| Literature DB >> 35591521 |
Guifeng Liu1, Huadi Zhang1, Jianpeng Liu1, Shuqi Xu2, Zhengfa Chen1.
Abstract
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is a new type of high-performance cement-based composite. It is widely used in important buildings, bridges, national defense construction, etc. because of its excellent mechanical properties and durability. Freeze thaw and salt erosion damage are one of the main causes of concrete structure failure. The use of UHPC prepared with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) is an effective method to enhance the durability of concrete structures in complex environments. In this work, the optimal mix proportion based on mechanical properties was obtained by changing the content of MWCNTs and water binder ratio to prepare MWCNTs UHPC. Then, based on the changes in the compressive strength, mass loss rate, and relative dynamic modulus of elasticity (RDME), the damage degree of concrete under different salt erosion during 1500 freeze-thaw (FT) cycles was analyzed. The changes in the micro pore structure were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The test results showed that the optimum mix proportion at the water binder ratio was 0.19 and 0.1% MWCNTs. At this time, the compressive strength was 34.1% higher and the flexural strength was 13.6% higher than when the MWCNTs content was 0. After 1500 salt freezing cycles, the appearance and mass loss of MWCNTs-UHPC prepared according to the best ratio changed little, and the maximum mass loss was 3.18%. The higher the mass fraction of the erosion solution is, the lower the compressive strength and RDME of concrete after FT cycles. The SEM test showed that cracks appeared in the internal structure and gradually increased due to salt freezing damage. However, the microstructure of the concrete was still relatively dense after 1500 salt freezing cycles. The NMR test showed that the salt freezing cycle has a significant influence on the change in the small pores, and the larger the mass fraction of the erosion solution, the smaller the change in the proportion of pores. After 1500 salt freezing cycles, the samples did not fail, which shows that MWCNTs UHPC with a design service life of 150 years has good salt freezing resistance under the coupling effect of salt corrosion and the FT cycle.Entities:
Keywords: durability; mechanical properties; microstructure; multi-walled carbon nanotubes; salt erosion and freeze-thaw coupling; ultra-high-performance concrete
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591521 PMCID: PMC9101171 DOI: 10.3390/ma15093188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Physical parameters of MWCNTs [26].
| Pipe Diameter | Tube Length | Purity | Ash | Specific Surface Area | Packing Density |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–20 | 5–50 | >85 | <2.0 | 200–300 | 0.006–0.09 |
Figure 1Granulometry curve of sand.
Mix proportions of the specimens (kg/m3).
| Sample | Cement | Silica Fume | Fly Ash | Slag Powder | Sand | W/B | Water Reducer | MWCNTs Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 540 | 100 | 180 | 100 | 1080 | 0.16 | 2.5% | 0/0.02/0.05/0.10/0.15/0.20/0.30 |
| M2 | 540 | 100 | 180 | 100 | 1080 | 0.17 | 2.5% | 0/0.02/0.05/0.10/0.15/0.20/0.30 |
| M3 | 540 | 100 | 180 | 100 | 1080 | 0.18 | 2.5% | 0/0.02/0.05/0.10/0.15/0.20/0.30 |
| M4 | 540 | 100 | 180 | 100 | 1080 | 0.19 | 2.5% | 0/0.02/0.05/0.10/0.15/0.20/0.30 |
| M5 | 540 | 100 | 180 | 100 | 1080 | 0.20 | 2.5% | 0/0.02/0.05/0.10/0.15/0.20/0.30 |
Composition and mass fraction of erosion solution.
| Sample | Erosion Solution Type | Type and Dosage of Salt /g·L−1 | Solution Mass Fraction/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaHCO3 | NaCl | Na2SO4 | |||
| F1 | Composite salt | 14.38 | 7.46 | 13.36 | 3.4 |
| F2 | Bicarbonate | 14.38 | 0 | 0 | 1.42 |
| F3 | Chloride salt | 0 | 7.46 | 0 | 0.74 |
| F4 | Sulphate | 0 | 0 | 13.36 | 1.32 |
| F5 | Clean water | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Main test apparatus.
| Name | Model Parameters |
|---|---|
| Collector type constant temperature heating magnetic stirrer (Shanghai Yuhua Instrument Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) | DF-101S |
| Ultrasonic cleaner (Shenzhen yuanpin Instrument Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China) | KQ-250B |
| Single horizontal shaft forced concrete mixer (Wuxi Jianyi Instrument Machinery Co., Ltd, Wuxi, China) | HJW-60 |
| Microcomputer controlled electro-hydraulic pressure testing machine (Shanghai Linjia science and Education Instrument Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) | TYW-2000 |
| Constant loading pressure testing machine (Wuxi xinluda Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd, Wuxi, China) | EHDC |
| Concrete freeze-thaw testing machine (Shanghai Sanhao refrigeration equipment factory, Shanghai, China) | CDR-5 |
| Dynamic elastic modulus tester (Tianjin Yaxing Automation Experimental Instrument Co., Ltd, Tianjin, China) | DT-20W |
| Electron scanning microscope (Shanghai Baihe Instrument Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) | JSM-IT100(L) |
| Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging analyzer (Suzhou niumag Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd, Suzhou, China) | MesoMR12-060H-I |
Figure 2Test flow chart.
Figure 3Mechanical properties of MWCNTs UHPC with different water binder ratios (0.16–0.20) and different MWCNTs contents (0–0.30%): (a) Flexural strength; (b) Compressive strength.
Figure 4Specimen morphology of MWCNTs UHPC under different salt freezing cycles: (a) Bicarbonate and FT coupling; (b) Chloride salt and FT coupling; (c) Clean water and FT coupling.
Figure 5Variation in the compressive strength during salt freezing cycles. (F1: Composite salt and FT coupling; F2: Bicarbonate and FT coupling F3: Chloride salt and FT coupling; F4: Sulphate and FT coupling; F5: Clean water and FT coupling).
Figure 6The mass loss rate of MWCNTs UHPC during salt freezing cycles. (F1: Composite salt and FT coupling; F2: Bicarbonate and FT coupling F3: Chloride salt and FT coupling; F4: Sulphate and FT coupling; F5: Clean water and FT coupling).
The referred compressive strength loss rate and mass loss rate of UHPC after FT cycles.
| Number | Author | Number of FT Cycles | Compressive Strength Loss Rate (%) | Mass Loss Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lu et al. [ | 300 | 27.5 | −0.65 |
| 2 | Lee et al. [ | 300 | −3 | - |
| 600 | 1 | - | ||
| 1000 | 6 | - | ||
| 3 | Ji et al. [ | 500 | 4.9–17.8 | 0.57–0.95 |
| 4 | Li et al. [ | 800 | 0.869–1.501 | - |
Figure 7RDME of MWCNTs UHPC during salt freezing cycles (F1: Composite salt and FT coupling; F2: Bicarbonate and FT coupling F3: Chloride salt and FT coupling; F4: Sulphate and FT coupling; F5: Clean water and FT coupling).
Figure 8SEM of MWCNTs UHPC under different salt freezing cycles.
Figure 9T2 distribution curve of the NMR test (H1-H5 is the sample after 1500 salt freezing cycles under 5 erosion solutions, and H6 is the control sample without salt freezing cycles).
Figure 10T2 spectrum area and proportion of the peak value of the T2 distribution.