tasks; provide a knowledge base for operating e-tests, etc. From the other side [19], pointed out that there are eight criteria for developing and implementing electronic tests, including development and implementation of design options, scalability, security, accessibility, and usability. and features of feedback, uniqueness, cost, and interoperability. Furthermore [20], describe five essential criteria of e-exams which are as the following:

Strategic: this means that considers the identification of the key elements for improvement based on the acquisition of competencies.

Integral: this means that assures the integral acquisition of the competencies.

Holistic: this means that considers all the internal and external agents.

Transversal: this means that affects all of the learning actions and activities and the interactions that take place during the learning process.

Coherent: this means that considers the different processes as interrelated and not isolated, giving coherence to the assessment.

There is no question that the Learning Management Systems (LMS) programs (software) of e-learning in educational institutions and training learners on it is a motivating element for both the teacher and the learner to make use of the Internet in the educational process. These systems are designed to help teachers use the Internet in teaching, assessment and communication with students in an easy way without the need for deep knowledge of programming methods. Examples of such LMS: Blackboard, Schoology, Dokeos, ATutor, Moodle, Web CT, Leapsome, Canvas, Brightspace, etc.

Ajman University in the Emirates adopted Moodle as one of the Learning Management Systems (LMS) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Where the University adopted online learning, and students were evaluated through e-exams, especially after heavily relying on e-exams during the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, the university held training and workshops for the faculty members to provide them with basic skills and proper knowledge about designing and preparing for e-exams. Fig 2 illustrates the use of Moodle by faculty members of all colleges at Ajman University of their designing and preparation the e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic during the second semester of the 2019/2020 academic year.

Fig 2

Using Moodle in preparing and designing e-exams.

2.3 E- exams benefits

There is a group of studies that highlight a number of the main benefits of online e-exams, in addition to some noticeable challenges from the point of view of both teachers and students, when compared to traditional printed paper exams [4, 21–24]. These can be summarized as seen in Fig 3.

Fig 3

Benefits of e-exams.

Several studies pointed out that students prefer e-exams over traditional printed exams because they can take the exam at any time and anywhere, they can obtain feedback and marks more quickly, they have more control, are easy and quick to use, save time, and are environmentally friendly [25-27]. In contrast, we find that traditional paper exams have numerous disadvantages, such as being time-consuming. Grading of paper-based exams needs to be done manually, which is difficult and laborious. The examination of many students requires more invigilators. Grades are not exact, as calculations are carried out manually. Examination results can be lost, and it takes a long time to check the results, as this is done manually.

2.4 Challenges related to E-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic

After campus closures to curb the spread of COVID-19 pandemic, universities and schools have faced many challenges related to changing the system of learners’ exams to e-exams instead of traditional paper exams. There are many challenges to the implementation of e-exams, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [6, 8, 17, 28]. As shown in Fig 4, they can be summarized as follows:

Fig 4

Challenges related to e-exams during COVID-19 pandemic.

2.5 Electronic exam usability

In reviewing the linked literature and studies, the authors found that research about the application of e-exams in universities and schools remains insufficient to justify their success and effectiveness in education and learning as a replacement for traditional printed exams. There have been several studies conducted by universities and academic institutions on the use of e-exams in their institutions, all of which centered on the features and the benefits of e-exams [1–3, 7, 8, 14, 18, 23, 24, 29–34]. Results from these studies focused on the perceptions of students and faculty members concerning the relative benefits, features, and challenges of e-exams and their efficiency compared to traditional paper exams. The results showed that students’ showed their openness to and acceptance of the e-exams. They also confirmed that they prefer electronic computerized tests of the type of multiple-choice questions; in addition to a preference for the feature in e-exams that enables them to re-sit the exam several times in order to improve their scores. Additionally, in [34], the results indicated that the application of e-exams does not have a negative impact on students’ grades and academic achievement, and features of e-exams were appropriate and accepted by students [35]. Reported that the system of electronic examinations could reduce the burden on teachers and enhance instructional quality. Also, studies have confirmed that e-exams offer direct feedback to students and help improve learning in comparison with traditional paper exams [26, 27, 36]. On the other hand, some other studies have shown that students were upset about the inability to explain their responses and answers because of strict computer technology settings, which raised their stress and confusion during the exam [37]. At the same time, some studies have shown that students’ readiness for type of test the need to complete, together with the consistency of the exam, eventually affects their academic results [38]. According to [39], there are reasons for removing the time-limits imposed on e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic: it causes unnecessary pressure on students; problems with bandwidth and network connectivity can cause delays; timed exams measure speed, which is only weakly connected with comprehension; is not secure from fraud; and it might put an extra burden on learners who really need learning accommodations. Moreover [9], pointed out that while e-exams might be a reliable tool to measure what they aim to measure, they may also raise learners’ anxiety and tension levels and might makes it easier to cheat. On the other hand [14], pointed out that learners preferred print to digital displays during their studying and exams, as reading electronic online exams may lead to more cognitive stress load on the reader compared to reading from print exams [40]. Also revealed that learners thought it easier to cheat on electronic examinations conducted online.

The current study differs from the previous studies in that it attempts to investigate the degree of perspective of undergraduate students to accept e-exams at Ajman University as one of the higher education institutions in all colleges in the university and its number (9), which means that it includes all disciplines of undergraduate students. Moreover, this study examined the degree of acceptance of undergraduate students at Ajman University for e-exams during the spread of COVID-19 according to gender, college, and academic year variables.

Better understanding of students’ perspectives on e-exams will assist in identifying the major challenges in achieving undergraduate students’ acceptance of their application.

The findings of the current study might encourage and facilitate the sustained switchover to E-learning and e-exams as an assessment process in the education system during and after COVID-19.

Findings of the current study might benefit higher education institutions and other educational sectors outside of the United Arab Emirates.

3. Method

3.1 Approach of the study

The current analysis was carried utilizing a descriptive method approach, which is a type of research that describes an under-examined population, condition, or phenomena by gathering quantifiable data that can be used for statistical analysis [41]. According to [42], the prime purpose of descriptive research is to examine phenomena and their specific features. Moreover, it deals with what really occurred, instead of why or how Thus, a questionnaire instrument was utilized to gather data from a sample of the population.

3.2 Population of study

The research population comprised male and female students of all Ajman University colleges registered in the second semester in the academic year 2019/2020. The total number was 6620 undergraduate students as shown in Table 1 and Fig 3.

Table 1

Study population.

	College	# of students	(%)
1	College of Dentistry	944	14.3%
2	College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences	397	6.0%
3	College of Engineering and Information Technology	1209	18.3%
4	College of Architecture, Art and Design	531	8.0%
5	College of Business Administration	979	14.8%
6	College of Law	545	8.2%
7	College of Mass Communication	589	8.9%
8	College of Humanities and Sciences	1304	19.7%
9	College of Medicine	122	1.8%
Total		6620	100.0%

3.3 Sample

A sample of 30% of the population of each college was taken by the investigators. A random sampling method, implemented through a stratified sample technique, was used to obtain the sample for this study, which totaled 1986 (6620 * 30/100 = 1986) students. For example, for the students of the College of Dentistry, 944 * 30/100 = 283.2, which indicated that a sample of 283 students was required from this college. As a percentage of the total sample, College of Dentistry students were 283 /1986* 100 = 14.2%. The same process was followed for the other colleges (see Table 2).

Table 2

Research sample.

College		# of students	Percentage (%)
1	Dentistry	283	14.2%
2	Pharmacy & Health Sciences	119	6.0%
3	Engineering and Information Technology	363	18.3%
4	Architecture, Art and Design	159	8.0%
5	Business Administration	294	14.8%
6	Law	163	8.2%
7	Mass Communication	177	8.9%
8	Humanities and Sciences	391	19.7%
9	Medicine	37	1.9%
Total		1986	100.0%

A total of 1986 electronic questionnaires were designed and distributed via emails, WhatsApp, and social media to students in order to collect the data needed to achieve the study objectives. Of these, 1742 were returned completed correctly and in full. A number of learners (n = 244) across all selected colleges did not responding correctly to the questionnaire. Consequently, the sample became 1742 students. Table 3 shows the demographic data for the selected sample of students who answered the questionnaire correctly.

Table 3

Demographic information of students.

Study variables	Variables levels	Frequency (f)	Percentage (%)
Gender	Female	964	55.3%
	Male	778	44.7%
	Total	1742	100.0%
College	Dentistry	253	14.5%
	Pharmacy & Health Sciences	112	6.4%
	Engineering and Information Technology	295	16.9%
	Architecture, Art and Design	146	8.4%
	Business Administration	264	15.2%
	Law	161	9.2%
	Mass Communication	144	8.3%
	Humanities and Sciences	334	19.2%
	Medicine	33	1.9%
	Total	1742	100.0%
Academic year	First	542	31.1%
	Second	447	25.7%
	Third	285	16.4%
	Fourth	234	13.4%
	Fifth	234	13.4%
	Total	1742	100.0%

3.4 Study instrument

The questionnaire was used to gather data from the sample learners. It was sent to them during the second semester of the academic year 2019/2020, during the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the design of the questionnaire, similar research in this area was reviewed, such as studies conducted by [43]. The questionnaire comprised of two sections. The first section concerned students’ general information, and the second part represented the questionnaire elements (n = 27) based on the study’s objectives.

3.4.1 The validity of the instrument

A group of arbitrators (10) faculty members of UAE universities) with extensive experience in the field of education were asked to express their views on the items of the questionnaire, in terms of the relevance of items for achieving the research aims and the number and comprehensiveness of the questionnaire items. The educational specialists’ comments and suggested modifications were taken into account, and relevant deletions, amendments, and additions were made. As a result, the questionnaire after modification consisted of 27 elements, to achieve the objective of the research.

3.4.2 Reliability of the instrument

To verify the internal consistency of the study tool, Cronbach’s α was used. It was applied to a pilot study involving 50 students from outside the study sample, for which the calculated Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.874.

3.5 Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee/Deanship of Graduate Studies and Research of Ajman University (Reference number: H-H-F-2020-May-28) on May 30, 2020.We obtained informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

3.6 Data analysis measures

In this analysis, a five-dimensional Likert scale is implemented, as shown in Table 4 below.

Table 4

Evaluation of scale data based on the options of scale and score intervals.

Description	Scores	Intervals
Very high	5	4.21–5.00
High	4	3.41–4.20
Moderate	3	2.61–3.40
Low	2	1.81–2.60
Very low	1	1.00–1.80

3.7 Statistical analysis of the data

For data analysis, the researchers utilized the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to compute the percentage, mean, standard deviation SD, independent t-test tests, one-way ANOVA, and the Scheffe test.

4. Results

4.1 Findings of the study attributed to question 1: To what extent do Ajman University undergraduate students accept e-exams during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic?

To address the first research question, we computed average scores and standard deviations of participants’ responses to every one of the Items 1−27, which were relevant to the students’ acceptance of e-exams during the spread COVID-19 pandemic, as seen in Table 5.

Table 5

Descriptive statistics for the students’ responses to the items about the degree of acceptance of E-exams.

No.	Paragraphs	Mean	SD	Description
I1	E-exams provide a more engaging experience than using paper	3.23	1.34	Moderate
I2	E-exams are more environmentally friendly than paper exams	3.68	1.25	High
I3	E-exams provide the ability to easily identify and access unanswered questions	3.62	1.09	High
I4	I think that e-exams are more familiar for me than printed paper exams	3.45	1.11	High
I5	The number of electronic exam questions is sufficient	3.56	1.11	High
I6	The electronic exam system is clear and specific	3.59	1.11	High
I7	E-exams help extract results quickly, meaning feedback and marks are provided more quickly	4.13	1.00	High
I8	Electronic exam regulations are clear and easy to understand	3.64	1.09	High
I9	Electronic exam times are appropriate for students	2.68	1.17	Moderate
I10	I think the electronic exam system was successful in protecting against technical problems	2.54	1.16	Moderate
I11	Students do not need external help when using the computer [for e-exams]	2.57	1.32	Moderate
I12	The exam time is not enough to answer all questions	3.21	1.33	Moderate
I13	E-exams help raise the efficiency of student achievement	3.01	1.33	Moderate
I14	E-exams serve as an accurate and reliable assessment method	2.67	1.29	Moderate
I15	I would recommend the e-exams system to others	2.91	1.34	Moderate
I16	E-exams are suitable for assessing students on any course	2.90	1.31	Moderate
I17	Taking the electronic exam requires less time than taking the paper-based exam	2.87	1.25	Moderate
I18	I prefer taking paper-based exams for assessing my knowledge	2.96	1.23	Moderate
I19	E-exams enable me to show a better academic achievement	3.04	1.36	Moderate
I20	E-exams serve as a flexible assessment method	3.00	1.33	Moderate
I21	E-exams make me feel less stressed than paper-based exams	3.29	1.27	Moderate
I22	I feel that the program (software) in the e-exams system is easy to use and deal with	3.27	1.21	Moderate
I23	In general, I prefer taking e-exams to taking paper-based exams	2.94	1.22	Moderate
I24	Internet interruption while I am doing e-exams causes me great anxiety	3.72	0.99	High
I25	Electronic online exams make me feel more stress, pressure, and anxiety compared to printed paper-based exams	3.15	1.30	Moderate
I26	I feel that it is easy to cheat while performing e-exams	3.70	1.03	High
I27	I think that e-exams are more difficult than traditional exams	2.56	1.32	Moderate
Total		3.18	1.22	Moderate

The findings shown in Table 5 show that the mean for responses for all items (1–27) was 3.18 (SD 1.22), indicating that the students showed a moderate acceptance of e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic. This finding might indicate that some students still prefer traditional paper exams, even though there is a COVID-19 pandemic. It is also evident from Table 5 that the students’ answers to Item-7 (‘E-exams help extract results quickly, meaning feedback and marks are provided more quickly’) was given the highest mean value (4.13) at a high degree, and Item-24 (‘Internet interruption while I am doing e-exams causes me great anxiety’) came in second, also at a high level with a mean value of 3.72. Item-26 (‘I feel that it is easy to cheat while performing e-exams’) came in third, at a high level with a mean value of 3.70. Moreover, Item-2 (‘E-exams are more environmentally friendly than paper exams’) came in fourth, also at a high degree of acceptance of e-exams with a mean value of 3.68. Furthermore, it is also evident from the students’ responses to Item-8 (‘Electronic exam regulations are clear and easy to understand’) that this question was rated as having the fifth highest degree of acceptance of using e-exams, with a mean of 3.64, and at a high degree. Similarly, a high degree was also found for Items 3, 4, 5, and 6 with the respective mean values of 3.62, 3.45, 3.56, and, 3.59. The lowest mean (2.54) was acquired for Item-10 (‘I think the electronic exam system was successful in protecting against technical problems’), suggesting a moderate degree. In the same way, a moderate degree also obtained for Qs 1, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, and 27, with the respective mean values of 3.23, 2.68, 2.57, 3.21, 3.01, 2.67, 2.91, 2.90, 2.87, 2.96, 3.04, 3.00, 3.29, 3.27, 2.94, 3.15 and 2.56.

4.2 Findings of the study attributed to question 2: Does the degree Ajman University undergraduate students’ acceptance of e-exams during the spread of COVID-19 vary according to gender, college, and academic year?

Mean scores and SD were calculated for questions, and t-test, one-way ANOVA test, and Scheffe’s post-hoc comparison test were also conducted to determine the significance of the variations between averages. The findings of the answers to the study subjects are listed below according to the study variables.

4.2.1 First: Gender variations among students

A t-test was utilized to assess the significance of the differences between the averages of the acceptance of e-exams by undergraduate students at Ajman University during the spread COVID-19, from the perspective of students, according to gender, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6

Means and SD of the students’ answers based on gender.

Gender	N	Mean	SD	Mean Difference	T. Value	df	Sig.
Female	42	3.06	.503	0.05814	2.037	1740	0.042*
Male	45	3.20	.723

* Statistically significant at (p<0.05)

As presented in Table 6 and Fig 5, the findings clearly illustrated that the computed t value was 2.037, which is greater than the (t) table, indicating the presence of significant differences between the mean values for males and females (in favor of females), at the significance level of 0.042, which is less than the required statistical significance level (0.05). The finding means that female Ajman University undergraduate students are more accepting than their male counterparts of e-exams during the spread of COVID-19.

Fig 5

Means and standard deviations of the students’ answers based on gender.

4.2.2 Second: College variable among students

A one-way ANOVA test was utilized to assess the significance of the differences between averages of Ajman University undergraduate students’ acceptance of e-exams during the spread COVID-19, according to college variable among students. The findings of the one-way ANOVA test of this variable are shown in Table 7 and Fig 7. As displayed in Table 7 and Fig 6, the results clearly illustrated that there are statistically significant differences in students’ perspectives according to the variable of college, as the p-value is 0.003, which is less than the required statistical significance level (0.05).

Table 7

One-way ANOVA test for college variable among students.

		Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	Sig. (tailed)	Sig. level
College variable	Between Groups	16.394	8	2.049	5.966	0.001	Significant
	Within Groups	595.321	1733	0.344
	Total	611.715	1741

* Statistically significant at (p<0.05)

Fig 7

One-way ANOVA test for academic year variable among students.

Fig 6

One-way ANOVA test for college variable among students.

Therefore, in order to identify the source of the differences, the Scheffe test was used for the following comparisons, and the findings are shown in Table 8 below. The results shown in Table 8 emphasize that the source of the differences in the students’ acceptance of e-exams according to the variable of college was in favor of students of the Pharmacy & Health Science College.

Table 8

The Scheffe test results according to the college variable.

(I) The college	(J) The college	Mean difference (I-J)	Sig.
Dentistry	Pharmacy & Health Science	.15351	.722
	Business Administration	-.01737	1.000
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.15540	.297
	Architecture, Art and Design	-.05822	.999
	Law	-.23680*	.042
	Mass and Communication	.03189	1.000
	Humanities and Sciences	.00623	1.000
	Medicine	-.03308	1.000
Pharmacy &Health Science	Dentistry	-.15351	.722
	Business Administration	-.17089	.571
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.30892*	.004
	Architecture, Art and Design	-.21174	.408
	Law	-.39031*	.000
	Mass Communication	-.12162	.951
	Humanities and Sciences	-.14728	.725
	Medicine	-.18660	.958
Business Administration	Dentistry	.01737	1.000
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.17089	.571
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.13803	.461
	Architecture, Art and Design	-.04085	1.000
	Law	-.21943	.082
	Mass Communication	.04927	1.000
	Humanities and Sciences	.02360	1.000
	Medicine	-.01571	1.000
Engineering and Information Technology	Dentistry	.15540	.297
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.30892*	.004
	Business Administration	.13803	.461
	Architecture, Art and Design	.09718	.952
	Law	-.08139	.981
	Mass Communication	.18730	.274
	Humanities and Sciences	.16163	.156
	Medicine	.12232	.996
Architecture, Art and Design	Dentistry	.05822	.999
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.21174	.408
	Business Administration	.04085	1.000
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.09718	.952
	Law	-.17858	.525
	Mass Communication	.09012	.989
	Humanities and Sciences	.06445	.996
	Medicine	.02514	1.000
Law	Dentistry	.23680*	.042
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.39031*	.000
	Business Administration	.21943	.082
	Engineering and Information Technology	.08139	.981
	Architecture, Art and Design	.17858	.525
	Mass Communication	.26869*	.043
	Humanities and Sciences	.24303*	.017
	Medicine	.20371	.913
Mass Communication	Dentistry	-.03189	1.000
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.12162	.951
	Business Administration	-.04927	1.000
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.18730	.274
	Architecture, Art and Design	-.09012	.989
	Law	-.26869*	.043
	Humanities and Sciences	-.02566	1.000
	Medicine	-.06498	1.000
Humanities and Sciences	Dentistry	-.00623	1.000
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.14728	.725
	Business Administration	-.02360	1.000
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.16163	.156
	Architecture, Art and Design	-.06445	.996
	Law	-.24303*	.017
	Mass Communication	.02566	1.000
	Medicine	-.03932	1.000
Medicine	Dentistry	.03308	1.000
	Pharmacy & Health Science	.18660	.958
	Business Administration	.01571	1.000
	Engineering and Information Technology	-.12232	.996
	Architecture, Art and Design	-.02514	1.000
	Law	-.20371	.913
	Mass Communication	.06498	1.000
	Humanities and Sciences	.03932	1.000

* Statistically significant at (p<0.05)

4.2.3 Third: Academic year variable

A one-way ANOVA test was utilized to assess the significance of the differences between averages of the acceptance of e-exams by undergraduate students at Ajman University during the spread COVID-19, according to academic year variable. The findings of the one-way ANOVA test of this variable are shown in Table 9 and Fig 7. As displayed in Table 9 and Fig 7, the results clearly illustrate that there are statistically significant differences in students’ perspectives according to the variable of academic year, as the p-value is 0.003, which is less than the required statistical significance level (0.05).

Table 9

One-way ANOVA test for academic year variable among students.

		Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	Sig. (tailed)	Sig. level
Academic year	Between Groups	5.536	4	1.384	3.966	0.003*	Significant
	Within Groups	606.179	1737	.349
	Total	611.715	1741

* Statistically significant at (p<0.05)

Therefore, in order to identify the source of the differences, the Scheffe test was used for the following comparisons, and the findings are shown in Table 10 below. The results shown in Table 10 indicate that the source of the differences in the students’ acceptance of e-exams according to the variable of academic year was in favor of students in their third academic year.

Table 10

The results of the Scheffe test according to the academic year variable.

(I) Academic Year	Mean Difference (I-J)	Sig.	(I) Academic Year
First	Second	.03336	.922
	Third	-.08773	.253
	Fourth	.11649	.289
	Fifth	.31250	.968
Second	First	-.03336	.922
	Third	-.12109	.077
	Fourth	.08313	.683
	Fifth	.27914	.979
Third	First	.08773	.253
	Second	.12109	.077
	Fourth	.20422*	.012
	Fifth	.40023	.923
Fourth	First	-.11649	.289
	Second	-.08313	.683
	Third	-.20422*	.012
	Fifth	.19601	.995
Fifth	First	-.31250	.968
	Second	-.27914	.979
	Third	-.40023	.923
	Fourth	-.19601	.995

* Statistically significant at (p<0.05)

5. Discussion

Results of the first research question on the degree of acceptance of e-exams during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic at Ajman University indicate that, from the students’ own perspective, the degree of acceptance of e-exams was at a moderate level, with a general arithmetic mean of 3.18 and standard deviation of 1.22. The moderate result might mean that some of the undergraduate students at Ajman University accepted the implementation of e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic, while others did not, preferring the traditional paper-based exams. Based on the results in Table 5, related to the students’ responses to the questionnaire items, it was noted that some of their responses indicated positive attitudes towards the implementation of e-exams at Ajman University during the Covid-19 pandemic. Items Item-2, Item -3, Item -4, Item -5, Item -6, Item -7 and Item -8 all indicated high degrees of acceptance. This means that undergraduate students might be satisfied to accept the implementation of e-exams in their university during the Covid-19 pandemic spread, which may be due to reasons related to the features of e-exams such as quicker feedback and marks, saving time, environmentally friendly, easy to identify and access unanswered questions, the system of e-exams being clear and easy, and the ability of learners to take the exam anywhere and at any time. These results are consistent with those of previous studies [1, 3, 5–8, 17, 24, 30–33, 44]. The results of these studies indicated that students showed their openness to and acceptance of e-exams, and they also confirmed that they prefer e-exams, especially when the type of questions are multiple-choice or true/false. Moreover, the results agree with studies that confirmed that students prefer e-exams because they provide marks and feedback more quickly, and help them to improve their learning and understanding of the content of the curriculum compared to traditional paper exams [6, 7, 27, 44]. In contrast, however, some of the students’ responses to the questionnaire items showed negative attitudes towards the implementation and application of e-exams at their university during the Covid-19 pandemic spread. For example, they responded to Item -24 (‘Internet interruption while I am doing e-exams causes me great anxiety’) with a high level, with a mean value of 3.72. This means that undergraduate students at Ajman University might be feeling anxiety and stress as a result of carrying out e-exams rather than traditionally printed examination papers. This result is consistent with previous studies that found that students were upset, confused, and nervous about their inability to explain their responses and answers during e-exams, due to strict computer technology settings [14, 37–39, 45]. Furthermore, Ajman University undergraduate students’ responses to Item -26 (‘I feel that it is easy to cheat while performing e-exams’) also came with a high level, with a mean value of 3.70. This might mean that undergraduate students at Ajman University might feel that there may be opportunities for some cases to cheat while students perform e-exams. This result may be consistent with the study conducted by [40] Comas-Forgas et al. (2021), who pointed out that learners thought it easier to cheat when doing electronic examinations online. Also, it is consistent with the results obtained by [9] Da’asin (2016), who pointed out that e-exams might be a reliable and competent tool to measure what they aim to measure, but they may raise learners’ anxiety and tension levels and might make cheating easier. Moreover, Ajman University undergraduate students’ responses to Item-10 (‘I think the electronic exam system was successful in protecting against technical problems’) came with the lowest mean value of 2.54. This might mean that undergraduate students at Ajman University might have faced some technical problems while taking their e-exams during the spread COVID-19 pandemic through the second semester of the academic year 2019/2020. This result might be consistent with the studies conducted by [37], who pointed out that learners were upset and confused about not being able to answer e-exams questions due to strict computer technology settings.

The second research question focused on determining whether the degree of acceptance of e-exams by undergraduate students at Ajman University during the spread COVID-19 varied, from the students’ perspectives, according to gender, college, and academic year. Our findings (as seen in Tables 6–10, and Figs 5–7) showed that the degree of acceptance of e-exams by undergraduate students varies according to gender in favor of females. This result means that female Ajman University undergraduate students’ acceptance of e-exams during the spread COVID-19 is greater than the acceptance of their male counterparts. Also, the results indicate that acceptance also varies according to college type (in favor of the Pharmacy & Health Science College), and according to academic year (in favor of the third academic year).

6. Conclusion

Due to the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, most educational institutions, such as universities and schools, have moved towards using technology in the process of assessing students through the implementation of e-exams during the learning and teaching process. It might that a large-scale shift towards e-exams can be expected during the next few years if the COVID-19 pandemic is not completely controlled in the world. The current study aimed to explore the acceptance of e-exams on the part of Ajman University undergraduate students during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings showed that Ajman University undergraduate students demonstrated a moderate acceptance of e-exams during the spread COVID-19 pandemic, with a total average and SD respectively of 3.18 and 1.22. This may indicate that some students accepted e-exams and they gave a positive impression about it in their responses to the items of the questionnaire. This impression might due to the positive advantages that are distinguished by them, such as quicker feedback and marks, time savings, environmentally friendly, easy to identify and access unanswered questions, the system of e-exams being clear and easy, and the ability of learners to take the exam anywhere and at any time. At the same time, responses of the undergraduate students to some other questionnaire items showed negative attitudes towards the implementation and application of e-exams at their university during the Covid-19 pandemic. This impression might due to their feelings of anxiety and stress as a result of completing e-exams rather than traditionally printed examination papers. Also, it may be due to the fact that they were confused and nervous about their inability to explain their responses and answers during the electronic exam, due to strict computer technology settings. Furthermore, the findings indicated that female Ajman University undergraduate students’ acceptance of e-exams during the spread COVID-19 is greater than the acceptance of their male counterparts. Also, the results indicate that acceptance also varies according to college type (in favor of the Pharmacy & Health Science College), and according to academic year (in favor of the third academic year). Like any other analysis, this study has some limitations that should be acknowledged.

This study was limited to students’ responses, and the responses of faculty members were not taken. This is because the authors have investigated the level of acceptance of e-exams by undergraduate students at Ajman University during the spread of COVID-19, since the students consider are the center of the educational system and their perspectives and impressions are of high importance for improving the processes of assessment and evaluation.

The study was limited to a sample size of 1986 students, representing 30% of the study population.

The study conducted in main campus of Ajman University during and the tool of study (questionnaire) was distributed via email, WhatsApp, and other social Media during the second semester of the academic year 2019/2020.

7. Implications and recommendations

Notwithstanding the aforementioned limitations, the following suggested educational implications and recommendations are provided for future research on the implementation of e-exams during the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Most higher education institutions adopted the decision to temporarily avoid all in-person contact and close their campuses completely during the COVID-19 pandemic, which led these institutions to apply online e-exams instead of traditional paper exams. Thus, it necessary to provide students with accurate and fair grades. This requires universities to provide a protection system for these e-exams on an ongoing basis.

Appropriate solutions need to be found to technical problems and the disruption of the internet during the implementation of e-exams.

It is necessary to provide technical support on an ongoing basis while conducting electronic tests.

It is necessary that processes be established to ensure that there are no cases of cheating during electronic examinations.

Similar research should be performed on the implementation of e-exams in higher education institutions.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

19 Nov 2021

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-20789_reviewer.pdf

Click here for additional data file.

Submitted filename: Modify some terms.docx

Click here for additional data file.

10 Mar 2022

Authors response to reviewers and editor comments, they attached their response in the file named (Response to Reviewers), also, they attached the (Revised Manuscript with Track Changes) and (Revised Manuscript).

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers..docx

Click here for additional data file.

31 Mar 2022

Implementation of E-exams During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A quantitative Study in Higher education

PONE-D-21-20789R1

Dear Dr. Alsalhi,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Christine E. King, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

12 May 2022

PONE-D-21-20789R1

Implementation of E-exams During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A quantitative Study in Higher education

Dear Dr. Alsalhi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Christine E. King

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE