Literature DB >> 35590041

Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis.

Per Soelberg Sorensen1.   

Abstract

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is a major problem in several recombinant protein therapies used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The etiology of ADAs is multifaceted. The predisposition for a breakdown of immune tolerance is probably genetically determined, and many factors may contribute to the immunogenicity, including structural properties, formation of aggregates, and presence of contaminants and impurities from the industrial manufacturing process. ADAs may have a neutralizing capacity and can reduce or abrogate the bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy of the drug and cause safety issues. Interferon (IFN)-β was the first drug approved for the treatment of MS, and-although it is generally recognized that neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) appear and potentially have a negative effect on therapeutic efficacy-the use of routine measurements of NAbs and the interpretation of the presence of NAbs has been debated at length. NAbs appear after 9-18 months of therapy in up to 40% of patients treated with IFNβ, and the frequency and titers of NAbs depend on the IFNβ preparation. Although all pivotal clinical trials of approved IFNβ products in MS exhibited a detrimental effect of NAbs after prolonged therapy, some subsequent studies did not observe clinical effects from NAbs, which led to the claim that NAbs did not matter. However, it is now largely agreed that persistently high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, an absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. Low and medium titers are ambiguous, and treatment decisions should be guided by determination of in vivo messenger RNA myxovirus resistance protein A induction after IFNβ administration and clinical disease activity. During treatment with glatiramer acetate, ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely affect treatment efficacy or result in adverse events. ADAs occur in approximately 5% of patients treated with natalizumab within 6 months of therapy, and persistent NAbs are associated with a lack of efficacy and acute infusion-related reactions and should instigate a change of therapy. When using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of MS, it is not necessary to test for NAbs as these occur very infrequently. Alemtuzumab is immunogenic, but routine measurements of ADAs are not recommended as the antibodies in the pivotal 2-year trials at the population level did not influence lymphocyte depletion or repopulation, efficacy, or safety. However, in some individuals, NAbs led to poor lymphocyte depletion.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35590041     DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00920-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   6.497


  162 in total

Review 1.  Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Correlation between anti-interferon-β binding and neutralizing antibodies in interferon-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  P E H Jensen; F Sellebjerg; H B Søndergaard; P S Sørensen
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 6.089

3.  Immunological mechanism underlying the immune response to recombinant human protein therapeutics.

Authors:  Melody Sauerborn; Vera Brinks; Wim Jiskoot; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  Appearance and disappearance of neutralizing antibodies during interferon-beta therapy.

Authors:  P Soelberg Sorensen; N Koch-Henriksen; C Ross; K M Clemmesen; K Bendtzen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Immunogenicity of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: influence of preparation, dosage, dose frequency, and route of administration. Danish Multiple Sclerosis Study Group.

Authors:  C Ross; K M Clemmesen; M Svenson; P S Sørensen; N Koch-Henriksen; G L Skovgaard; K Bendtzen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Analysis of neutralizing antibodies to therapeutic interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: a comparison of three methods in a large Australasian cohort.

Authors:  Fiona McKay; Stephen Schibeci; Robert Heard; Graeme Stewart; David Booth
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 7.  The implications of immunogenicity for protein-based multiple sclerosis therapies.

Authors:  Bruce A Cohen; Joel Oger; Alison Gagnon; Gavin Giovannoni
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Clinical importance of neutralising antibodies against interferon beta in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Per Soelberg Sorensen; Christian Ross; Katja Maria Clemmesen; Klaus Bendtzen; Jette Lautrup Frederiksen; Kai Jensen; Ole Kristensen; Thor Petersen; Soren Rasmussen; Mads Ravnborg; Egon Stenager; Nils Koch-Henriksen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Treatment- and population-specific genetic risk factors for anti-drug antibodies against interferon-beta: a GWAS.

Authors:  Till F M Andlauer; Jenny Link; Dorothea Martin; Malin Ryner; Christina Hermanrud; Verena Grummel; Michael Auer; Harald Hegen; Lilian Aly; Christiane Gasperi; Benjamin Knier; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Poul Erik Hyldgaard Jensen; Finn Sellebjerg; Ingrid Kockum; Tomas Olsson; Marc Pallardy; Sebastian Spindeldreher; Florian Deisenhammer; Anna Fogdell-Hahn; Bernhard Hemmer
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Clinicogenomic factors of biotherapy immunogenicity in autoimmune disease: A prospective multicohort study of the ABIRISK consortium.

Authors:  Signe Hässler; Delphine Bachelet; Julianne Duhaze; Natacha Szely; Aude Gleizes; Salima Hacein-Bey Abina; Orhan Aktas; Michael Auer; Jerôme Avouac; Mary Birchler; Yoram Bouhnik; Olivier Brocq; Dorothea Buck-Martin; Guillaume Cadiot; Franck Carbonnel; Yehuda Chowers; Manuel Comabella; Tobias Derfuss; Niek De Vries; Naoimh Donnellan; Abiba Doukani; Michael Guger; Hans-Peter Hartung; Eva Kubala Havrdova; Bernhard Hemmer; Tom Huizinga; Kathleen Ingenhoven; Poul Erik Hyldgaard-Jensen; Elizabeth C Jury; Michael Khalil; Bernd Kieseier; Anna Laurén; Raija Lindberg; Amy Loercher; Enrico Maggi; Jessica Manson; Claudia Mauri; Badreddine Mohand Oumoussa; Xavier Montalban; Maria Nachury; Petra Nytrova; Christophe Richez; Malin Ryner; Finn Sellebjerg; Claudia Sievers; Dan Sikkema; Martin Soubrier; Sophie Tourdot; Caroline Trang; Alessandra Vultaggio; Clemens Warnke; Sebastian Spindeldreher; Pierre Dönnes; Timothy P Hickling; Agnès Hincelin Mery; Matthieu Allez; Florian Deisenhammer; Anna Fogdell-Hahn; Xavier Mariette; Marc Pallardy; Philippe Broët
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Engineering a Therapeutic Protein to Enhance the Study of Anti-Drug Immunity.

Authors:  Patricia E Zerra; Ernest T Parker; Wallace Hunter Baldwin; John F Healey; Seema R Patel; James W McCoy; Courtney Cox; Sean R Stowell; Shannon L Meeks
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.