| Literature DB >> 35589774 |
Michalina Ilska1, Anna Brandt-Salmeri2, Anna Kołodziej-Zaleska2, Heidi Preis3, Emily Rehbein3, Marci Lobel3.
Abstract
Although anxiety is common because of the transitional nature of the perinatal period, particularly high levels of anxiety have been observed in some studies of pregnant women during the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the severity of anxiety among pregnant women during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland, and factors associated with it. Cross-sectional study with a total of 1050 pregnant women recruited via social media in Poland during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, from March 1 until June 1, 2020. The survey included validated psychological measures: the GAD-7 (anxiety), the PREPS (pandemic stress), with two subscales: preparedness and infection stress, and obstetric, sociodemographic and COVID-19 related variables. T-tests, ANOVAs, and hierarchical binary logistic regression for dichotomized GAD-7 scores (minimal or mild vs. moderate or severe) were used. Over a third of respondents experienced moderate or severe levels of anxiety. Predictors of moderate or severe anxiety were non-pandemic related factors like unplanned pregnancy and emotional and psychiatric problems, as well as pandemic related pregnancy stress. Levels of anxiety among pregnant women during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland exceeded pre-pandemic norms. Findings suggest that prior psychiatric conditions, unplanned pregnancy, and elevated pandemic-related pregnancy stress due to concerns about infection or poor preparation for birth contributed to the risk of high anxiety in Polish pregnant women during the pandemic onset. Given the harmful effects of antenatal anxiety on the health and well-being of mothers and their children, psychotherapeutic interventions, efforts to alleviate pregnant women's stress, and training in adaptive ways to cope with stress are vital to reduce the prevalence of maternal anxiety and its potential consequences during this global crisis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35589774 PMCID: PMC9118185 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12275-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Sample characteristics and mean differences in GAD-7 scale score based on sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric factors, and other predictors (N = 1050).
| N (%) | GAD-7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Younger (< 35) | 894 (85.1) | 7.19 ± 5.39 |
| Older (≥ 35) | 156 (14.9) | 6.62 ± 4.81 |
| Some or no relationship | 32 (3.0) | 6.21 ± 5.52 |
| Married or cohabiting | 1014 (96.6) | 7.14 ± 5.29 |
| Below average | 69 (6.6) | 9.13 ± 5.89a |
| Average | 669 (63.7) | 7.18 ± 5.21b |
| Above average | 312 (29.7) | 6.50 ± 5.26b |
| Yes | 64 (6.1) | 9.40 ± 5.76 |
| No | 986 (93.9) | 6.95 ± 5.24 |
| Yes | 101 (9.6) | 12.01 ± 5.37 |
| No | 949 (90.4) | 6.58 ± 5.03 |
| Yes | 266 (25.3) | 8.01 ± 5.53 |
| No | 784 (74.7) | 6.76 ± 5.19 |
| Yes | 160 (15.2) | 8.26 ± 5.49 |
| No | 890 (84.8) | 6.90 ± 5.25 |
| Yes | 455 (43.4) | 6.83 ± 5.32 |
| No | 594 (56.6) | 7.32 ± 5.30 |
| 1st | 111 (10.6) | 6.59 ± 4.71 |
| 2nd | 344 (32.8) | 6.74 ± 5.14 |
| 3rd | 594 (56.6) | 7.42 ± 5.49 |
| Yes | 119 (11.3) | 8.89 ± 6.17a |
| No | 882 (84.0) | 6.84 ± 5.17b |
| Unsure | 49 (4.7) | 7.51 ± 4.74ab |
| Yes | 295 (28.1) | 8.01 ± 5.45a |
| No | 744 (70.9) | 6.69 ± 5.18b |
| Unsure | 11 (1.0) | 10.81 ± 5.82a |
| Yes | 86 (8.2) | 7.29 ± 5.31 |
| No | 963 (91.7) | 7.08 ± 5.31 |
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
Estimates of effect sizes: d—Cohen’s d; η2—eta squared.
Means with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05 in a post hoc Scheffé test.
Sample characteristics and mean differences in GAD-7 scale score based on COVID-19 related conditions (N = 1050).
| COVID-19 related conditions | N (%) | GAD-7 |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 297 (28.3) | 7.87 ± 5.58 |
| No | 753 (71.7) | 6.80 ± 5.16 |
| Yes | 343 (32.7) | 7.69 ± 5.45 |
| No | 707 (67.3) | 6.82 ± 5.22 |
| Yes | 52 (5.0) | 7.46 ± 5.13 |
| No | 718 (68.4) | 6.91 ± 5.33 |
| Unsure | 280 (26.7) | 7.52 ± 5.25 |
| Yes, whenever I want | 743 (70.8) | 6.52 ± 5.14a |
| Sometimes | 220 (21.0) | 7.95 ± 5.21b |
| Rarely | 87 (8.3) | 9.95 ± 5.81c |
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
Estimates of effect sizes: d—Cohen’s d; η2—eta squared.
Means with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05 in a post hoc Scheffé test.
Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations among COVID-19 related stress and anxiety (N = 1050).
| PREPS-IS | PREPS-PS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PREPS-IS | 2.98 | 1.14 | ||
| PREPS-PS | 3.46 | 0.95 | .582** | |
| GAD-7 | 7.10 | 5.31 | .355** | .446** |
PREPS-IS pandemic-related pregnancy infection stress, PREPS-PS pandemic-related pregnancy preparedness stress, GAD-7 generalized anxiety disorder.
**p < .01 *p < .05.
Binary hierarchical logistic regression predicting moderate or severe anxiety symptoms (N = 1050).
| Step 1 | Step 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR | 95% CI | AOR | 95% CI | |
| Financial status† | 1.25 | (0.91, 1.73) | 1.13 | (0.79, 1.60) |
| Lifetime abuse | 1.63 | (0.93, 2.85) | 1.30 | (0.70, 2.40) |
| Emotional or psychiatric problems | 4.88*** | (3.09, 7.68) | 5.16*** | (3.12, 8.54) |
| Major life event | 1.34 | (0.97, 1.84) | 1.39 | (0.98, 1.97) |
| Unplanned pregnancy | 1.67* | (1.15, 2.43) | 2.37*** | (1.57, 3.60) |
| High risk† | 1.35 | (0.92, 1.97) | 1.23 | (0.81, 1.87) |
| Chronic illness† | 1.51* | (1.10, 2.06) | 1.25 | (0.88, 1.76) |
| Income lost | 1.12 | (0.80, 1.58) | ||
| Appointment altered | 1.17 | (0.85, 1.63) | ||
| Limited access to outdoor space† | 1.24 | (0.89, 1.73) | ||
| PREPS—infection | 1.06** | (1.02, 1.09) | ||
| PREPS—preparedness | 1.13*** | (1.09, 1.17) | ||
AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
†Women who reported below average or average financial status were grouped together; Women who reported sometimes or rarely having access to outdoor space were grouped together; Women who reported having a chronic illness and those who were unsure were grouped together; Women who reported being high risk and those who were unsure were grouped together.