| Literature DB >> 35586807 |
Fanli Jin1,2,3, Lanxi Zhang1,2,3, Kai Chen1,2, Yufang Miao1,2, Yang Liu1,2, Yange Tian1,2, Jiansheng Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Objective: To explore more efficient treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), effective-component compatibility of Bufei Yishen formula III (ECC-BYF III) and electroacupuncture were tested on rats with COPD, and silent information regulator transcript-1 (SIRT1)/nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) signaling was further investigated to interpret the therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35586807 PMCID: PMC9110177 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3360771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematic diagram of SIRT1/NF-κB.
Figure 2Rat acupoint diagram. (a) The location of Dazhui (GV 14), Feishu (BL 13), and Shenshu (BL 23) points [30]. (b) Schematic diagram of electroacupuncture treatment.
Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Product length | Primer | Primer sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | 83 | Forward primer | GACTTCCAGCCAGTTGCCTT |
| Reverse primer | AAGTCTCCTCTCCGGACTTGT | ||
| IL-10 | 147 | Forward primer | CGCTGTCATCGATTTCTCCC |
| Reverse primer | TGTCACGTAGGCTTCTATGC | ||
| TNF- | 88 | Forward primer | CATCAAGAGCCCTTGCCCTA |
| Reverse primer | CTGGAAGACTCCTCCCAGGTA | ||
| SIRT1 | 119 | Forward primer | AGTAAGCGTCTTGACGGTAATCA |
| Reverse primer | CTGCCACAGGAACTAGAGGAT | ||
| NF- | 106 | Forward primer | AGTCCCGCCCCTTCTAAAAC |
| Reverse primer | CAATGGCCTCTGTGTAGCCC | ||
| GAPDH | 72 | Forward primer | ACGGGAAACCCATCACCATC |
| Reverse primer | TACTCAGCACCAGCATCACC |
Reaction conditions of qRT-PCR.
| Procedure | Temperature | Time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predenaturation | 95°C | 30 s | |
|
| |||
| Amplification curve | 95°C |
| 40 circles |
| 60°C | |||
|
| |||
| Dissolution curve | 95°C | 15 s | |
| 60°C | 1 min | ||
| 95°C | 15 s | ||
Figure 3Changes in the pulmonary function in each group of rats at week 20: (a) FVC; (b) FEV 0.1; (c) FEV 0.1/FVC (%). Note: n = 6; aP < 0.05 and aaP < 0.01 vs. the Control group; bP < 0.05 and bbP < 0.01 vs. the Model group; cP < 0.05 and ccP < 0.01 vs. the SA group; dP < 0.05 and ddP < 0.01 vs. the APL group; eP < 0.05 and eeP < 0.01 vs. the ECC-BYF III group; fP < 0.05 and ffP < 0.01 vs. the EA group.
Figure 4Changes in pulmonary histopathology in each group of rats: (a) pulmonary histopathology (hematoxylin-eosin, ×200); (b) MLI; (c) MAN; (d) Wt; (e) Wa. Note: n = 6; aP < 0.05 and aaP < 0.01 vs. the Control group; bP < 0.05 and bbP < 0.01 vs. the Model group; cP < 0.05 and ccP < 0.01 vs. the SA group; dP < 0.05 and ddP < 0.01 vs. the APL group.
Figure 5Changes in the inflammatory factor levels and protein expression. (a) IHC photograph. (b–d) IOD. (e–g) Levels of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α in the lung tissue. Note: n = 6; aP < 0.05 and aaP < 0.01 vs. the Control group; bP < 0.05 and bbP < 0.01 vs. the Model group; cP < 0.05 and ccP < 0.01 vs. the SA group; dP < 0.05 and ddP < 0.01 vs. the APL group; fP < 0.05 and ffP < 0.01 vs. the EA group.
Figure 6Changes of mRNA expressions of SIRT1, NF-κBp65, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α. Note: n = 6; aP < 0.05 and aaP < 0.01 vs. the Control group; bP < 0.05 and bbP < 0.01 vs. the Model group; cP < 0.05 and ccP < 0.01 vs. the SA group; dP < 0.05 and ddP < 0.01 vs. the APL group; fP < 0.05 and ffP < 0.01 vs. the EA group.
Figure 7Changes of protein expressions of SIRT1, NF-κBp65, and Ac-NF-κBp65. Note: n = 3; aP < 0.05 and aaP < 0.01 vs. the Control group; bP < 0.05 and bbP < 0.01 vs. the Model group; cP < 0.05 and ccP < 0.01 vs. the SA group; dP < 0.05 and ddP < 0.01 vs. the APL group; fP < 0.05 and ffP < 0.01 vs. the EA group.