| Literature DB >> 35592014 |
Shailesh Hadgaonkar1, Amogh Zawar2, Anoop Patel1, Ajay Kothari1, Ashok Shyam1, Parag Sancheti1.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic spinal cord compression with carcinoid tumor as primary is a rare entity with its own diagnostic dilemmas and surgical challenges. Most of these neuroendocrine tumors arise from the gastrointestinal tract or lungs with metastasis to spine in <2% cases. Early diagnosis in an orderly manner is of significance as most of it is delayed due to slowly developing symptoms. Furthermore, prompt management has been an important factor as morbidity and mortality are high in such cases and surgical intervention if needed, which can be a challenge due to disturbed alignment, complex regional anatomy, and careful handling of spinal cord. Case Description: The authors describe a case report on similar lines of a middle aged gentleman presenting with low back pain and weakness in both lower limbs which on further investigations revealed a pathological fracture causing spinal cord compression due to metastasis from small cell carcinoma in the lungs, managed with surgical intervention, and subsequently with radiotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Carcinoid tumors; Lumbar spine; Metastasis; Spinal cord compression
Year: 2020 PMID: 35592014 PMCID: PMC9112984 DOI: 10.25259/SNI_343_2020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Neurol Int ISSN: 2152-7806
Figure 1:Preoperative plain radiograph of lumbar spine in (a) anteroposterior and (b) lateral views revealing compression fracture of L3 vertebral body with loss of height.
Figure 2:Magnetic resonance imaging scan showing (a) screening of whole spine, (b) sagittal, and (c) axial cut sections revealing retropulsed segment of L3 vertebral body causing spinal cord compression.
Figure 3:Fluoro-2-deoxy D-glucose positron emission-computerized tomography scan showing (a) primary lesion in the lungs, (b) and (c) multiple lytic lesions in the lumbar spine and pelvis.
Figure 4:Postoperative radiograph revealing posterior instrumented stabilization with pedicle screws and rods with mesh cage at L3 level after performing corpectomy in (a) anteroposterior and (b) lateral views.
Figure 5:Histological study slide as seen under light microscopy (a) showing characteristic tumor cells with small size, scanty cytoplasm and (b) round to fusiform shape and absent or inconspicuous nucleoli representing small cell neuroendocrine tumor.
Neurological recovery chart of the patient along with VAS and ODI scores.
Figure 6:A sequential sagittal (a) computed tomography scan imaging study at 3 months after surgery revealing implants and cage in situ with no retropulsion. A three-dimensional image (b) confirming the same findings.