| Literature DB >> 35588124 |
Elaine Cristina Tôrres Oliveira1, Marília Cristina Prado Louvison2, Doralice Severo da Cruz Teixeira3, Tarciana Nobre de Menezes4, Tereza Etsuko da Costa Rosa5, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Duarte6.
Abstract
To identify difficulties in accessing health services by the elderly in the city of São Paulo/Brazil and the contributory factors that reflect inequalities. This is a cross-sectional study that used data from the Health, Well-being and Aging Study (SABE). The population is composed of elderly ≥ 60 years old, of both sexes, living in the urban area of São Paulo. For this analysis, we used data from the 2015 cohort of the SABE study, containing a sample of 1,221 individuals. The proportions of access difficulty and, through logistic regression, the associated factors were verified, based on Andersen's Behavioral Model, which considers factors of predisposition, enabling and need as individual determinants of access to health care. It was observed that 37.0% of the elderly reported difficulty accessing health services when they needed it. This difficulty was greatest among females (42.3%), aged 60 to 69 years (40.9%), black race/color (58.8%), illiterate (44.5%), single/separated/divorced (44.3%), with income slower than one salary minimum (46.8%), without health insurance (51.9%), with poor/very poor self-assessment of health (54.7%), with multimorbidity (40.1%), frail (47.2%) and among those who used polypharmacy (40.8%). After multivariate analysis, in the final model, there was a positive association between difficulty of access and predisposing factors (female gender, age group 60 to 69 years, black race/color, illiterate), enabling factors (possession of health insurance) and need factors (regular and poor/very poor self-assessment of health and pre-fragility and frailty condition). The presence of difficulty in access associated with predisposing, enabling and need factors reflect the existence of inequalities caused by barriers that point to weaknesses in the organization of services. The identification of these barriers that hinder access highlights important points that can have an impact on the equity and resolution of care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35588124 PMCID: PMC9119537 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Sample distribution of the SABE Study, years 2000, 2006, 2010 and 2015.
São Paulo-Brazil. a Primary sample. b Reinterviewed elderly. c Elderly people aged 60 to 64 included. d Number of elderly in each cohort.
Distribution of the elderly according to the difficulty of access to health services, predisposing, enabling and health need characteristics.
SABE Study, São Paulo, Brazil, 2015.
| Variables | N (%) | Difficulty of access to health services | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % (95% CI | p-value | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Male | 425 (34.8) | 30.27(24.80, 36.36) | <0.001 |
| Female | 796 (65.2) | 42.26(37.94, 46.71) | |
|
| |||
| 60 to 69 years | 675 (55.3) | 40.94(35.41, 46.72) | 0.0497 |
| 70 to 79 years | 309 (25.3) | 34.78(27.41, 42.96) | |
| 80 years or more | 237 (19.4) | 27.59(20.49, 36.03) | |
|
| |||
| White | 627 (51.3) | 33.14(28.01, 38.70) | <0.001 |
| Black | 87 (7.1) | 58.82(47.13, 69.60) | |
| Others | 492 (40.3) | 38.68(33.57, 44.05) | |
|
| |||
| Illiterate | 169 (13.8) | 44.55(35.46, 54.02) | 0.001 |
| 1 to 3 years | 226 (18.5) | 42.67(35.43, 50.23) | |
| 4 to 7 years | 452 (37.0) | 37.00(31.30, 43.10) | |
| 8 to 11 years | 245 (20.1) | 36.92(29.97, 44.46) | |
| 12 years or more | 126 (10.3) | 19.90(12.91, 29.39) | |
|
| |||
| Married/cohabitation | 608 (49.8) | 35.01(29.77, 40.64) | 0.0732 |
| Single/separated/divorced | 220 (18.0) | 44.33(37.14, 51.75) | |
| Widowed | 393 (32.2) | 36.71(31.47, 42.28) | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Less than 1 minimum wage | 48 (3.9) | 46.85(30.42, 63.99) | 0.0623 |
| Between 1 and 2 minimum wages | 557 (45.6) | 40.51(35.40, 45.84) | |
| More than 2 minimum wages | 616 (50.5) | 33.38(28.11, 30.09) | |
|
| |||
| Yes | 564 (46.2) | 19.87(16.02, 24.38) | <0.001 |
| No | 657 (53.8) | 51.86(46.54, 57.14) | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Very good/good | 576 (47.2) | 29.27(23.90, 35.29) | <0.001 |
| Average | 529 (43.3) | 42.95(37.45, 48.63) | |
| Bad/very bad | 86 (7.0) | 54.72(41.66, 67.16) | |
|
| |||
| 0 to 1 chronic disease | 468 (38.3) | 32.37(26.52, 38.83) | 0.0184 |
| 2 or more chronic diseases | 753 (61.7) | 40.14(35.78, 44.66) | |
|
| |||
| Not fragile | 389 (31.9) | 30.85(25.14, 37.20) | 0.0098 |
| Pre-fragile | 663 (54.3) | 38.68(33.54, 44.08) | |
| Fragile | 167 (13.8) | 47.25(37.71, 57.00) | |
|
| |||
| 0 to 4 medications | 739 (60.5) | 34.61(29.76, 39.81) | 0.0467 |
| 5 or more medications | 482 (39.5) | 40.85(35.60, 46.31) | |
a 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
b Statistically significant association (p<0.05).
c Value of the minimum wage numbers received per month at the time of data collection taken as a reference was 880.00 Brazilian reais (about 225 U.S. dollars).
Logistic regression in relation to the outcome difficulty in accessing health services by the elderly and associated factors.
SABE Study, São Paulo, Brazil, 2015.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95% CI | Adjusted OR (95% CI | Adjusted OR (95% CI | Adjusted OR (95% CI | |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Female | 1.686[1.289, 2.205] | 1.648[1.229, 2.210] | 1.891[1.402, 2.549] | 1.863[1.375, 2.524] |
|
| ||||
| 60 to 69 years | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 years | 0.769[0.507, 1.166] | 0.671[0.431, 1.043] | 0.785[0.493, 1.250] | 0.663[0.405, 1.084] |
| 80 years or more | 0.549[0.347, 0.869] | 0.446[0.271, 0.733] | 0.651[0.398, 1.065] | 0.477[0.284, 0.801] |
|
| ||||
| White | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Black | 2.882[1.711, 4.852] | 2.384[1.384, 4.106] | 1.927[1.113, 3.336] | 2.005[1.126, 3.567] |
| Others | 1.272[0.952, 1.699] | 1.078[0.797, 1.459] | 0.974[0.704, 1.349] | 0.993[0.721, 1.368] |
|
| ||||
| Illiterate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 to 3 years | 0.926[0.585, 1.464] | 0.776[0.476, 1.263] | 0.811[0.487, 1.351] | 0.849[0.516, 1.395] |
| 4 to 7 years | 0.731[0.474, 1.127] | 0.611[0.400, 0.935] | 0.680[0.435, 1.063] | 0.732[0.467, 1.146] |
| 8 to 11 years | 0.728[0.436, 1.216] | 0.539[0.318, 0.913] | 0.688[0.409, 1.157] | 0.750[0.443, 1.269] |
| 12 years or more | 0.309[0.164, 0.582] | 0.245[0.131, 0.458] | 0.464[0.249, 0.865] | 0.546[0.299, 0.996] |
|
| ||||
| Married/cohabitation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Single/separated/divorced | 1.478[1.069, 2.042] | 1.229[0.876, 1.724] | 1.059[0.728, 1.539] | 1.073[0.737, 1.563] |
| Widowed | 1.076[0.796, 1.454] | 0.951[0.669, 1.351] | 0.827[0.585, 1.170] | 0.821[0.581, 1.160] |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Less than 1 minimum wage | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Between 1 and 2 minimum wages | 0.772[0.373, 1.598] | 0.991[0.496, 1.977] | 0.995[0.455, 2.005] | |
| More than 2 minimum wages | 0.568[0.287, 1.122] | 1.191[0.616, 2.301] | 1.200[0.592, 2.432] | |
|
| ||||
| Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 4.344[3.221, 5.858] | 4.012[2.972, 5.415] | 3.992[2.892, 5.508] | |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Very good/good | 1 | 1 | ||
| Average | 1.821[1.325, 2.505] | 1.418[1.022, 1.968] | ||
| Bad/very bad | 2.914[1.632, 5.204] | 1.943[1.038, 3.638] | ||
|
| ||||
| 0 to 1 chronic disease | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 or more chronic diseases | 1.400[1.058, 1.852] | 1.028[0.690, 1.531] | ||
|
| ||||
| Not fragile | 1 | 1 | ||
| Pre-fragile | 1.414[1.042, 1.918] | 1.520[1.096, 2.107] | ||
| Fragile | 2.008[1.198, 3.364] | 2.245[1.317, 3.826] | ||
|
| ||||
| 0 to 4 medications | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5 or more medications | 1.304[1.009, 1.695] | 1.300[0.886, 1.908] |
a 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
b Statistically significant association (p<0.05).
c Value of the minimum wage numbers received per month at the time of data collection taken as a reference was 880.00 Brazilian reais (about 225 U.S. dollars).