| Literature DB >> 35591860 |
Jun Ominato1, Tokuhide Oyama2, Hiroyuki Cho1, Naoya Shiozaki1, Koichi Eguchi3, Takeo Fukuchi1.
Abstract
Although eyelid reconstruction by transplanting an autologous free tarsoconjunctival graft (FTG) is a well-established technique, few studies have examined the postoperative course of FTG transplantation for East Asian eyelids, including those of Japanese patients. Therefore, this study investigated complication and reoperation rates after FTG transplantation in the reconstruction of East Asian (Japanese) eyelids. This study included 42 eyelids wherein posterior lobe reconstruction after resection of a malignant tumour of the eyelid was performed by FTG transplantation between 2007 and 2019 at Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital. We investigated complications and need for revision surgery during the patients' postoperative courses. The relationship between postoperative complications, tumour diameter, and eyelid defect width was statistically examined. Of 42 cases reconstructed with FTG, the upper eyelid was reconstructed in 23. Postoperative complications were observed in 12 cases (52%): entropion in eight and corneal epithelial disorder in four. Revision surgery was required in three of those cases (13%). There were 19 cases of lower eyelid reconstruction. Postoperative complications were observed in seven cases (32%): ectropion in three and corneal epithelial disorder in two and one lower eyelid ptosis. Two of these cases (11%) required revision surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in tumour diameter between cases with and without postoperative complications. There was also no significant association between the width of the eyelid defect and the presence/absence of complications. Entropion and ectropion were more likely to occur in the upper and lower eyelids, respectively. For Japanese eyelids, complication rates after FTG transplantation were approximately 50% and 30% for the upper and lower eyelids, respectively. The revision surgery rate was approximately 10% for both upper and lower eyelids. As these revision surgery rates are low, FTG transplantation may be an option for the reconstruction of Japanese eyelids.Entities:
Keywords: Eyelid tumour; Japanese; Surgery; Tarsoconjunctival graft
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591860 PMCID: PMC9111925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JPRAS Open ISSN: 2352-5878
Fig. 1FTG harvesting. a. The upper eyelid tarsus and palpebral conjunctiva are incised at full-layers, and the aponeurosis is detached (surgeon's view). b. Schema of the FTG harvesting (surgeon's view). c. Schema of sagittal section: the graft is harvested 4 mm away from the upper eyelid margin. The conjunctiva is cut at 2 mm from the upper edge of the tarsus. FTG: free tarsoconjunctival graft.
Fig. 2Reconstruction of the posterior lamella with FTG (upper eyelid, surgeon's view) Suture fixation of the graft to the cut end of the tarsus (Fig. 2-a) and aponeurosis (Fig. 2-b). FTG: free tarsoconjunctival graft.
Fig. 3Schema of V-Y advancement flap (upper eyelid). a. Create a V-shaped myocutaneous flap from the defect site toward the lateral side.b. Advance the myocutaneous flap horizontally and suture it in a Y-shape.
Fig. 4Schema of transposition flap (lower eyelid). a. Create a flap with the anterior lamella of the upper eyelid with a pedicle on the lateral side of the lateral canthal angle.b. Suture the area covered by the flap and the area where the flap was created, respectively. Normal skin is partially trimmed as needed.
Clinical characteristics of patients who underwent eyelid reconstruction with a free tarsoconjunctival graft.
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Total number of patients, | 42 |
| Age (years) | 73.5 (±11.8, 38–93) |
| Men/women, | 16/26 |
| Postoperative follow-up period (months) | 49.5 (±33.2, 12–141) |
| Upper/lower eyelid, | 23/19 |
| Type of eyelid tumour, | |
| Sebaceous carcinoma | 26 (61.9%) |
| Basal cell carcinoma | 10 (23.8%) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 4 (9.5%) |
| Merkel cell carcinoma | 2 (4.8%) |
Data are presented as the mean (±standard deviation, minimum–maximum) unless otherwise noted.
Overview of the 23 cases of reconstructed upper eyelids.
| Case | Diagnosis | Tumour diameter (mm) | Operative method | Defect width | Postoperative complication | Revision surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SC | 12 | Contralateral FTG + orbital periosteal flap + redundant skin flap | Large | (-) | (-) |
| 2 | SC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Large | (-) | (-) |
| 2 | SC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Large | Entropion | (-) |
| 4 | SC | 12 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Large | Corneal epithelial disorder | (-) |
| 5 | SC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + V | Large | Corneal epithelial disorder | (-) |
| 6 | SC | 15 | Contralateral FTG + V | Large | Corneal epithelial disorder | (-) |
| 7 | SC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 8 | SC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 9 | SC | 8 | Contralateral FTG + V | Moderate | Entropion | (-) |
| 10 | SC | 6 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | Entropion | (+) |
| 11 | SC | 6 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | Entropion | (+) |
| 12 | SC | 8 | Contralateral FTG + V | Moderate | Entropion | (+) |
| 13 | SC | 8 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | Entropion | (-) |
| 14 | SC | 8 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | Entropion | (-) |
| 15 | SC | 7 | Contralateral FTG + V | Moderate | Entropion | (-) |
| 16 | SC | 8 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 17 | SC | 8 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Small | (-) | (-) |
| 18 | SC | 5 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Small | (-) | (-) |
| 19 | BCC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 20 | BCC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Small | (-) | (-) |
| 21 | MCC | 18 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Large | (-) | (-) |
| 22 | MCC | 14 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Large | Corneal epithelial disorder | (-) |
| 23 | SCC | 12 | Contralateral FTG + V | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
SC: sebaceous carcinoma, FTG: free tarsoconjunctival graft, large: width of the eyelid defect was over 75% of the lateral width, BCC: basal cell carcinoma, moderate: width of the eyelid defect was 50–75% of the lateral width, MCC: Merkel cell carcinoma, small: width of the eyelid defect was less than 50% of the lateral width, SCC: squamous cell carcinoma, V-Y flap: V-Y advancement flap, -: no, +: yes.
Overview of the 19 cases of reconstructed lower eyelids.
| Case | Diagnosis | Tumour diameter (mm) | Operative method | Defect width | Postoperative complication | Revision surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | SC | 20 | Ipsilateral FTG + V | Large | Ectropion | (-) |
| 25 | SC | 10 | Ipsilateral FTG + advancement flap with lateral Z-plasty | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 26 | SC | 6 | Ipsilateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 27 | SC | 13 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 28 | SC | 8 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 29 | SC | 8 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 30 | SC | 7 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 31 | SC | 5 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | Corneal epithelial disorder | (+) |
| 32 | BCC | 5 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | Corneal epithelial disorder | (-) |
| 33 | BCC | 14 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | Lower lid ptosis | (+) |
| 34 | BCC | 7 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 35 | BCC | 10 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 36 | BCC | 10 | Ipsilateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 37 | BCC | 7 | Ipsilateral FTG + V | Moderate | Ectropion | (-) |
| 38 | BCC | 10 | Ipsilateral FTG + V | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 39 | BCC | 12 | Contralateral FTG + vertical & horizontal V-Y flap, bilobed flap | Moderate | Ectropion | (-) |
| 40 | SCC | 13 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 41 | SCC | 12 | Ipsilateral FTG + transposition flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
| 42 | SCC | 10 | Contralateral FTG + redundant skin flap | Moderate | (-) | (-) |
SC: sebaceous carcinoma, FTG: free tarsoconjunctival graft, large: width of the eyelid defect was over 75% of the lateral width, BCC: basal cell carcinoma, moderate: width of the eyelid defect was 50–75% of the lateral width, SCC: squamous cell carcinoma, V-Y flap: V-Y advancement flap, -: no, +: yes.
Comparison of cases with and without complications.
| Postoperative complications | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (+) | (-) | p-value | |
| Upper lid, n | 12 | 11 | |
| Tumour size (mm) | 9.3 (±3.0) | 10.3 (±3.2) | 0.48 |
| Width of the upper lid defect, n | |||
| Large | 5 | 3 | |
| Moderate | 7 | 5 | |
| Small | 0 | 3 | 0.23 |
| ower lid, n | 6 | 13 | |
| Tumour size (mm) | 10.5 (±6.0) | 9.5 (±2.3) | 0.72 |
| Width of the lower lid defect, n | |||
| Large | 1 | 0 | |
| Moderate | 5 | 13 | 0.32 |
Data are presented as the mean (±standard deviation) unless otherwise noted.
Calculated using Student's t-test.
Calculated using Fisher's exact test.
Calculated using Welch's test.
Large: width of the eyelid defect was over 75% of the lateral width, moderate: width of the eyelid defect was 50–75% of the lateral width, small: width of the eyelid defect was less than 50% of the lateral width, -: no, +: yes.
Comparison of complications between upper and lower eyelids.
| Cases with complications | ||
|---|---|---|
| Upper eyelids ( | Lower eyelids ( | |
| Entropion | 8 | 0 |
| Corneal epithelial disorder | 4 | 2 |
| Ectropion | 0 | 3 |
| Lower eyelid ptosis | 0 | 1 |