| Literature DB >> 35591672 |
Yu-Kyung Jung1, Alam Venugopal Narendra Kumar2, Byong-Hun Jeon2, Eun Young Kim1, Taewoo Yum1, Ki-Jung Paeng1.
Abstract
Perchlorate contamination in groundwater poses a serious threat to human health, owing to its interference with thyroid function. The high solubility and poor adsorption of perchlorate ions make perchlorate degradation a necessary technology in groundwater contaminant removal. Here, we demonstrate the perchlorate degradation by employing nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) embedded in biocompatible silica alginate hybrid beads fabricated using calcium chloride (1 wt%) as a crosslinker. The concentration of precursors (sodium alginate, sodium silicate) for bead formation was standardized by evaluating the thermal stability of beads prepared at different sodium silicate and alginate concentrations. Thermal degradation of silica alginate hybrid samples showed a stepwise weight loss during the thermal sweep, indicating different types of reactions that occur during the degradation process. The formation of the silica alginate hybrid structure was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) data revealed the surface morphology of silica alginate hybrid changes by varying sodium silicate and alginate concentrations. nZVI-loaded alginate-silicate polymer bead (nZVI-ASB) exhibited excellent perchlorate degradation efficiency by degrading 20 ppm of perchlorate within 4 h. Our study also showed the perchlorate degradation efficiency of nZVI-ASB is maximum at neutral pH conditions.Entities:
Keywords: nZVI; perchlorate contamination; perchlorate degradation; silicate–alginate beads
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591672 PMCID: PMC9099448 DOI: 10.3390/ma15093340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Preparation of ASB by varying sodium alginate and sodium silicate concentration at a fixed concentration of calcium chloride.
| Sample Name | Sodium Alginate (wt%) | Sodium Silicate (wt%) | Calcium Chloride (wt%) | wt% loss after Air Drying |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 98.05 |
| b | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 97.45 |
| c | 5 | 0.5 | 1 | 95.86 |
| d | 10 | 0.5 | 1 | 94.12 |
| a1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 97.16 |
| b1 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 97.28 |
| c1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 95.33 |
| d1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 94.09 |
| a2 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 97.78 |
| b2 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 96.76 |
| c2 | 5 | 1.5 | 1 | 95.57 |
| d2 | 10 | 1.5 | 1 | 90.40 |
| a3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 97.70 |
| b3 | 2.5 | 2 | 1 | 96.76 |
| c3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 95.57 |
| d3 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 90.40 |
Scheme 1Schematic diagram showing the steps involved in the formation of nZVI-ASB.
Figure 1SEM images of ASB synthesized by fixing 0.5 (a–d), 1.0 (a1–d1), 1.5 (a2–d2) and 2.0 (a3–d3) wt% of sodium silicate and varying sodium alginate precursor from 1 to 10 wt% (scale 10 μm).
Figure 2TG profiles of ASB prepared at fixed concentrations of sodium alginate 0.5 (a), 1.0 (b), 1.5 (c) and 2.0 (d) wt% and varying sodium silicate concentrations.
Thermal analysis of ASB prepared at various Silicate alginate ratios.
| Sample Name | % Weight Loss of ASB at Different Temperature (°C). | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 | 900 | 1000 | |
| a | 5.82 | 19.25 | 42.64 | 49.01 | 58.67 | 60.94 | 64.01 | 65.59 | 67.88 | 71.25 |
| b | 3.27 | 19.55 | 44.08 | 52.19 | 62.67 | 65.63 | 67.31 | 68.32 | 69.40 | 71.32 |
| c | 3.47 | 20.58 | 50.20 | 57.33 | 65.23 | 65.87 | 68.55 | 75.41 | 76.39 | 77.62 |
| d | 2.44 | 18.49 | 49.18 | 56.09 | 63.28 | 64.37 | 66.41 | 73.69 | 74.35 | 74.99 |
| a1 | 5.59 | 16.28 | 33.57 | 45.08 | 58.84 | 60.49 | 62.71 | 64.66 | 66.15 | 66.69 |
| b1 | 2.77 | 17.30 | 44.01 | 51.08 | 60.28 | 63.94 | 65.68 | 66.32 | 67.35 | 68.52 |
| c1 | 2.21 | 19.20 | 47.55 | 55.12 | 61.59 | 62.28 | 65.51 | 70.81 | 71.65 | 72.54 |
| d1 | 4.38 | 16.09 | 45.92 | 53.55 | 60.48 | 62.95 | 64.87 | 70.99 | 71.73 | 72.05 |
| a2 | 4.25 | 16.81 | 31.95 | 39.66 | 49.07 | 50.62 | 52.02 | 52.51 | 53.58 | 54.76 |
| b2 | 3.12 | 16.88 | 39.23 | 47.83 | 58.41 | 60.64 | 61.52 | 62.38 | 63.33 | 64.81 |
| c2 | 2.71 | 19.39 | 44.39 | 51.45 | 61.38 | 63.80 | 65.74 | 66.52 | 67.30 | 68.82 |
| d2 | 2.13 | 18.31 | 48.55 | 55.76 | 62.73 | 63.78 | 67.62 | 73.81 | 74.55 | 75.35 |
| a3 | 2.34 | 12.89 | 22.89 | 31.11 | 39.20 | 40.61 | 41.35 | 42.14 | 43.39 | 45.01 |
| b3 | 3.55 | 17.50 | 36.66 | 45.76 | 55.91 | 58.36 | 59.17 | 60.78 | 62.73 | 65.04 |
| c3 | 0.91 | 13.67 | 39.44 | 47.89 | 58.84 | 61.59 | 62.88 | 63.64 | 64.56 | 65.85 |
| d3 | 1.02 | 15.70 | 45.81 | 53.44 | 61.04 | 62.20 | 66.28 | 72.18 | 72.85 | 73.71 |
Pore characteristic of ASB by varying sodium alginate and sodium silicate concentration at a fixed concentration of calcium chloride.
| Sample Name | Total Intrusion | Porosity (%) | Bulk Density (g/mL) | Apparent Density |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 0.0525 | 11.9591 | 2.2780 | 2.5874 |
| b | 0.0336 | 5.0924 | 1.5150 | 1.5963 |
| c | 0.0153 | 3.0963 | 2.0252 | 2.0899 |
| d | 0.0177 | 3.4383 | 1.9417 | 2.0109 |
| a1 | 0.0903 | 0.3361 | 0.0372 | 0.0374 |
| b1 | 0.0352 | 0.1481 | 0.0421 | 0.0421 |
| c1 | 0.0306 | 0.1560 | 0.0510 | 0.0511 |
| d1 | 0.0243 | 0.1695 | 0.0698 | 0.0700 |
| a2 | 0.1081 | 18.0628 | 1.6707 | 2.0391 |
| b2 | 0.0598 | 10.4051 | 1.7400 | 1.9421 |
| c2 | 0.0294 | 5.0000 | 1.7023 | 1.7919 |
| d2 | 0.0265 | 5.5343 | 2.0871 | 2.2093 |
| a3 | 0.0499 | 8.9412 | 1.7935 | 1.9696 |
| b3 | 0.0454 | 8.0920 | 1.7812 | 1.9380 |
| c3 | 0.0326 | 5.6307 | 1.7264 | 1.8295 |
| d3 | 0.0299 | 5.5616 | 1.8621 | 1.9718 |
Figure 3FTIR spectra of alginate and silicate and ASB (a). Solid-state NMR spectrum of silicate and ASB (b).
Figure 4Decomposition efficiency of perchlorate by nZVI-ASB (1 g), perchlorate (20 μg/mL) and pH = 6, 7 and 8, @90 °C.
Figure 5Perchlorate degradation efficiencies of pure, used and reloaded nZVI-ASB (a). Optical images of nZVI-ASB after perchlorate degradation (b) and Fe reloaded beads (c).