| Literature DB >> 35591503 |
Dongxing Wu1, Wenchao Chu2, Longlin Wang3,4, Wensheng Wang5, Haoyun Wang5, Xuanhao Shangguan5, Xiang Cui6.
Abstract
Utilizing recycled crushed clay brick (RCB) from C&D waste in road engineering construction as the substitute for natural aggregates has attracted a lot of attention, which would be a promising step forward towards sustainable development and green construction. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of cement-stabilized macadam (CSM), incorporating various RCB fine aggregate substitution ratios. For this purpose, the physical and chemical properties of RCB fine aggregate was tested, and RCB exhibited a porous surface micro-morphology, high water absorption and pozzolanic activity. Subsequently, a comprehensive experimental investigation of modified CSM with RCB has been carried out based on laboratory tests concerning the mechanical and shrinkage properties. Results showed that higher RCB fine aggregate substitution ratio resulted in lower unconfined compressive strength, and the negative influence of RCB on unconfined compressive strength would decrease gradually, varying curing time; however, the higher the RCB substitution ratio was, the larger the indirect tensile strength at 90 d curing time of the late curing period was. CSM containing RCB had an overall increasing accumulative water loss rate, accumulative strain of dry shrinkage and average coefficient of dry shrinkage, except that 20% RCB resulted in an excellent dry shrinkage property. Moreover, RCB with pozzolanic activity reacted very slowly mainly at later ages, enhancing the interfacial transition zone.Entities:
Keywords: cement-stabilized macadam; durability; leaching toxicity; mechanical performances; recycled clay brick; shrinkage characteristics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591503 PMCID: PMC9099881 DOI: 10.3390/ma15093171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The technical indicators of BA and RCB aggregates.
| Aggregates | Apparent Specific Density | Water | Flakiness Content | Crushed Stone Value (%) | Liquid Limit | Plasticity Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse BA | 2.735 | 1.24 | 9.57 | 21.63 | / | / |
| Fine BA | 2.689 | 1.73 | / | / | 18.06 | 4.34 |
| Coarse RCB | 2.331 | 17.36 | 9.97 | 41.53 | / | / |
| Fine RCB | 2.116 | 17.60 | / | / | 37.91 | 8.50 |
Figure 1Properties of RCB aggregate: (a) EDS spectrum; (b) XRD pattern.
Figure 2Aggregate gradation curve of CSM.
Figure 3MDD and OWC results of CSM samples.
Figure 4The flowchart of this study.
Figure 5The unconfined compressive strength of CSM with different RCB substitution ratios.
Figure 6The unconfined compressive strength of CSM with different curing times.
Figure 7Comparison of unconfined compressive strength between experimental and predictive values.
Figure 8The indirect tensile strength results of CSM.
Figure 9The accumulative water loss rate of CSM changing with time.
Figure 10The accumulative strain of dry shrinkage changing with time.
Figure 11The accumulative strain of dry shrinkage changing with accumulative water loss rate.
Figure 12The coefficient of dry shrinkage: (a) coefficient of dry shrinkage with time; (b) average coefficient of dry shrinkage.
Figure 13The EDTA consumption with curing for CSM samples.