Literature DB >> 35591788

Nanosurfer assay dissects β-cardiac myosin and cardiac myosin-binding protein C interactions.

Anja M Touma1, Wanjian Tang2, David V Rasicci2, Duha Vang1, Ashim Rai1, Samantha B Previs3, David M Warshaw3, Christopher M Yengo2, Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan4.   

Abstract

Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) modulates cardiac contractility through putative interactions with the myosin S2 tail and/or the thin filament. The relative contribution of these binding-partner interactions to cMyBP-C modulatory function remains unclear. Hence, we developed a "nanosurfer" assay as a model system to interrogate these cMyBP-C binding-partner interactions. Synthetic thick filaments were generated using recombinant human β-cardiac myosin subfragments (HMM or S1) attached to DNA nanotubes, with 14- or 28-nm spacing, corresponding to the 14.3-nm myosin spacing in native thick filaments. The nanosurfer assay consists of DNA nanotubes added to the in vitro motility assay so that myosins on the motility surface effectively deliver thin filaments to the DNA nanotubes, enhancing thin filament gliding probability on the DNA nanotubes. Thin filament velocities on nanotubes with either 14- or 28-nm myosin spacing were no different. We then characterized the effects of cMyBP-C on thin filament motility by alternating HMM and cMyBP-C N-terminal fragments (C0-C2 or C1-C2) on nanotubes every 14 nm. Both C0-C2 and C1-C2 reduced thin filament velocity four- to sixfold relative to HMM alone. Similar inhibition occurred using the myosin S1 construct, which lacks the myosin S2 region proposed to interact with cMyBP-C, suggesting that the cMyBP-C N terminus must interact with other myosin head domains and/or actin to slow thin filament velocity. Thin filament velocity was unaffected by the C0-C1f fragment, which lacks the majority of the M-domain, supporting the importance of this domain for inhibitory interaction(s). A C0-C2 fragment with phospho-mimetic replacement in the M-domain showed markedly less inhibition of thin filament velocity compared with its phospho-null counterpart, highlighting the modulatory role of M-domain phosphorylation on cMyBP-C function. Therefore, the nanosurfer assay provides a platform to precisely manipulate spatially dependent cMyBP-C binding-partner interactions, shedding light on the molecular regulation of β-cardiac myosin contractility.
Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35591788      PMCID: PMC9279167          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   3.699


  58 in total

1.  C0 and C1 N-terminal Ig domains of myosin binding protein C exert different effects on thin filament activation.

Authors:  Samantha P Harris; Betty Belknap; Robert E Van Sciver; Howard D White; Vitold E Galkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A gain-of-function mutation in the M-domain of cardiac myosin-binding protein-C increases binding to actin.

Authors:  Kristina L Bezold; Justin F Shaffer; Jaskiran K Khosa; Elaine R Hoye; Samantha P Harris
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Effects of cardiac Myosin binding protein-C on actin motility are explained with a drag-activation-competition model.

Authors:  Sam Walcott; Steffen Docken; Samantha P Harris
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Unique single molecule binding of cardiac myosin binding protein-C to actin and phosphorylation-dependent inhibition of actomyosin motility requires 17 amino acids of the motif domain.

Authors:  Abbey Weith; Sakthivel Sadayappan; James Gulick; Michael J Previs; Peter Vanburen; Jeffrey Robbins; David M Warshaw
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 5.  Phosphorylation and function of cardiac myosin binding protein-C in health and disease.

Authors:  David Barefield; Sakthivel Sadayappan
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.000

6.  Molecular mechanics of cardiac myosin-binding protein C in native thick filaments.

Authors:  M J Previs; S Beck Previs; J Gulick; J Robbins; D M Warshaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  ER/K linked GPCR-G protein fusions systematically modulate second messenger response in cells.

Authors:  Rabia U Malik; Matthew Dysthe; Michael Ritt; Roger K Sunahara; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  What a drag!: Skeletal myosin binding protein-C affects sarcomeric shortening.

Authors:  Brett A Colson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Myosin S2 is not required for effects of myosin binding protein-C on motility.

Authors:  Justin F Shaffer; Maria V Razumova; An-Yue Tu; Michael Regnier; Samantha P Harris
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 10.  MyBP-C: one protein to govern them all.

Authors:  L W H J Heling; M A Geeves; N M Kad
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.