| Literature DB >> 35588159 |
Hui Gao1,2, Alex R Neale2, Qiang Zhu1,3, Mounib Bahri4, Xue Wang1,3, Haofan Yang1,3, Yongjie Xu1,3, Rob Clowes1, Nigel D Browning4, Marc A Little1, Laurence J Hardwick2, Andrew I Cooper1,3.
Abstract
Electrochemically active covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are promising electrode materials for Li-ion batteries. However, improving the specific capacities of COF-based electrodes requires materials with increased conductivity and a higher concentration of redox-active groups. Here, we designed a series of pyrene-4,5,9,10-tetraone COF (PT-COF) and carbon nanotube (CNT) composites (denoted as PT-COFX, where X = 10, 30, and 50 wt % of CNT) to address these challenges. Among the composites, PT-COF50 achieved a capacity of up to 280 mAh g-1 as normalized to the active COF material at a current density of 200 mA g-1, which is the highest capacity reported for a COF-based composite cathode electrode to date. Furthermore, PT-COF50 exhibited excellent rate performance, delivering a capacity of 229 mAh g-1 at 5000 mA g-1 (18.5C). Using operando Raman microscopy the reversible transformation of the redox-active carbonyl groups of PT-COF was determined, which rationalizes an overall 4 e-/4 Li+ redox process per pyrene-4,5,9,10-tetraone unit, accounting for its superior performance as a Li-ion battery electrode.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35588159 PMCID: PMC9164232 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c02196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Chem Soc ISSN: 0002-7863 Impact factor: 16.383
Figure 1(a) Chemical structure of PT-COF. (b) PXRD pattern fitting of PT-COF with Pawley refinement (a = b = 30.07 Å, c = 3.55 Å, V = 2784.1 Å3, Rp = 2.21%, Rwp = 3.17%); inset shows AA stacked structural model for PT-COF along the crystallographic c axis (top). Atom colors: C, gray; N, blue; O, red; and H, white. (c,d) TEM images of PT-COF and (e,f) TEM images of PT-COF50. The circled regions highlight the comparable pore structures found in the TEM images of PT-COF and PT-COF50. Scale bars are included in the insets.
Figure 2(a) CV profiles at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s–1; (b) charge–discharge profiles at 200 mA g–1; (c) cycling performances over 150 cycles at 200 mA g–1; (d) long cycling performance of PT-COF50 at 2000 mA g–1; (e) rate performance of PT-COF, PT-COF10, PT-COF30, and PT-COF50. Open symbols represent the charge capacity, and solid symbols represent the discharge capacity.
Electrochemical Performance of PT-COF, PT-COF10, PT-COF30, and PT-COF50
| electrode | active site utilization | rate performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| retention | ||||
| PT-COF | 193 | 71 | 76 | 39 |
| PT-COF10 | 225 | 83 | 115 | 51 |
| PT-COF30 | 267 | 96 | 145 | 54 |
| PT-COF50 | 280 | 98 | 229 | 82 |
The highest delivered reversible discharge capacity (Q) at 200 mA g–1.
Subtracted the capacity contribution of CNTs.
Capacity at a current density of 5000 mA g–1 (QmaxJ).
Capacity retention at 5000 mA g–1 related to 200 mA g–1.
Figure 3Operando Raman microscopy of a free-standing PT-COF electrode during galvanostatic discharging (a-i, lithiation) and charging (a-ii, delithiation) between 3.5 and 1.5 V vs Li+/Li at 54 mA g–1 (C/5). (b) Selected spectra from discharge and charge steps showing the primary shifts/growths in peaks of interest and the observed isosbestic point highlighted by the turquoise circle (ca. 1670 cm–1). (c) Example fitted spectra used to extract peak characteristics for the changes observed in (d) aromatic C=C bond and (e) the lithium enolate C–O–Li mode as a function of discharge. (f) Proposed 4 e– (4 Li+) reversible electrochemical redox mechanism of PT-COF during the lithiation/delithiation process.