| Literature DB >> 35591745 |
Michela Ricca1, Maria Francesca Alberghina1,2, Negin Derakhshan Houreh3, Aybuke Sultan Koca3, Salvatore Schiavone2, Mauro Francesco La Russa1, Luciana Randazzo4, Silvestro Antonio Ruffolo1.
Abstract
A multi-analytical approach was employed to study wall paintings located in the Sotterra church at Paola, in the province of Cosenza, Italy. The site is an underground church (hence the name of Sotterra, which means "under the earth") rediscovered in the second half of the 19th century, during the building works of the Madonna del Carmine church on the same area. This underground church preserves valuable mural paintings having different styles. The construction's dating and overlapped modifications made until the site was abandoned is also debated. A wall painting, depicting "The Virgin" as part of the "Annunciation and the Archangel Gabriel" present on the opposite side of the apse, was selected and investigated using both in situ and laboratory-based analysis. Preliminarily, the non-destructive investigations involved several analytical techniques (IR imaging, UV-Induced Visible Fluorescence, and X-ray Fluorescence analyses) that provided mapping and characterization of pictorial layers and first data about deterioration phenomena. On the basis of this information, a more in-depth study was conducted on micro-fragments aimed at characterizing the stratigraphy and to identify the artist's technique. Cross-sections were analysed using polarized optical microscopy and electron scanning microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to obtain morphological and chemical information on the selected pictorial micro-fragments of the wall painting. The results allowed to characterize the pigments and provide better readability of the whole figure, revealing details that are not visible to the naked eye, important for future historical-artistic and conservative studies. The results represent the first step of a systematic archaeometric research aimed at supporting the ongoing historical-stylistic studies to distinguish the different building phases hypothesized for this religious site which remained buried for three centuries.Entities:
Keywords: Sotterra church; frescoes; infrared imaging; mural paintings; non-destructive analyses; pigments; stratigraphy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591745 PMCID: PMC9104980 DOI: 10.3390/ma15093411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(A) Overview of the cycle of frescoes in the church of Sotterra with evidence, from left to right, of the angel of the Annunciation, Christ in glory with apostles and the Virgin. (B) Detail of the Virgin as part of the mural painting object of this study.
Mural painting depicting the “Virgin”: an overview of areas investigated and sampled both with in situ and laboratory-based methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Mantle of Virgin | Dark Red layer | p-XRF |
| A2 | Mantle of Virgin | Light Red layer | p-XRF |
| A3 | Background | Yellow layer | p-XRF |
| A4 | Detail of geometric decoration of the frame | Green layer | p-XRF |
|
|
|
|
|
| NST-2 | From the bracelet of Virgin | Green | SEM-EDS |
| NST-3 | From the book that is in the Virgin’s hand | Yellow | PLOM, SEM-EDS |
| NST-4 | From the bottom part of the Virgin’s mantle | Reddish/whitish | PLOM, SEM-EDS |
| NST-5 | From the left border of the mural painting | Reddish/whitish | PLOM, SEM-EDS |
| NST-6 | From the left part of the Virgin’s mantle | Blackish | SEM-EDS |
Figure 2Sampling points for the Mural painting depicting the “Virgin” by in situ methods (ID: A) and laboratory-based analysis (ID: NST).
Figure 3Virgin mural painting: Photographs by visible light (A), UV fluorescence images (B,C), Infrared images (950 nm) (D,E).
Figure 4Details (at different magnifications) of the (from left) UVF and IR images for the comparison of the diagnostic information obtained from the imaging techniques: (A) Detail of the face and the halo; (B) detail of the dress and of the background floral-geometric decoration.
Portable X-ray fluorescence (p-XRF) elemental composition of “Virgin” mural painting. Notes: more abundant elements (in bold); minor or trace elements (in brackets).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Dark red layer |
| |
|
| Light red layer |
| |
|
| Yellow layer |
| |
|
| Green layer |
|
Figure 5p-XRF spectra acquired on the “Virgin” mural painting; A1, Dark Red layer (A); A2, Light Red layer (B); A3, Yellow layer (C); A4, Green layer (D).
Figure 6Photomicrographs by polarized light optical microscopy; Sample NST-3 (5×, CPL, scale-bar 200 µm) (A), Sample NST-4 (10×, CPL, scale-bar 100 µm) (B) and Sample NST-5 (5×, CPL, scale-bar 200 µm) (C). Note: CPL = Crossed Polarized Light.
EDS chemical data detected for both thin sections and micro-fragments of “Virgin” mural painting. Notes: more abundant elements (in bold); minor elements (in brackets); / (not detected); * the pigmented surface layer of NST-3 was analysed on a micro-fragment.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| / | |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Figure 7SEM representative images, showing samples’ stratigraphy on thin sections. Specifically: (A) sample NST-5 with evidence of 3 layers named as (a–c); (B) sample NST-3 with evidence of 2 layers named as (a,b). All layers were analysed by EDS (Table 3); for NST-3 analysis was also performed on a residual of micro-fragment (C) related to layer (a) of the same samples because the pigmented layer had clearly detached from the stone support during section preparation.