Literature DB >> 35589387

Identification of a novel pathogenic variant in FBN1 associated with Marfan Syndrome.

Julia P Pereira1, Juliana R Ferreira1, Anna Paula A Botelho1, Marcelo M Melo1, Glauber Monteiro Dias2.   

Abstract

Aortic diseases arising in Marfan Syndrome (MFS), such as in aneurysms and dissections of the thoracic aorta, are related to genetic alterations in the FBN1 gene. Databases, such as Universal Mutations-FBN1, ClinVar and The Human Gene Mutation, contain more than a thousand FBN1 mutations associated with MFS. The FBN1 gene, which encodes fibrillin-1, is responsible for the integral production of different protein domains. Possible genetic changes may lead to a weakening of blood vessels, leading to the development of aortopathies. In this study, we present the association of a novel FBN1 variant with MFS. The proband is a man who presented ascending aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) at 42-yr-old, which was surgically treated. Clinical investigations were performed in all family members enrolled in the study. Marfan signs were observed in the proband, daughters and granddaughter. Direct sequencing of the FBN1 gene in the proband identified a novel truncation variant p.(Glu2019Ter) and a cascade screening were done. The variant was classified as pathogenic and causal for MFS according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria and revised Ghent nosology for MFS diagnosis, respectively. Proband's daughter and granddaughter harbor the variant, however without aortic alteration. This work reports for the first time a patient with the FBN1-p.(Glu2019Ter) variant and its association with MFS/TAAD. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic aneurysm; Ascending aortic dissection

Year:  2022        PMID: 35589387      PMCID: PMC9235843          DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a006215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud        ISSN: 2373-2873


CASE PRESENTATION

Marfan syndrome (MFS; MIM #154700) is a connective tissue disorder with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, conferring phenotypes such as ectopia lentis, arachnodactyly, and thoracic aortic aneurysm/dissection (TAAD) (Araújo et al. 2016). Numerous mutations in the FBN1 gene, which encodes fibrillin protein, are directly linked to the syndrome, supporting the fact that it is considered the “Marfan gene” (Sakai et al. 2016). The relationship between the phenotype, location, and types of mutations in FBN1 has been constantly investigated, with the aim of improving treatment and follow-up and establishing an improvement in risk stratification (Takeda and Komuro 2019). Here we report the association of a novel variant in FBN1 and MFS phenotypes in a Brazilian family. The proband is a 46-yr-old man who presented acute aortic syndrome (type I aortic dissection) at age 42 yr. He was admitted to an emergency hospital, and a computed tomography (CT) angiography of the chest was performed, which showed dissection of the ascending aorta with significant aneurysmal dilatation (maximum diameter, 70 mm), extending to the beginning of the abdominal aorta. The echocardiogram showed normal systolic diameter and preserved systolic function without segmental alteration. He underwent emergency surgery. Moreover, he presented Marfan signs, such as wrist and thumb sign, reduced upper/lower extremity ratio, and facial features (Fig. 1A). The proband could not be evaluated by an ophthalmologist; therefore, without an ectopia lentis test, he did not fill the MFS diagnosis criteria, according to the revised Ghent nosology for MFS (Loeys et al. 2010).
Figure 1.

Clinical findings for Marfan syndrome (MFS) in proband and in family members (A). (A1,A5,A7) Mandibular retrognathism. (A2,A6) Positive fist sign. (A3,A8) Flat feet. (A4) Reduced upper/lower segment ratio. (B) Pedigree indicating proband with MFS diagnosis (black square), individuals with some MFS physical features, but no aortic disease (gray circles), the p.(Glu2019Ter) carriers (−/+) and noncarriers (−/−). An N indicates unaffected individuals (no signs for MFS and normal aorta) and white symbols indicate not-evaluated individuals. (C) Electropherogram of the FBN1 gene pointing to a variant c.6055G > T p.(Glu2019Ter) in exon 50, resulting in the exchange of a glutamic acid for a premature stop codon.

Clinical findings for Marfan syndrome (MFS) in proband and in family members (A). (A1,A5,A7) Mandibular retrognathism. (A2,A6) Positive fist sign. (A3,A8) Flat feet. (A4) Reduced upper/lower segment ratio. (B) Pedigree indicating proband with MFS diagnosis (black square), individuals with some MFS physical features, but no aortic disease (gray circles), the p.(Glu2019Ter) carriers (−/+) and noncarriers (−/−). An N indicates unaffected individuals (no signs for MFS and normal aorta) and white symbols indicate not-evaluated individuals. (C) Electropherogram of the FBN1 gene pointing to a variant c.6055G > T p.(Glu2019Ter) in exon 50, resulting in the exchange of a glutamic acid for a premature stop codon. Genetic analysis identified a novel variant in the FBN1 gene, c.6055G > T; (p.(Glu2019Ter)) (Table 1). Nine members of proband's family were clinically evaluated and submitted to cascade screening for variant detection (Fig. 1B).
Table 1.

Genetic findings in the FBN1 gene

Genomic locationHGVS cDNAHGVS proteinTypeZigositydbSNPgnomAD MAFCADD/mutation tasteraVariant interpretation
Chr 15:48734026 (GRCh37)Chr 15:48441829 (GRCh38)NM_000138.5: c.6055G > Tp.Glu2019TerNonsenseHet--47/PDCPathogenic

(MAF) Minor allele frequency, (PDC) prediction disease causing.

aCADD score >20, probably pathogenic.

Genetic findings in the FBN1 gene (MAF) Minor allele frequency, (PDC) prediction disease causing. aCADD score >20, probably pathogenic. His parents (77-yr-old father and 68-yr-old mother) have coronary artery disease, but did not present any systemic MFS signs or aorta structural alterations. Cascade screening did not find the variant in his parents; therefore, it is an assumed de novo variant, as no paternity test was performed. Thus, the proband met the criteria for the MFS diagnosis (Loeys et al. 2010): absence of family history of MFS, aorta aneurysm (Z ≥ 2) and a de novo and nonsense FBN1 mutation (Table 2).
Table 2.

Revised Ghent criteria for diagnosis of Marfan syndrome and related conditions

CriteriaPbI.1I.2II.4III.1III.2III.3III.4IV.1
FBN1 mutationYNNUNNUYY
Ao (Z ≥ 2)aYNNNNNNNN
Ectopia lentisUUUUUUUUU
Systemic scoreb (pts)500000333
 Wrist and thumb sign (3 pts)Y--------
 Wrist or thumb sign (1 pt)------YYY
 Pectus carinatum deformity (2 pts)---------
 Plain pes planus (1 pt)--------Y
 Pneumothorax (2 pts)---------
 Dura ectasia (2 pts)---------
 Protusio acetabuli (2 pts)---------
 Reduced upper/lower segment ratio (1 pt)Y-----YY-
 Scoliosis or thoracolumbar kyphosis (1 pt)---------
 Reduced elbow extension (1 pt)---------
 Facial featuresc (3/5) (1 pt)Y-----YYY
 Skin striae (1 pt)---------
 Myopia > 3 diopters (1 pt)---------
 Mitral valve prolapse (all types) (1 pt)---------

(Pb) Proband, (Ao) aorta, (N) no, (U) unknown, (Y) yes.

aZ-score indicates aorta dilatation (aneurysm, Z ≥ 2).

bMaximum total: 20 points; score ≥7 indicates systemic involvement.

cDolichocephaly, enophthalmos, downslanting palpebral fissures, malar hypoplasia, and retrognathia.

Revised Ghent criteria for diagnosis of Marfan syndrome and related conditions (Pb) Proband, (Ao) aorta, (N) no, (U) unknown, (Y) yes. aZ-score indicates aorta dilatation (aneurysm, Z ≥ 2). bMaximum total: 20 points; score ≥7 indicates systemic involvement. cDolichocephaly, enophthalmos, downslanting palpebral fissures, malar hypoplasia, and retrognathia. The proband has four children. Two daughters (25- and 24-yr-old) fill 3 points on the systemic score (wrist sign, reduced upper/lower limb ratio, retrognathia, dolichocephaly, palpebral fissures with inferolateral slope), without aortic aneurysm. They still do not meet the criteria for MFS. The older one inherited the variant FBN1 allele, and the younger sister did not consent the genetic test (Table 2). The proband's sons (23-yr-old and 4-yr-old) do not have clinical signs of MFS and presented negative variant screening. The proband's granddaughter is 4-yr-old and does not have an aortic aneurysm, neither does she meet MFS criteria yet, although she meets three points on the systemic score (wrist sign, flat feet, and facial features). She harbors the p.(Glu2019Ter) variant.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood samples. For proband, coding regions and intron–exon boundary regions of the FBN1 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the genetic analyzer 3500xl (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR primers sequences are described in Supplemental Table S1. Cascade screening was performed in all family members who consented. Sequences were analyzed with Geneious software v11.1.5 (BioMatters) and variant classification was done according to criteria from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) (Richards et al. 2015).

VARIANT INTERPRETATION

The alteration c.6055G > T in exon 50 of FBN1 generates a premature stop codon in place of glutamic acid-2019 [p.(Glu2019Ter)], causing early interruption of mRNA translation. This variant is not deposited in gnomAD (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) and ClinVar databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/); neither was it described in any publication until now, being considered a novel variant. It is an assumed de novo variant, because the proband's parents do not carry the altered allele. On the other hand, the variant was transmitted to his daughter and granddaughter, both with physical signs of MFS, but without aortic structural alteration. In silico analyses with the CADD and MutationTaster online prediction tools support for an impact to the protein, resulting in a truncated protein or a haploinsufficiency due to a nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) mechanism. In summary, the p.(Glu2019Ter) meets the PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3, and PP4 criteria of the ACMG/AMP guideline, which classify it as a pathogenic variant. Moreover, according to the revised criteria for MFS diagnosis (Loeys et al. 2010), the p.(Glu2019Ter) is considered a causal mutation for MFS.

DISCUSSION

Numerous studies have investigated the relationship of phenotypes corresponding to MFS with the involvement of the FBN1 gene; and in the study of Dietz et al. (1991), the first mutation in the locus corresponding to the fibrillin gene was recorded, establishing the causal relationship between patients with MFS and the FBN1 gene. Although the identification of mutations in FBN1 is not a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of MFS, the FBN1 gene is, in many cases, crucial in the analysis of mild or incomplete phenotypes of the syndrome (Loeys et al. 2010; Sakai et al. 2016). The revised Ghent nosology reports that, in the absence of ectopia lentis, the presence of dilation (Z ≥ 2) or aortic dissection associated with identification of a causal FBN1 mutation is a sufficient criterion for diagnosis of MFS. For the identified alteration to be considered a causal mutation of the syndrome, some specific criteria, such as a de novo mutation (with proven paternity and absence of disease), and nonsense alterations are required in the analysis (Loeys et al. 2010). The variant identified in our study fills the Ghent nosology for MFS and the ACMG pathogenicity criteria. The FBN1 p.(Glu2019Ter) was not deposited in variant databases, and to our knowledge, it was not reported in a MFS/TAAD case. Reporting this variant as a causal mutation for MFS and TAAD can provide valuable information to support informed decision-making in precision medicine context. The proband's descendants with the identified variant have not yet presented aorta dilatation or closed clinical diagnosis for the MFS, although they have physical signs for syndrome. The genetic evaluation of FBN1 and the identification of a pathogenic variant in the family can directly influence the management of family clinical follow-up.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Database Deposition and Access

The c.6055G > T; p.(Glu2019Ter) variant was submitted to ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) and can be found under accession number VCV001679424.1.

Ethics Statement

This case report was part of a cohort study approved by the Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia research ethics committee. A written patient consent was obtained from all individuals enrolled in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the family for participating in this study.

Author Contributions

J.P.P. and J.R.F. contributed equally for this work: clinical evaluation of subjects and analyzing and interpreting data. J.P.P. and A.P.A.B. sequenced all samples. M.M.M. reviewed the manuscript. J.P.P., J.R.F., and G.M.D. wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazil Health Ministry and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Referees

Peter N. Robinson Anonymous
  6 in total

1.  Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene.

Authors:  H C Dietz; G R Cutting; R E Pyeritz; C L Maslen; L Y Sakai; G M Corson; E G Puffenberger; A Hamosh; E J Nanthakumar; S M Curristin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Bart L Loeys; Harry C Dietz; Alan C Braverman; Bert L Callewaert; Julie De Backer; Richard B Devereux; Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Guillaume Jondeau; Laurence Faivre; Dianna M Milewicz; Reed E Pyeritz; Paul D Sponseller; Paul Wordsworth; Anne M De Paepe
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  FBN1: The disease-causing gene for Marfan syndrome and other genetic disorders.

Authors:  Lynn Y Sakai; Douglas R Keene; Marjolijn Renard; Julie De Backer
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 4.  Genetic basis of hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections.

Authors:  Norifumi Takeda; Issei Komuro
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Marfan Syndrome: new diagnostic criteria, same anesthesia care? Case report and review.

Authors:  Maria Rita Araújo; Céline Marques; Sara Freitas; Rita Santa-Bárbara; Joana Alves; Célia Xavier
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-11-27

6.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.