| Literature DB >> 35586416 |
Lídia Hau1, Tamás Tényi2, Natália László1, Márton Áron Kovács2, Szabina Erdö-Bonyár3, Zsuzsanna Csizmadia3, Tímea Berki3, Diána Simon3, Györgyi Csábi1.
Abstract
Patients suffering from encephalitis may present psychiatric symptoms; however, the clinical relevance of anti-neuronal antibodies in patients experiencing a psychotic episode without encephalitis is still unclear. In this study, we examined the presence of anti-neuronal cell surface autoantibodies and onconeural autoantibodies in serum samples of 22 synthetic cannabinoid users presenting with psychosis. We found only two positive cases; however, seven patients had borderline results. Nonetheless, we found no significant correlation between anti-neuronal autoantibodies and the intensity of psychosis indicated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. The length of drug use and the combination of other drugs with synthetic cannabinoids have no significant effect on anti-neuronal autoantibody positivity. Nonetheless, the ratio of anti-citrate synthase (anti-CS) IgM and IgG natural autoantibodies was significantly lower (p = 0.036) in the anti-neuronal autoantibody-positive/borderline samples, than in the negative group. Interestingly, anti-CS IgM/IgG showed a significant negative correlation with PANSS-positive score (p = 0.04, r = -0.464). Our results demonstrated that anti-neuronal autoantibody positivity occurs in synthetic cannabinoid users, and the alteration of anti-CS IgM/IgG natural autoantibody levels points to immunological dysfunctions in these cases.Entities:
Keywords: anti-citrate synthase antibodies; anti-neuronal autoantibodies; autoimmune encephalitis; natural autoantibodies; psychosis; synthetic cannabinoid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35586416 PMCID: PMC9108165 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.850955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Characteristics of patients.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 17 (4.9) |
| Sex (male), | 19 (86.4%) |
| Family history (positive for addiction), | 5 (22.7%) |
| Polytoxicomania (yes), | 9 (40.9%) |
| Drug use (month), mean (SD) | 23.8 (23.5) |
| PANSS total, mean (SD) | 55 ( |
| PANSS general, mean (SD) | 32.6 (8.7) |
| PANSS positive, mean (SD) | 11.7 (7.6) |
| PANSS negative, mean (SD) | 11.1 (5.5) |
PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.
Clinical features and autoantibody results of each case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15, male | – | 48 | SCRA | negative | Yo borderline | 9 | 10 | 22 | 41 |
| 16, male | 1 | 6 | SCRA | negative | Rec borderline | 7 | 7 | 25 | 39 |
| 17, male | – | 9 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 27 | 46 | 80 |
| 16, male | – | 3 | SCRA | negative | Hu borderline | 7 | 7 | 32 | 46 |
| 15, male | – | – | SCRA, other NPS | negative | Tr borderline | 26 | 13 | 54 | 93 |
| 17, male | – | – | SCRA | negative | SOX1 borderline | 7 | 7 | 31 | 45 |
| 15, male | – | 3 | SCRA | negative | negative | 10 | 7 | 34 | 51 |
| 13, female | 2 | <1 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 11 | 32 | 50 |
| 17, female | 3 | 60 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 7 | 26 | 40 |
| 16, male | 3 | 48 | SCRA, NC, LSD, other NPS, MDMA, amphetamine | negative | Amp positive | 7 | 14 | 35 | 56 |
| 17, male | 3 | 3 | SCRA, NC | negative | negative | 7 | 7 | 34 | 48 |
| 15, female | 4 | 4 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 7 | 22 | 36 |
| 17, male | – | <1 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 10 | 32 | 49 |
| 15, male | 3 | 24 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 7 | 28 | 42 |
| 13, male | 1 | 18 | SCRA | negative | negative | 7 | 7 | 32 | 46 |
| 14, male | 5 | 60 | SCRA, cocaine, other NPS | negative | Rec borderline | 7 | 13 | 27 | 47 |
| 17, male | – | 60 | SCRA, amphetamine, NC | negative | negative | 23 | 8 | 32 | 63 |
| 15, male | 4 | 36 | SCRA, NC, MDMA, cocaine | negative | negative | 7 | 13 | 30 | 50 |
| 17, male | – | 60 | SCRA | negative | negative | 23 | 16 | 46 | 85 |
| 19, male | – | 8 | SCRA, BDZ | negative | negative | 24 | 19 | 41 | 84 |
| 32, male | 6 | 17 | SCRA, other NPS | negative | negative | 28 | 21 | 39 | 88 |
| 30, male | 7 | 6 | SCRA, cocaine, heroin, NC | CASPR2 positive | negative | 16 | 7 | 17 | 40 |
|
| |||||||||
| 1. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | |||||||||
| 2. Emotional disorders with onset specific to childhood | |||||||||
| 3. Unspecified behavioral and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence | |||||||||
| 4. Adjustment disorders | |||||||||
| 5. Mild mental retardation | |||||||||
| 6. Personality disorder, unspecified | |||||||||
| 7. Other acute and transient psychotic disorders | |||||||||
SCRA, Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist; NPS, New Psychoactive Substances; NC, Natural Cannabis; MDMA, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine; LSD, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide; BDZ, Benzodiazepine.
Case vignettes for two patients with positive or borderline anti-neuronal antibody test result.
|
|
|---|
| Case 1 was a 16-year-old adolescent who had been using drugs for 4 years; previously, he had consumed different drugs. In the past period, he used synthetic cannabinoids; the last time when he used it was on the same day of admittance to hospital. His serum sample was positive for anti-AMP antibody. After his admission, he tried to escape many a times, and he was aggressive with the nurses. He had psychomotor agitation, acoustic hallucination, and had suicidal intention after using synthetic cannabinoids. He tried to stop using drugs but failed. |
|
|
| Case 2 was a 16-year-old adolescent who had been using drugs for 6 months. He was adopted and started using synthetic cannabinoids when his foster mother died. He admitted not using drugs for 2 weeks. Anti-Rec antibody was borderline in his laboratory findings. He behaved aggressively due to substance use in the past months. He had burst of anger many a times against his mates, and he damaged the furniture in the orphanage. Once he threatened his classmate with an alarm gun. |
Figure 1The level of anti-citrate synthase (CS) IgM (A), IgG (B), and autoantibodies and their ratio (C) in patients with positive/borderline (n = 8) and negative (n = 14) results for anti-neuronal autoantibodies. The boxes show interquartile ranges (IQR); the horizontal lines represent medians and the whiskers indicate the lowest and highest values. *p < 0.05.