| Literature DB >> 35591023 |
Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed1, Hamed Alqahtani1, Riaz Ullah Khan2, Sultan Almakdi3, Mohammed Alshehri3, Mohammed Aref Abdul Rasheed4.
Abstract
The transportation industry is crucial to the realization of a smart city. However, the current growth in vehicle numbers is not being matched by an increase in road capacity. Congestion may boost the number of accidents, harm economic growth, and result in higher gas emissions. Currently, traffic congestion is seen as a severe threat to urban life. Suffering as a result of increased car traffic, insufficient infrastructure, and inefficient traffic management has exceeded the tolerance limit. Since route decisions are typically made in a short amount of time, the visualization of the data must be presented in a highly conceivable way. Also, the data generated by the transportation system face difficulties in processing and sometimes lack effective usage in certain fields. Hence, to overcome the challenges in computer vision, a novel computer vision-based traffic management system is proposed by integrating a wireless sensor network (WSN) and visual analytics framework. This research aimed to analyze average message delivery, average latency, average access, average energy consumption, and network performance. Wireless sensors are used in the study to collect road metrics, quantify them, and then rank them for entry. For optimization of the traffic data, improved phase timing optimization (IPTO) was used. The whole experimentation was carried out in a virtual environment. It was observed from the experimental results that the proposed approach outperformed other existing approaches.Entities:
Keywords: computer vision; improved phase timing optimization (IPTO); traffic management system; visual analytics; wireless sensor network (WSN)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591023 PMCID: PMC9099745 DOI: 10.3390/s22093333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1The schematic representation of the proposed method.
Figure 2The actual length of a road segment as contrasted to the perceived length.
Figure 3Average delivery ratio vs. different message interval for the existing and proposed method.
Figure 4Average delivery delay vs. different message interval for the existing and proposed method.
Figure 5Average communication cost vs. different message interval for the existing and proposed method.
Figure 6Average energy consumption vs. simulation time for the existing and proposed method.
Figure 7First node death vs. number of nodes for the existing and proposed method.
Figure 8Network lifetime vs. number of nodes for the existing and proposed method.
Figure 9Access ratio vs. different number of RSUs for the existing and proposed method [8,25,26].