| Literature DB >> 35591627 |
Haoyu Chai1,2, Hui Li2, Fei Zhong2, Zhen Xu2, Shengqiang Bai2,3, Lidong Chen2,3.
Abstract
The utility of a solvent is one of the key factors that impacts resultant film morphology. However, the effect of solvent-dependent morphology on the doping process and electrical conductivity has not been adequately elucidated. In this work, we compared the morphology of chloroform- and chlorobenzene-processed thiophene polymer films and investigated how the choice of solvent influences film morphology, doping level, charge transport properties, and thus electrical conductivity. It was found that the film drop-casted from chloroform exhibits better crystallinity than that drop-casted from chlorobenzene. The crystallinity has negligible impact on the doping level but significant impact on charge transport properties. As a result, the chloroform-processed film shows a higher electrical conductivity of up to 408 S cm-1 due to a high carrier mobility related to the continuously crystalline domains in film. This finding indicates that the choice of solvent for preparation of film, which strongly correlated with molecular orientation, is a new strategy to optimize the electrical conductivity of doped polymers.Entities:
Keywords: carrier mobility; chemical doping; conductive polymer; electrical conductivity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591627 PMCID: PMC9105990 DOI: 10.3390/ma15093293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Scheme 1The synthetic route to the polymer PODTT-4T.
Figure 1(a) The thickness-normalized absorption spectra; (b) Raman spectra of pristine and doped films drop casted from CF and CB, respectively. The Raman intensity is normalized on the band peaked at mode A.
Figure 2Electrical conductivities of PODTT-4TCF (black line) and PODTT-4TCB (red line) doped by FeCl3 as a function of the doping time.
Figure 3(a) GIWAXS line cuts of in-plane scattering profiles; (b) GIWAXS line cuts of out-of-plane scattering profiles of pristine and doped films drop-cast from CB and CB, respectively.
Figure 4AFM height images of (a) pristine PODTT-4TCF film, (b) pristine PODTT-4TCB film, (c) doped PODTT-4TCF film, and (d) doped PODTT-4TCB film.
Figure 5Temperature-dependent electrical conductivity of doped PODTT-4TCF and PODTT-4TCB films (the unit of σ is S cm−1). All doped films were immersed in FeCl3 solution for 10 min.