Literature DB >> 35591964

Outcomes of laparoscopic salvage radical prostatectomy after primary treatment of prostate cancer.

Raquel Catarino1, Renán Javier Otta-Oshiro2, Fernando Lista-Mateos2, Jose María García-Mediero2, Carlos Nunez-Mora2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PC) is managed mainly by androgen deprivation therapy. Nonetheless, selected patients could benefit from local salvage treatment options.In this study we present our series of recurrent PC cases submitted to laparoscopic salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) at our institution. Material and methods: A total of 29 patients with recurrent PC after primary non-surgical treatment were submitted to laparoscopic sRP at our institution, with a mean follow-up time of 7 years.
Results: There were 7 post-operative complications Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2. At the end of the follow-up, 58.6% patients presented biochemical recurrence and five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 50%.Positive lymph nodes, high preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and TNM stage were correlated with worse RFS. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that stage pT3b was independently associated with worse RFS in comparison with stage pT3a or less.At 12 months, pad-free continence or mild incontinence was observed in 62% of the patients. Conclusions: sRP is a technically challenging surgery, and in our series, we were able to perform this procedure with acceptable operative time and limited blood loss.Post-operative complications, functional results and oncological outcomes were similar to other published studies, being our series, to the best of our knowledge, the one with the longest follow-up, of 7 years.sRP is a feasible local treatment with curative intent for radio-recurrent prostate cancer, with good oncological outcomes and reasonable continence rates in selected patients. Copyright by Polish Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biochemical recurrence; prostate cancer management; recurrent prostate cancer; salvage radical prostatectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35591964      PMCID: PMC9074060          DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cent European J Urol        ISSN: 2080-4806


INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men [1]. It is expected that PC will account for 21% of all diagnosed cancers in men in 2020, with a mortality rate of 10% [2]. Most PC cases are localized at diagnosis and suitable for curative therapy. It is estimated that 20–38% of these patients are treated with radiation therapy (RT), and 22–69% of the patients treated with primary RT will undergo biochemical recurrence (BCR) [3, 4]. Salvage treatment is scarce and there is lack of controlled trials comparing oncological outcomes, thus there is no consensus regarding the best treatment option. Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is a very complex surgery that is not performed very often. Studies suggest that only 2–3% of patients with BCR after RT would receive local salvage treatment [5]. Most of the patients will be treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this study we present our series of recurrent PC, submitted to laparoscopic sRP at our institution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with recurrent PC after primary non-surgical treatment were submitted to laparoscopic sRP at our institution from January 2007 until September 2019. Regarding primary treatment, 9 patients (31.0%) were treated with brachytherapy, 16 patients (55.2%) with external beam radiotherapy, 2 patients (6.9%) received cobalt therapy, 1 patient (3.4%) was treated with tomotherapy and 1 patient (3.4%) received both brachytherapy and external radiotherapy. All patients presented histologically confirmed recurrent PC after a transrectal biopsy and metastatic disease was excluded by imaging studies, namely bone scan, computed tomography, positron emission tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients presented a life expectancy of at least 10 years. Laparoscopic sRP were performed by the same experienced and specialized team of surgeons, using a standardized technique [6]. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months in the first year after surgery, every 6 months in the second year and yearly thereafter. Recurrence-free survival was calculated from the time of sRP until biochemical relapse or the last available follow-up. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a PSA level >0.5 ng/ml after a subsequent confirmatory measurement. Surgical complications within 30 days after surgery were recorded using Clavien-Dindo classification [7]. Postoperative continence was defined as pad-free, mild incontinence was classified as using less than 3 pads per day and severe incontinence with the use of 3 or more pads per day. Erectile function was queried in preoperatively potent patients. Recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of risk factors on biochemical recurrence after sRP. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v 24.0 for Mac (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Demographics

The median age of the patients was 65 years (IQR 61–68). Median time from primary treatment until biochemical recurrence was 53 months (IQR 6–98) and the median PSA level before surgery was 4.60 ng/ml (IQR 2.64–8.36). Eight patients (27.6%) received androgen deprivation therapy before surgery; none of these patients were castration resistant at the time of surgery.

Tumor pathological characteristics and perioperative features

Regarding tumor stage, 10 patients (34.4%) presented pT2 (10.3% pT2a, 3.4% pT2b and 20.7% pT2c), 17 patients (58.6%) had pT3 (31% pT3a and 27.6% pT3b) and 2 patients (6.9%) presented pT4 tumor stage. Final Gleason score was 7 in 10 patients (34.5%), 8 in 3 patients (10.3%) and 9 in 10 patients (34.5%). Median surgical time was 90 minutes (IQR 70–150) and the median blood loss was 200 ml (IQR 200–250). Median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 3–7) and the median indwelling bladder catheter time was 10 days (IQR 7–20). Regarding surgical margins, 8 patients (27.6%) presented positive surgical margins. Of these, the pathological study revealed that 6 had locally advanced disease (pT3), 1 pT4 and 1 pT2. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 25 (86.2%) patients and 5 (17.2%) patients presented positive lymph nodes (Table 1).
Table 1

Tumor characteristics, operative features and oncological results

Tumor stage pT2a pT2b pT2c pT3a pT3b pT4N (%)3 (10.3)1 (3.4)6 (20.7)9 (31.0)8 (27.6)2 (6.9)
Final Gleason score 7 8 9 UnknownN (%)10 (34.5)3 (10.3)10 (34.5)6 (20.7)
Median surgical time (minutes) (IQR)90 (70–150)
Median blood loss (ml) (IQR)200 (200–250)
Median hospital stay (days) (IQR)4 (3–7)
Median indwelling bladder catheter (days) (IQR)10 (7–20)
Positive surgical margins (n)(%)8 (27.6)
Lymphadenectomy (n) (%)25 (86.2)
Positive lymph nodes (n) (%)5 (17.2)
Median follow-up (months) (IQR)94 (7–162)
BCR (n) (%)17 (58.6)
5-year recurrence-free survival (%)50

n – number; IQR – interquartile range; BCR – biochemical recurrence

Tumor characteristics, operative features and oncological results n – number; IQR – interquartile range; BCR – biochemical recurrence Regarding operative complications, there were 2 rectal injuries managed intra-operatively and 1 patient required a blood transfusion. There were 7 post-operative complications, namely 4 cases of Clavien-Dindo grade 2 (1 case of urinary retention after bladder catheter removal, 1 case of bladder catheter intolerance, 1 infectious complication treated with antibiotics and 1 case of deep venous thrombosis) and 3 cases grade 3b (1 case of vesicorectal fistula, and 2 cases of anastomotic stricture).

Oncological results

The median follow-up time was 94 months (range 7–162). Figure 1 demonstrates the Kaplan-Meier curve of recurrence-free survival of all patients (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curve of recurrence-free survival of all patients submitted to laparoscopic salvage radical prostatectomy.

Kaplan-Meier curve of recurrence-free survival of all patients submitted to laparoscopic salvage radical prostatectomy. Seventeen (58.6%) patients presented biochemical recurrence at the end of the follow-up and the median time to BCR was 61 months. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 50%. All recurrent cases were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. At the end of the follow-up, there were 2 deaths, although only 1 patient died from prostate cancer. Our results demonstrate that recurrence-free survival after sRP was statistically different according to pathological stage, with an estimated mean recurrence-free survival time of 101.1 months for patients with tumor stage ≤pT3a, comparing with 31.5 months for patients with tumor stages ≥pT3b (log-rank test, 0.008) (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves of recurrence-free survival according to tumor stage (A), lymph node status (B) and pre-operative prostate-specific antigen levels (C).

Kaplan-Meier curves of recurrence-free survival according to tumor stage (A), lymph node status (B) and pre-operative prostate-specific antigen levels (C). Positive lymph nodes were also associated with shorter recurrence-free survival, of 10.8 months, comparing with 64.7 months for negative lymph node cases (log-rank test, p = 0.002) (Figure 2B). Moreover, PSA values before surgery were also correlated with recurrence-free survival, indicating that higher PSA concentrations were associated with a worst outcome (for PSA ≥10 ng/dl, mean recurrence-free survival of 29.8 months versus 91.8 months for PSA <10 ng/dl, log-rank test p = 0.011) (Figure 2C). Surgical margin status, Gleason score and pre-operative androgen deprivation therapy did not interfere with recurrence-free survival (log-rank test, p >0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that tumor stage (≤pT3a vs ≥pT3b) (HR 3.27, 95%CI 1.26–8.53, P = 0.015), positive lymph nodes (HR 4.89, 95%CI 1.48–16.14, p = 0.009) and high PSA values (PSA ≥10 ng/ml) (HR 3.35, 95%CI 1.19–9.43, p = 0.022) were associated with BCR (Table 2). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis did not indicate a statistically significant association between these variables and BCR (p >0.05).
Table 2

Univariate Cox-regression analysis of risk factors for BCR after sRP

Risk factorHR (95% CI)p value
Stage (≤pT3a vs ≥pT3b)3.27 (1.26–8.53)0.015
Lymph node status4.89 (1.48–16.14)0.009
Pre-sRP PSA (<10 vs ≥10 ng/ml)3.35 (1.19–9.43)0.022

BCR – biochemical recurrence; sRP – salvage radical prostatectomy; CI – confidence interval; HR – hazard ratio; PSA – prostate-specific antigen

Univariate Cox-regression analysis of risk factors for BCR after sRP BCR – biochemical recurrence; sRP – salvage radical prostatectomy; CI – confidence interval; HR – hazard ratio; PSA – prostate-specific antigen Moreover, our results demonstrate that recurrence-free survival after sRP was significantly lower in patients with tumor stage pT3b, with an estimated mean recurrence-free survival time of 33.9 months, comparing with 86.8 months for patients with pT3a (log-rank test, p = 0.021). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pathological stage pT3b is independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival (HR 14.3; 95%CI 1.52–135.16; P = 0.020) comparing with stage pT3a, with PSA values before surgery and lymph node involvement as covariates (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Cox-regression analysis of recurrence-free survival according to tumor stage.

HR – hazard ratio

Cox-regression analysis of recurrence-free survival according to tumor stage. HR – hazard ratio

Functional results

Regarding continence at 12 months after surgery, pad-free continence was observed in 6 (20.6%) of the patients, mild incontinence in 12 (41.4%) patients, and severe incontinence in 10 (34.5%) patients. Regarding erectile function, the preoperative erectile dysfunction rate was 75.9%, with 7 patients declaring potency preoperatively. Of these, 1 preserved erectile function at 12 months after surgery (Table 3).
Table 3

Functional results at 12 months

N (%)
Urinary continence Pad-free continence Mild incontinence Severe incontinence6 (20.6)12 (41.4)10 (34.5)
Erectile function Preoperative erectile function Preserved erectile function at 12 months7 (24.1)1 (14.3)
Functional results at 12 months

DISCUSSION

Prostate cancer treatment has greatly advanced in the last few years. New treatment approaches have changed the outcome of this disease. Most patients have localized disease at diagnosis, suitable for a localized treatment approach. However, recurrence rates are high for intermediate and high-risk groups, leaving a substantial proportion of patients needing further management [8]. Treatment of radio-recurrent PC is managed mainly by ADT, which lacks curative intent and it is not directed to control local disease, and considering that the majority of recurrent cases after radiation therapy are localized to the prostate, these patients could benefit local salvage treatment options [8, 9, 10]. sRP is a complex surgery, historically associated with high morbidity and commonly avoided due to technical difficulties. There are a few studies evaluating the role of sRP and more recently robotic sRP [11-17]. In this study we evaluated the results of laparoscopic sRP at our institution, and to the best of our knowledge, with the longest follow-up period, with a mean follow-up of 7 years. Considering that sRP is a complex and technically challenging surgery, in our series we were able to perform the surgery with an acceptable operative time, with a median operative time of 90 minutes and limited blood loss (Table 1). Regarding surgical complications, rectal injury is perhaps the most feared operative complication, and in our series, we present 2 cases of intraoperatively managed rectal injury (6.9%), which is in agreement with other published studies. Post-operative complications were also similar to other published studies, namely recent reports concerning robot-assisted sRP [3, 15, 16]. Regarding functional results, the literature varies widely, and we report a continence rate of 20.6% and 14.3% of preserved erectile function at 12 months (Table 2). Our results are consistent with previous studies of sRP for radio-recurrent prostate cancer, reporting continence rates of 15–77% and potency rates of 0–20% [3, 14, 18]. Positive surgical margin rates described in the literature vary from 13% to 45%. In our series, we present a positive surgical margin rate of 27.6% [3]. We performed lymphadenectomy in the majority of the patients (86%) and 17.2% of the cases had positive lymph nodes, which is slightly higher than other published studies [3], but still inferior to the high-risk subgroup of patients defined by Mandel and co-workers [15]. Our median follow-up time was 94 months, and at the end of the follow-up, 58.6% of the patients presented BCR, with a median time to BCR of 61 months (Table 1). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 50%, which is in agreement with other published series [3]. According to the EAU guidelines, patients with initial clinical staging ≤T2, biopsy ISUP grade ≤3, preoperative PSA value <10 ng/ml and a life expectancy greater than 10 years could be evaluated for sRP. Mandel et al found that these patients present significantly better outcomes, with a 5-year BCR-free survival of 73.9% comparing with 11.6% for other patients [15]. Our results demonstrate that patients with tumor stages ≤pT3a present a significant increased mean recurrence-free survival time, of 101.1 months, comparing with 31.5 months for patients with tumor stages ≥pT3b (log-rank test, p = 0.008) (Figure 2A). Moreover, positive lymph nodes and high pre-operative PSA values were also correlated with worse recurrence-free survival time (Figure 2B and 2C) (Table 2). Surgical margin status and biopsy Gleason score did not interfere with recurrence-free survival in our series. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pathological stage pT3b is independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival (HR 14.3; 95%CI 1.52–135.16; P = 0.020) comparing with stage pT3a, with PSA values before surgery and lymph node involvement as covariates (Figure 3). Patient selection is vital to achieve the greatest results in the salvage setting. It is acknowledged that early salvage treatment after BCR is associated with better outcomes. Chade et al. reported that lower pre-operative PSA values and lower biopsy Gleason score after radiotherapy had the highest probability of cure from sRP, specifying that patients with a pre-operative PSA <4 ng/ml are the most favorable group for sRP [19]. This indicates that earlier recurrence detection is needed to improve oncologic outcomes in the salvage scenario. Consequently, the current BCR criteria and detection methods may not be adequate to timely detect just local recurrence. Moreover, new imaging techniques may be of great help in re-staging patients and discriminating localized disease and selecting the best candidates to salvage local treatment. This study has several limitations, namely its retrospective nature, the heterogeneity of the patients and considering the rarity of the procedure, the sample size. Despite these limitations, this study adds more information about current oncological and functional outcomes in patients with radio-recurrent prostate cancer submitted to laparoscopic sRP.

CONCLUSIONS

sRP is a feasible local treatment with curative intent for radio-recurrent prostate cancer, with good oncological outcomes and reasonable continence rates in selected patients. However, the salvage nature of the procedure requests timely recurrence detection, in order to increase the probability of cure.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  19 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Salvage Prostatectomy After Primary Radiation or Ablation Treatment.

Authors:  Estefania Linares Espinós; Rafael Sánchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman; Jose I Perez-Reggeti; Eric Barret; François Rozet; Marc Galiano; Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a multi-institutional collaboration.

Authors:  Daher C Chade; Shahrokh F Shariat; Angel M Cronin; Caroline J Savage; R Jeffrey Karnes; Michael L Blute; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Henk G van der Poel; Hendrik Van Poppel; Steven Joniau; Guilherme Godoy; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Martin E Gleave; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Miguel Srougi; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicole M Golbari; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity matched study of perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  A S Bates; S Samavedi; A Kumar; V Mouraviev; B Rocco; R Coelho; K Palmer; V R Patel
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer: verification of European Association of Urology guideline criteria.

Authors:  Philipp Mandel; Thomas Steuber; Sascha Ahyai; Maximilian Kriegmair; Jonas Schiffmann; Katharina Boehm; Hans Heinzer; Uwe Michl; Thorsten Schlomm; Alexander Haese; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Is it worth to perform salvage radical prostatectomy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer? A literature review.

Authors:  Giorgio Calleris; Giancarlo Marra; Ettore Dalmasso; Marco Falcone; Robert Jeffrey Karnes; Alessandro Morlacco; Marco Oderda; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Francesco Soria; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Radical laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy: medium-term functional and oncological results.

Authors:  Carlos Nuñez-Mora; Jose M García-Mediero; Pedro M Cabrera-Castillo
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy for radiation resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan A Eandi; Brian A Link; Rebecca A Nelson; David Y Josephson; Clayton Lau; Mark H Kawachi; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.