| Literature DB >> 35587733 |
Pedro Ferreirinha1,2, Ruben G R Pinheiro1,2,3, Jonathan J M Landry4, Nuno L Alves1,2.
Abstract
The thymus stroma constitutes a fundamental microenvironment for T-cell generation. Despite the chief contribution of thymic epithelial cells, recent studies emphasize the regulatory role of mesenchymal cells in thymic function. Mesenchymal progenitors are suggested to exist in the postnatal thymus; nonetheless, an understanding of their nature and the mechanism controlling their homeostasis in vivo remains elusive. We resolved two new thymic fibroblast subsets with distinct developmental features. Whereas CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1- cells prevailed in the embryonic thymus and declined thereafter, CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1+ cells emerged in the late embryonic period and predominated in postnatal life. The fibroblastic-associated transcriptional programme was upregulated in CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1+ cells, suggesting that they represent a mature subset. Lineage analysis showed that CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1+ maintained their phenotype in thymic organoids. Strikingly, CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1- generated CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1+, inferring that this subset harboured progenitor cell activity. Moreover, the abundance of CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1+ fibroblasts was gradually reduced in Rag2-/- and Rag2-/-Il2rg-/- thymi, indicating that fibroblast maturation depends on thymic crosstalk. Our findings identify CD140αβ+GP38+SCA-1- as a source of fibroblast progenitors and define SCA-1 as a marker for developmental stages of thymic fibroblast differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: Mouse; Progenitors; Thymic mesenchymal cells; Thymic stroma; Thymus
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35587733 PMCID: PMC9188757 DOI: 10.1242/dev.200513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Development ISSN: 0950-1991 Impact factor: 6.862
Fig. 1.GP38 and SCA1 expression on TMC subsets. (A) Total thymi cells from 1-week-old mice were isolated, and total TMCs (CD45−EpCAM−) were analysed by flow cytometry. t-SNE representation of the expression of CD31, CD140α, CD140β, GP38, SCA-1, Ly51 and αSMA. (B) Three main clusters were identified: cluster 1 (CD31+), cluster 2 (CD140α+β+) and cluster 3 (CD140α−β+). Clusters 2 and 3 were respectively subdivided into cluster 2.1 (CD140α+β+GP38+SCA1−) and 2.2 (CD140α+β+GP38+SCA1+); and 3.1 (CD140α−β+Ly51+αSMA−) and 3.2 (CD140α−β+Ly51+αSMA+). (C) TMCs (CD45−EpCAM−CD31−) were analysed for the indicated markers, and sub-cluster 2.1 (red gate), 2.2 (green gate), 3.1 and 3.2 (light- and dark-blue gates) were identified. (D) Analysis of GP38, SCA-1 and DPP4 expression in TFA (red gate) and TFB (green gate) populations at E14, E17, 1 week old (W) and 4W. Numbers in plots indicate the frequency of cells found within each gate. Plots are of a representative analysis per time point. (E) Bar graphs showing mean+s.d. of the frequency and cellularity of TFA and TFB subsets, of three independent analyses per time point. Differences in TF subsets, CD140α+β+GP38+SCA1− (red) and CD140α+β+GP38+SCA1+ (green), were statistically analysed at different ages: ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05.
Fig. 2.Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of TF subsets identifies stages with distinctive gene expression profiles. (A) Principal component analysis plot and dendrogram, detailing the hierarchical clustering between the biological samples, performed with data obtained from total RNA-sequencing analysis of sorted TFA (CD45−EpCAM−GP38+SCA-1−) (n=3), TFB (CD45−EpCAM−GP38+SCA-1+) (n=3) and MC (CD45−EpCAM−GP38−SCA-1−Ly51+) (n=3) populations. (B) Heat maps representing the deviation from average expression of the phenotypic markers used to identify TMC populations, of genes previously associated with pericytes and of genes previously associated with thymic fibroblasts. (C) Heat maps representing the deviation from average expression of the uniquely upregulated genes identified for populations TFA and TFB and the associated molecular functions identified by GO analysis. Genes with FDR<10% were considered as differentially expressed. Enriched GO terms (molecular functions) were identified using MGSA. Represented categories had a marginal posterior probability estimate higher than 0.65.
Fig. 3.TF (A) Chimeric RTOCs were established with E14 cells from WT thymus and mixed with TFA or TFB cells isolated from the postnatal day 1-3 Actin-RFP mice. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the chimeric RTOC at day 0 (input) and after 7 days in culture (output). Data presented and bar graphs correspond to mean+s.d. of two independent analyses. (C) Analysis of GP38 and SCA-1 expression within TF populations from 1- and 4-week-old Rag2−/− and Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− mice. Numbers in plots indicate the frequency of cells found within each gate. Flow cytometry plots are of a representative analysis. Bar graphs correspond to mean+s.d. of two (1-week-old Rag2−/−) and three (1-week-old Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− and 4-week-old Rag2−/− and Rag2−/−Il2rg−/−) independent experiments per time point. Each experiment contains a pool of two to four mice per analysis. The numbers of TF subsets found in the WT thymus are co-represented as a reference and were originally described in Fig. 1. Differences between WT and Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− TF subsets at 1 week and between WT, Rag2−/− and Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− at 4 weeks were statistically analysed: ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05.