Literature DB >> 35588568

Benchmarking weakly-supervised deep learning pipelines for whole slide classification in computational pathology.

Narmin Ghaffari Laleh1, Hannah Sophie Muti1, Chiara Maria Lavinia Loeffler1, Amelie Echle1, Oliver Lester Saldanha1, Faisal Mahmood2, Ming Y Lu2, Christian Trautwein1, Rupert Langer3, Bastian Dislich4, Roman D Buelow5, Heike Irmgard Grabsch6, Hermann Brenner7, Jenny Chang-Claude8, Elizabeth Alwers9, Titus J Brinker10, Firas Khader11, Daniel Truhn11, Nadine T Gaisa5, Peter Boor5, Michael Hoffmeister9, Volkmar Schulz12, Jakob Nikolas Kather13.   

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can extract visual information from histopathological slides and yield biological insight and clinical biomarkers. Whole slide images are cut into thousands of tiles and classification problems are often weakly-supervised: the ground truth is only known for the slide, not for every single tile. In classical weakly-supervised analysis pipelines, all tiles inherit the slide label while in multiple-instance learning (MIL), only bags of tiles inherit the label. However, it is still unclear how these widely used but markedly different approaches perform relative to each other. We implemented and systematically compared six methods in six clinically relevant end-to-end prediction tasks using data from N=2980 patients for training with rigorous external validation. We tested three classical weakly-supervised approaches with convolutional neural networks and vision transformers (ViT) and three MIL-based approaches with and without an additional attention module. Our results empirically demonstrate that histological tumor subtyping of renal cell carcinoma is an easy task in which all approaches achieve an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of above 0.9. In contrast, we report significant performance differences for clinically relevant tasks of mutation prediction in colorectal, gastric, and bladder cancer. In these mutation prediction tasks, classical weakly-supervised workflows outperformed MIL-based weakly-supervised methods for mutation prediction, which is surprising given their simplicity. This shows that new end-to-end image analysis pipelines in computational pathology should be compared to classical weakly-supervised methods. Also, these findings motivate the development of new methods which combine the elegant assumptions of MIL with the empirically observed higher performance of classical weakly-supervised approaches. We make all source codes publicly available at https://github.com/KatherLab/HIA, allowing easy application of all methods to any similar task.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Computational pathology; Convolutional neural networks; Multiple-Instance Learning; Vision transformers; Weakly-supervised deep learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35588568     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   13.828


  1 in total

1.  Adversarial attacks and adversarial robustness in computational pathology.

Authors:  Narmin Ghaffari Laleh; Daniel Truhn; Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen; Tianyu Han; Marko van Treeck; Roman D Buelow; Rupert Langer; Bastian Dislich; Peter Boor; Volkmar Schulz; Jakob Nikolas Kather
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.