| Literature DB >> 35591999 |
Melina Garcia Guizzo1,2, Lucas Tirloni3, Sergio A Gonzalez4, Marisa D Farber4, Glória Braz5, Luís Fernando Parizi6, Lucas Andre Dedavid E Silva6, Itabajara da Silva Vaz6,7,8, Pedro L Oliveira2,8.
Abstract
In the past decade, metagenomics studies exploring tick microbiota have revealed widespread interactions between bacteria and arthropods, including symbiotic interactions. Functional studies showed that obligate endosymbionts contribute to tick biology, affecting reproductive fitness and molting. Understanding the molecular basis of the interaction between ticks and their mutualist endosymbionts may help to develop control methods based on microbiome manipulation. Previously, we showed that Rhipicephalus microplus larvae with reduced levels of Coxiella endosymbiont of R. microplus (CERM) were arrested at the metanymph life stage (partially engorged nymph) and did not molt into adults. In this study, we performed a transcriptomic differential analysis of the R. microplus metanymph in the presence and absence of its mutualist endosymbiont. The lack of CERM resulted in an altered expression profile of transcripts from several functional categories. Gene products such as DA-P36, protease inhibitors, metalloproteases, and evasins, which are involved in blood feeding capacity, were underexpressed in CERM-free metanymphs. Disregulation in genes related to extracellular matrix remodeling was also observed in the absence of the symbiont. Taken together, the observed alterations in gene expression may explain the blockage of development at the metanymph stage and reveal a novel physiological aspect of the symbiont-tick-vertebrate host interaction.Entities:
Keywords: Coxiella; Rhipicephalus microplus; microbiome; symbiont; tick; transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591999 PMCID: PMC9111531 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.868575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Relative abundance of CERM (Coxiella endosymbiont from Rhipicephalus microplus) analyzed by qPCR in metanymphs from control and tetracycline-treated groups collected from the host on the 14th post-infestation day. Each dot represents an individual whole metanymph. The levels of CERM were expressed as the median with 95% of CI of five biological samples with three technical replicates in each point. Statistical analyses: Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 2Multidimensional scaling plot (MDS) of Rhipicephalus microplus CERM-depleted and control metanymphs. C1, C2, C3: CERM metanymphs; T1, T2, T3: CERM-free metanymphs. BCV, Biological coefficient of variation.
Figure 3Differentially expressed transcripts in CERM (Coxiella endosymbiont from Rhipicephalus microplus) and CERM-free metanymphs. Heat map of normalized TPM data for CERM and CERM-free replicates. The row Z-score color scale accounts for the Z-score deviation from the mean by standard deviation units.
Total TPM (transcripts per million) in each functional category for the differentially expressed transcripts in CERM (Coxiella endosymbiont from R. microplus)-free metanymphs.
| Sum of TPM in CERM and CERM-free metanymphs grouped into functional categories | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | CERM | CERM-free | Regulation pattern |
| Secreted/protease inhibitor | 24078.64 | 4937.82 | UNDER |
| Secreted/evasin | 2460.52 | 158.63 | UNDER |
| Secreted/metalloprotease | 2373.48 | 1219.23 | UNDER |
| Detoxification/oxidation | 1278.55 | 1245.03 | UNDER |
| Protein synthesis | 986.93 | 280.05 | UNDER |
| Transposon | 674.3 | 131.88 | UNDER |
| Energetic metabolism | 535.7 | 200.29 | UNDER |
| Basic tail protein | 315.75 | 52.37 | UNDER |
| Ixodegrin | 268.89 | 88.74 | UNDER |
| Secreted/DAP-36 | 233.86 | 17.12 | UNDER |
| Secreted/8.9 | 204.17 | 1.32 | UNDER |
| Extracellular matrix | 35552.83 | 49671.50 | OVER |
| Immunity | 3841.65 | 17208.42 | OVER |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 2548.87 | 8705.11 | OVER |
| Secreted/lipocalin | 4208.02 | 5421.52 | OVER |
| Nucleotide metabolism | 766.46 | 4452.99 | OVER |
| Lipid metabolism | 3659.48 | 4316.08 | OVER |
| Signal transduction | 1455.77 | 4189.93 | OVER |
| Protein modification | 1212.22 | 3697.05 | OVER |
| Secreted/protease | 2383.11 | 3373.91 | OVER |
| Cytotoxin | 1150.83 | 2937.87 | OVER |
| Transporters and receptors | 1309.5 | 2607.53 | OVER |
| Detoxification | 835.30 | 1740.97 | OVER |
| Transcription machinery | 508.04 | 1610.77 | OVER |
| Protein export | 1363.44 | 1410.07 | OVER |
| Secreted/mucin | 375.89 | 1307.63 | OVER |
| Nuclear regulation | 165.40 | 1138.48 | OVER |
| Cytoeskeletal | 164,81 | 1014.25 | OVER |
| Proteasome | 379.20 | 753.54 | OVER |
| Amino-acid metabolism | 205.76 | 737.19 | OVER |
| Transcription factor | 57.11 | 181.83 | OVER |
| Storage | 12.79 | 136.03 | OVER |
| Nuclear export | 22.67 | 102.24 | OVER |
| Intermediate metabolism | 2.44 | 14.42 | OVER |
| Total | 95592.38 | 125061.81 | |
UNDER, Underexpressed categories in CERM-free metanymphs; OVER, overexpressed categories in CERM-free metanymphs.
Figure 4Total TPM (transcripts per million) in each functional category for differentially expressed transcripts underexpressed and overexpressed in CERM (Coxiella endosymbiont from Rhipicephalus microplus)-free metanymphs. Unknown and Unknown conserved categories were excluded from the analysis.
Number of transcripts IDs differentially expressed in CERM (Coxiella endosymbiont from R. microplus)-free metanymphs grouped into functional categories.
| Number of transcripts IDs overexpressed and underexpressed in CERM-free metanymphs grouped into functional categories | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Overexpressed | Underexpressed | Total |
| Basic tail protein | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cytoeskeletal | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Cytotoxin | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Detoxification | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| Detoxification/oxidation | 8 | 12 | 20 |
| Extracellular matrix | 25 | 20 | 45 |
| Immunity | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| Ixodegrin | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Amino-acid metabolim | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 10 | 11 | 21 |
| Energetic metabolism | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Intermediate metabolism | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lipid metabolism | 14 | 35 | 49 |
| Nucleotide metabolism | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| Nuclear export | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nuclear regulation | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Protein export | 8 | 6 | 14 |
| Protein modification | 19 | 3 | 22 |
| Proteasome | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| Protein synthesis | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Secreted/8.9 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Secreted/DAP-36 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Secreted/evasin | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Secreted/lipocalin | 3 | 22 | 25 |
| Secreted/metalloprotease | 6 | 29 | 35 |
| Secreted/mucin | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Secreted/protease | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| Secreted/protease inhibitor | 6 | 35 | 41 |
| Secreted/unknown conserved | 17 | 41 | 58 |
| Secreted/unknown | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Signal transduction | 33 | 9 | 42 |
| Storage | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Transposon | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Transcription factor | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Transcription machinery | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| Transporters and receptors | 12 | 17 | 29 |
| Unknown conserved | 38 | 26 | 64 |
| Unknown | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Total | 307 | 343 | 650 |
Figure 5Summary scheme: Differentially expressed transcripts underexpressed (blue arrow) and overexpressed (red arrow) in CERM (Coxiella endosymbiont from Rhipicephalus microplus)-free metanymph were significantly involved with blood intake, suggesting that the endosymbiont is essential for building the blood feeding capacity during development. The number of transcripts from each category is indicated in the parentheses.