| Literature DB >> 35587933 |
Kiana Kirsty van Rayne1, Oluwafemi Ayodeji Adebo2, Obiro Cuthbert Wokadala3, Lucky Sithole4, Nomali Ziphorah Ngobese1.
Abstract
Strychnos madagascariensis is an underutilized South African fruit-bearing tree, with the pulp being the primary consumable component. However, the seeds hold the potential as a food source due to their high nutrient composition. The aim of this study was to determine the physical properties of S. madagascariensis fruit and seeds to aid in food processing equipment development. Fruit physical properties were determined at four progressive ripening stages, as well as the seed physical properties and mineral composition. The pulp contributed the most towards fruit composition across stages of ripeness (c 50%), followed by the rind (c 30%) and seeds (c 20%). Furthermore, significant variations in seed physical properties were observed at progressive maturity stages. The seeds showed significantly greater mineral compositions in unripe-green fruit in comparison to fruit at progressive ripening stages. The data provided may serve as a basis for the development of processing procedures and equipment and suggests that seeds of unripe-green fruit hold greater nutritional benefits.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35587933 PMCID: PMC9119479 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1A representation of the axial dimensions of S. madagascariensis seeds.
Physical properties of S. madagascariensis fruit.
The means for each parameter are reported under the respective stages of maturity followed by the standard error in brackets. Means accompanied by the same letter in a given column are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
| Stage | Weight (g) | Diameter (cm) | Colour | Composition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | Pulp | Rind | Seed | |||
| 1 | 286.96 (23.23) a | 8.07 (0.21) a | 56.98 (0.27) a | -5.65 (0.13) a | 18.83 (0.34) b | 49.48 (0.92) a | 33.32 (1.16) a | 17.20 (0.96) ab |
| 2 | 160.20 (7.89) c | 6.48 (0.11) c | 57.65 (0.21) a | -5.84 (0.09) a | 15.86 (0.30) c | 51.96 (1.83) ab | 30.01 (1.27) ab | 15.02 (0.71) a |
| 3 | 230.76 (13.52) ab | 7.52 (0.16) ab | 69.68 (0.53) b | 18.48 (0.25) b | 46.71 (0.25) a | 53.13 (0.44) b | 29.30 (0.53) bc | 17.57 (0.28) b |
| 4 | 201.60 (10.81) b | 7.12 (0.13) b | 66.47 (0.26) c | 18.24 (0.14) b | 45.90 (0.35) a | 49.11 (0.90) a | 29.08 (0.92) c | 21.81 (0.69) c |
Fig 2Strychnos madagascariensis fruit at four stages of ripeness.
(A) stage 1 –unripe-green fruit; (B) stage 2 –semi-ripe fruit; (C) stage 3 –ripe fruit; (D) stage 4 –over ripe fruit.
Axial dimensional properties and shape of S. madagascariensis seeds at four stages of ripeness.
The means for each parameter are reported under the respective stages of maturity followed by the standard error in brackets. Means accompanied by the same letter in a given row are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
| Parameters | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.48 (0.01) a | 2.50 (0.01) a | 2.41 (0.01) b | 2.41 (0.01) b |
|
| 1.91 (0.01) ab | 1.95 (0.01) ac | 1.89 (0.01) b | 1.99 (0.02) c |
|
| 0.88 (0.01) b | 0.92 (0.01) a | 0.93 (0.01) a | 1.00 (0.01) c |
|
| 0.65 (0.00) a | 0.66 (0.00) b | 0.67 (0.00) c | 0.70 (0.00) d |
|
| 0.77 (0.01) a | 0.78 (0.01) a | 0.79 (0.01) a | 0.78 (0.01) b |
|
| 16.00 (0.07) a | 16.46 (0.07) b | 16.16 (0.07) a | 16.80 (0.07) c |
|
| 809.17 (7.27) a | 855.91 (7.16) b | 825.02 (6.92) a | 890.36 (7.08)c |
|
| 0.53 (0.00) a | 0.55 (0.00) a | 0.56 (0.00) b | 0.59 (0.00) c |
Mineral composition of S. madagascariensis seeds at four stages of ripeness.
The means for each parameter are reported under the respective stages of maturity followed by the standard error in brackets. Means accompanied by the same letter in a given column are not significantly different (P > 0.05). This information is based on seeds collected from location 1: Bushbuckridge.
| Stage | Minerals (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Ca | Mg | K | Na | Zn | Cu | Mn | Fe | P | Al | |
| 1 | 1.65(0.20) a | 0.11(0.0) a | 0.11(0.0) c | 0.90(0.1) b | 0.03(0.00) a | 0.000(0.0006) a | 0.0006(0.0001) ab | 0.011(0.001) b | 0.0016(0.0011) a | 0 | 0.0001(0.0002) a |
| 2 | 1.38(0.2) b | 0.10(0.0)a | 0.09(0.0) ab | 0.72(0.1) a | 0.02(0.01) ab | 0.0006(0.0006) a | 0.0005(0.0001) ab | 0.008(0.001) a | 0.0009(0.0006) a | 0 | 0.0002(0.0004) a |
| 3 | 1.41(0.18) ab | 0.11(0.0)a | 0.09(0.0) a | 0.58(0.0) a | 0.01(0.00) b | 0.0010(0.0003) a | 0.0007(0.0001) a | 0.008(0.001) a | 0.0045(0.0066) ab | 0 | 0.0001(0.0002) a |
| 4 | 1.32(0.0) b | 0.07(0.0) b | 0.10(0.0) b | 0.54(0.0) c | 0.00(0.00) c | 0.0009(0.0001) a | 0.0004(0.0001) b | 0.005(0.00) c | 0.0041(0.0007) b | 0 | 0.0001(0.0001) a |
Comparison of the mineral composition of S. madagascariensis seeds collected from different locations at two stages of ripeness.
The means for each parameter are reported under the respective stages of maturity followed by the standard error. Means accompanied by the same letter in a given column are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Location 1: Bushbuckridge, Location 2: Shongweni Nature Reserve.
| Stage | Location | Minerals (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Ca | Mg | K | Na | Zn | Cu | Mn | Fe | P | Al | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1.65(0.20) a | 0.11(0.01) a | 0.11(0.01) a | 0.90(0.13) a | 0.03(0.007) a | 0.001(0.0001) a | 0.001(0) a | 0.011(0.001) a | 0.002(0.001) a | 0 | 0.0001(0.0002) a |
| 2 | 1.13(0.13) b | 0.05(0.01) b | 0.10(0.01) b | 0.66(0.09) b | 0.01(0.001) b | 0.001(0.0001) a | 0.001(0) a | 0.006(0.000) b | 0.005(0.002) b | 0 | 0.0005(0.0006) a | |
| 3 | 1 | 1.41(0.18) a | 0.12(0.01) a | 0.09(0.00) a | 0.58(0.02) a | 0.01(0.003) a | 0.001(0.0003) a | 0.001(0) a | 0.008(0.001) a | 0.005(0.007) a | 0 | 0.0001(0.0002) a |
| 2 | 1.22(0.16) b | 0.05(0.01) b | 0.10(0.00) b | 0.69(0.06) b | 0.01(0.001) b | 0.001(0.0001) a | 0.001(0) a | 0.005(0.001) b | 0.005(0.002) a | 0 | 0.0001(0.0002) a | |
Proximate composition of S. madagascariensis seed flour (per 100 g, dry mass basis) at four stages of ripeness.
Data presented in the table above represents the mean of five replicates, followed by the standard error. Values associated with the same letter in each row for each location show no significant differences (P < 0.05).
| Composition | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 73.24(12.25) a | 84.23(21.52) a | 84.47(8.78) a | 87.14(12.10) a |
|
| 7.39(0.30) a | 7.48(0.35) a | 7.48(0.30) a | 6.55(0.39) a |
|
| 10.29(1.25) a | 8.63(1.22) b | 8.78(1.14) ab | 8.28(0.17) b |
|
| 0.61(0.20) a | 0.55(0.25) a | 0.54(0.16) a | 0.58(0.18) a |
|
| 86.97(1.15) b | 89.02(1.07) ab | 88.75(1.24) ab | 90.03(0.45) a |
|
| 80.02(3.12) a | 77.59(5.48) a | 77.71(2.29) a | 77.92(2.98) a |
|
| 2.43(0.26) a | 2.04(0.25) ab | 1.85(0.02) b | 1.02(0.29) c |