Literature DB >> 35593934

Preoperative sarcopenia is a negative predictor for enhanced postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

David O Nauheim1, Hannah Hackbart1, Emily Papai1, David Moskal1, Charles J Yeo1, Harish Lavu1, Avinoam Nevler2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sarcopenia is common in pancreatic cancer patients. Considering the growing adoption of standardized protocols for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), we examined the clinical impact of sarcopenia in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients in a 5-day accelerated ERAS program, termed the Whipple Accelerated Recovery Pathway.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing PD from 2017 through 2020 on the ERAS pathway. Preoperative computerized tomographic scans taken within 45 days before surgery were analyzed to determine psoas muscle cross-sectional area (PMA) at the third lumbar vertebral body. Sarcopenia was defined as the lowest quartile of PMA respective to gender. Outcome measures were compared between patients with or without sarcopenia.
RESULTS: In this 333-patient cohort, 252 (75.7%) patients had final pathology revealing pancreatic or periampullary cancer. The median age was 66.7 years (16.4-88.4 years) with a 161:172 male to female ratio. Sarcopenia correlated with delayed tolerance of oral intake (OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.1-4.3, P = 0.03), increased complication rates (OR 4.3; 95%CI 2.2-8.5, P < 0.01), and longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (P < 0.05). Preoperative albumin levels, BMI, and history of pancreatitis were also found to correlate with LOS (P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis found low PMA, BMI, and male gender to be independent predictors of increased LOS (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia correlated with increased LOS and postoperative complications in ERAS patients after PD. Sarcopenia can be used to predict poor candidates for ERAS protocols who may require an alternative recovery protocol, promoting a clinical tier-based approach to ERAS for pancreatic surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERAS; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Sarcopenia; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35593934     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02558-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  45 in total

1.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 2.  Pancreatic cancer: yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Daniel Ansari; Bobby Tingstedt; Bodil Andersson; Fredrik Holmquist; Christian Sturesson; Caroline Williamsson; Agata Sasor; David Borg; Monika Bauden; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019.

Authors:  Emmanuel Melloul; Kristoffer Lassen; Didier Roulin; Fabian Grass; Julie Perinel; Mustapha Adham; Erik Björn Wellge; Filipe Kunzler; Marc G Besselink; Horacio Asbun; Michael J Scott; Cornelis H C Dejong; Dionisos Vrochides; Thomas Aloia; Jakob R Izbicki; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Clinicopathologic features of small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A collective study.

Authors:  H Furukawa; S Okada; H Saisho; J Ariyama; E Karasawa; A Nakaizumi; S Nakazawa; K Murakami; T Kakizoe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Khe T C Tran; Hans G Smeenk; Casper H J van Eijck; Geert Kazemier; Wim C Hop; Jan Willem G Greve; Onno T Terpstra; Jan A Zijlstra; Piet Klinkert; Hans Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Eugene J Koay; Suresh T Chari; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Standard whipple's operation versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial study.

Authors:  Chatchai Srinarmwong; Prakob Luechakiettisak; Wasan Prasitvilai
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2008-05

8.  Enhancing Patient Outcomes while Containing Costs after Complex Abdominal Operation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Whipple Accelerated Recovery Pathway.

Authors:  Harish Lavu; Neal S McCall; Jordan M Winter; Richard A Burkhart; Michael Pucci; Benjamin E Leiby; Theresa P Yeo; Shawnna Cannaday; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Ji; Wen-Tao Zhu; Qiang Wei; Xiao-Xiao Wang; Hai-Bin Wang; Qiang-Pu Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew McGuigan; Paul Kelly; Richard C Turkington; Claire Jones; Helen G Coleman; R Stephen McCain
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.