| Literature DB >> 35590897 |
Norliza Sidek1, Nor'ashikin Ali1, Gamal Alkawsi2.
Abstract
The rapid growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has vigorously affected government by enhancing quality and efficiency of public services. However, the application of IoT-based services in public sectors is slow, despite its benefits to citizens. Research is needed to deepen understanding of the factors that influence the successful implementation of facilities management as the Internet-of-Things-based services in public sectors. An integrated model is developed and validated to extend the DeLone and McLean IS success model by including technology readiness and other identified factors which impact the use of facilities management of IoT-based services in public sectors from the perspective of employees. An online questionnaire was developed and distributed to employees from all local authorities throughout Malaysia, and 187 usable responses were collected. The partial least squares structural equation modelling approach was used to test the model, with 90.8% of the variance in IoT-based services, suggesting an acceptable model fit with seven out of nine hypotheses were supported. Thus, the empirical evidence exerts significant effects of technology readiness towards the success of IoT-based facility management in the public sector.Entities:
Keywords: Internet of Things; facility management; public sectors; quantitative method; technology readiness
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35590897 PMCID: PMC9103958 DOI: 10.3390/s22093207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Scope of IoTbs for FM.
| Sources | Country | Scope of FM | IoT Devices/Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Malaysia | The scope is complete, including landscaping services, cleaning services, mechanical and electrical services, civil services and many others. | GPS, sensors, smartphone, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), cloud computing. |
| [ | Finland | Building information modelling | Sensor readings, Big Data analysis, connected sensor networks, ubiquitous computing |
| [ | Sweden | Inclusive of invisible services, business infrastructure management and asset management for buildings. | Artificial intelligence (AI), smartphone, sensors. |
| [ | Australia | It is related to buildings and infrastructure that depend on a slew of incompatible technologies to keep track of asset value management and building maintenance. | RFID, sensors, laser scanning, wireless sensor networks, smartphone Bluetooth, webcam-enabled handheld devices. |
| [ | China | Facilities’ energy consumption, the security of facilities, the quality and ambient comfort of the indoor environment, the assessment of infrastructures, visualisation of facilities’ information, the use of interior space, and structural health. | Auto-ID, sensor, photogrammetry/videogrammetry and laser scanning, wireless sensor networks (WSNs). |
Figure 1Research model.
Response rate.
| Results | N * |
|---|---|
| Total sent | 297 |
| Undeliverable because of a non-valid email address and contact number | −15 |
| Responses after the first email | 117 |
| Responses after the second reminder | 28 |
| Responses after the third reminder | 23 |
| Responses after the fourth reminder | 27 |
| Total usable returned questionnaires | 195 |
* N, number of questionnaires.
Comparing respondents with the population.
| Respondents | Population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 98 | 50.3% | 373 | 54.1% |
| Male | 97 | 49.7% | 316 | 45.9% |
Frequency distribution of descriptive analysis.
| Demographic Attribute | Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) | Valid | Cumulative Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 93 | 49.7 | 49.7 | 49.7 |
| Female | 94 | 50.3 | 50.3 | 100.0 | |
| Age (years) | 18–30 | 40 | 21.4 | 21.4 | 21.4 |
| 31–40 | 110 | 58.8 | 58.8 | 80.2 | |
| 41–50 | 27 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 94.7 | |
| >51 | 10 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 100.0 | |
| Education Level | SPM or SPTM or SPMV | 27 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 |
| Diploma | 60 | 32.1 | 32.1 | 46.5 | |
| Bachelor’s degree | 81 | 43.3 | 43.3 | 89.8 | |
| Master’s degree | 14 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 97.3 | |
| Doctorate | 1 | .05 | 0.5 | 97.9 | |
| Others | 4 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 100.0 | |
| Service Group | Support Group | 123 | 65.8 | 65.8 | 65.8 |
| Management and Professional | 59 | 31.6 | 31.6 | 97.3 | |
| Top-Level Management | 5 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 100.0 | |
| Department | District Council | 84 | 44.9 | 44.9 | 44.9 |
| Municipal Council | 52 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 72.7 | |
| City Council | 20 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 83.4 | |
| Others | 31 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 100.0 | |
| Working Experience (years) | <5 | 117 | 62.6 | 62.6 | 62.6 |
| >5 | 70 | 37.4 | 37.4 | 100.0 |
Collinearity analysis result.
| Construct | PU | IoTbs Use | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISQ | 4.028 | 5.544 | |
| PU | 5.537 | 5.215 | |
| SN | 3.991 | ||
| TR | 2.504 | 2.357 | |
| US | 5.537 |
Path coefficient result.
| Hypothesis | Relationship | Std. Beta | Std. Error | T-Value | Decision | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | ISQ→PU | 0.498 | 0.079 | 6.311 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H2 | ISQ→US | 0.490 | 0.077 | 6.347 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H3 | PU→IoTbs Use | 0.641 | 0.081 | 7.910 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H4 | PU→US | 0.454 | 0.077 | 5.861 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H5 | SN→PU | 0.443 | 0.091 | 4.877 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H6 | TR→ISQ | 0.746 | 0.035 | 21.154 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H7 | TR→PU | 0.026 | 0.056 | 0.472 | 0.318 | Not Supported |
| H8 | TR→US | 0.017 | 0.050 | 0.344 | 0.365 | Not Supported |
| H9 | US→IoTbs Use | 0.333 | 0.085 | 3.916 | 0.000 | Supported |
Figure 2Structural model analysis results.
Summary of R2, f2 Q2, and q2 results.
| Hypothesis | Relationship | R2 | f2 | Q2 | q2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | IS Quality→Perceived Usefulness | 0.857 | 0.434 | 0.714 | 0.182 |
| H2 | IS Quality→User Satisfaction | 0.331 | 0.135 | ||
| H3 | Perceived Usefulness→Use | 0.908 | 0.808 | 0.716 | |
| H4 | Perceived Usefulness→User Satisfaction | 0.869 | 0.303 | 0.733 | |
| H5 | Subjective Norm→Perceived Usefulness | 0.342 | 0.143 | ||
| H6 | TR→IS Quality | 0.558 | 1.261 | 0.375 | |
| H7 | TR→Perceived Usefulness | 0.002 | 0.000 | ||
| H8 | TR→User Satisfaction | 0.001 | −0.004 | ||
| H9 | User Satisfaction→Use | 0.217 |
A comparison between the present research and prior research of IoT success—study settings.
| Study | Industry and Country: Unit of Analysis (Respondent) | Types of IoT/IS (Dependent Variable) |
|---|---|---|
| The present research | Facilities Management in Malaysia: Individual (Public Employees’) | IoT-based Facilities Management (IoTbs use) |
| [ | Smart Cities in India: Individual (Citizens) | General IoT devices used for Smart Cities (Actual usage of IoT) |