Literature DB >> 35589856

Effects of short-term upper limb immobilization on sensory information processing and corticospinal excitability.

Yoshitaka Okamoto1, Daisuke Ishii2,3, Satoshi Yamamoto4, Kiyoshige Ishibashi5, Yutaka Kohno6, Kenji Numata7.   

Abstract

Several studies have reported the effects of short-term immobilization of the upper limb on the excitability of the primary motor cortex. In a report examining the effects of upper limb immobilization on somatosensory information processing using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), short-term upper limb immobilization reduced the amplitude and increased the latency of the P45 component recorded over the contralateral sensorimotor cortex of SEPs. However, the effects of upper limb immobilization on other regions involved in somatosensory information processing are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the effects of short-term right upper limb immobilization on sensory information processing, particularly in motor-related areas, by measuring the cortical components of SEPs. We also evaluated the excitability of the primary motor cortex and corticospinal tract as well as motor performance (visual simple reaction time and pinch force) related to these areas. All subjects were divided into two groups: the SEP group, in which the effects of upper limb immobilization on the excitability of somatosensory processing were investigated, and the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) group, in which the effects of upper limb immobilization on the excitability of the corticospinal tract and primary motor cortex were investigated. Motor performance was evaluated in all subjects. We showed that 10-h right upper limb immobilization increased the cortical component of SEPs (N30) in the SEP group and decreased the excitability of the corticospinal tract, but not of the primary motor cortex, in the TMS group. The pinch force decreased after upper limb immobilization. However, the visual simple reaction time did not change between pre- and post-immobilization. The supplementary motor area and premotor cortex are believed to be the source of the N30. Therefore, these results suggest that upper limb immobilization affected somatosensory information processing in motor-related areas. Moreover, 10-h right upper limb immobilization reduced the excitability of corticospinal tracts but not that of the primary motor cortex, suggesting that circuits outside the M1, such as the intra- and inter-hemispheric inhibitory and facilitatory circuits rather than circuits within the M1, may be responsible for the reduced excitability of the central nervous system after restraint.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracortical facilitation; Long-interval intracortical inhibition; Short-interval intracortical inhibition; Short-term immobilization; Somatosensory-evoked potentials; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35589856     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06371-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  29 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans.

Authors:  C Civardi; R Cantello; P Asselman; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilisation of the ring and little fingers.

Authors:  Stefano Facchini; Michela Romani; Michele Tinazzi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Gating of the early components of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in different sensory-motor interference modalities.

Authors:  G Cheron; S Borenstein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  G Cruccu; M J Aminoff; G Curio; J M Guerit; R Kakigi; F Mauguiere; P M Rossini; R-D Treede; L Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  SEPs to finger joint input lack the N20-P20 response that is evoked by tactile inputs: contrast between cortical generators in areas 3b and 2 in humans.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; I Ozaki
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

6.  Color imaging of parietal and frontal somatosensory potential fields evoked by stimulation of median or posterior tibial nerve in man.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; M Bourguet
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

7.  Cast immobilization increases long-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; Janet L Taylor; Richard L Hoffman; Douglas J Dearth; James S Thomas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Use-dependent hemispheric balance.

Authors:  Laura Avanzino; Michela Bassolino; Thierry Pozzo; Marco Bove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. A review of scalp and intracranial recordings.

Authors:  T Allison; G McCarthy; C C Wood; S J Jones
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Training the motor cortex by observing the actions of others during immobilization.

Authors:  Michela Bassolino; Martina Campanella; Marco Bove; Thierry Pozzo; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.