| Literature DB >> 35592397 |
Mengying Suo1, Yan Qi1, Lingxin Liu1, Chunmei Zhang1, Jingyuan Li1, Xuefang Yan1, Chen Zhang1, Yun Ti1, Tongshuai Chen1, Peili Bu1.
Abstract
Heart failure caused by pressure overload is one of the leading causes of heart failure worldwide, but its pathological origin remains poorly understood. It remains critical to discover and find new improvements and treatments for pressure overload-induced heart failure. According to previous studies, mitochondrial dysfunction and myocardial interstitial fibrosis are important mechanisms for the development of heart failure. The oligopeptide Szeto-Schiller Compound 31 (SS31) can specifically interact with the inner mitochondrial membrane and affect the integrity of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Whether SS31 alleviates pressure overload-induced heart failure through the regulation of mitochondrial fusion has not yet been confirmed. We established a pressure-overloaded heart failure mouse model through TAC surgery and found that SS31 can significantly improve cardiac function, reduce myocardial interstitial fibrosis, and increase the expression of optic atrophy-associated protein 1 (OPA1), a key protein in mitochondrial fusion. Interestingly, the role of SS31 in improving heart failure and reducing fibrosis is inseparable from the presence of sirtuin3 (Sirt3). We found that in Sirt3KO mice and fibroblasts, the effects of SS31 on improving heart failure and improving fibroblast transdifferentiation were disappeared. Likewise, Sirt3 has direct interactions with proteins critical for mitochondrial fission and fusion. We found that SS31 failed to increase OPA1 expression in both Sirt3KO mice and fibroblasts. Thus, SS31 can alleviate pressure overload-induced heart failure through Sirt3-mediated mitochondrial fusion. This study provides new directions and drug options for the clinical treatment of heart failure caused by pressure overload.Entities:
Keywords: SS31; Sirt3; heart failure; mitochondrial fusion; myocardial fibroblasts
Year: 2022 PMID: 35592397 PMCID: PMC9110818 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.858594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1The effect of SS31 on heart function. (A) Representative size of the mice heart in different groups; (B) Echocardiography was performed on the mice with sham or TAC surgery, Representative M-mode tracing shows the constriction of the aortic arch (white arrow), and the Doppler ultrasound image shows the blood flow and blood flow velocity; (C) the ratio of heart weight (mg) to body weight (g) (HW/BW); (D) Heart weight to tibia length ratio (HW/TL). (E) The level of serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in mice detected by ELISA. (The results are expressed as the means ± SEM, n = 5;*p < 0.05 vs. WT + sham group; #p < 0.05 vs. WT + TAC group; &p < 0.05 vs. Sirt3KO + sham group).
SS31 improves the related indexes of heart structure and function in wild-type mice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW, g | 26.7 ± 1.2 | 21.2 ± 0.79 | 26.2 ± 0.44 | 27.0 ± 1.4 | 23.7 ± 0.85 | 24.1 ± 0.38 |
| HW, mg | 143 ± 3.3 | 200 ± 8.2 | 163 ± 4.9 | 143 ± 6.1 | 186 ± 7.4 | 168 ± 8.7 |
| TL, mm | 20.0 ± 0.20 | 19.0 ± 0.32 | 20.0 ± 0.033 | 19.5 ± 0.34 | 19.0 ± 0.29 | 19.5 ± 0.29 |
| EF% | 68.6 ± 2.2 | 42.3 ± 1.8 | 59.2 ± 2.7 | 52.3 ± 2.9 | 24.34 ± 1.5 | 35.5 ± 2.4 |
| FS% | 39.5 ± 1.5 | 20.4 ± 1.1 | 30.6 ± 1.8 | 26.3 ± 1.8 | 11.0 ± 0.73 | 17.4 ± 1.3 |
| E/A | 1.69 ± 0.05 | 1.11 ± 0.04 | 1.44 ± 0.08 | 1.44 ± 0.09 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 1.01 ± 0.09 |
| E'/A' | 1.43 ± 0.080 | 0.876 ± 0.055 | 1.41 ± 0.11 | 1.60 ± 0.12 | 0.911 ± 0.10 | 0.906 ± 0.15 |
| Ao Root, mm | 1.15 ± 0.022 | 1.36 ± 0.038 | 1.28 ± 0.0092 | 1.22 ± 0.027 | 1.38 ± 0.033 | 1.33 ± 0.019 |
| LV; vol, ul | 14.7 ± 1.39 | 32.4 ± 1.7 | 16.5 ± 2.7 | 25.7 ± 3.0 | 42.5 ± 4.6 | 31.6 ± 4.5 |
| Lvs, d, mm | 0.695 ± 0.045 | 1.09 ± 0.024 | 0.684 ± 0.047 | 0.737 ± 0.050 | 1.06 ± 0.13 | 0.772 ± 0.055 |
HW, heart weight; BW, body weight; TL, tibia length; EF%, ejection fraction; FS%, fractional shortening; E, maximum ventricular filling velocity in early diastole; A, maximum ventricular filling velocity in late diastole degree; E′, the tissue movement speed of the posterior wall of the left ventricle in the early diastole; A′, the tissue movement speed of the posterior wall of the left ventricle in the late diastole; Ao Root, Aortic root width; LV; vol, left ventricular volume; IVS; d, diastolic interventricular septum thickness. (The results are expressed as the means ± SEM, n = 6;
p < 0.05 vs. WT + sham group;
p < 0.05 vs. WT + TAC group;
p < 0.05 vs. Sirt3KO + sham group).
Figure 2The effect of SS31 on myocardial fibrosis in mice. (A) Masson staining images of each group; (B) Masson staining statistical analysis of the degree of fibrosis between tissues; (C) Masson staining statistical analysis of the degree of perivascular fibrosis (n = 5, *p < 0.05, WT + TAC vs. WT + sham; #p < 0.05, WT + TAC + SS31 vs. WT + TAC; &p < 0.05, Sirt3KO + TAC vs. Sirt3KO + sham); (D) Immunohistochemical staining images of collagen I, collagen III, TGF-β and α-SMA in each group (bar = 20 μm); (E–H) collagen I and collagen III immunohistochemical staining statistical analysis. (The results are expressed as the means ± SEM, n = 5. The one-way ANOVA test was used, and n represents the number of independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. WT + sham group; #p < 0.05 vs. WT + TAC group; &p < 0.05 vs. Sirt3KO + sham group).
Figure 3The effect of SS31 on the morphological structure of mouse heart mitochondria. (A) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation of myocardial tissue in each group at 8 weeks postoperatively. The image above is a representative evaluation of the left ventricle's TEM image. (B–F) Observing the effect of SS31 on the expression of mitochondrial fusion protein OPA1 in mouse heart at the molecular level; (B) Immunohistochemical staining of OPA1 in mouse myocardial tissue; (C) Statistical analysis of OPA1 immunohistochemistry; (D) Western blot pictures of Sirt3 and OPA1 of myocardial tissue in mice; (E) Western blot statistical analysis of Sirt3; (F) Western blot statistical analysis of OPA1. (The results are expressed as the means ± SEM, n = 5. The one-way ANOVA test was used, and n represents the number of independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. WT + sham group; #p < 0.05 vs. WT + TAC group; &p < 0.05 vs. Sirt3KO + sham group).
Figure 4SS31 inhibits the transdifferentiation of cardiac fibroblasts induced by angiotensin II. The expression of α-SMA in fibroblasts was shown by immunofluorescence staining (red). DAPI stains the nucleus (blue). *p < 0.05. WT+TAC vs. WT+sham, #p < 0.05. WT+TAC+SS31 vs. WT+TAC, &p < 0.05. Sirt3KO+TAC vs. Sirt3KO+sham.
Figure 5SS31 regulates mitochondrial fusion in fibroblasts. (A) Immunofluorescence staining of mitochondria in cells to observe the morphology of mitochondria. Red represents mitochondria and blue represents the nucleus. (B–D) Western Blot to observe the role of SS31 in the transdifferentiation of cardiac fibroblasts. (B) Western blot pictures of Sirt3 and OPA1 between different groups; (C) Western blot statistical analysis of Sirt3; (D) Western blot statistical analysis of OPA1. (The results are expressed as the means ± SEM, n = 3. The one-way ANOVA test was used, and n represents the number of independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. Sirt3KO group; #p < 0.05 vs. WT + NC group; &p < 0.05 vs. WT + Ang II group; $p < 0.05, Sirt3OE vs. WT + NC group).