| Literature DB >> 35589940 |
Gregory H Borschel1,2,3,4, Konstantin Feinberg1,2, Simeon C Daeschler5, Jennifer Zhang1,3, Tessa Gordon1,3.
Abstract
Diabetes is by far, the most common cause of neuropathy, inducing neurodegeneration of terminal sensory nerve fibers associated with loss of sensation, paresthesia, and persistent pain. Foretinib prevents die-back degeneration in cultured sensory and sympathetic neurons by rescuing mitochondrial activity and has been proven safe in prospective clinical trials. Here we aimed at investigating a potential neuroprotective effect of Foretinib in experimental diabetic neuropathy. A mouse model of streptozotocin induced diabetes was used that expresses yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in peripheral nerve fibers under the thy-1 promoter. Streptozotocin-injected mice developed a stable diabetic state (blood glucose > 270 mg/dl), with a significant reduction of intraepidermal nerve fiber density by 25% at 5 weeks compared to the non-diabetic controls. When diabetic mice were treated with Foretinib, a significantly greater volume of the cutaneous nerve fibers (67.3%) in the plantar skin was preserved compared to vehicle treated (37.8%) and non-treated (44.9%) diabetic mice while proximal nerve fiber morphology was not affected. Our results indicate a neuroprotective effect of Foretinib on cutaneous nerve fibers in experimental diabetic neuropathy. As Foretinib treated mice showed greater weight loss compared to vehicle treated controls, future studies may define more sustainable treatment regimen and thereby may allow patients to take advantage of this neuroprotective drug in chronic neurodegenerative diseases like diabetic neuropathy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35589940 PMCID: PMC9120083 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12455-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Diabetic phenotype. The dashed line represents the diabetic threshold of 15 mmol/l. Diabetic groups had significantly higher glucose compared to the non-diabetic control. Between diabetic groups there were no significant differences except for week 4 when the Foretinib treated group had significantly lower blood sugar values compared to the vehicle treated control (p = 0.0036; mean ± SEM; * indicates significant differences at p < 0.05).
Figure 2Cutaneous innervation. (A) Fluorescent image of a longitudinally cross sectioned plantar full-thickness skin sample in maximum intensity projection of a non-diabetic control showing a densely innervated epidermis. The nuclear counterstaining in blue (DAPI) and nerve fibers in green (beta 3). The red dotted line delineates the dermo-epidermal junction and red arrows indicate intraepidermal nerve fibers. (B) Plantar full-thickness skin sample of a diabetic mouse treated with a vehicle, showing a reduced IENFD. (C) Plantar full-thickness skin sample of a diabetic Foretinib treated mouse, showing a similarly reduced IENFD. Scale bars represent 15 µm. (D) Representative maximum intensity projection image of a plantar full-thickness skin sample of a non-diabetic control showing a dense cutaneous nerve fiber plexus in green (thy-1 yfp). (E) Plantar full-thickness skin sample of a non-treated diabetic mouse with a loss of smaller, interconnecting dermal nerve fiber bundles but remaining larger nerve fiber trunks in the deep dermis and subcutis. (F) Plantar full-thickness skin sample of a Foretinib-treated diabetic mouse showing a largely preserved but subepidermal nerve fiber plexus compared to (D). (G) Plantar full-thickness skin sample of a vehicle-treated diabetic mouse showing the marked reduction of dermal nerve fiber density, comparable to (C). Scale bars indicate 100 µm. (H) Plantar intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENDF) of experimental animals 5 weeks post-diabetes induction showing that all diabetic groups had a significantly reduced IENDF compared to the healthy control (p < 0.01), with no significant difference between diabetic groups. (I) Cutaneous nerve fiber density in a full thickness plantar skin sample indicating a neuroprotective effect of Foretinib on cutaneous nerve fibers in diabetic mice. *Indicates significant differences (p < 0.05); **(p < 0.01); ***(p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001); Epi = epidermis.
Figure 3Histomorphology of lower extremity nerves. (A) Drawing that illustrates the site of neuro-histomorphologic analysis of the lower extremity nerves in mice. The sciatic nerve was analyzed approximately 5 mm proximal to its bifurcation and the sural nerve was analyzed at the ankle level. (B) Representative cross section of a sciatic nerve from a non-diabetic mouse, containing separate fascicles. The red dashed square indicates the position of the magnified image in C. Scale bar 100 µm. (C) Sciatic nerve of a non-diabetic mouse in higher magnification. (D) Sciatic nerve of a diabetic mouse. (E) Sciatic nerve of a Foretinib-treated diabetic mouse. (F) Sciatic nerve of a vehicle-treated diabetic mouse. (G) Axon diameter of the sciatic nerve. (H) Myelin sheath thickness of the sciatic nerve. (I) G-ratio, as axon diameter divided by total nerve fiber diameter, of the sciatic nerve. No significant differences between groups for all metrics (p > 0.05). (J) Axon diameter of the sural nerve at the ankle level. (K) Myelin sheath thickness of the sural nerve. (L) G-ratio of the sural nerve. No significant differences between groups for all metrics (p > 0.05). (M) Sural nerve cross section of a non-diabetic mouse. (D) Sural nerve of a diabetic mouse. (E) Sural nerve of a Foretinib-treated diabetic mouse. (F) Sural nerve of a vehicle-treated diabetic mouse. Scale bar 10 µm. Osmium stained, epoxy embedded nerves, 1 µm cross sections.
Figure 4Potential side effects of Foretinib. (A) Body weight of the experimental animals with the vehicle treated group being significantly lighter compared to the non-treated diabetic group in week 2 and 4 (p < 0.05). (B) Relative body weight as proportion of the pre-diabetic weight showing that the Foretinib treated group dropped below the threshold of − 15% weight loss at 5 weeks post-injection (dashed line). The Graphs display mean ± SEM. * indicates significant differences (p < 0.05).