Literature DB >> 35586122

A new species of Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae) from Western Pamir-Alay, Uzbekistan.

Natalia V Shchegoleva1, Elena V Nikitina2, Inom J Juramurodov3,4, Andrei A Zverev5, Orzimat T Turginov3, Anvarbek M Jabborov3, Ziyoviddin Yusupov6,7, Davron B Dekhkonov6, Tao Deng7, Hang Sun7.   

Abstract

New data on the phylogeny of four rare and endemic species of RanunculusL.sect.Ranunculastrum DC. of western Pamir-Alai, one of which is new to science, have been obtained. Ranunculustojibaevii sp. nov., from the Baysuntau Mountains, Western Hissar Range of Uzbekistan, is described. The new species is closely related to R.botschantzevii Ovcz., R.convexiusculus Kovalevsk. and R.alpigenus Kom., but differs in the blade of the radical leaves, which is rounded-reniform, segments 3-5-dissected, each 2-5-partite with elongated, rounded apical lobes. A phylogenetic analysis, using both the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and cpDNA (matK, rbcL, trnL-trnF), was informative in placing R.tojibaevii in context with its most closely-related species. Discussion on the geographic distribution, updated identification key, a detailed description, insights about its habitat and illustrations are provided. Natalia V. Shchegoleva, Elena V. Nikitina, Inom J. Juramurodov, Andrei A. Zverev, Orzimat T. Turginov, Anvarbek M. Jabborov, Ziyoviddin Yusupov, Davron B. Dekhkonov, Tao Deng, Hang Sun.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endemic; Hissar Range; Pamir-Alay; Ranunculales; Ranunculastrum; phylogenetic analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35586122      PMCID: PMC9005467          DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.193.70757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PhytoKeys        ISSN: 1314-2003            Impact factor:   1.635


Introduction

L., the largest genus in the Juss., includes ca. 600 genetically diverse species (Tamura 1995). The genus is distinguished by its high ecological-geographical diversity over a wide zonal spectrum ranging from the Arctic tundra through varied forests, steppes, deserts to exclusively aquatic habitats and high-altitude communities on nearly all continents (Paun et al. 2005). However, the main centres of speciation of are often in large mountain systems, where the formation of species is not only directly related to isolation, but also significantly depends on specific conditions of the highlands (Emadzade et al. 2015; Fernández Prieto et al. 2017; Shchegoleva 2018; Shchegoleva et al. 2020; Zverev et al. 2020). More than 90 species of are distributed in Central Asia (Kovalevskaya 1972). Differentiation in the genus and the formation of locally endemic species are closely related to the history of the Tian Shan and Pamir-Alay Mountain formations. Here, more than half of the members of the genus are autochthonous representatives of the mountainous Central Asian flora, which arose in the process of regional adaptive diversification from ancient Mediterranean predecessors (Ovchinnikov 1971; Kamelin 1973). In the dry Central Asian seasonal climate, the features of these species are observed only in the short-term hydrothermal period of active vegetative growth. was first discovered in 2013 on the Baysuntau Highlands (Khodzha-Gurgur-ata Mountain) on the south-western spur of the Hissar Range (Pamir-Alay). The populations were detected again in 2019 while working on the Flora of Uzbekistan Project (Sennikov et al. 2016). It should be noted that the flora of the Western Pamir-Alay is characterised by a high taxonomic diversity (Kamelin 1973; Vasilchenko and Vasileva 1985; Tojibaev et al. 2016; Makhmudjanov et al. 2019; Yusupov et al. 2020). The morphological features indicated that the unknown plants belonged to (Hörandl and Emadzade 2012; Baltisberger and Hörandl 2016). The main differences between sect. and other sections of are the presence of a triangular beak equal to or longer than the achene body, a receptacle completely glabrous, a taproot partly tuberous and a mostly elongate fruit (Hörandl and Emadzade 2012). The unknown plants closely resembled Ovcz. (Ovchinnikov 1941) and Kovalevsk. (Kovalevskaya 1972), as well as Kom. (Komarov 1896) in their main morphological features. The molecular results presented here also clearly substantiated its independent taxonomic status. In this study, we present a morphological description of these plants, which we named Schegol. & Turginov. Figures showing its features, a map of its distribution, taxonomy and an identification key separating it from the most closely-related species are also provided.

Materials and methods

Morphological observations and measurements of were made on two populations; in total, 34 individuals were compared. Voucher specimens have been deposited in the National Herbarium of Uzbekistan – TASH (Tashkent, Uzbekistan). Additionally, two closely-related species, and , from the same territory and high-altitude regions were examined. Herbarium specimens at TASH, TAD, LE, FRU, AA, MW, LE and TK were also compared. Studies of closely related species were performed during field expeditions to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, from 2017–2021 (Shchegoleva et al. 2020). The distribution map was generated in ESRI ArcGIS 10 software using GPS coordinates (www.esri.com). The conservation status was established, based on IUCN Criteria (IUCN 2019).

Molecular methods

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

DNA isolation was performed using a Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TIENGEN Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. CTAB extraction protocol with some modifications was used to extract genomic DNA from herbarium specimens of (Doyle and Doyle 1987). Selected nuclear DNA regions ITS1-ITS2 (for herbarium specimen ) and ITS1-ITS4; plastid DNA regions matK, rbcL and trnL-F were amplified on a thermal cycler (BioRad) using the 2X PCR Taq Plus MasterMix with dye (Applied Biological Materials Inc., Canada). Amplification of the DNA regions was carried out by using primers of the forward and reverse primer sets (TsingKe, China) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Primers used in this study.

Primer nameSequences (forward / reverse)DNA fragment size, bpPrimer source
ITS1-18S ITS4-26S5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’ 5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’~ 700 bp White et al. (1990)
ITS15’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG -3’~ 650 bp White et al. (1990)
ITS25’-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3’
matK-390F matK-1326R 5’-CGATCTATTCATTCAATATTTC-3’ 5’-TCTAGCACACGAAAGTCGAAGT-3’~ 900 bp Cuenoud et. al. (2002)
trnL-F_F trnL-F_R 5’-CGAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG -3’ 5’-ATTTGAACTGGTGACACGAG-3’~ 900 bp Taberlet et al. (1991)
rbcLaF rbcLaR 5’-ATGTCACCACAAACAGAGACTAAAGC-3’ 5’-GTAAAATCAAGTCCACCRCG-3’~ 600 bp Kress and Erickson (2007)
Primers used in this study. To obtain sequences of the genes of interest, PCR amplification was carried out according to the following parameters (except ): for ITS1-ITS4, initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 amplification cycles: 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 50–54 °C, 1 min at 72 °C; elongation 7 min at 72 °C; for matK– an initial denaturation for 3 min 94 °C, followed by 35 amplification cycles: 30 s 94 °C, 1 min 51 °C, 1 min 72 °C; final extension 10 min at 72 °C; for rbcL, an initial denaturation for 4 min 95 °C, followed by 34 amplification cycles: 1 min 94 °C, 1 min 50 °C, 1 min 72 °C; final extension 10 min at 72 °C; for trnL-F, an initial denaturation for 3 min 94 °C, followed by 32 amplification cycles: 45 s 94 °C, 45 s 50 °C, 1 min 72 °C; final extension 8 min at 72 °C. PCR amplification for was performed for ITS1-ITS2, with the following programme: initial denaturation at 94 °C/5 min; 35 amplification cycles at 94 °C/30 s, at 54 °C/30 s, at 72 °C/ 45 s; elongation at 72 °C/7 min; for rbcL, 94 °C/4 min, 34 cycles: 94 °C/30 s, 54 °C/ 45 s, 72 °C/45 s; final extension at 72 °C/10 min.

Taxon sampling

To determine the taxonomic status and systematic position of , we sampled 24 species of . New nDNA (ITS) and cpDNA intergenic spacers (matK, rbcL, trnL-trnF) sequences for nine species were generated. We also used available sequences of 15 species from GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank) (Table 2). We used as the outgroup (Hörandl and Emadzade 2012; Almerekova et al. 2020).
Table 2.

Accession numbers of samples used for phylogenetic analyses of (* newly-generated sequences).

SpeciesGenBank accession number
ITS matK rbcL trnL-F
Ranunculusacris AY680167 AY954199 HQ590232
R.alpigenus* OM283824 OM287560
R.arvensis HQ650550 HQ650551 MK925091
R.auricomus FM242803 FM242739 JN893758
R.botschantzevii* MW540744 MW748677 MW748685 MW748693
R.convexiusculus* MW540743 MW748676 MW748684 MW748692
R.flammula AY680185 AY954204 MK526480
R.glaberrimus KP687273 JF509974 MG247649
R.inamoenus KP687279 KP687302 MG249011
R.japonicus EU591982 AY954200 MH657741 DQ410744
R.leptorrhynchus* MW737444 MW748673 MW748681 MW748689
R.linearilobus* MW737445 MW748674 MW748682 MW748690
R.lingua AY680184 AY954206 JN892742
R.muricatus DQ410718 AY954191 HM850296 DQ410740
R.paucidentatus* MW540747 MW748679 MW748687 MW748695
R.pygmaeus KP687287 KP687310 KC483860
R.regelianus* MW737446 MW748675 MW748683 MW748691
R.repens MT271835 HM565166 MK925397 EU382995
R.sceleratus MT271836 GU257993 AB517148 DQ410746
R.sulphureus JF509969 JF509983 KC483870
R.talassicus* MW540748 MW748680 MW748688 MW748696
R.tojibaevii* MW540745 MW748678 MW748686 MW748694
R.tojibaevii* OM278385 OM287558 OM287559
R.trichophyllus KC620483 AY954133 L08766
R.turneri FM242817 FM242741 MG249550
Accession numbers of samples used for phylogenetic analyses of (* newly-generated sequences).

Phylogenetic analyses

Sequence alignments were performed using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 2002) as implemented in MEGA X software (Kumar et al. 2018). The best partitioning scheme for the combined dataset contained two partitions: the ITS data; and the three plastid sequences data (matK, rbcL, trnL-trnF). Phylogenetic reconstruction was first conducted separately, based on the nuclear and the plastid data. Visual inspection determined that differences between the nuclear and the plastid trees were solely due to resolved/collapsed clades. No topological incongruence with a high support value (posterior probabilities and bootstrap percentages) was found. To further test whether the nuclear and plastid data could be combined for phylogenetic reconstruction, the incongruence length difference (ILD, Farris et al. 1995) test was conducted in PAUP* 4.0a169 (current) by using only the informative sites, heuristic search, tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping algorithm, simple addition sequence and 1,000 replicates. The ILD test between the nuclear and the plastid data found p = 0.322, indicating insignificant support for incongruence between the two datasets. Therefore, the nuclear and the plastid sequences were combined into one dataset for phylogenetic analyses using SequenceMatrix software (Vaidya et al. 2011). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using Maximum Likelihood (ML), Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Bayesian Inference (BI). For ML, we employed raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2020), with 1,000 bootstrap replicates and, for BI, we used MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) with 10,000,000 generations with random trees sampled every 1,000 generations. In the latter analysis, after discarding the first 25% trees as burn-in, a 50% majority-rule consensus tree was constructed from the remaining trees to estimate Posterior Probabilities (PP). For analyses, a model of nucleotide substitution was selected, based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) using jModelTest2 on XSEDE (www.phylo.org). Phylogenetic analyses were also performed with the MP method using PAUP* 4.0a169. The MP bootstrap analysis was performed with heuristic search, TBR branch-swapping, 1,000 bootstrap replicates, random addition sequence with ten replicates, a maximum of 1,000 trees saved per round. Trees were visualised in FigTree v.1.4.0 (Rambaut 2012).

Results and discussion

The phylogenetic tree, based on the nuclear and plastid sequences (Fig. 1), showed that is sister to and with high support values PP = 1, MP = 94% and ML = 94%. , and formed a clade with well supported values (PP = 0.8, MP = 71% and ML = 64%).
Figure 1.

Bayesian tree based on combined nuclear (ITS) and plastid (matK, rbcL, trnL-trnF) sequence data showing phylogenetic position of Schegol. & Turginov in . Bayesian Posterior Probability (PP) / Maximum Parsimony (MP) is given on each branch, respectively; Maximum Likelihood (ML) is below branches. The classification is according to Hörandl and Emadzade (2012). * denotes the species analysed in this study. The new species is highlighted in bold.

Bayesian tree based on combined nuclear (ITS) and plastid (matK, rbcL, trnL-trnF) sequence data showing phylogenetic position of Schegol. & Turginov in . Bayesian Posterior Probability (PP) / Maximum Parsimony (MP) is given on each branch, respectively; Maximum Likelihood (ML) is below branches. The classification is according to Hörandl and Emadzade (2012). * denotes the species analysed in this study. The new species is highlighted in bold. The results of the phylogenetic analysis were similar to the results of Hörandl and Emadzade (2012) and Almerekova et al. (2020). Species of are of particular interest. In our case, these native Asian species are mainly limited to the foothills and mountains of Central Asia (southern Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan), as well as to the mountains of Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan. It is obvious that in Central Asia is heterogeneous. The species forming sub-clusters in this section differ in their area of distribution, altitude confinement and time of origin, thereby confirming the neoendemic nature and origin of .

Taxonomy

Schegol. & Turginov sp. nov. 200BBEC3-EDDC-5391-B0F9-79F409C8D487 urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77296907-1 Figs 2 , 3
Figure 2.

Schegol. & Turginov (Shchegoleva, Jabborov, Turginov, holotype TASH-003743).

Figure 3.

Schegol. & Turginov. Habitat (A flowering B fruiting) and flower (C). Scale bar: 1 cm.

Diagnosis.

Similar to , and morphologically, but differing in the rounded-reniform radical leaves dissected into 3–5 segments, each 2–5-partite into elongated lobes rounded at the apex (Fig. 4). differs from in having fewer levels of leaf blade dissection. It differs from in the dissection of the radical leaf blades, larger flowers and having somewhat white, bristle-like hairs on the root collar and also from by the rounded apical lobes of the basal leaves and more xeromorphic habit.
Figure 4.

Series of basal leaves in related species A (from the holotype) BCD. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Schegol. & Turginov (Shchegoleva, Jabborov, Turginov, holotype TASH-003743).

Type.

Uzbekistan. Hissar Ridge, Baysuntau, Khodzha-Gurgur-ata Mountains, vicinity of the Village Gumatag, , 2482 m a.s.l., 30 May 2019, N. Shchegoleva, A. Jabborov, O. Turginov (holotype: TASH-003743; isotypes: TASH-003748, TASH-003749, TASH-003750, TK-002339). Schegol. & Turginov. Habitat (A flowering B fruiting) and flower (C). Scale bar: 1 cm.

Description.

Herbs perennial. Roots dimorphic, some roots subulate, up to 0.5 mm thick, storage roots palmately-thickened, ca. 2.5 mm thick; root collar with milk-white bristle-like hairs. Stems 10–12(–15) cm tall, up to 2 mm diam., erect, branched, pubescent with white curly hairs, 1–3-flowered. Leaves dimorphic, radical leaves 2–3, 1.6–2 × 1.5–2.2 cm, blade rounded-reniform, 3–5-dissected, segments 2–5-partite, elongate, lobes apically rounded; cauline leaves 1–2, petiole short, slender, blade trisected, lobes 0.6–0.9 × 0.1–0.2 cm, oblong-lanceolate. Flowers 1.6–2.4 cm diam., sepals 0.4–0.6 mm long, ovate-concave, sparsely white pubescent; petals 0.9–1.2 cm long, well-developed, ovate, apex rounded. Infructescence globose-ovoid; receptacle oblongoid, glabrous; achenes 1–1.8 mm long, with white bristle-like hairs; beak hamate-curved. Series of basal leaves in related species A (from the holotype) BCD. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Specimen seen (paratype).

Uzbekistan. Pamir-Alay, South-western spurs of the Hissar Ridge, Baysuntau, vicinity of the Village Gumatag, amongst the stones, 4 June 2013, O. Turginov (TASH-003754).

Phenology.

Flowering in May. Fruiting in May and June.

Distribution.

is distributed in the Khodzha-Gurgur-ata of the Baysuntau Mountains area of Hissar Ridge (Fig. 5). The closely-related is endemic to Central Asia and is endemic to the Western Pamir-Alay.
Figure 5.

Distribution of , , and .

Distribution of , , and .

Habitat and plant associations.

is rupicolous on southern and western exposed limestone outcrops and in cracks and crevices of large boulders at 2,450–2,500 m. a.s.l. The region is alpine and rather xerophytic. The common taxonomic composition of phytocenosеs includes Nevski (), Kar. & Kir. (), C.Winkl. (), Vved. (), Vved. (), Tojibaev & Turginov, (Vved.) T.Hall & Seisums, Maxim. (all ), Losinsk. (), Regel () and Juz. ().

Conservation status.

is a local, narrowly distributed endemic, represented by two or three individuals per m2 within an area of < 500 m2. It should therefore be assigned the status EN (Endangered), Criteria B1 ab(i, ii, iii)+ B2 ab(i, ii, iii), following the IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (IUCN 2019).

Notes.

differs from closely-related species by its habitat on well-heated limestone outcrops, as well as in cracks and crevices of large boulders at ca. 2,500 m a.s.l., which is atypical of related species. is on clayey-stony soil, less often on slopes of fine earth, at 2,000–2,600 m a.s.l. is hygrophilous in wet mountain meadows with melting snow and on slopes of fine clayey soil at 2,400–3,500 m a.s.l. grows on slopes of fine soil of the alpine belt at 2,800–4,000 m a.s.l. All these species are endemic to the western Pamir-Alay. The vicariant species to is Ovcz. & Koch. from the western Pamirs.

Etymology.

is named after Komiljon Tojibaev, a leading botanist, professor and academician from Uzbekistan who actively promotes the botanical sciences in Central Asia. Comparison of , , and
Table 3.

Comparison of , , and

R.tojibaevii R.botschantzevii R.convexiusculus R.alpigenus
Blade of radical leaves rounded-ovate, 3–5-dissected, segments further 2–5-dissected, lobules elongated, rounded at apextriangular-reniform, 3–5-partite, segments narrowly cuneate, unequally and subacutely dentatereniform, dissected 1/3 to nearly 1/2 of its length, lobes broad incised-dentatebroadly ovate, dissected into pinnatipartite segments, segments tripartite, terminal lobules oblong
Sepals narrowly elliptic, concave, less than half as long as petals, with long reclinate hairselliptic, concave, some shorter than the petals, with sparse, long reclinate hairselliptic, concave, half as long as petals, with short reclinate spreading hairselliptic, concave, with scattered hairs
Petals oblong-obovate, greenish-yellow, base cuneate, margin undulateobovate, bright yellow, becoming dark when dry, base broadly cuneate, margin undulatevery broadly ovate, golden yellow, base cuneate, margin slightly undulateoblong-ovate, yellow-green, base narrowly cuneate, marginundulate
Achenes 1.0–1.8 mm long, asymmetrically ovate, slightly convex, with semi-appressed hairs2.2–2.5 mm long, oblong, slightly laterally compressed, with appressed hairs1.8–2.5 mm long, oblong, slightly convex, with appressed hairs1.5–2.0 mm long, asymmetrically obovate, laterally compressed, with scattered not appressed hairs
1Blades of basal leaves broadly ovate, dissected into pinnatipartite segments, with tripartite-oblong terminal lobules R.alpigenus
Radical leaves 3–5-dissected or lobed-incised 2
2Blade of radical leaves 1/3 or nearly 1/2 unequally partite into broad incised-dentate lobes R.convexiusculus
Blade of radical leaves 3–5-dissected 3
3Blade of basal leaves triangular-reniform, 3–5-dissected almost to the base, wedge-shaped segments, unequally sharp-toothed R.botschantzevii
Blade of radical leaves is round-reniform, 3–5-dissected, each section divided into 2–5 elongated lobules; apex of lobules rounded R.tojibaevii
  10 in total

1.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.

Authors:  P Taberlet; L Gielly; G Pautou; J Bouvet
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX.

Authors:  Julie D Thompson; Toby J Gibson; Des G Higgins
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-08

4.  Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences.

Authors:  Philippe Cuénoud; Vincent Savolainen; Lars W Chatrou; Martyn Powell; Renée J Grayer; Mark W Chase
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Phylogenomics of Allium section Cepa (Amaryllidaceae) provides new insights on domestication of onion.

Authors:  Ziyoviddin Yusupov; Tao Deng; Sergei Volis; Furkat Khassanov; Dilmurod Makhmudjanov; Komiljon Tojibaev; Hang Sun
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2020-08-11

7.  The complete chloroplast genome of Eremurus robustus (Asphodelaceae).

Authors:  Dilmurod Makhmudjanov; Ziyoviddin Yusupov; Davlatali Abdullaev; Tao Deng; Komiljon Tojibaev; Hang Sun
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 0.658

8.  A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region.

Authors:  W John Kress; David L Erickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The molecular taxonomy of three endemic Central Asian species of Ranunculus(Ranunculaceae).

Authors:  Shyryn Almerekova; Natalia Shchegoleva; Saule Abugalieva; Yerlan Turuspekov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.