| Literature DB >> 35589956 |
Haotian Wu1,2, Tianfu Ding1, Siyi Yan2, Zhongyue Huang1, Huan Zhang3,4.
Abstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure for removing renal calculi, while a large number of patients experience acute moderate-to-severe pain despite the analgesia provided. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for postoperative pain after PCNL, which may provide a novel perspective to refine the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program and to improve clinical outcomes. The clinical data of 331 patients who underwent PCNL in our hospital from September 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The pain intensity was assessed every 4 h until 24 h post-surgery. According to the visual analog scale (VAS) score, patients were divided into two groups: mild or no pain group (VAS score, 0-3) and moderate-to-severe pain group (VAS score, 4-10). The pre-, peri-, and post-operative data were collected and analyzed. The indicators with statistically significant differences were selected, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the risk factors for postoperative pain after PCNL. Among 331 patients, 221 patients had moderate-to-severe pain and the incidence rate was 66.77%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors for moderate-to-severe pain after PCNL were the diameter of the renal calculus (odds ratio (OR) = 6.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50-15.56, P = 0.001), the number of renal calculi (OR = 15.892, 95% CI 7.721-32.711, P < 0.01), the presence of residual calculi (OR = 1.780, 95% CI 0.897-3.533, P = 0.01), and operation time (OR = 1.033, 95% CI 1.020-1.046, P < 0.01). The diameter of the renal calculus, the number of renal calculi, the presence of residual calculi, and operation time were significant predictors of postoperative pain after PCNL.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35589956 PMCID: PMC9120144 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12623-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Under the guidance of ultrasound, the puncture needle selected the puncture point between the 11th intercostal or 12th intercostal posterior axillary line and the subscapular angle to puncture into the target calyces and establish the 16F microchannel. (taken by Tianfu Ding).
Figure 2The "two-step" method was used to establish the standard channel. First, a small ureteroscope was used to enter the microchannel to observe the position of the channel, and the preliminary adjustment was made. After the adjustment, the sheath was gradually expanded to establish the 24F standard channel. (taken by Tianfu Ding).
Comparison of postoperative pain factors between the two groups.
| Mild or no pain group (n = 110) (33.3) | Moderate-to-severe pain group (n = 221) (66.7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Median | |||
| 0.163 | 0.687 | |||
| Female | 39 (32) | 83 (68) | ||
| Male | 71 (34.1) | 137 (65.9) | ||
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 51.24 ± 11.10 | 50.72 ± 11.98 | ||
| 0.00 | 1.00 | |||
| ≤ 25 | 51 (33.3) | 102 (66.7) | ||
| > 25 | 59 (33.3) | 118 (66.7) | ||
| 2.72 | 0.099 | |||
| I | 37 (40.2) | 55 (59.8) | ||
| II | 73 (30.7) | 165 (69.3) | ||
| Renal calculusdiameter (mm, mean ± sd ) | 27.07 ± 13.86 | 31.95 ± 16.06 | − 2.72 | < 0.01 |
| 4.014 | 0.247a | |||
| Normal | 57 (36.5) | 99 (63.5) | ||
| Mild | 46 (30.3) | 106 (69.7) | ||
| Moderate | 2 (16.7) | 10 (83.3) | ||
| Severe | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | ||
| 0.66 | 0.417 | |||
| Negative | 74 (34.9) | 138 (65.1) | ||
| Positive | 36 (30.5) | 82 (69.5) | ||
| 1.778 | 0.182 | |||
| Balloon dilatation | 54 (37.2) | 91 (62.8) | ||
| Two-step method Dilatation | 56 (30.3) | 129 (69.7) | ||
| 2.056 | 0.152 | |||
| 24Fr | 109 (34) | 212 (66) | ||
| < 24Fr | 1 (11.1) | 8 (88.9) | ||
| 5.72 | 0.017 | |||
| Calculus-free | 87 (37.3) | 146 (62.7) | ||
| Calculus-residual | 23 (23.7) | 74 (76.3) | ||
| 0.228 | 0.892 | |||
| None | 95 (33.8) | 186 (66.2) | ||
| Nonsteroidal | 12 (30) | 28 (70) | ||
| Weak opioids | 3 (33.3) | 6 (66.6) | ||
| 1.81 | 0.77 | |||
| None | 68 (31.3) | 149 (68.7) | ||
| Hypertension | 22 (40.7) | 32 (59.3) | ||
| Diabetes | 13 (35.1) | 24 (64.9) | ||
| coronary heart disease | 5 (31.3) | 11 (68.8) | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | ||
| Puncture time (s, mean ± sd) | 206.80 ± 43.69 | 213.66 ± 39.51 | − 1.44 | 0.152 |
| 3.357 | 0.187 | |||
| 1 | 98 (35.4) | 179 (64.6) | ||
| 2 | 11 (23.4) | 36 (76.6) | ||
| 3 | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.3) | ||
| Duration of surgery (min, mean ± SD) | 85.07 ± 27.22 | 110.93 ± 38.14 | − 6.35 | < 0.01 |
| 4.207 | 0.120 | |||
| Normal | 99 (32.7) | 204 (67.3) | ||
| Clavien–Dindo Ib | 11 (47.8) | 12 (52.2) | ||
| Clavien–Dindo II | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | ||
| Preoperative creatinine (µmol/L, mean ± SD) | 85.11 ± 50.32 | 79.22 ± 45.01 | 1.078 | 0.282 |
| 87.09 | < 0.01 | |||
| 1 | 58 (78.4) | 16 (21.6) | ||
| > 1 | 52 (20.3) | 204 (79.7) | ||
Degree of hydronephrosis: the anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis is measured using CT and divided into normal (0–4 mm), mild (5–9 mm), moderate (10–15 mm), and severe (> 15 mm).
Calculus residual: after applying various treatments, the stones failed to be removed cleanly.
Preoperative creatinine: the normal value of creatinine is 57–111 µmol/L.
aChoose to use the Fisher probability method.
bClavien–Dindo I: pain was ruled out.
Risk factors for moderate-to-severe postoperative pain in patients with PCNL.
| Risk factor | B | Wald | OR | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter of the renal calculus | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 6.23 | 2.50–15.56 |
| Calculusresidual | 0.577 | 2.716 | 0.01 | 1.780 | 0.897–3.533 |
| Duration of surgery | 0.032 | 24.883 | < 0.01 | 1.033 | 1.020–1.046 |
| Number of renal calculi | 2.766 | 56.385 | < 0.01 | 15.892 | 7.721–32.711 |