| Literature DB >> 35586810 |
Tian Zhang1,2, Hongju Liu1, Hui Li1, Sha He1, Li Xiao1, Ting Qin1, Wei Long Xu2.
Abstract
Objective: A retrospective case-control study was performed to observe the effect and clinical significance of early electroacupuncture combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on pain perception and dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35586810 PMCID: PMC9110174 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6560816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Comparison of baseline data of patients.
| Group | Male (example) | Female (example) | Age (years) | Time of illness (year) | Complicated with hypertension (example) | Complicated with diabetes mellitus (example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C group | 28 | 22 | 65.96 ± 3.58 | 4.23 ± 1.02 | 11 | 8 |
| R group | 26∗ | 24∗ | 65.91 ± 3.63∗ | 4.30 ± 1.11∗ | 10∗ | 7∗ |
∗Compared with the control group, P > 0.05.
Comparison of therapeutic effects [n/%].
| Group |
| Remarkable effect | Effective | Invalid | Total efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C group | 50 | 15 (30.00) | 28 (56.00) | 7 (14.00) | 43 (86.00) |
| R group | 50 | 27 (54.00) | 22 (44.00) | 1 (2.00) | 49 (98.00) |
|
| 4.891 | ||||
|
| 0.026 |
Comparison of the time of getting out of bed for the first time, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, and the cost of postoperative rehabilitation [±s].
| Group |
| The first time to get out of bed after operation (d) | Postoperative recovery time (d) | Postoperative rehabilitation expenses (yuan) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C group | 50 | 3.26 ± 0.91 | 17.42 ± 3.55 | 10113.42 ± 524.83 |
| R group | 50 | 2.71 ± 0.86 | 12.53 ± 3.10 | 12401.71 ± 530.77 |
|
| 3.106 | 7.337 | 21.677 | |
|
| 0.003 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
Comparison of VAS and HSS scores before and after treatment [±s, Points].
| Group |
| VAS | HSS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| C group | 50 | 5.63 ± 1.12 | 3.45 ± 0.36a | 43.56 ± 7.74 | 65.82 ± 10.44a |
| R group | 50 | 5.46 ± 1.14 | 1.76 ± 0.28b | 43.17 ± 7.56 | 83.48 ± 11.23b |
|
| 0.752 | 16.712 | 0.255 | 8.144 | |
|
| 0.454 | 0.0001 | 0.799 | 0.0001 | |
Note: the control group before and after treatment, aP < 0.05; the study group before and after treatment, bP < 0.05.
Comparison of knee joint ROM between the two groups after treatment [±s, °].
| Group |
| Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C group | 50 | 46.53 ± 3.41 | 61.52 ± 5.20a | 78.42 ± 6.45b | 98.77 ± 8.67c |
| R group | 50 | 49.47 ± 3.60 | 64.38 ± 5.32a | 86.93 ± 6.72b | 104.20 ± 9.11c |
|
| 4.192 | 2.718 | 6.460 | 3.053 | |
|
| 0.0001 | 0.008 | 0.0001 | 0.003 |
Note: compared with the first week, aP < 0.05; compared with the second week, bP < 0.05; compared with the 4th week, cP < 0.05.
Comparison of whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level between 1 day and 7 days after operation [±s, %].
| Group |
| Whole blood viscosity low shear | Plasma viscosity | Fibrinogen | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 day after operation | 7 days after operation | 1 day after operation | 7 days after operation | 1 day after operation | 7 days after operation | ||
| C group | 50 | 9.44 ± 2.51 | 7.83 ± 1.45a | 1.18 ± 0.53 | 1.02 ± 0.20 | 3.15 ± 0.34 | 3.01 ± 0.51 |
| R group | 50 | 9.40 ± 2.48 | 6.30 ± 1.22b | 1.15 ± 0.48 | 0.98 ± 0.15b | 3.18 ± 0.37 | 2.12 ± 0.45b |
|
| 0.080 | 5.709 | 0.297 | 1.131 | 0.422 | 9.253 | |
|
| 0.936 | 0.0001 | 0.767 | 0.261 | 0.674 | 0.0001 | |
Note: in the control group, 1 day after operation and 7 days after operation, aP < 0.05, while in the study group, 1 day after operation and 7 days after operation, bP < 0.05.